Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · U.S. Code · Title 28 - JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE · CHAPTER 5— DISTRICT COURTS · § 134

§ 134. Tenure and residence of district judges

1,267 words·~6 min read·/usc/title-28/section-134

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

(a)The district judges shall hold office during good behavior.
(b)Each district judge, except in the District of Columbia, the Southern District of New York, and the Eastern District of New York, shall reside in the district or one of the districts for which he is appointed. Each district judge of the Southern District of New York and the Eastern District of New York may reside within 20 miles of the district to which he or she is appointed.
(c)If the public interest and the nature of the business of a district court require that a district judge should maintain his abode at or near a particular place for holding court in the district or within a particular part of the district the judicial council of the circuit may so declare and may make an appropriate order. If the district judges of such a district are unable to agree as to which of them shall maintain his abode at or near the place or within the area specified in such an order the judicial council of the circuit may decide which of them shall do so.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 896; Aug. 3, 1949, ch. 387, § 2(b)(1), 63 Stat. 495; Feb. 10, 1954, ch. 6, § 2(b)(13)(a), 68 Stat. 12; Pub. L. 86–3, § 9(c), Mar. 18, 1959, 73 Stat. 8; Pub. L. 87–36, § 2(e)(3), May 19, 1961, 75 Stat. 83; Pub. L. 89–571, § 1, Sept. 12, 1966, 80 Stat. 764; Pub. L. 92–208, § 3(e), Dec. 18, 1971, 85 Stat. 742; Pub. L. 104–317, title VI, § 607, Oct. 19, 1996, 110 Stat. 3860.)
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., § 1 and section 863 of title 48, U.S.C., 1940 ed., Territories and Insular Possessions (Apr. 12, 1900, ch. 191, § 34, 31 Stat. 84; Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, § 1, 36 Stat. 1087; Jan. 7, 1913; ch. 6, 37 Stat. 648; July 30, 1914, ch. 216, 38 Stat. 580; Mar. 2, 1917, ch. 145, § 41, 39 Stat. 965; Mar. 4, 1921, ch. 161, § 1, 41 Stat. 1412; Sept. 14, 1922, ch. 306, § 1, 42 Stat. 837; Mar. 26, 1938, ch. 51, § 2, 52 Stat. 118).
Section consolidates the last paragraph of section 1 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., with portions of section 863 of title 48, U.S.C., 1940 ed., with changes in phraseology necessary to effect consolidation.
Provisions of section 1 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., relating to the number of judges in the various districts are incorporated in section 133 of this title.
A portion of section 863 of title 48, U.S.C., 1940 ed., is retained in said title 48. For remainder of section 863, see Distribution Table.
The exception in subsection
(b)“except in the District of Columbia” conforms with the recent decision in U.S. ex. rel. Laughlin v. Eicher, 1944, 56 F.Supp. 972, holding that residence requirement of section 1 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., did not apply to district judges in the District of Columbia. (See reviser’s note under section 44 of this title.)
The clause in said last paragraph of section 1 of title 28 providing that any district judge, who violates the residence requirement, shall be deemed guilty of a high misdemeanor, was omitted. This penalty provision was attached to the residence requirement at the time of compilation of the Revised Statutes of 1878, although it is apparent that Congress only intended that the penalty should be invoked upon the unauthorized practice of law. See U.S. ex. rel. Laughlin v. Eicher, supra, in which an outline of the history of said section 1 of title 28 is given.
Connections7 cite this · traces to 6
41 references not yet in our index
  • June 25, 1948, ch. 646
  • 62 Stat. 896
  • Aug. 3, 1949, ch. 387, § 2(b)(1)
  • 63 Stat. 495
  • Feb. 10, 1954, ch. 6, § 2(b)(13)(a)
  • 68 Stat. 12
  • Pub. L. 86–3, § 9(c)
  • 73 Stat. 8
  • Pub. L. 87–36, § 2(e)(3)
  • 75 Stat. 83
  • Pub. L. 89–571, § 1
  • 80 Stat. 764
  • Pub. L. 92–208, § 3(e)
  • 85 Stat. 742
  • Pub. L. 104–317, title VI, § 607
  • 110 Stat. 3860
  • Apr. 12, 1900, ch. 191, § 34
  • 31 Stat. 84
  • Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, § 1
  • 36 Stat. 1087
  • 37 Stat. 648
  • July 30, 1914, ch. 216
  • 38 Stat. 580
  • Mar. 2, 1917, ch. 145, § 41
  • 39 Stat. 965
  • Mar. 4, 1921, ch. 161, § 1
  • 41 Stat. 1412
  • Sept. 14, 1922, ch. 306, § 1
  • 42 Stat. 837
  • Mar. 26, 1938, ch. 51, § 2
  • 52 Stat. 118
  • Pub. L. 104–317
  • Pub. L. 92–208
  • Pub. L. 89–571
  • Pub. L. 87–36
  • Pub. L. 86–3
  • section 3(f) of Pub. L. 92–208
  • 73 Stat. 4
  • section 491 of Title 48
  • Pub. L. 89–571, § 4
+ 1 more
Citation graph
cites case law
§ 134
Tenure and residence of district judges
U.S.C.×7
ActJune 25, 1948, ch. 646
Stat.62 Stat. 896
ActAug. 3, 1949, ch. 387, § 2(b)(1)
Stat.63 Stat. 495
ActFeb. 10, 1954, ch. 6, § 2(b)(13)(a)
Cites 47 · showing 11Cited by 7 across 1 source
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.