Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · CFR · Title 40 — Protection of Environment · Part 26 · § 26.1706

§ 26.1706. Criteria and procedure for decisions to protect public health by relying on otherwise unacceptable research.

203 words·~1 min read·/us/cfr/t40/s§ 26.1706·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

This section establishes the exclusive criteria and procedure by which EPA may decide to rely on data from research that is not acceptable under the standards in §§ 26.1703 through 26.1705. EPA may rely on such data only if all the conditions in paragraphs
(a)through
(d)of this section are satisfied:
(a)EPA has obtained the views of the Human Studies Review Board concerning the proposal to rely on the otherwise unacceptable data,
(b)EPA has provided an opportunity for public comment on the proposal to rely on the otherwise unacceptable data,
(c)EPA has determined that relying on the data is crucial to a decision that would impose a more stringent regulatory restriction that would improve protection of public health, such as a limitation on the use of a pesticide, than could be justified without relying on the data, and
(d)EPA has published a full explanation of its decision to rely on the otherwise unacceptable data, including a thorough discussion of the ethical deficiencies of the underlying research and the full rationale for finding that the standard in paragraph
(c)of this section was met. [71 FR 6168, Feb. 6, 2006, as amended at 78 FR 10546, Feb. 14, 2013]
Connections13 cite this
Cited by 13 sections · top 2
Citation graph
cites case law
§ 26.1706
Criteria and procedure for decisions to protect public health by relying on otherwise unacceptable research.
Fed. Reg.×13
Cites 0Cited by 13 across 1 source
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.