Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · U.S. Code · Title 5 - GOVERNMENT ORGANIZATION AND EMPLOYEES · CHAPTER 6— THE ANALYSIS OF REGULATORY FUNCTIONS · § 603

§ 603. Initial regulatory flexibility analysis

896 words·~4 min read·/usc/title-5/section-603

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

(a)Whenever an agency is required by section 553 of this title, or any other law, to publish general notice of proposed rulemaking for any proposed rule, or publishes a notice of proposed rulemaking for an interpretative rule involving the internal revenue laws of the United States, the agency shall prepare and make available for public comment an initial regulatory flexibility analysis. Such analysis shall describe the impact of the proposed rule on small entities. The initial regulatory flexibility analysis or a summary shall be published in the Federal Register at the time of the publication of general notice of proposed rulemaking for the rule. The agency shall transmit a copy of the initial regulatory flexibility analysis to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration. In the case of an interpretative rule involving the internal revenue laws of the United States, this chapter applies to interpretative rules published in the Federal Register for codification in the Code of Federal Regulations, but only to the extent that such interpretative rules impose on small entities a collection of information requirement.
(b)Each initial regulatory flexibility analysis required under this section shall contain—
(1)a description of the reasons why action by the agency is being considered;
(2)a succinct statement of the objectives of, and legal basis for, the proposed rule;
(3)a description of and, where feasible, an estimate of the number of small entities to which the proposed rule will apply;
(4)a description of the projected reporting, recordkeeping and other compliance requirements of the proposed rule, including an estimate of the classes of small entities which will be subject to the requirement and the type of professional skills necessary for preparation of the report or record;
(5)an identification, to the extent practicable, of all relevant Federal rules which may duplicate, overlap or conflict with the proposed rule.
(c)Each initial regulatory flexibility analysis shall also contain a description of any significant alternatives to the proposed rule which accomplish the stated objectives of applicable statutes and which minimize any significant economic impact of the proposed rule on small entities. Consistent with the stated objectives of applicable statutes, the analysis shall discuss significant alternatives such as—
(1)the establishment of differing compliance or reporting requirements or timetables that take into account the resources available to small entities;
(2)the clarification, consolidation, or simplification of compliance and reporting requirements under the rule for such small entities;
(3)the use of performance rather than design standards; and
(4)an exemption from coverage of the rule, or any part thereof, for such small entities.
(1)For a covered agency, as defined in section 609(d)(2), each initial regulatory flexibility analysis shall include a description of—
(A)any projected increase in the cost of credit for small entities;
(B)any significant alternatives to the proposed rule which accomplish the stated objectives of applicable statutes and which minimize any increase in the cost of credit for small entities; and
(C)advice and recommendations of representatives of small entities relating to issues described in subparagraphs
(A)and
(B)and subsection (b).
(2)A covered agency, as defined in section 609(d)(2), shall, for purposes of complying with paragraph (1)(C)—
(A)identify representatives of small entities in consultation with the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration; and
(B)collect advice and recommendations from the representatives identified under subparagraph
(A)relating to issues described in subparagraphs
(A)and
(B)of paragraph
(1)and subsection (b).
(Added Pub. L. 96–354, § 3(a), Sept. 19, 1980, 94 Stat. 1166; amended Pub. L. 104–121, title II, § 241(a)(1), Mar. 29, 1996, 110 Stat. 864; Pub. L. 111–203, title X, § 1100G(b), July 21, 2010, 124 Stat. 2112.)
Connections6,390 cite this · traces to 3
Cited by 6,390 sections · top 60
register
13 references not yet in our index
  • Pub. L. 96–354, § 3(a)
  • 94 Stat. 1166
  • Pub. L. 104–121, title II, § 241(a)(1)
  • 110 Stat. 864
  • Pub. L. 111–203, title X, § 1100G(b)
  • 124 Stat. 2112
  • Pub. L. 111–203
  • Pub. L. 104–121, § 241(a)(1)(B)
  • Pub. L. 104–121, § 241(a)(1)(A)
  • section 1100H of Pub. L. 111–203
  • Pub. L. 104–121
  • section 245 of Pub. L. 104–121
  • section 4 of Pub. L. 96–354
Citation graph
cites case law
§ 603
Initial regulatory flexibility analysis
Fed. Reg.×6,385
U.S.C.×4
Stat.×1
Pub. L.Pub. L. 96–354, § 3(a)
Stat.94 Stat. 1166
Pub. L.Pub. L. 104–121, title II, § 241(a)(1)
Stat.110 Stat. 864
Pub. L.Pub. L. 111–203, title X, § 1100G(b)
Cites 16 · showing 8Cited by 6,390 across 3 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.