Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · CFR · Title 20 — Employees' Benefits · Part 683 — Administrative Provisions Under Title I of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act · § 683.440

§ 683.440. What is the Grant Officer resolution process?

482 words·~2 min read·/us/cfr/t20/s§ 683.440·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

(a)General. When the Grant Officer is dissatisfied with the a recipient's disposition of an audit or other resolution of findings (including those arising out of site visits, incident reports or compliance reviews), or with the recipient's response to findings resulting from investigations or monitoring reports, the initial and final determination process as set forth in this section is used to resolve the matter.
(b)Initial determination. The Grant Officer makes an initial determination on the findings for both those matters where there is agreement and those where there is disagreement with the recipient's resolution, including the allowability of questioned costs or activities. This initial determination is based upon the requirements of WIOA, the Wagner-Peyser Act, and applicable regulations, and the terms and conditions of the grants or other agreements under the award.
(c)Informal resolution. Except in an emergency situation, when the Secretary invokes the authority described in sec. 184(e) of WIOA, the Grant Officer may not revoke a recipient's grant in whole or in part, nor institute corrective actions or sanctions, without first providing the recipient with an opportunity to present documentation or arguments to resolve informally those matters in dispute contained in the initial determination. The initial determination must provide for an informal resolution period of at least 60 days from issuance of the initial determination. If the matters are resolved informally, the Grant Officer must issue a final determination under paragraph
(d)of this section which notifies the parties in writing of the nature of the resolution and may close the file.
(d)Final determination.
(1)Upon completion of the informal resolution process, the Grant Officer provides each party with a written final determination by certified mail, return receipt requested. For audits of recipient-level entities and other recipients which receive WIOA funds directly from the Department, ordinarily, the final determination is issued not later than 180 days from the date that the Office of Inspector General
(OIG)issues the final approved audit report to the Employment and Training Administration. For audits of subrecipients conducted by the OIG, ordinarily the final determination is issued not later than 360 days from the date the OIG issues the final approved audit report to ETA.
(2)A final determination under this paragraph
(d)must:
(i)Indicate whether efforts to resolve informally matters contained in the initial determination have been unsuccessful;
(ii)List those matters upon which the parties continue to disagree;
(iii)List any modifications to the factual findings and conclusions set forth in the initial determination and the rationale for such modifications;
(iv)Establish a debt, if appropriate;
(v)Require corrective action, when needed;
(vi)Determine liability, method of restitution of funds, and sanctions; and
(vii)Offer an opportunity for a hearing in accordance with § 683.800.
(3)Unless a hearing is requested, a final determination under this paragraph
(d)is final agency action and is not subject to further review.
Connections1 cite this
Citation graph
cites case law
§ 683.440
What is the Grant Officer resolution process?
Fed. Reg.×1
Cites 0Cited by 1 across 1 source
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.