Rules and Regulations.
671 words·~3 min read·
/register/2019/12/16/2019-27217·A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.
BILLING CODE 4510-27-P 84 241 Monday, December 16, 2019 Presidential Documents Part IV The President Executive Order 13899—Combating Anti-Semitism Title 3— The President Executive Order 13899 of December 11, 2019 Combating Anti-Semitism By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered as follows: **Section 1** . *Policy.* My Administration is committed to combating the rise of anti-Semitism and anti-Semitic incidents in the United States and around the world.
Anti-Semitic incidents have increased since 2013, and students, in particular, continue to face anti-Semitic harassment in schools and on university and college campuses. Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VI), 42 U.S.C. 2000d *et seq.,* prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, and national origin in programs and activities receiving Federal financial assistance. While Title VI does not cover discrimination based on religion, individuals who face discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin do not lose protection under Title VI for also being a member of a group that shares common religious practices.
Discrimination against Jews may give rise to a Title VI violation when the discrimination is based on an individual's race, color, or national origin. It shall be the policy of the executive branch to enforce Title VI against prohibited forms of discrimination rooted in anti-Semitism as vigorously as against all other forms of discrimination prohibited by Title VI. **Sec. 2** . *Ensuring Robust Enforcement of Title VI.*
(a)In enforcing Title VI, and identifying evidence of discrimination based on race, color, or national origin, all executive departments and agencies (agencies) charged with enforcing Title VI shall consider the following:
(i)the non-legally binding working definition of anti-Semitism adopted on May 26, 2016, by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA), which states, “Antisemitism is a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews. Rhetorical and physical manifestations of antisemitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or their property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious facilities”; and
(ii)the “Contemporary Examples of Anti-Semitism” identified by the IHRA, to the extent that any examples might be useful as evidence of discriminatory intent.
(b)In considering the materials described in subsections (a)(i) and (a)(ii) of this section, agencies shall not diminish or infringe upon any right protected under Federal law or under the First Amendment. As with all other Title VI complaints, the inquiry into whether a particular act constitutes discrimination prohibited by Title VI will require a detailed analysis of the allegations. **Sec. 3** . *Additional Authorities Prohibiting Anti-Semitic Discrimination.* Within 120 days of the date of this order, the head of each agency charged with enforcing Title VI shall submit a report to the President, through the Assistant to the President for Domestic Policy, identifying additional nondiscrimination authorities within its enforcement authority with respect to which the IHRA definition of anti-Semitism could be considered. **Sec. 4** . *Rule of Construction.* Nothing in this order shall be construed to alter the evidentiary requirements pursuant to which an agency makes a determination that conduct, including harassment, amounts to actionable discrimination, or to diminish or infringe upon the rights protected under any other provision of law. **Sec. 5** . *General Provisions.*
(a)Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:
(i)the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or
(ii)the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.
(b)This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.
(c)This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person. Trump.EPS THE WHITE HOUSE, December 11, 2019. [FR Doc. 2019-27217 Filed 12-13-19; 11:15 am]
Connections16 cite this · traces to 2
Cited by 16 sections · top 11
Citation graph
cites case law
Cites 2Cited by 16 across 2 sources