Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · BILL · 117th Congress · H.R. 4521 (Placed on Calendar Senate) — To provide for a coordinated Federal research initiative to ensure continued United States leadership in engineering... · Sec. 10225

Sec. 10225. Digital identity management research

296 words·~1 min read·/bill/117/hr/4521/pcs/section-10225

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Section 504 of the Cybersecurity Enhancement Act of 2014 ( 15 U.S.C. 7464 ) is amended to read as follows: The Director shall carry out a program of research to support the development of voluntary, consensus-based technical standards, best practices, benchmarks, methodologies, metrology, testbeds, and conformance criteria for identity management, taking into account appropriate user concerns— to improve interoperability and portability among identity management technologies; to strengthen identity proofing and verification methods used in identity management systems, including identity and attribute validation services provided by Federal, State, and local governments; to improve privacy protection in identity management systems through authentication and security protocols; and to monitor and improve the accuracy, usability, and inclusivity of identity management systems.
The Director, in consultation with other relevant Federal agencies and stakeholders from the private sector, shall develop and maintain a technical roadmap for digital identity management research and development focused on enabling the voluntary use and adoption of modern digital identity solutions that align with the four criteria in subsection (a). The Director shall develop, and periodically update, in collaboration with other public and private sector organizations, common definitions and voluntary guidance for digital identity management systems, including identity and attribute validation services provided by Federal, State, and local governments.
The Guidance shall— align with the four criteria in subsection (a), as practicable; provide case studies of implementation of guidance; incorporate voluntary technical standards and industry best practices; and not prescribe or otherwise require the use of specific technology products or services. In carrying out this subsection, the Director shall consult with— Federal and State agencies; industry; potential end-users and individuals that will use services related to digital identity verification; and experts with relevant experience in the systems that enable digital identity verification, as determined by the Director. .
Connectionstraces to 1
Citation graph
cites case law
Sec. 10225
Digital identity management research
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.