Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · STATUTE-COMPILATIONS · Multifamily Mortgage Foreclosure Act of 1981 · Sec. 1152

Sec. 1152. judicial review

410 words·~2 min read·/statute-compilations/comps-10576/sec-1152

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

## Sec. 1152 judicial review ###
(a)Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the special court shall have original and exclusive jurisdiction over any civil action— ####
(1)for injunctive, declaratory, or other relief relating to the enforcement, operation, execution, or interpretation of any provision of or amendment made by this subtitle or part 2 of the Conrail Privatization Act, or administrative action taken thereunder to the extent such action is subject to judicial review; ####
(2)challenging the constitutionality of any provision of or amendment made by this subtitle or part 2 of the Conrail Privatization Act; ####
(3)to obtain, inspect, copy, or review any document in the possession or control of the Secretary, Conrail, the United States Railway Association, or Amtrak that would be discoverable in litigation under any provision of or amendment made by this subtitle or part 2 of the Conrail Privatization Act; or ####
(4)seeking judgment upon any claim against the United States founded upon the Constitution and resulting from the operation of any provision of or amendment made by this subtitle or part 2 of the Conrail Privatization Act. ### (b)30 Appeal An order or judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in any action referred to in this section shall be reviewable in accordance with sections 1291, 1292, and 1294 of title 28, United States Code. 30Section 605(d) of the Federal Courts Improvement Act of 1996 provided that this subsection shall not apply to any final order or judgement entered into by the special court established under section 209(b) of the Regional Rail Reorganization Act of 1973 for which—
(1)a petition for writ of certiorari has been filed before the date on which the special court is abolished **[**February 16, 1997**]**; or
(2)the time for filing a petition for writ of certiorari has not expired before that date. ###
(c)Administrative action under the provisions of or amendments made by this subtitle or part 2 of the Conrail Privatization Act which is subject to review shall be upheld unless such action is found to be unlawful under standards established for review of informal agency action under paragraphs
(2)(A), (B), (C), and
(D)of section 706, title 5, United States Code. The requirements of this subtitle or part 2 of the Conrail Privatization Act, as the case may be, shall constitute the exclusive procedures required by law for such administrative action. **[**[45 U.S.C. 1105](/us/usc/t45/s1105)**]**
Connectionstraces to 1
Traces to 1 document
Citation graph
cites case law
Sec. 1152
judicial review
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.