Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · U.S. Code · Title 45 - RAILROADS · CHAPTER 20— NORTHEAST RAIL SERVICE · § 1105

§ 1105. Judicial review

1,043 words·~5 min read·/usc/title-45/section-1105

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

(a)Special court; exclusive jurisdiction for civil actions Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the special court shall have original and exclusive jurisdiction over any civil action—
(1)for injunctive, declaratory, or other relief relating to the enforcement, operation, execution, or interpretation of any provision of or amendment made by this subtitle or part 2 of the Conrail Privatization Act [45 U.S.C. 1311 et seq.], or administrative action taken thereunder to the extent such action is subject to judicial review;
(2)challenging the constitutionality of any provision of or amendment made by this subtitle or part 2 of the Conrail Privatization Act [45 U.S.C. 1311 et seq.];
(3)to obtain, inspect, copy, or review any document in the possession or control of the Secretary, Conrail, the United States Railway Association, or Amtrak that would be discoverable in litigation under any provision of or amendment made by this subtitle or part 2 of the Conrail Privatization Act [45 U.S.C. 1311 et seq.]; or
(4)seeking judgment upon any claim against the United States founded upon the Constitution and resulting from the operation of any provision of or amendment made by this subtitle or part 2 of the Conrail Privatization Act [45 U.S.C. 1311 et seq.].
(b)Appeal An order or judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in any action referred to in this section shall be reviewable in accordance with sections 1291, 1292, and 1294 of title 28.
(c)Scope of review of administrative actions Administrative action under the provisions of or amendments made by this subtitle or part 2 of the Conrail Privatization Act [45 U.S.C. 1311 et seq.] which is subject to review shall be upheld unless such action is found to be unlawful under standards established for review of informal agency action under paragraphs (2)(A), (B), (C), and
(D)of section 706 of title 5. The requirements of this subtitle or part 2 of the Conrail Privatization Act [45 U.S.C. 1311 et seq.], as the case may be, shall constitute the exclusive procedures required by law for such administrative action.
(Pub. L. 97–35, title XI, § 1152, Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 676; Pub. L. 99–509, title IV, § 4033(c)(1)(A), Oct. 21, 1986, 100 Stat. 1908; Pub. L. 100–352, § 6(f), June 27, 1988, 102 Stat. 664; Pub. L. 104–317, title VI, § 605(b)(3), (c)(4), Oct. 19, 1996, 110 Stat. 3859.)
Connections16 cite this · traces to 8
21 references not yet in our index
  • Pub. L. 97–35, title XI, § 1152
  • 95 Stat. 676
  • Pub. L. 99–509, title IV, § 4033(c)(1)(A)
  • 100 Stat. 1908
  • Pub. L. 100–352, § 6(f)
  • 102 Stat. 664
  • Pub. L. 104–317, title VI, § 605(b)(3)
  • 110 Stat. 3859
  • Pub. L. 97–35
  • 95 Stat. 643
  • Pub. L. 99–509
  • 100 Stat. 1892
  • Pub. L. 104–317, § 605(b)(3)
  • Pub. L. 104–317, § 605(c)(4)
  • Pub. L. 100–352
  • Pub. L. 99–509, § 4033(c)(1)(A)(i)
  • Pub. L. 99–509, § 4033(c)(1)(A)
  • Pub. L. 104–317
  • section 605(e) of Pub. L. 104–317
  • section 7 of Pub. L. 100–352
  • section 605(d) of Pub. L. 104–317
Citation graph
cites case law
§ 1105
Judicial review
Stat.×6
Bills×5
Stat. Comp.×3
U.S.C.×2
Pub. L.Pub. L. 97–35, title XI, § 1152
Stat.95 Stat. 676
Pub. L.Pub. L. 99–509, title IV, § 4033(c)(1)(A)
Stat.100 Stat. 1908
Cites 29 · showing 12Cited by 16 across 4 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.