§ 7613. Relevance and merit of agricultural research, extension, and education funded by the Department

1,004 words·~5 min read·/usc/title-7/section-7613

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

(a)Review of National Institute of Food and Agriculture

(1)Peer review of research grants The Secretary shall establish procedures that provide for scientific peer review of each agricultural research grant administered, on a competitive basis, by the National Institute of Food and Agriculture of the Department.

(2)Relevance and merit review of research, extension, and education grants

(A)Establishment of procedures The Secretary shall establish procedures that provide for relevance and merit review of each agricultural research, extension, or education grant administered, on a competitive basis, by the National Institute of Food and Agriculture.

(B)Consultation with Advisory Board The Secretary shall consult with the Advisory Board in establishing the merit review procedures on a continuous basis.

(3)Consideration Peer and merit review procedures established under paragraphs

(1)and

(2)shall not take the offer or availability of matching funds into consideration.

(b)Advisory Board review On an annual basis, the Advisory Board shall review—

(1)the relevance to the priorities established under section 7612(a) of this title of the funding of all agricultural research, extension, or education activities conducted or funded by the Department; and

(2)the adequacy of the funding.

(c)Requests for proposals

(1)Review results As soon as practicable after the review is conducted under subsection

(b)for a fiscal year, the Secretary shall consider the results of the review when formulating each request for proposals, and evaluating proposals, involving an agricultural research, extension, or education activity funded, on a competitive basis, by the Department.

(2)Input In formulating a request for proposals described in paragraph

(1)for a fiscal year, the Secretary shall solicit and consider input from persons who conduct or use agricultural research, extension, or education regarding the prior year’s request for proposals.

(d)Scientific peer review of agricultural research

(1)Peer review procedures The Secretary shall establish procedures that ensure scientific peer review of all research activities conducted by the Department.

(2)Review panel required As part of the procedures established under paragraph (1), a review panel shall verify, at least once every 5 years, that each research activity of the Department and research conducted under each research program of the Department has scientific merit and relevance.

(3)Mission area If the research activity or program to be reviewed is included in the research, educational, and economics mission area of the Department, the review panel shall consider—

(A)the scientific merit and relevance of the activity or research in light of the priorities established pursuant to section 7612 of this title; and

(B)the national or multistate significance of the activity or research.

(4)Composition of review panel

(A)In general A review panel shall be composed of individuals with scientific expertise, a majority of whom are not employees of the agency whose research is being reviewed.

(B)Scientists from colleges and universities To the maximum extent practicable, the Secretary shall use scientists from colleges and universities to serve on the review panels.

(5)Submission of results The results of the panel reviews shall be submitted to the Advisory Board.

(e)Merit review

(1)1862 and 1890 Institutions Effective October 1, 1999, to be eligible to obtain agricultural research or extension funds from the Secretary for an activity, each 1862 Institution and 1890 Institution shall—

(A)establish a process for merit review of the activity; and

(B)review the activity in accordance with the process.

(2)1994 Institutions Effective October 1, 1999, to be eligible to obtain agricultural extension funds from the Secretary for an activity, each 1994 Institution shall—

(A)establish a process for merit review of the activity; and

(B)review the activity in accordance with the process.

(3)Hispanic-serving agricultural colleges and universities To be eligible to obtain agricultural extension funds from the Secretary for an activity, each Hispanic-serving agricultural college and university shall—

(A)establish a process for merit review of the activity; and

(B)review the activity in accordance with such process.

(Pub. L. 105–185, title I, § 103, June 23, 1998, 112 Stat. 527; Pub. L. 110–234, title VII, §§ 7129(c)(3), 7301, 7511(c)(30), May 22, 2008, 122 Stat. 1227, 1242, 1270; Pub. L. 110–246, § 4(a), title VII, §§ 7129(c)(3), 7301, 7511(c)(30), June 18, 2008, 122 Stat. 1664, 1988, 2003, 2031; Pub. L. 113–79, title VII, § 7301, Feb. 7, 2014, 128 Stat. 887.)

Connections97 cite this · traces to 4

Cited by 97 sections · top 60

public-private-law

U.S. Code

statute-compilations

statutes-at-large

Traces to 4 documents

U.S. Code

public-private-law

Agricultural Act of 2014
Public Law 113-79

17 references not yet in our index

Pub. L. 105–185, title I, § 103
112 Stat. 527
Pub. L. 110–234, title VII
122 Stat. 1227
Pub. L. 110–246, § 4(a)
122 Stat. 1664
128 Stat. 887
Pub. L. 110–234
Pub. L. 110–246
section 4(a) of Pub. L. 110–246
section 103 of Pub. L. 105–185
Pub. L. 110–246, § 7511(c)(30)
Pub. L. 110–246, § 7301
Pub. L. 110–246, § 7129(c)(3)
section 4 of Pub. L. 110–246
section 7511(c)(30) of Pub. L. 110–246
section 7511(c) of Pub. L. 110–246

Citation graph

cites case law

§ 7613

Relevance and merit of agricultural research, extension, and education funded by the Department

Fed. Reg.×55

Stat.×16

Bills×11

Stat. Comp.×7

U.S.C.×6

Pub. L.×2

U.S.C.§ 7612

Pub. L.Public Law 113-79

U.S.C.§ 8701

U.S.C.§ 1522

Pub. L.Pub. L. 105–185, title I, § 103

Stat.112 Stat. 527

Pub. L.Pub. L. 110–234, title VII

Stat.122 Stat. 1227

Pub. L.Pub. L. 110–246, § 4(a)

Cites 21 · showing 9Cited by 97 across 6 sources