Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2014-06-05 · Department of State · Notices

Notices. Final rule

1,131 words·~5 min read·/register/2014/06/05/2014-13091

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 4160-01-P DEPARTMENT OF STATE 22 CFR Part 42 [Public Notice: 8755] RIN 1400-AD52 Visas: Documentation of Immigrants Under the Immigration and Nationality Act, as Amended AGENCY: Department of State. ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Violence Against Women and Department of Justice Reauthorization Act of 2005, the Department of State amends the immigrant visa classification table listed in the Department's regulations to add a symbol for an immigrant visa issued to to an alien who: is the parent of a current U.S.citizen, or the parent of a former U.S. citizen who, within the two-year period prior to filing the petition, lost or renounced U.S. citizenship status related to an incident of domestic violence or died; is a person of good moral character; is eligible to be classified as an immediate relative under the Immigration and Nationality Act; resides, or has resided, with the U.S. citizen daughter or son; demonstrates that he or she has been battered or subject to extreme cruelty by the U.S. citizen daughter or son; and has an approved petition from the Department of Homeland Security.
DATES: This rule becomes effective June 5, 2014. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Taylor W. Beaumont, Department of State, Bureau of Consular Affairs, Office of Visa Services, Legal Affairs, Division of Legislation and Regulations, 600 19th Street NW., Washington, DC 20431, email ( *BeaumontTW@state.gov* ). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 816 of the Violence Against Women and Department of Justice Reauthorization Act of 2005, Title VIII of Public Law 109-162, codified at 8 U.S.C. 1154(a)(1)(A)(vii), created an immigrant visa classification for the parents of U.S. citizens, and the parents of former U.S. citizens who, within the past two years, have lost or renounced U.S. citizenship status related to an incident of domestic violence or died.
The Department currently identifies applicants for this status using the “IB5” symbol, an existing symbol used for parents of U.S. citizens who are at least 21 years old. The unique IB5 classification symbol will facilitate the Department's ability to identify applicants for such status in various immigrant visa information databases. Regulatory Findings A. Administrative Procedure Act Since this rule concerns the administration of visas, which is a foreign affairs function of the United States, the Department publishes this rule as a final rule pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(a)(1).
In addition, since this rule implements the provisions of the Violence Against Women and Department of Justice Reauthorization Act of 2005, the Department finds that notice and public comment on this rule are unnecessary, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B). Accordingly, this rule is effective immediately. B. Regulatory Flexibility Act/Executive Order 13272: Small Business Because this rule is exempt from notice and comment rulemaking under 5 U.S.C. 553, it is exempt from the regulatory flexibility analysis requirements set forth at sections 603 and 604 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 603 and 604).
Nonetheless, consistent with section 605(b) of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 605(b)), the Department has reviewed this regulation and certifies that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. C. The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995, Public Law 104-4, 109 Stat. 48, 2 U.S.C. 1532, generally requires agencies to prepare a statement before proposing any rule that may result in an annual expenditure of $100 million or more by State, local, or tribal governments, or by the private sector.
This rule will not result in any such expenditure, nor will it significantly or uniquely affect small governments. D. The Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 This rule is not a major rule as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804, for purposes of congressional review of agency rulemaking under the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, Public Law 104-121. This rule would not result in an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more; a major increase in costs or prices; or significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or on the ability of United States-based companies to compete with foreign-based companies in domestic and export markets.
E. Executive Order 12866 The Department does not consider this rule to be a “significant regulatory action” within the scope of section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866. Nonetheless, the Department has reviewed the rule to ensure its consistency with the regulatory philosophy and principles set forth in the Executive Order. F. Executive Order 13563 The Department of State has considered this rule in light of Executive Order 13563 and affirms that this regulation is consistent with the guidance therein.
G. Executive Orders 12372 and 13132: Federalism This regulation will not have substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between the national government and the states, or the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. Nor will the rule have federalism implications warranting the application of Executive Orders 12372 and 13132. H. Executive Order 12988: Civil Justice Reform The Department has reviewed the regulations in light of sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988 to eliminate ambiguity, minimize litigation, establish clear legal standards, and reduce burden.
I. Executive Order 13175 The Department of State has determined that this rulemaking will not have tribal implications, will not impose substantial direct compliance costs on Indian tribal governments, and will not pre-empt tribal law. Accordingly, the requirements of Executive Order 13175 do not apply to this rulemaking. J. Paperwork Reduction Act This rule does not impose information collection requirements under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C., Chapter 35.
List of Subjects in 22 CFR Part 42 Aliens, Foreign officials, Immigration, Passports and visas. 22 CFR Part 42 is amended as follows: PART 42—VISAS: DOCUMENTATION OF IMMIGRANTS UNDER THE IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY ACT, AS AMENDED 1. The authority citation for part 42 is amended to read as follows: Authority: 8 U.S.C. 1104 and 1182; Pub. L. 105-277; Pub. L. 108-449; 112 Stat. 2681-795 through 2681-801; The Convention on Protection of Children and Co-operation in Respect of Intercountry Adoption (done at the Hague, May 29, 1993), S.
Treaty Doc. 105-51 (1998), 1870 U.N.T.S. 167 (Reg. No. 31922 (1993)); 42 U.S.C. 14901-14954, Pub. L. 106-279; Pub. L. 111-287; 8 U.S.C. 1101, 124 Stat. 3058; 8 U.S.C. 1154, Pub. Law 109-162. 2. Section 42.11 is amended by adding an entry for “IB5” after “IB3” under “Immediate Relatives” in the “Immigrants” table to read as follows: § 42.11 Classification symbols. Immigrants Symbol Class Section of law Immediate Relatives * * * * * * * IB5 Self-petition Parent of U.S. Citizen 204(a)(1)(A)(vii) * * * * * * * Dated:
May 12, 2014. Michele T. Bond, Acting Assistant Secretary for Consular Affairs, Department of State. [FR Doc. 2014-13091 Filed 6-4-14; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 14
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.