Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · U.S. Code · Title 16 - CONSERVATION · CHAPTER 84— HEALTHY FOREST RESTORATION · SUBCHAPTER I— HAZARDOUS FUEL REDUCTION ON FEDERAL LAND · § 6515

§ 6515. Special administrative review process

742 words·~3 min read·/usc/title-16/section-6515

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

(a)Interim final regulations
(1)In general Not later than 30 days after December 3, 2003, the Secretary of Agriculture shall promulgate interim final regulations to establish a predecisional administrative review process for the period described in paragraph
(2)that will serve as the sole means by which a person can seek administrative review regarding an authorized hazardous fuel reduction project on Forest Service land.
(2)Period The predecisional administrative review process required under paragraph
(1)shall occur during the period—
(A)beginning after the completion of the environmental assessment or environmental impact statement; and
(B)ending not later than the date of the issuance of the final decision approving the project.
(3)Eligibility To be eligible to participate in the administrative review process for an authorized hazardous fuel reduction project under paragraph (1), a person shall submit to the Secretary, during scoping or the public comment period for the draft environmental analysis for the project, specific written comments that relate to the proposed action.
(4)Effective date The interim final regulations promulgated under paragraph
(1)shall take effect on the date of promulgation of the regulations.
(b)Final regulations The Secretary shall promulgate final regulations to establish the process described in subsection (a)(1) after the interim final regulations have been published and reasonable time has been provided for public comment.
(c)Administrative review
(1)In general A person may bring a civil action challenging an authorized hazardous fuel reduction project in a Federal district court only if the person has challenged the authorized hazardous fuel reduction project by exhausting—
(A)the administrative review process established by the Secretary of Agriculture under this section; or
(B)the administrative hearings and appeals procedures established by the Department of the Interior.
(2)Issues An issue may be considered in the judicial review of an action under section 6516 of this title only if the issue was raised in an administrative review process described in paragraph (1).
(3)Exception
(A)In general An exception to the requirement of exhausting the administrative review process before seeking judicial review shall be available if a Federal court finds that the futility or inadequacy exception applies to a specific plaintiff or claim.
(B)Information If an agency fails or is unable to make information timely available during the administrative review process, a court should evaluate whether the administrative review process was inadequate for claims or issues to which the information is material.
(Pub. L. 108–148, title I, § 105, Dec. 3, 2003, 117 Stat. 1899.)
Connections83 cite this · traces to 9
Cited by 83 sections · top 59
bill
7 references not yet in our index
  • Pub. L. 108–148, title I, § 105
  • 117 Stat. 1899
  • 128 Stat. 913
  • Public Law 112–74
  • Pub. L. 112–74, div. E, title IV, § 428
  • 125 Stat. 1046
  • section 322 of Public Law 102–381
Citation graph
cites case law
§ 6515
Special administrative review process
Bills×50
Fed. Reg.×14
U.S.C.×6
Stat. Comp.×5
Pub. L.×4
Stat.×3
C.F.R.×1
Pub. L.Pub. L. 108–148, title I, § 105
Stat.117 Stat. 1899
Stat.128 Stat. 913
Cites 16 · showing 12Cited by 83 across 7 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.