RCW 36.70C.030
240 words·~1 min read·
/wa/title-36/chapter-36-70c/36-70c-030·A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.
(1)This chapter replaces the writ of certiorari for appeal of land use decisions and shall be the exclusive means of judicial review of land use decisions, except that this chapter does not apply to:
(a)Judicial review of:
(i)Land use decisions made by bodies that are not part of a local jurisdiction;
(ii)Land use decisions of a local jurisdiction that are subject to review by a quasi-judicial body created by state law, such as the shorelines hearings board or the growth management hearings board;
(b)Judicial review of applications for a writ of mandamus or prohibition; or
(c)Claims provided by any law for monetary damages or compensation. If one or more claims for damages or compensation are set forth in the same complaint with a land use petition brought under this chapter, the claims are not subject to the procedures and standards, including deadlines, provided in this chapter for review of the petition. The judge who hears the land use petition may, if appropriate, preside at a trial for damages or compensation.
(2)The superior court civil rules govern procedural matters under this chapter to the extent that the rules are consistent with this chapter.
[ 2010 1st sp.s. c 7 s 38 ; 2003 c 393 s 17 ; 1995 c 347 s 704 .]
Notes:
Effective date — 2010 1st sp.s. c 26; 2010 1st sp.s. c 7: See note following RCW 43.03.027 .