Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · U.S. Code · Title 28 - JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE · CHAPTER 123— FEES AND COSTS · § 1919

§ 1919. Dismissal for lack of jurisdiction

330 words·~2 min read·/usc/title-28/section-1919

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Whenever any action or suit is dismissed in any district court, the Court of International Trade, or the Court of Federal Claims for want of jurisdiction, such court may order the payment of just costs.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 955; Pub. L. 96–417, title V, § 510, Oct. 10, 1980, 94 Stat. 1743; Pub. L. 102–572, title IX, § 908(a), (b)(1), Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4519.)
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., § 80 (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, § 37, 36 Stat. 1098).
Words “dismissed for want of jurisdiction” were substituted for “it shall appear to the satisfaction of the said district court, at any time after such suit has been brought or removed thereto, that such suit does not really and substantially involve a dispute or controversy properly within the jurisdiction of said district court”. The substituted language is sufficient. (See reviser’s note under section 1359 of this title.) The provisions of section 80 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., relating to dismissal for improper or collusive joinder in removal proceedings, are incorporated in section 1359 of this title.
Other provisions of section 80 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., appear in section 1447 of this title.
Changes were made in phraseology.
Connections2 cite this · traces to 4
13 references not yet in our index
  • June 25, 1948, ch. 646
  • 62 Stat. 955
  • Pub. L. 96–417, title V, § 510
  • 94 Stat. 1743
  • Pub. L. 102–572, title IX, § 908(a)
  • 106 Stat. 4519
  • Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, § 37
  • 36 Stat. 1098
  • section 80 of title 28
  • Pub. L. 102–572
  • Pub. L. 96–417
  • section 911 of Pub. L. 102–572
  • section 701(b)(1)(E) of Pub. L. 96–417
Citation graph
cites case law
§ 1919
Dismissal for lack of jurisdiction
U.S.C.×2
ActJune 25, 1948, ch. 646
Stat.62 Stat. 955
Pub. L.Pub. L. 96–417, title V, § 510
Stat.94 Stat. 1743
Pub. L.Pub. L. 102–572, title IX, § 908(a)
Cites 17 · showing 9Cited by 2 across 1 source
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.