Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · STATUTE-COMPILATIONS · America’s Conservation Enhancement Act · Sec. 301

Sec. 301. STUDY TO REVIEW CONSERVATION FACTORS

489 words·~2 min read·/statute-compilations/comps-15833/sec-301

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

## SEC. 301 STUDY TO REVIEW CONSERVATION FACTORS ###
(a)Definition of Secretaries In this section, the term “Secretaries” means— ####
(1)the Secretary of Agriculture; ####
(2)the Secretary of Commerce, acting through the Assistant Administrator of the National Marine Fisheries Service; and ####
(3)the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service. ###
(b)Study To assess factors affecting successful conservation activities under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), the Secretaries shall carry out a study— ####
(1)#####
(A)to review any factors that threaten or endanger a species, such as wildlife disease, for which a listing under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) would not contribute to the conservation of the species; and #####
(B)to identify additional conservation measures that can be taken to protect and conserve a species described in subparagraph (A); ####
(2)to review any barriers to— #####
(A)the delivery of Federal, State, local, or private funds for such conservation activities, including statutory or regulatory impediments, staffing needs, and other relevant considerations; or #####
(B)the implementation of conservation agreements, plans, or other cooperative agreements, including agreements focused on voluntary activities, multispecies efforts, and other relevant considerations; ####
(3)to review factors that impact the ability of the Federal Government to successfully implement the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.); ####
(4)to develop recommendations regarding methods to address barriers identified under paragraph (2), if any; ####
(5)to review determinations under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) in which a species is determined to be recovered by the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, or the Secretary of Commerce, acting through the Assistant Administrator of the National Marine Fisheries Service, but remains listed under that Act, including— #####
(A)an explanation of the factors preventing a delisting or downlisting of the species; and #####
(B)recommendations regarding methods to address the factors described in subparagraph (A); and ####
(6)to review any determinations under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) in which a species has been identified as needing listing or uplisting under that Act but remains unlisted or listed as a threatened species, respectively, including— #####
(A)an explanation of the factors preventing a listing or uplisting of the species; and #####
(B)recommendations regarding methods to address the factors described in subparagraph (A). ###
(c)Report Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretaries shall submit to the Committees on Appropriations and Environment and Public Works of the Senate and the Committees on Appropriations and Natural Resources of the House of Representatives and make publicly available a report describing the results of the study under subsection (b).
Connectionstraces to 1
Citation graph
cites case law
Sec. 301
STUDY TO REVIEW CONSERVATION FACTORS
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.