Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · CFR · Title 10 — Energy · Part 2 — Agency Rules of Practice and Procedure · § 2.1407

§ 2.1407. Appeal and Commission review of initial decision.

392 words·~2 min read·/us/cfr/t10/s§ 2.1407·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

(a)(1) Within 25 days after service of a written initial decision, a party may file a written appeal seeking the Commission's review on the grounds specified in paragraph
(b)of this section. Unless otherwise authorized by law, a party must file an appeal with the Commission before seeking judicial review.
(2)An appeal under this section may not be longer than twenty
(20)pages and must contain the following:
(i)A concise statement of the specific rulings and decisions that are being appealed;
(ii)A concise statement (including record citations) where the matters of fact or law raised in the appeal were previously raised before the presiding officer and, if they were not, why they could not have been raised;
(iii)A concise statement why, in the appellant's view, the decision or action is erroneous; and
(iv)A concise statement why the Commission should review the decision or action, with particular reference to the grounds specified in paragraph
(b)of this section.
(3)Any other party to the proceeding may, within 25 days after service of the appeal, file an answer supporting or opposing the appeal. The answer may not be longer than 20 pages and should concisely address the matters specified in paragraph (a)(2) of this section. The appellant does not have a right to reply. Unless it directs additional filings or oral arguments, the Commission will decide the appeal on the basis of the filings permitted by this paragraph.
(b)In considering the appeal, the Commission will give due weight to the existence of a substantial question with respect to the following considerations:
(1)A finding of material fact is clearly erroneous or in conflict with a finding as to the same fact in a different proceeding;
(2)A necessary legal conclusion is without governing precedent or is a departure from, or contrary to, established law;
(3)A substantial and important question of law, policy or discretion has been raised by the appeal;
(4)The conduct of the proceeding involved a prejudicial procedural error; or
(5)Any other consideration which the Commission may deem to be in the public interest.
(c)Once a decision becomes final agency action, the Secretary shall transmit the decision to the NRC staff for action in accordance with the decision. [69 FR 2271, Jan. 14, 2004, as amended at 77 FR 46599, Aug. 3, 2012]
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.