Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

§
Marginalia
Code · CFR · Title 40 — Protection of Environment · Part 26 · § 26.1705

§ 26.1705. Prohibition of reliance on unethical human research with non-pregnant, non-nursing adults initiated after April 7, 2006.

341 words·~2 min read·/us/cfr/t40/s§ 26.1705·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

(a)This section applies to research subject to this subpart, that:
(1)Was initiated after April 7, 2006.
(2)Was subject, at the time it was conducted, either to subparts A through L of this part, or to the codification of the Common Rule by another Federal department or agency.
(b)Except as provided in § 26.1706, EPA must not rely on data from any research subject to this section unless EPA determines that the research was conducted in substantial compliance with either:
(1)All applicable provisions of subparts A through L of this part, or the codification of the Common Rule by another Federal department or agency; or
(2)If the research was conducted outside the United States, with procedures at least as protective of subjects as those in subparts A through L of this part, or the codification of the Common Rule by another Federal department or agency.
(c)Except as provided in § 26.1706, EPA must not rely on data from any research subject to this section unless EPA determines that the research was conducted in substantial compliance with either:
(1)A proposal that was found to be acceptable under § 26.1603(c), and no amendments to or deviations from that proposal placed participants at increased risk of harm (based on knowledge available at the time the study was conducted) or impaired their informed consent. If EPA discovers that the submitter of the proposal materially misrepresented or knowingly omitted information that would have altered the outcome of EPA's evaluation of the proposal under § 26.1603(c), EPA must not rely on that data.
(2)A proposal that would have been found to be acceptable under § 26.1603(c), if it had been subject to review under that section, and no amendments to or deviations from that proposal placed participants at increased risk of harm (based on knowledge available at the time the study was conducted) or impaired their informed consent.
(d)The prohibition in this section is in addition to the prohibitions in § 26.1703. [78 FR 10545, Feb. 14, 2013]
Connections4 cite this
Citation graph
cites case law
§ 26.1705
Prohibition of reliance on unethical human research with non-pregnant, non-nursing adults initiated after April 7, 2006.
Fed. Reg.×4
Cites 0Cited by 4 across 1 source
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.