Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · U.S. Code · Title 31 - MONEY AND FINANCE · CHAPTER 37— CLAIMS · SUBCHAPTER III— CLAIMS AGAINST THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT · § 3724

§ 3724. Claims for damages caused by investigative or law enforcement officers of the Department of Justice

870 words·~4 min read·/usc/title-31/section-3724

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

(a)The Attorney General may settle, for not more than $50,000 in any one case, a claim for personal injury, death, or damage to, or loss of, privately owned property, caused by an investigative or law enforcement officer as defined in section 2680(h) of title 28 who is employed by the Department of Justice acting within the scope of employment that may not be settled under chapter 171 of title 28. An officer or employee of the United States Government may not present a claim arising during the scope of employment. A claim may be allowed only if it is presented to the Attorney General within one year after it accrues.
(b)A claim may be paid under this section only if the claimant accepts the amount of the settlement in complete satisfaction of the claim against the Government.
(Pub. L. 97–258, Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 975; Pub. L. 101–203, § 1(a), (b)(1), Dec. 7, 1989, 103 Stat. 1805; Pub. L. 105–362, title X, § 1001(c), Nov. 10, 1998, 112 Stat. 3291.)
In subsection (a), the words “of the United States” are omitted as unnecessary. The word “settle” is substituted for “consider, adjust, and determine” for consistency. The words “after January 1, 1934” are omitted as executed. The words “personal injury, death” are substituted for “damages to any person” for clarity. The words “of the Department of Justice” are omitted as unnecessary. The words “that may not be settled under chapter 171 of title 28” are substituted for section 424(a)(2d par. on p. 847) and (b)(related to 2d par. of
(a)on p. 847) of the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946 (31:224b(note)) because of the restatement. The words “An officer or employee of the United States Government may not present a claim arising during the scope of employment” are substituted for 31:224b(1st proviso) to eliminate unnecessary words. The text of 31:224b(2d proviso words after semicolon) is omitted as executed.
In subsection (b), the word “settlement” is substituted for “amount as may be found due to any claimant . . . as a legal claim” for clarity and consistency. The words “by Congress” are omitted as surplus.
In subsection (c), the words “A claim may be paid under this section” are added for clarity. The words “of the settlement” are substituted for “determined to be due him under the provisions of this section” for consistency and to eliminate unnecessary words. The word “complete” is substituted for “full and final” to eliminate unnecessary words. The word “satisfaction” is substituted for “settlement” for clarity.
Connections8 cite this · traces to 2
13 references not yet in our index
  • Pub. L. 97–258
  • 96 Stat. 975
  • Pub. L. 101–203, § 1(a)
  • 103 Stat. 1805
  • Pub. L. 105–362, title X, § 1001(c)
  • 112 Stat. 3291
  • Pub. L. 105–362
  • Pub. L. 101–203, § 1(b)(1)
  • Pub. L. 101–203, § 1(a)(1)
  • Pub. L. 101–203, § 1(a)(2)
  • Pub. L. 101–203, § 2
  • Pub. L. 106–185, § 3(b)
  • 114 Stat. 211
Citation graph
cites case law
§ 3724
Claims for damages caused by investigative or law enforcement officers of the Department of Justice
C.F.R.×3
Stat.×2
U.S.C.×2
Fed. Reg.×1
Pub. L.Pub. L. 97–258
Stat.96 Stat. 975
Pub. L.Pub. L. 101–203, § 1(a)
Stat.103 Stat. 1805
Pub. L.Pub. L. 105–362, title X, § 1001(c)
Cites 15 · showing 7Cited by 8 across 4 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.