Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · U.S. Code · Title 28 - JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE · CHAPTER 153— HABEAS CORPUS · § 2253

§ 2253. Appeal

593 words·~3 min read·/usc/title-28/section-2253

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

(a)In a habeas corpus proceeding or a proceeding under section 2255 before a district judge, the final order shall be subject to review, on appeal, by the court of appeals for the circuit in which the proceeding is held.
(b)There shall be no right of appeal from a final order in a proceeding to test the validity of a warrant to remove to another district or place for commitment or trial a person charged with a criminal offense against the United States, or to test the validity of such person’s detention pending removal proceedings.
(1)Unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability, an appeal may not be taken to the court of appeals from—
(A)the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding in which the detention complained of arises out of process issued by a State court; or
(B)the final order in a proceeding under section 2255.
(2)A certificate of appealability may issue under paragraph
(1)only if the applicant has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.
(3)The certificate of appealability under paragraph
(1)shall indicate which specific issue or issues satisfy the showing required by paragraph (2).
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 967; May 24, 1949, ch. 139, § 113, 63 Stat. 105; Oct. 31, 1951, ch. 655, § 52, 65 Stat. 727; Pub. L. 104–132, title I, § 102, Apr. 24, 1996, 110 Stat. 1217.)
Historical and Revision Notes
1948 Act
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §§ 463(a) and 466 (Mar. 10, 1908, ch. 76, 36 [35] Stat. 40; Feb. 13, 1925, ch. 229, §§ 6, 13, 43 Stat. 940, 942; June 29, 1938, ch. 806, 52 Stat. 1232).
This section consolidates paragraph
(a)of section 463, and section 466 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed.
The last two sentences of section 463(a) of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., were omitted. They were repeated in section 452 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed. (See reviser’s note under section 2241 of this title.)
Changes were made in phraseology.
1949 Act
This section corrects a typographical error in the second paragraph of section 2253 of title 28.
Connections2 cite this · traces to 5
15 references not yet in our index
  • June 25, 1948, ch. 646
  • 62 Stat. 967
  • May 24, 1949, ch. 139, § 113
  • 63 Stat. 105
  • Oct. 31, 1951, ch. 655, § 52
  • 65 Stat. 727
  • Pub. L. 104–132, title I, § 102
  • 110 Stat. 1217
  • Mar. 10, 1908, ch. 76
  • Feb. 13, 1925, ch. 229
  • 43 Stat. 940
  • June 29, 1938, ch. 806
  • 52 Stat. 1232
  • section 466 of title 28
  • Pub. L. 104–132
Citation graph
cites case law
§ 2253
Appeal
U.S.C.×2
ActJune 25, 1948, ch. 646
Stat.62 Stat. 967
ActMay 24, 1949, ch. 139, § 113
Stat.63 Stat. 105
ActOct. 31, 1951, ch. 655, § 52
Cites 20 · showing 10Cited by 2 across 1 source
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.