Private Law 33.
1,314 words·~6 min read·
/statutes-at-large/vol-53/private-law-33·A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.
(/us/pvtl/76/32)] *Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled*,Mack Copper Company.Jurisdiction conferred upon Court of Claims to hear, etc., claim of. That jurisdiction be, and is hereby, conferred upon the Court of Claims of the United States, notwithstanding the lapse of time, prior determination, the invalidity of the lease, or any statute of limitation, to hear and determine the claim of the Mack Copper Company against the United States for the damages and waste inflicted to certain real property owned by the Mack Copper Company and situated in San Diego County, ’State of California, which real property was taken, used, and occupied *Provisos*.Limitation on the measure of damages sustained.by the United States as an Army cantonment, training camp, or for other military purposes during the period from on or about May 15, 1917, to on or about June 1, 1922, not heretofore paid by the United States to the Mack Copper Reconsideration de novo of claim heretofore adjudicated.Company: *Provided*, That the measure of the damages sustained shall not exceed the difference between the value of the land when taken, as already found by the court, and the value of the land when returned to the Mack Copper Company: *Provided further*, That in the event that any suit is brought on said claim pursuant to the provisions of this Act, the court shall reopen and reconsider de novo the claim heretofore adjudicated for use and occupation of said property, if the United States so requests.
Sec. 2. Evidence. That, the Court of Claims of the United States in the hearing and determination of any suit prosecuted under the authority of this Act, is authorized, in its discretion, to use and consider as evidence in such suit, together with any other evidence which may be taken therein, the testimony and other evidence filed by Mack Copper Company and the United States, respectively, in case numbered D-134 on the docket of that court entitled “Mack Copper Company against United States”, wherein the court rendered a judgment on the 6th day of June 1927.
Sec. 3. Application for writ of certiorari to Supreme Court. From any decision or judgment rendered in any suit presented under the authority of this Act a writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of the United States may be applied for by either party thereto, as is provided by law in other cases. Approved, April 20, 1939. To allow credit in the accounts of certain former disbursing officers of the Veterans’ Administration, and for other purposes. 1939-04-26 105 Chapter 53 Stat. 1453 76 1 United States Government Publishing Office text/xml EN Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
Digitization Vendor 2024-11-24 private 53 Stat. 1453 [CHAPTER 105] AN ACT To allow credit in the accounts of certain former disbursing officers of the Veterans’ Administration, and for other purposes.April 26, 1939[[H. R. 2073](/us/bill/76/hr/2073)][[Private, No. 33](/us/pvtl/76/33)] *Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled*, That the ComptrollerVeterans’ Administration.Credit allowed in accounts of former disbursing officers.
General of the United States is hereby authorized and directed in the settlement of the accounts of the following-named former disbursing officers of the Veterans’ Administration, the Veterans’ Bureau (now Veterans’ Administration), and the present Chief DisbursingChief Disbursing Officer, Treasury Department. Officer, Treasury Department, to allow credit in the sums herein stated now standing as disallowances in the said accounts on the books of the General Accounting Office: *Provided*, That any amount herein*Provisos*.Accountability. allowed in the account or a disbursing officer shall not be chargeable to any administrative officer or employee of the Veterans’ Administration: *Provided further*, That this Act shall not bar recovery ofRecovery not barred. the amounts herein specified from the persons to whom such amounts have been paid.
First: J. B. Schommer, former Disbursing Officer, Veterans’J. B. Schommer. Administration, Washington, District of Columbia, in the sums of $25 and $95.25, which amounts were expended during the period from May 1933 to June 30, 1934 (symbols XXXX and XXXX). Second: C. A. Wood, former Disbursing Officer, Veterans’ AdministrationC. A. Wood. Facility, Atlanta, Georgia, in the sum of $509.75, which amount was expended during the period from August 1932 to June 30, 1933 (symbol XXXX).
Third: Warren A. Minnis, former Disbursing Officer, Veterans’Warren A. Minnis. Administration Facility, Bay Pines, Florida, in the sum of $97.66, which amount was expended during the period from May 1933 to May 1934 (symbol XXXX). Fourth: H. R. Barraclough, former Disbursing Officer, Veterans’H. R. Barraclough. Administration, Boston, Massachusetts, in the sum of $47.63, which amount was expended during the period from May 1 to July 31, 1933 (symbol XXXX). Fifth: J. W. Reynar, former Disbursing Officer, Veterans’ Administration,J.
W. Reynar. Charlotte, North Carolina, in the sum of $13.80, which amount was expended during the period from May 1 to August 31, 1933 (symbol XXXX). Sixth: James H. Jones, former Disbursing Officer at Veterans’James H. Jones. Administration Facility, Cheyenne, Wyoming, in the sum of $1, which amount was expended during the period from August 1 to 31, 1934 (symbol XXXX). Seventh:Don Iler. Marsden V. Bates, former Disbursing Officer at Veterans’Marsden V. Bates. Administration, Detroit, Michigan, in the sum of $6.94, which amount was expended during the period from February 1 to 28, 1934 (symbol XXXX).
Eighth: E. J. Cooper, former Disbursing Officer at Veterans’E. J. Cooper. Administration Facility, Fort Harrison, Montana, in the sum of $8, which amount was expended during the period from October 1 to 31, 1933 (symbol XXXX). Ninth: T. A. Dillon, former Disbursing Officer at Veterans’ AdministrationT. A. Dillon. Facility, Indianapolis, Indiana, in the sum of $50.33, which amount was expended during the period from October 1, 1933, to May 31, 1934 (symbol XXXX). Tenth: James J.
Gallagher, former Disbursing Officer at Veterans’James J. Gallagher. Administration Facility, Lyons, New Jersey, in the sum of $72.71, which amount was expended during the period from April 1 to April 30, 1934 (symbol XXXX).53 Stat. 1454 Eleventh: Don Iler, former Disbursing Officer at Veterans’ Administration, New York, New York, in the sum of $18, which amount was expended during the period from May 1 to 31, 1933 (symbol XXXX). Twelfth:D. B. Kennedy. D. B. Kennedy, former Disbursing Officer at Veterans’ Administration Facility, Palo Alto, California, in the sum of $15, which amount was expended during the period from January 1 to March 31, 1934 (symbol XXXX).
Thirteenth:P. J. Carney. P. J. Carney, former Disbursing Officer at Veterans’ Administration, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, in the sum of $2.95, which amount was expended during the period from July 1, 1933, to July 31, 1934 (symbol XXXX). Fourteenth:J. William Yates, Jr. J. William Yates, Junior, former Disbursing Officer at Veterans’ Administration Facility, Tuscaloosa, Alabama, in the sum of $113, which amount was expended on May 9, 1929 (symbol XXXX). Fifteenth:A. G. Ferguson.
A. G. Ferguson, former Disbursing Officer at Veterans’ Administration Facility, Wadsworth, Kansas, in the sum of $134.90, which amount was expended during the period of July 1 to 31, 1933 (symbol XXXX). Sixteenth:G. F. Allen, Chief Disbursing Officer, Treasury Department. G. F. Allen, Chief Disbursing Officer, Treasury Department, in the sums of $30, $37.50, $539, $383.03, $286.39, and $384.71, which amounts were expended during the period from July 1, 1934, to March 31, 1937 (symbols and and for which certain employees in the Veterans’ Administration are held financially liable.
Approved, April 26, 1939. For the relief of Junius Alexander. 1939-05-02 108 Chapter 53 Stat. 1454 76 1 United States Government Publishing Office text/xml EN Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain. Digitization Vendor 2024-11-24 private [CHAPTER 108] AN ACT For the relief of Junius Alexander.May 2, 1939[[H. R. 2074](/us/bill/76/hr/2074)][
Connections4 cite this · traces to 2
Cited by 4 sections · top 2
statutes-at-large
Traces to 2 documents
Citation graph
cites case law
Cites 2Cited by 4 across 1 source