Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · CFR · Title 18 — Conservation of Power and Water Resources · Part 12 — Safety of Water Power Projects and Project Works · § 12.38

§ 12.38. Report on a comprehensive assessment.

392 words·~2 min read·/us/cfr/t18/s§ 12.38·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

(a)Scope. The comprehensive assessment report must include documentation of all the items listed in § 12.37.
(b)Specific evaluation. In addition to the items listed in § 12.36(b)(1) through § 12.36(b)(5), the comprehensive assessment report must evaluate:
(1)The adequacy of spillways, including the effects of overtopping of nonoverflow structures, as described in § 12.39;
(2)The structural adequacy and stability of structures under all credible loading conditions;
(3)The potential for internal erosion and/or piping of embankments, foundations, and abutments;
(4)The design and construction practices used during original construction and subsequent modifications, in comparison with the industry best practices in use at the time of the inspection under this subpart D;
(5)The adequacy of the Supporting Technical Information Document and the attached electronic records; and
(6)The adequacy and findings of the potential failure mode analysis and risk analysis report(s).
(c)Analyses of record. The comprehensive assessment report must include the independent consultant team's evaluation of the assumptions, methods, calculations, results, and conclusions of the items listed in § 12.37(a)(2)(i) through (iv). The evaluation must:
(1)Address the accuracy, relevance, and consistency with the current state of the practice of dam engineering;
(2)Be accompanied by sufficient documentation of the independent consultant team's rationale, including, as needed, new calculations by the independent consultant team to verify that the assumptions, methods, calculations, results, and conclusions in the analyses of record are correct; and
(3)If the independent consultant team is unable to review the analyses of record for any of the items listed in § 12.37(a)(2)(i) through (iv); or if the independent consultant team disagrees with the assumptions, methods, calculations, results, or conclusions therein; the independent consultant(s) must recommend that the licensee complete new analyses to address the identified concerns.
(d)Changes since the previous inspection. The requirements of this section are the same as described in § 12.36(c).
(e)Recommendations. The requirements of this section are the same as described in § 12.36(d).
(f)Dissenting views. The requirements of this section are the same as described in § 12.36(e).
(g)List of participants. The requirements of this section are the same as described in § 12.36(f).
(h)Statement of independence. The requirements of this section are the same as described in § 12.36(g).
(i)Signature. The requirements of this section are the same as described in § 12.36(h).
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.