Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · CFR · Title 34 — Education · Part 75 · § 75.105

§ 75.105. Annual absolute, competitive preference, and invitational priorities.

483 words·~2 min read·/us/cfr/t34/s§ 75.105·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

(a)What programs are covered by this section? This section applies to any program for which the Secretary establishes priorities for selection of applications in a particular fiscal year.
(b)How does the Secretary establish annual priorities?
(1)The Secretary establishes final annual priorities by publishing the priorities in a notice in the Federal Register, usually in the application notice for that program.
(2)The Secretary publishes proposed annual priorities for public comment, unless:
(i)The final annual priorities will be implemented only through invitational priorities (Cross-reference: See 34 CFR 75.105(c)(1));
(ii)The final annual priorities are chosen from a list of priorities already established in the program's regulations;
(iii)Publishing proposed annual priorities would be impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest;
(iv)The program statute requires or authorizes the Secretary to establish specified priorities;
(v)The annual priorities are chosen from allowable activities specified in the program statute; or
(vi)The final annual priorities are developed under the exemption from rulemaking for the first grant competition under a new or substantially revised program authority pursuant to section 437(d)(1) of GEPA, 20 U.S.C. 1232(d)(1), or an exemption from rulemaking under section 681(d) of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. 1481(d), section 191 of the Education Sciences Reform Act, 20 U.S.C. 9581, or any other applicable exemption from rulemaking.
(c)How does the Secretary implement an annual priority? The Secretary may choose one or more of the following methods to implement an annual priority:
(1)Invitations. The Secretary may simply invite applications that meet a priority. If the Secetary chooses this method, an application that meets the priority receives no competitive or absolute preference over applications that do not meet the priority.
(2)Competitive preference. The Secretary may give one of the following kinds of competitive preference to applications that meet a priority.
(i)The Secretary may award some or all bonus points to an application depending on the extent to which the application meets the priority. These points are in addition to any points the applicant earns under the selection criteria (see § 75.200(b)). The notice states the maximum number of additional points that the Secretary may award to an application depending upon how well the application meets the priority.
(ii)The Secretary may select an application that meets a priority over an application of comparable merit that does not meet the priority.
(3)Absolute preference. The Secretary may give an absolute preference to applications that meet a priority. The Secretary establishes a separate competition for applications that meet the priority and reserves all or part of a program's funds solely for that competition. The Secretary may adjust the amount reserved for the priority after determining the number of high-quality applications received. \[46 FR 3205, Jan. 14, 1981, as amended at 57 FR 30337, July 8, 1992; 60 FR 63873, Dec. 12, 1995; 89 FR 70320, Aug. 29, 2024\]
Connections5,661 cite this · traces to 4
Cited by 5,661 sections · top 60
register
Citation graph
cites case law
§ 75.105
Annual absolute, competitive preference, and invitational priorities.
Fed. Reg.×5,658
C.F.R.×3
Cites 4Cited by 5,661 across 2 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.