Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · U.S. Code · Title 50 - WAR AND NATIONAL DEFENSE · CHAPTER 44— NATIONAL SECURITY · SUBCHAPTER I— COORDINATION FOR NATIONAL SECURITY · § 3061

§ 3061. Counterintelligence and national security protections for intelligence community grant funding

516 words·~2 min read·/usc/title-50/section-3061

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

(a)Disclosure as condition for receipt of grant The head of an element of the intelligence community may not award a grant to a person or entity unless the person or entity has certified to the head of the element that the person or entity has disclosed to the head of the element any material financial or material in-kind support that the person or entity knows, or should have known, derives from the People’s Republic of China, the Russian Federation, the Islamic Republic of Iran, the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, or the Republic of Cuba, during the 5-year period ending on the date of the person or entity’s application for the grant.
(b)Process for review of grant applicants prior to award
(1)In general The head of an element of the intelligence community may not award a grant to a person or entity who submitted a certification under subsection
(a)until such certification is received by the head of an element of the intelligence community and submitted to the Director of National Intelligence pursuant to the process set forth in paragraph (2).
(2)Process
(A)In general The Director of National Intelligence, in coordination with such heads of elements of the intelligence community as the Director considers appropriate, shall establish a process to review the awarding of a grant to an applicant who submitted a certification under subsection (a).
(B)Elements The process established under subparagraph
(A)shall include the following:
(i)The immediate transmission of a copy of each applicant’s certification made under subsection
(a)to the Director of National Intelligence.
(ii)The review of the certification and any accompanying disclosures submitted under subsection
(a)as soon as practicable.
(iii)Authorization for the heads of the elements of the intelligence community to take such actions as may be necessary, including denial or revocation of a grant, to ensure a grant does not pose an unacceptable risk of—
(I)misappropriation of United States intellectual property, research and development, and innovation efforts; or
(II)other counterintelligence threats.
(July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title I, § 121, as added Pub. L. 117–263, div. F, title LXIII, § 6302(a), Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 3501; amended Pub. L. 119–60, div. F, title LXVIII, § 6801(a)(2), Dec. 18, 2025, 139 Stat. 1652.)
Connections12 cite this · traces to 3
6 references not yet in our index
  • July 26, 1947, ch. 343
  • 136 Stat. 3501
  • Pub. L. 119–60, div. F, title LXVIII, § 6801(a)(2)
  • 139 Stat. 1652
  • Pub. L. 119–60
  • 136 Stat. 3502
Citation graph
cites case law
§ 3061
Counterintelligence and national security protections for intelligence community grant funding
Bills×4
Stat. Comp.×3
Pub. L.×2
Stat.×2
U.S.C.×1
ActJuly 26, 1947, ch. 343
Stat.136 Stat. 3501
Pub. L.Pub. L. 119–60, div. F, title LXVIII, § 6801(a)(2)
Stat.139 Stat. 1652
Pub. L.Pub. L. 119–60
Cites 9 · showing 8Cited by 12 across 5 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.