Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · U.S. Code · Title 22 - FOREIGN RELATIONS AND INTERCOURSE · CHAPTER 32— FOREIGN ASSISTANCE · SUBCHAPTER III— GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS · § 2376

§ 2376. Nuclear non-proliferation policy in South Asia

624 words·~3 min read·/usc/title-22/section-2376

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

(a)Findings The Congress finds that—
(1)the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction remains one of the most serious threats to international peace and stability;
(2)South Asia, in particular, is an area where the threat of a regional nuclear exchange remains high due to continued Indo-Pakistani tensions over issues such as Kashmir;
(3)to date, United States efforts to halt proliferation in South Asia have failed;
(4)although global disarmament is a desirable goal which should be vigorously pursued, both regional and sub-regional security arrangements can serve to decrease tensions and promote non-proliferation in certain areas;
(5)thus far, there has been some success on a regional basis, such as the South Pacific Nuclear Weapons Free Zone and the Treaty of Tlatelolco in Latin America;
(6)in particular, in Latin America, the Treaty of Tlatelolco has been signed by all the nuclear powers;
(7)a critical part of this treaty is Protocol II which prohibits nuclear attacks by nuclear weapons states on signatories to the treaty;
(8)in 1991, a proposal was made for a regional conference on non-proliferation in South Asia which would include Pakistan, India, the People’s Republic of China, the Soviet Union, and the United States; and
(9)thus far, Pakistan, China, Russia, and the United States have expressed interest in attending such a conference, whereas India has refused to attend.
(b)Policy It is the sense of the Congress that the President should pursue a policy which seeks a regional negotiated solution to the issue of nuclear non-proliferation in South Asia at the earliest possible time, including a protocol to be signed by all nuclear weapons states, prohibiting nuclear attacks by nuclear weapons states on countries in the region. Such a policy should have as its ultimate goal concurrent accession by Pakistan and India to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, and should also include as needed a phased approach to that goal through a series of agreements among the parties on nuclear issues, such as the agreement reached by Pakistan and India not to attack one another’s nuclear facilities.
(Pub. L. 87–195, pt. III, § 620F, as added Pub. L. 102–391, title V, § 585(a), Oct. 6, 1992, 106 Stat. 1688; amended Pub. L. 105–277, div. G, subdiv. B, title XXII, § 2219(b), Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–817; Pub. L. 113–188, title XIV, § 1401, Nov. 26, 2014, 128 Stat. 2023.)
Connections16 cite this · traces to 2
7 references not yet in our index
  • Pub. L. 87–195
  • Pub. L. 102–391, title V, § 585(a)
  • 106 Stat. 1688
  • Pub. L. 105–277, div. G
  • 112 Stat. 2681–817
  • 128 Stat. 2023
  • Pub. L. 105–277
Citation graph
cites case law
§ 2376
Nuclear non-proliferation policy in South Asia
Bills×8
Stat. Comp.×3
Stat.×3
Pub. L.×1
U.S.C.×1
Pub. L.Pub. L. 87–195
Pub. L.Pub. L. 102–391, title V, § 585(a)
Stat.106 Stat. 1688
Pub. L.Pub. L. 105–277, div. G
Stat.112 Stat. 2681–817
Cites 9 · showing 7Cited by 16 across 5 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.