§ 611. FUNDING.
926 words·~4 min read·
/usc/title-6/section-611A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.
(a)Regional coordination The Administrator shall ensure that—
(1)all recipients of grants administered by the Department to prevent, prepare for, protect against, or respond to natural disasters, acts of terrorism, or other man-made disasters (excluding assistance provided under section 203, title IV, or title V of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5133, 5170 et seq., and 5191 et seq.)) coordinate, as appropriate, their prevention, preparedness, and protection efforts with neighboring State, local, and tribal governments; and
(2)all high-risk urban areas and other recipients of grants administered by the Department to prevent, prepare for, protect against, or respond to natural disasters, acts of terrorism, or other man-made disasters (excluding assistance provided under section 203, title IV, or title V of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5133, 5170 et seq., and 5191 et seq.)) that include or substantially affect parts or all of more than 1 State coordinate, as appropriate, across State boundaries, including, where appropriate, through the use of regional working groups and requirements for regional plans.
(b)Planning committees
(1)In general Any State or high-risk urban area receiving a grant under section 604 or 605 of this title shall establish a State planning committee or urban area working group to assist in preparation and revision of the State, regional, or local homeland security plan or the threat and hazard identification and risk assessment, as the case may be, and to assist in determining effective funding priorities for grants under such sections.
(2)Composition
(A)In general The State planning committees and urban area working groups referred to in paragraph
(1)shall include at least one representative from each of the following significant stakeholders:
(i)Local or tribal government officials.
(ii)Emergency response providers, which shall include representatives of the fire service, law enforcement, emergency medical services, and emergency managers.
(iii)Public health officials and other appropriate medical practitioners.
(iv)Individuals representing educational institutions, including elementary schools, community colleges, and other institutions of higher education.
(v)State and regional interoperable communications coordinators, as appropriate.
(vi)State and major urban area fusion centers, as appropriate.
(B)Geographic representation The members of the State planning committee or urban area working group, as the case may be, shall be a representative group of individuals from the counties, cities, towns, and Indian tribes within the State or high-risk urban area, including, as appropriate, representatives of rural, high-population, and high-threat jurisdictions.
(3)Existing planning committees Nothing in this subsection may be construed to require that any State or high-risk urban area create a State planning committee or urban area working group, as the case may be, if that State or high-risk urban area has established and uses a multijurisdictional planning committee or commission that meets the requirements of this subsection.
(c)Sense of Congress It is the sense of Congress that, in order to ensure that the Nation is most effectively able to prevent, prepare for, protect against, and respond to all hazards, including natural disasters, acts of terrorism, and other man-made disasters—
(1)the Department should administer a coherent and coordinated system of both terrorism-focused and all-hazards grants;
(2)there should be a continuing and appropriate balance between funding for terrorism-focused and all-hazards preparedness, as reflected in the authorizations of appropriations for grants under the amendments made by titles I and II, as applicable, of the Implementing Recommendations of the 9/11 Commission Act of 2007; and
(3)with respect to terrorism-focused grants, it is necessary to ensure both that the target capabilities of the highest risk areas are achieved quickly and that basic levels of preparedness, as measured by the attainment of target capabilities, are achieved nationwide.
(Pub. L. 107–296, title XX, § 2021, as added Pub. L. 110–53, title I, § 101, Aug. 3, 2007, 121 Stat. 285; amended Pub. L. 114–328, div. A, title XIX, § 1911, Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2682; Pub. L. 115–278, § 2(g)(7)(C), Nov. 16, 2018, 132 Stat. 4180.)
Connections45 cite this · traces to 6
Cited by 45 sections · top 40
public-private-law
U.S. Code
statutes-at-large
- Public Law 115–278To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to authorize the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency of the Department of Homeland Security, and for other purposes
- Public Law 114–328To authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2017 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military personnel strengths for such fiscal year, and for other purposes
- Public Law 110–53To provide for the implementation of the recommendations of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States
statute-compilations
bill
- Sec. 101Memoranda of understanding
- Sec. 106Administration and coordination of grants
- Sec. 3Technical amendments to the Homeland Security Act of 2002
- Sec. 3Technical amendments to the Homeland Security Act of 2002
- Sec. 3Technical amendments to the Homeland Security Act of 2002
- Sec. 101Memoranda of understanding
- Sec. 106Administration and coordination of grants
- Sec. 101Memoranda of understanding
- Sec. 106Administration and coordination of grants
- Sec. 101Memoranda of understanding
- Sec. 106Administration and coordination of grants
- Sec. 2Administration and coordination of certain DHS grants
- Sec. 2Administration and coordination of certain DHS grants
- Sec. 2Administration and coordination of certain DHS grants
- Sec. 2Administration and coordination of certain DHS grants
- Sec. 501Memoranda of understanding
- Sec. 506Administration and coordination of grants
- Sec. 2901Administration and coordination of certain DHS grants
- Sec. 1911State and high-risk urban area working groups
- Sec. 3Technical amendments to the Homeland Security Act of 2002
- Sec. 3Technical amendments to the Homeland Security Act of 2002
- Sec. 1608Memoranda of understanding
- Sec. 1705Technical amendments to the Homeland Security Act of 2002
- Sec. 608Memoranda of understanding
- Sec. 705Technical amendments to the Homeland Security Act of 2002
- Sec. 108Memoranda of understanding
- Sec. 1608Memoranda of understanding
- Sec. 1705Technical amendments to the Homeland Security Act of 2002
- Sec. 2Cybersecurity and infrastructure security agency
- Sec. 2Cybersecurity and infrastructure security agency
- Sec. 607Memoranda of understanding
Traces to 6 documents
U.S. Code
9 references not yet in our index
- Pub. L. 107–296, title XX, § 2021
- Pub. L. 110–53, title I, § 101
- 121 Stat. 285
- 130 Stat. 2682
- 132 Stat. 4180
- Pub. L. 93–288
- 88 Stat. 143
- Pub. L. 110–53
- 121 Stat. 266
Citation graph
cites case law
§ 611
FUNDING.
Bills×36
Stat. Comp.×3
Stat.×3
Pub. L.×2
U.S.C.×1
Pub. L.Pub. L. 107–296, title XX, § 2021
Pub. L.Pub. L. 110–53, title I, § 101
Stat.121 Stat. 285
Stat.130 Stat. 2682
Stat.132 Stat. 4180
Cites 15 · showing 11Cited by 45 across 5 sources