Sec. 325. FIVE-YEAR REVIEWS OF CONTAINMENT TECHNOLOGIES RELATING TO RED HILL BULK FUEL STORAGE FACILITY
252 words·~1 min read·
/statute-compilations/comps-16736/sec-325A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.
## SEC. 325 FIVE-YEAR REVIEWS OF CONTAINMENT TECHNOLOGIES RELATING TO RED HILL BULK FUEL STORAGE FACILITY ###
(a)Reviews ####
(1)Reviews required At least once every 5 years, concurrently with the Department of the Navy’s Tank Upgrade Alternative
(TUA)decision review, the Secretary of the Navy shall conduct a review of available technologies relating to the containment of fuel to determine whether any such technology may be used to improve the containment of fuel with respect to storage tanks located at the Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility, Hawaii. ####
(2)Deadline for initial review The Secretary shall conduct the first review under paragraph
(1)concurrent with the first TUA decision review conducted after the date of the enactment of this Act. ###
(b)Briefings Not later than 60 days after the date on which a review conducted under subsection
(a)is completed, the Secretary shall provide to the congressional defense committees a briefing on— ####
(1)any technology identified in such review that the Secretary determines may be used to improve the containment of fuel with respect to storage tanks located at the Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility; and ####
(2)the feasibility and cost of implementing any such technology at the Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility. ###
(c)Termination The requirements to conduct reviews under subsection
(a)and provide briefings under subsection
(b)shall terminate on the date on which the Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility ceases operation, as determined by the Secretary of the Navy.