Sec. 204. Diplomatic support and security
3,598 words·~16 min read·
/bill/117/hr/8788/ih/section-204A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.
This section may be cited as the . Diplomatic Support and Security Act of 2022 It is the sense of Congress that— it is a United States national security priority that United States Government mission personnel are able to fully execute their duties, including— providing United States citizen services that are often a matter of life and death in insecure places; meeting with foreign officials, including government and nongovernment, civil society, private sector, and members of the press, to advance United States national security priorities; and understanding, engaging, and reporting on foreign political, social, and economic conditions; a risk-averse environment that inhibits the execution of these fundamental duties undermines the national security interests of the United States and contributes to the further militarization of United States foreign policy as military and intelligence agencies may experience fewer security restrictions and greater risk tolerance in the wake of security incidents; and Congress has a role to play in addressing the challenges of managing risk to the Department and United States Agency for International Development personnel and facilities and helping to balance security and safety concerns with the need for flexibility to carry out their most important duties.
Subsection
(b)of section 102 of the Diplomatic Security Act ( 22 U.S.C. 4801(b) ) is amended— by amending paragraph
(3)to read as follows: to promote strengthened security measures, institutionalize a culture of learning, and, in the case of apparent gross negligence or breach of duty, authorize the Secretary of State to investigate and pursue accountability for United States Government personnel with security-related responsibilities; ; by redesignating paragraphs
(4)and
(5)as paragraphs
(5)and (6), respectively; and by inserting after paragraph
(3)(as amended) the following: to support effective risk management strategies and practices that enables the Department of State to pursue its vital goals; . Paragraph
(1)of section 105(a) of the Diplomatic Security Act ( 22 U.S.C. 4804(a) ) is amended— in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking any plans to open or reopen a high risk, high threat post and inserting progress towards opening or reopening high risk, high threat posts, and the risk to national security of the continued closure or suspension of operations and remaining barriers to doing so ; in subparagraph (A), by striking the type and level of security threats such post could encounter and inserting the risk to United States foreign policy interests and national security of the post’s continued closure or suspension of operations as well as the risks and threats official United States personnel could encounter at such post ; and in subparagraph (C), by inserting the type and level of security threats such post could encounter, and before security . tripwires Section 301 of the Diplomatic Security Act ( 22 U.S.C. 4831 ) is amended— in the section heading, by striking the heading and inserting ; Investigation of serious security incidents in subsection (a)— by amending paragraph
(1)to read as follows: In any case of an incident involving loss of life, serious injury, or significant destruction of property at, or related to, a United States Government
(USG)mission abroad, and in any case of a serious breach of security involving intelligence activities of a foreign government directed at a USG mission abroad, an investigation, to be referred to as a Serious Security Incident Investigation or SSII , into such incident shall be convened by the Secretary of State and a report produced for the Secretary of State providing a full account of such incident, including— whether security provisions pertinent to such incident were in place and functioning; whether any malfeasance or breach of duty took place that materially contributed to the outcome of such incident; and any recommendations of relevant security improvements or follow-up measures. Subparagraph
(A)does not apply— if the Secretary determines that the incident clearly involves only causes unrelated to security, such as if the security at issue is outside of the scope of the Secretary of State’s security responsibility as defined in section 103 of the Omnibus Diplomatic Security and Antiterrorism Act of 1986 ( 22 U.S.C. 4802(a) ); in a case involving an incident where operational control of overseas security functions has been delegated to another agency consistent with section 106 of the Omnibus Diplomatic Security and Antiterrorism Act of 1986 ( 22 U.S.C. 4805(a) ); or in a case involving a cyber security incident which may be covered by other review mechanisms. ; in paragraph (2), by striking Board and inserting Serious Security Incident Investigation ; and in paragraph (3)(A)— in the heading, by striking and inserting Board ; Investigation matter preceding clause (i), by striking Board and inserting Serious Security Incident Investigation ; and in clause (ii), by striking “2022” and inserting “2025”; in subsection (b)— in paragraph (1)— by striking Except as and all that follows through convene a Board and inserting The Secretary of State shall conduct a Serious Security Incident Investigation not later than 60 days after the occurrence of an incident described in subsection (a)(1), or 60 days after the Department of State first becomes aware of such an incident, whichever is earlier, except that such 60-day period for convening an SSII may be extended for one additional 60-day period if the Secretary determines that the additional period is necessary, conduct an SSII of the incident under subsection (a), and establish a subsequent process with respect to the incident under section 302 to be carried out by the Serious Security Incident Investigation Permanent Coordinating Committee (SSII/PCC) established pursuant to such section ; and by striking for the convening of the Board ; and in paragraph (2), by striking Board each place it appears and inserting SSII/PCC ; and in subsection (c)— in the matter preceding paragraph (1)— by striking Board the first place such term appears and inserting SSII and begins the SSII/PCC process ; by striking chairman and inserting chair and ranking member ; and by inserting after Senate the following: , the chair and ranking member of the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives, and ; and by striking Board each place it appears and inserting SSII/PCC process . The table of contents in section 2 of the Omnibus Diplomatic Security and Antiterrorism Act of 1986 is amended by striking the item relating to section 301 and inserting the following new item: Sec. 301. Investigation of serious security incidents. . Section 302 of the Diplomatic Security Act of 1986 ( 22 U.S.C. 4832 ) is amended to read as follows: The Diplomatic Security Service of the Bureau of Diplomatic Security of the Department of State shall, at the direction of the Secretary of State, be responsible for conducting an appropriate investigation of an incident that is reasonably likely to involve loss of life, serious injury, or significant destruction of property at, or related to, a USG mission abroad that may be determined to be a serious security incident under section 301(a) and providing investigative personnel and other resources as may be necessary. The results of every investigation of all such incidents shall be referred to the Serious Security Incident Investigation Permanent Coordinating Committee established and convened pursuant to subsection
(b)for final assessments regarding whether such incidents are serious security incidents. The Secretary of State shall establish and convene a committee, referred to as a Serious Security Incident Investigation Permanent Coordinating Committee (in this title referred to as the SSII/PCC ), to review each incident described in subsection
(a)to determine, in accordance with section 304, if each such incident is a serious security incident. The SSII/PCC shall review the Report of Investigation prepared under section 303(c) and any other available reporting and evidence, including video recordings, and shall prepare the SSII/PCC Report under section 304(b). The SSII/PCC shall be composed primarily of Assistant Secretary-level personnel or their designated representatives in the Department of State, and shall at a minimum include the following personnel: A representative of the Under Secretary of State for Management, who shall serve as chair of the SSII/PCC. The Assistant Secretary or designated representative responsible for the region in which the serious security incident occurred. The Assistant Secretary or designated representative for Diplomatic Security. The Assistant Secretary or designated representative for the Bureau of Intelligence and Research. An Assistant Secretary-level or designated representative from any involved United States Government department or agency. Other personnel as determined necessary or appropriate. In this section, the term designated representative means an official of the Department of State with a rank and status not lower than a Deputy Assistant Secretary-level or equivalent relevant to the office in which the Assistant Secretary referred to in paragraph
(2)is a part and who is acting on behalf of the Assistant Secretary and with respect to whom the Assistant Secretary is responsible for the conduct and actions during the investigation process. . The table of contents in section 2 of the Omnibus Diplomatic Security and Antiterrorism Act of 1986 is amended by striking the item relating to section 302 and inserting the following new item: Sec. 302. Serious Security Incident Investigation Permanent Coordinating Committee. . Section 303 of the Diplomatic Security Act of 1986 ( 22 U.S.C. 4833 ) is amended to read as follows: The Serious Security Incident Investigation process shall commence when a United States Government
(USG)mission reports to the Secretary of State information relating to an incident involving loss of life, serious injury, or significant destruction of property at, or related to, a USG mission abroad, including detailed information about such incident, not later than 72 hours after the occurrence of such incident, if feasible. The Diplomatic Security Service of the Bureau of Diplomatic Security of the Department of State shall assemble an investigative team to carry out the investigation of an incident reported under paragraph (1). The investigation shall cover the following matters with respect to such incident: An assessment of what occurred, an identification, if known, of the perpetrator suspected of having carried out the incident, and whether applicable security procedures were followed. If the incident involved a USG mission abroad, an assessment regarding whether security systems, security countermeasures, and security procedures operated as intended. If such incident involved an individual under chief of mission security responsibility conducting approved operations or movements outside a USG mission, an assessment regarding whether proper security briefings and procedures were in place and whether security systems, security countermeasures, and security procedures operated as intended, and whether such systems, countermeasures, and procedures worked to materially mitigate such attack or were inadequate to mitigate any threat associated with such incident. An assessment of whether any officials’ or employees’ failure to follow procedures or perform their duties contributed to such incident. The investigative team assembled pursuant to subsection (a)(2) or otherwise shall— in accordance with section 302(a), refer to the SSII/PCC the results, including the Report of Investigation under subsection (c), of each investigation carried out under subsection (a); and make a recommendation to the SSII/PCC, based upon each such investigation, regarding whether the incident that is the subject of each such investigation should be determined to be a serious security incident. At the conclusion of a Serious Security Incident Investigation under subsection (a), the investigative team shall prepare a Report of Investigation and submit such Report to the SSII/PCC. Such Report shall include the following elements: A detailed description of the matters set forth in subparagraphs
(A)through
(D)of subsection (a)(2), including all related findings. An accurate account of the casualties, injuries, and damage resulting from the incident that is the subject of the investigation. A review of security procedures and directives in place at the time of such incident. A recommendation, pursuant to subsection (b)(2), regarding whether such incident should be determined to be a serious security incident. The investigative team shall adopt such procedures with respect to confidentiality as determined necessary, including procedures relating to the conduct of closed proceedings or the submission and use of evidence on camera, to ensure in particular the protection of classified information relating to national defense, foreign policy, or intelligence matters. The Director of National Intelligence shall establish the level of protection required for intelligence information and for information relating to intelligence personnel included in the Report of Investigation under subsection (b). The SSII/PCC shall determine the level of classification of the final report prepared under section 304(b), but shall incorporate in such report, to the maximum extent practicable, the confidentiality measures referred to in this subsection. In this section and section 304, the term official or employee means— an employee, as such term is defined in section 2105 of title 5, United States Code, including a member of the Foreign Service; a member of the uniformed services, as such term is defined in section 101(3) of title 37, United States Code; an employee of an instrumentality of the United States; or an individual employed by any person or entity under contract with agencies or instrumentalities of the United States Government to provide services, equipment, or personnel. . The table of contents in section 2 of the Omnibus Diplomatic Security and Antiterrorism Act of 1986 is amended by striking the item relating to section 303 and inserting the following new item: Sec. 303. Serious Security Incident Investigation process. . Section 304 of the Diplomatic Security Act ( 22 U.S.C. 4834 ) is amended to read as follows: The SSII/PCC shall review the Report of Investigation prepared pursuant to section 303(c), all other evidence, reporting, and relevant information relating to an incident involving loss of life, serious injury, or significant destruction of property at, or related to, a United States Government
(USG)mission abroad, including an examination of the facts and circumstances surrounding any serious injuries, loss of life, or significant destruction of property resulting from such incident and shall make the following written findings and final determinations: Whether such incident was security related and is determined to be a serious security incident. If such incident involved a USG mission abroad, whether the security systems, security countermeasures, and security procedures operated as intended, and whether such systems, countermeasures, and procedures worked to materially mitigate such attack or were inadequate to mitigate any threat associated with such attack. If such incident involved an individual under chief of mission security responsibility conducting an approved operation outside a USG mission, an assessment regarding whether a valid process was followed in evaluating such operation for approval and weighing any risks associated with such operation, except that such a determination shall not seek to assign accountability for such incident unless the SSII/PCC determines a breach of duty has occurred. An assessment of the impact of intelligence and information availability relating to such incident, and whether the USG mission was aware of the general operating threat environment or any more specific threat intelligence or information and the extent to which such was taken into account in ongoing and specific operations. Such other facts and circumstances that may be relevant to the appropriate security management of USG missions abroad. Not later than 60 days after receiving the Report of Investigation prepared under section 303(b), the SSII/PCC shall submit to the Secretary of State a SSII/PCC Report on the incident at issue, including the assessment under subsection
(a)and any related recommendations related to preventing and responding to similar such incidents, except that the Secretary of State may extend such period for one additional 60-day period when necessary for the completion of the Report. Not later than 90 days after receiving such SSII/PCC Report, the Secretary of State shall submit such SSII/PCC Report to the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives. Such SSII/PCC Report shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. If in the course of conducting an investigation under section 303, the investigative team finds reasonable cause to be concerned that any official or employee has breached the duty of such official or employee, or finds lesser failures on the part of an official or employee in the performance of his or her duties related to the serious security incident at issue, the investigative team shall report such to the SSII/PCC. If the SSII/PCC finds reasonable cause to support a finding relating to such a breach or failure, the SSII/PCC shall— notify the official or employee concerned; if such official or employee is employed by the Department of State, transmit to the Secretary of State for appropriate action such finding, together with all information relevant to such finding; or if such official or employee is employed by a Federal agency other than the Department of State, transmit to the head of such Federal agency for appropriate action such finding, together with all information relevant to such finding. . The table of contents in section 2 of the Omnibus Diplomatic Security and Antiterrorism Act of 1986 is amended by striking the item relating to section 304 and inserting the following new item: Sec. 304. Serious Security Incident Investigation Permanent Coordinating Committee findings and report. . Section 305 of the Diplomatic Security Act of 1986 ( 22 U.S.C. 4835 ) is amended— by striking Nothing in this title shall and inserting the following: Nothing in this title may ; and by adding at the end of the following new subsection: Nothing in this title may be construed to preclude the Secretary of State from convening a follow-up public board of inquiry to investigate any serious security incident if such incident was of such magnitude or significance that an internal process is determined to be insufficient to understand and investigate such incident. All materials gathered during the procedures provided under this title shall be provided to any such related board of inquiry convened by the Secretary. . Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall develop and submit to the appropriate congressional committees a strategy to train and educate Foreign Service personnel on appropriate risk management practices when conducting their duties in high risk, high threat environments. Such strategy shall include the following elements: Plans to continue to develop and offer additional training courses, or augment existing courses, for Foreign Service officers regarding the conduct of their duties in high risk, high threat environments outside of diplomatic compounds, including for diplomatic personnel such as political officers, economic officers, consular officers, and others. Plans to educate Senior Foreign Service personnel serving abroad, including ambassadors, chiefs of mission, deputy chiefs of missions, and regional security officers, on appropriate risk management practices to employ when evaluating requests for diplomatic operations in high risk, high threat environments outside of diplomatic compounds. It is the sense of Congress that the Secretary should— encourage expeditionary diplomacy, proper risk management practices, and regular and meaningful engagement with civil society at the Department through the establishment of an annual award to be known as the Expeditionary Diplomacy Award that would be awarded to officers or employees of the Department; and establish procedures for selecting recipients of such award, including any financial terms associated with such award. Section 603(b) of the Foreign Service Act of 1980 ( 22 U.S.C. 4003(b) ) is amended— in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by inserting after as the case may be, the following: and when occupying positions for which the following is, to any degree, an element of the member’s duties, ; in paragraph (1)— by striking when occupying positions for which such willingness and ability is, to any degree, an element of the member’s duties ; and by striking , or and inserting a semicolon; in paragraph (2), by striking the period and inserting ; or ; by redesignating paragraph
(2)(as so amended) as paragraph (3); by inserting after paragraph
(1)the following new paragraph: a willingness and ability to regularly and meaningfully engage with civil society and other local actors in-country; ; and by inserting after paragraph
(3)(as so redesignated) the following: the ability to effectively manage and assess risk associated with the conduct of diplomatic operations. . Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act and for every 180 days thereafter for the following two years, the Secretary shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on the Department’s risk management efforts, including information relating to progress in implementing this section, subsection
(b)of section 102 of the Diplomatic Security Act ( 22 U.S.C. 4801 ), as amended by subsection
(c)of this section, and the following elements: Progress on encouraging and incentivizing appropriate Foreign Service personnel to regularly and meaningfully engage with civil society and other local actors in-country. Efforts to promote a more effective culture of risk management and greater risk tolerance among all Foreign Service personnel, including through additional risk management training and education opportunities. Progress on efforts to incorporate the provisions of this Act into the Foreign Affairs Manual regulations and implement the Serious Security Incident Investigation Permanent Coordinating Committee (SSII/PCC) established and convened pursuant to section 302(b) of the Diplomatic Security Act ( 22 U.S.C. 4832 ), as amended by subsection (e), to more closely align Department procedures with how other Federal departments and agencies analyze, weigh, and manage risk. Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall identify and report to the appropriate congressional committees which official of the Department, with a rank not lower than Assistant Secretary or equivalent, will be responsible for leading the implementation of this section and the amendments made by this section.
Connectionstraces to 10
Traces to 10 documents
U.S. Code
- Findings and purposes§ 4801
- Briefings on embassy security§ 4804
- Security Review Committees§ 4831
- Responsibility of Secretary of State§ 4802
- Cooperation of other Federal agencies§ 4805
- Security Review Committee§ 4832
- Serious Security Incident investigation process§ 4833
- Security Review Committee findings and report§ 4834
- Relation to other proceedings§ 4835
- Recommendations and rankings§ 4003
Citation graph
cites case law
Sec. 204
Diplomatic support and security
Cites 10 · showing 9Cited by 0 across 0 sources