Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · U.S. Code · Title 22 - FOREIGN RELATIONS AND INTERCOURSE · CHAPTER 58— DIPLOMATIC SECURITY · SUBCHAPTER III— PERFORMANCE AND ACCOUNTABILITY · § 4833

§ 4833. Serious Security Incident investigation process

972 words·~4 min read·/usc/title-22/section-4833

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

(a)Investigation process
(1)Initiation upon reported incident A United States mission shall submit an initial report of a Serious Security Incident not later than 3 days after such incident occurs, whenever feasible, at which time an investigation of the incident shall be initiated.
(2)Initial congressional notification The Secretary shall notify the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate, the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives, the majority and minority leaders of the Senate, and the Speaker and minority leader of the House of Representatives not later than 8 days after a possible Serious Security Incident has been identified by the Department. Such notification shall include a preliminary description of the incident, of an incident described in paragraph (1), including any known individuals involved, when and where the incident took place, and the next steps in the investigation.
(3)Investigation Not later than 10 days after the submission of a report pursuant to paragraph (1), the Secretary shall direct the Diplomatic Security Service to assemble an investigative team to investigate the incident and independently establish what occurred. Each investigation under this subsection shall cover—
(A)an assessment of what occurred, who perpetrated or is suspected of having perpetrated the Serious Security Incident, and whether applicable security procedures were followed;
(B)in the event the Serious Security Incident involved a United States diplomatic compound, motorcade, residence, or other facility, an assessment of whether adequate security countermeasures were in effect based on a known threat at the time of the incident;
(C)if the incident involved an individual or group of officers, employees, or family members under Chief of Mission security responsibility conducting approved operations or movements outside the United States mission, an assessment of whether proper security briefings and procedures were in place and whether weighing of risk of the operation or movement took place; and
(D)an assessment of whether the failure of any officials or employees to follow procedures or perform their duties contributed to the security incident.
(4)Investigative team The investigative team assembled pursuant to paragraph
(3)shall consist of individuals from the Diplomatic Security Service who shall provide an independent examination of the facts surrounding the incident and what occurred. The Secretary, or the Secretary’s designee, shall review the makeup of the investigative team for a conflict, appearance of conflict, or lack of independence that could undermine the results of the investigation and may remove or replace any members of the team to avoid such an outcome.
(b)Report of Investigation Not later than 90 days after the occurrence of a Serious Security Incident, the investigative team investigating the incident shall prepare and submit a Report of Investigation to the Security Review Committee that includes—
(1)a detailed description of the matters set forth in subparagraphs
(A)through
(D)of subsection (a)(2), including all related findings;
(2)a complete and accurate account of the casualties, injuries, and damage resulting from the incident; and
(3)a review of security procedures and directives in place at the time of the incident.
(c)Confidentiality The investigative team investigating a Serious Security Incident shall adopt such procedures with respect to confidentiality as determined necessary, including procedures relating to the conduct of closed proceedings or the submission and use of evidence in camera, to ensure in particular the protection of classified information relating to national defense, foreign policy, or intelligence matters. The Director of National Intelligence shall establish the level of protection required for intelligence information and for information relating to intelligence personnel included in the report required under subsection (b). The Security Review Committee shall determine the level of classification of the final report prepared pursuant to section 4834(b) of this title, and shall incorporate the same confidentiality measures in such report to the maximum extent practicable.
(Pub. L. 99–399, title III, § 303, Aug. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 859; Pub. L. 117–263, div. I, title XCIII, § 9302(f), Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 3886; Pub. L. 117–286, § 4(a)(170), Dec. 27, 2022, 136 Stat. 4324; Pub. L. 118–159, div. G, title LXXV, § 7502, Dec. 23, 2024, 138 Stat. 2545.)
Connections30 cite this · traces to 5
Cited by 30 sections · top 27
6 references not yet in our index
  • Pub. L. 99–399, title III, § 303
  • 100 Stat. 859
  • 136 Stat. 3886
  • 136 Stat. 4324
  • 138 Stat. 2545
  • Pub. L. 108–458
Citation graph
cites case law
§ 4833
Serious Security Incident investigation process
Bills×16
U.S.C.×4
Pub. L.×3
Stat. Comp.×3
Stat.×3
Fed. Reg.×1
Pub. L.Pub. L. 99–399, title III, § 303
Stat.100 Stat. 859
Stat.136 Stat. 3886
Stat.136 Stat. 4324
Stat.138 Stat. 2545
Cites 11 · showing 10Cited by 30 across 6 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.