Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · STATUTES-AT-LARGE · Vol. 28 STAT. · February 8, 1895 · Chapter 59

Chapter 59. Providing for an additional circuit judge in the seventh judicial circuit, and for other purposes

186 words·~1 min read·/statutes-at-large/vol-28/chapter-59-2631548·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

CHAP. 59.— An Act Providing for an additional circuit judge in the seventh judicial circuit, and for other purposes.February 8, 1895. *Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled*,United States courts. That there shall be in the seventh judicial circuit an additional circuit judge, who shallAdditional judge, seventh judicial circuit. be appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, and shall possess the same qualifications and have the same power and jurisdiction now prescribed by law in respect to the present circuit judges therein.
Approved, February 8, 1895. Chapter 60: To authorize the city of Charlotte, North Carolina, to beautify and use as a public, park the United States mint property in said city, under rules and regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury. Chapter 60 28 Stat. 643 1895-02-08 United States Government Publishing Office text/xml EN Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain. Digitization Vendor 2026-02-15 53 3 public
Connections5 cite this · traces to 1
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.