Private Law 407.
602 words·~3 min read·
/statutes-at-large/vol-49/private-law-407·A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.
(/us/pvtl/74/406).] *Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled*, That the Secretary Look Hoon and Lau Hoon Leong. Payment to. of the Treasury be, and is hereby, authorized and directed to pay, out of any money not otherwise appropriated, to Look Hoon and Lau Hoon Leong, Honolulu, Territory of Hawaii, the sum of $1,000. Such sum shall be in full settlement of all claims against the United States for loss sustained by said Look Hoon and Lau Hoon Leong on account of forfeiture of $1,000 deposited by them as security on a bail bond conditioned upon the delivery of Leon Hing Loy, alias William Hing Leong, alias William H.
Wong, as stipulated in such bail bond. Such $1,000 was declared forfeited and paid into the Treasury of the United States when the said Look Hoon and Lau Hoon Leong failed to produce the said Leong Hing Loy for trial. The said Leong Hing Loy was subsequently produced by the said Look Hoon and Lau Hoon Leong and tried and convicted: *Provided*, *Proviso*. Limitation on attorney’s, etc., fees. That no part of the amount appropriated in this Act in excess of 10 per centum thereof shall be paid or delivered to or received by any agent or agents, attorney or attorneys, on account of services rendered in connection with said claim.
It shall be unlawful for any agent or agents, attorney or attorneys, to exact, collect, withhold, or receive any sum of the amount appropriated in this Act in excess of 10 per centum thereof on account of services rendered in connection with said claim, any contract to the contrary notwithstanding. Any person violating the provisions of this Act shall be Penalty for violation. deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be fined in any sum not exceeding $1,000.
Approved, February 28, 1936. For the relief of George Current. 1936-02-28 101 Chapter 49 Stat. 2227 74 2 United States Government Publishing Office text/xml EN Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain. Digitization Vendor 2025-01-07 private [CHAPTER 101.] AN ACT For the relief of George Current. February 28, 1936.[[H. R. 5525](/us/bill/74/hr/5525).][[Private, No. 407](/us/pvtl/74/407).] *Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled*, That the United George Current.
Benefits of Employees’ Compensation Act extended to. Vol. 39, p. 746. [U. S. C., p. 100](/us/usc/p100). States Employees’ Compensation Commission be, and is hereby, authorized to consider and determine, in the same manner and to the same extent as if application for the benefits of the Employees’ Compensation Act had been made within the one-year period required by sections 17 and 20 thereof, the claim of George Current, on account of disability due to epilepsy alleged to have been proximately caused by an injury received while on duty during his employment in the service of the United States between May 6, 1929, and March 14, 1934: *Provided*, That no benefits shall accrue prior to the enactment *Proviso*.
No prior benefits. of this Act. Approved, February 28, 1936. For the relief of David N. Aiken. 1936-02-28 102 Chapter 49 Stat. 2228 74 2 United States Government Publishing Office text/xml EN Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain. Digitization Vendor 2025-01-07 private 2228 [CHAPTER 102.] AN ACT For the relief of David N. Aiken. February 28, 1936.[[H. R. 6254](/us/bill/74/hr/6254).][
Connections4 cite this · traces to 2
Cited by 4 sections · top 3
statutes-at-large
Traces to 2 documents
Citation graph
cites case law
Cites 2Cited by 4 across 1 source