Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · U.S. Code · Title 15 - COMMERCE AND TRADE · CHAPTER 100A— CYBERSECURITY ENHANCEMENT · SUBCHAPTER IV— ADVANCEMENT OF CYBERSECURITY TECHNICAL STANDARDS · § 7464

§ 7464. Identity management research and development

370 words·~2 min read·/usc/title-15/section-7464

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

(a)In general The Director shall carry out a program of research to support the development of voluntary, consensus-based technical standards, best practices, benchmarks, methodologies, metrology, testbeds, and conformance criteria for identity management, taking into account appropriate user concerns to—
(1)improve interoperability and portability among identity management technologies;
(2)strengthen identity proofing and verification methods used in identity management systems commensurate with the level of risk, including identity and attribute validation services provided by Federal, State, and local governments;
(3)improve privacy protection in identity management systems; and
(4)improve the accuracy, usability, and inclusivity of identity management systems.
(b)Digital identity technical roadmap The Director, in consultation with other relevant Federal agencies and stakeholders from the private sector, shall develop and maintain a technical roadmap for digital identity management research and development focused on enabling the voluntary use and adoption of modern digital identity solutions that align with the four criteria in subsection (a).
(c)Digital identity management guidance
(1)In general The Director shall develop, and periodically update, in collaboration with other public and private sector organizations, common definitions and voluntary guidance for digital identity management systems, including identity and attribute validation services provided by Federal, State, and local governments.
(2)Guidance The Guidance shall—
(A)align with the four criteria in subsection (a), as practicable;
(B)provide case studies of implementation of guidance;
(C)incorporate voluntary technical standards and industry best practices; and
(D)not prescribe or otherwise require the use of specific technology products or services.
(3)Consultation In carrying out this subsection, the Director shall consult with—
(A)Federal and State agencies;
(B)industry;
(C)potential end-users and individuals that will use services related to digital identity verification; and
(D)experts with relevant experience in the systems that enable digital identity verification, as determined by the Director.
(Pub. L. 113–274, title V, § 504, Dec. 18, 2014, 128 Stat. 2987; Pub. L. 117–167, div. B, title II, § 10225, Aug. 9, 2022, 136 Stat. 1478.)
Connections23 cite this · traces to 2
Cited by 23 sections
2 references not yet in our index
  • 128 Stat. 2987
  • 136 Stat. 1478
Citation graph
cites case law
§ 7464
Identity management research and development
Bills×14
Pub. L.×3
Stat. Comp.×3
Stat.×2
U.S.C.×1
Stat.128 Stat. 2987
Stat.136 Stat. 1478
Cites 4Cited by 23 across 5 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.