Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · U.S. Code · Title 10 - ARMED FORCES · CHAPTER 363— PROHIBITION AND PENALTIES · § 4651

§ 4651. Expenditure of appropriations: limitation

553 words·~3 min read·/usc/title-10/section-4651

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

(a)Money appropriated to the Department of Defense may not be spent under a contract other than a contract for personal services unless that contract provides that—
(1)the United States may, by written notice to the contractor, terminate the right of the contractor to proceed under the contract if the Secretary concerned or his designee finds, after notice and hearing, that the contractor, or his agent or other representative, offered or gave any gratuity, such as entertainment or a gift, to an officer, official, or employee of the United States to obtain a contract or favorable treatment in the awarding, amending, or making of determinations concerning the performance, of a contract; and
(2)if a contract is terminated under clause (1), the United States has the same remedies against the contractor that it would have had if the contractor had breached the contract and, in addition to other damages, is entitled to exemplary damages in an amount at least three, but not more than 10, as determined by the Secretary or his designee, times the cost incurred by the contractor in giving gratuities to the officer, official, or employee concerned.
The existence of facts upon which the Secretary makes findings under clause
(1)may be reviewed by any competent court.
(b)This section does not apply to a contract that is for an amount not greater than the simplified acquisition threshold (as defined in section 134 of title 41).
(Added Pub. L. 87–651, title II, § 207(a), Sept. 7, 1962, 76 Stat. 520, § 2207; amended Pub. L. 104–106, div. A, title VIII, § 801, Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 389; Pub. L. 111–350, § 5(b)(5), Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3842; renumbered § 4651, Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVIII, § 1862(b), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4277.)
The following substitutions are made: “spent” for “expended”; “United States” for “Government”; “if a contract is terminated under clause (1)” for “that in the event any such contract is so terminated”; and “has . . . that it would have had if” for “shall be entitled . . . to pursue . . . as it could pursue in the event of”. The word “official” is inserted for clarity. The words “entered into after June 30, 1954” are omitted as executed.
Connections92 cite this · traces to 4
Cited by 92 sections · top 60
bill
16 references not yet in our index
  • Pub. L. 87–651, title II, § 207(a)
  • 76 Stat. 520
  • Pub. L. 104–106, div. A, title VIII, § 801
  • 110 Stat. 389
  • Pub. L. 111–350, § 5(b)(5)
  • 124 Stat. 3842
  • 134 Stat. 4277
  • Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041
  • 70A Stat. 260
  • Pub. L. 99–145, title XIII, § 1301
  • 99 Stat. 736
  • Pub. L. 112–239, div. A, title V, § 552(b)
  • 126 Stat. 1741
  • Pub. L. 111–350
  • 41 U.S.C. 403(11)
  • Pub. L. 104–106
Citation graph
cites case law
§ 4651
Expenditure of appropriations: limitation
Bills×57
Fed. Reg.×16
Pub. L.×8
Stat. Comp.×4
Stat.×3
C.F.R.×2
U.S.C.×2
Pub. L.Pub. L. 87–651, title II, § 207(a)
Stat.76 Stat. 520
Pub. L.Pub. L. 104–106, div. A, title VIII, § 801
Stat.110 Stat. 389
Pub. L.Pub. L. 111–350, § 5(b)(5)
Cites 20 · showing 9Cited by 92 across 7 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.