Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · U.S. Code · Title 16 - CONSERVATION · CHAPTER 84— HEALTHY FOREST RESTORATION · SUBCHAPTER I— HAZARDOUS FUEL REDUCTION ON FEDERAL LAND · § 6516

§ 6516. Judicial review in United States district courts

323 words·~1 min read·/usc/title-16/section-6516

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

(a)Venue Notwithstanding section 1391 of title 28 or other applicable law, an authorized hazardous fuels reduction project conducted under this subchapter shall be subject to judicial review only in the United States district court for a district in which the Federal land to be treated under the authorized hazardous fuels reduction project is located.
(b)Expeditious completion of judicial review In the judicial review of an action challenging an authorized hazardous fuel reduction project under subsection (a), Congress encourages a court of competent jurisdiction to expedite, to the maximum extent practicable, the proceedings in the action with the goal of rendering a final determination on jurisdiction, and (if jurisdiction exists) a final determination on the merits, as soon as practicable after the date on which a complaint or appeal is filed to initiate the action.
(c)Injunctions
(1)In general Subject to paragraph (2), the length of any preliminary injunctive relief and stays pending appeal covering an authorized hazardous fuel reduction project carried out under this subchapter shall not exceed 60 days.
(2)Renewal
(A)In general A court of competent jurisdiction may issue 1 or more renewals of any preliminary injunction, or stay pending appeal, granted under paragraph (1).
(B)Updates In each renewal of an injunction in an action, the parties to the action shall present the court with updated information on the status of the authorized hazardous fuel reduction project.
(3)Balancing of short- and long-term effects As part of its weighing the equities while considering any request for an injunction that applies to an agency action under an authorized hazardous fuel reduction project, the court reviewing the project shall balance the impact to the ecosystem likely affected by the project of—
(A)the short- and long-term effects of undertaking the agency action; against
(B)the short- and long-term effects of not undertaking the agency action.
(Pub. L. 108–148, title I, § 106, Dec. 3, 2003, 117 Stat. 1900.)
Connections31 cite this · traces to 1
Cited by 31 sections
bill
Traces to 1 document
2 references not yet in our index
  • Pub. L. 108–148, title I, § 106
  • 117 Stat. 1900
Citation graph
cites case law
§ 6516
Judicial review in United States district courts
Bills×27
U.S.C.×2
Stat. Comp.×1
Stat.×1
Pub. L.Pub. L. 108–148, title I, § 106
Stat.117 Stat. 1900
Cites 3Cited by 31 across 4 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.