Proposed Rules. Proposed rule

Agency: Department of Defense (DoD), General Services Administration (GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)
Action: Proposed rule
Citation: FR Doc. 2012-16709 · RIN 9000-AM27 · FAR Case 2012-018; Docket 2012-0018, Sequence 1 · 48 CFR 15

Summary

DoD, GSA, and NASA are proposing to amend the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to clarify the use of a price analysis technique in order to establish a fair and reasonable price.

Dates

Interested parties should submit written comments to the Regulatory Secretariat at one of the addressees shown below on or before September 10, 2012 to be considered in the formation of the final rule.

Supplementary Information

I. Background FAR 15.404-1(b)(2) addresses various price analysis techniques and procedures the Government may use to ensure a fair and reasonable price. FAR 15.404-1(b)(2)(i) discusses the comparison of proposed prices received in response to a solicitation as an example of such techniques and procedures. In this discussion, FAR 15.404-1(b)(2)(i) references 15.403-1(c)(1), which sets forth the requirements of adequate price competition. However, only 15.403-1(c)(1)(i) actually addresses the situation when two or more responsible offerors, competing independently, submit priced offers that satisfy the Government's expressed requirement. Therefore, the reference in 15.404-1(b)(2)(i) is more appropriately identified as 15.403-1(c)(1)(i). II. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 (E.O.s) direct agencies to assess all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility. This is not a significant regulatory action and, therefore, was not subject to review under Section 6(b) of E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, dated September 30, 1993. This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804. III. Regulatory Flexibility Act DoD, GSA, and NASA do not expect this proposed rule to have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities within the meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq., because this rule merely clarifies the reference at FAR 15.404-1(b)(2)(i) for the use of the price analysis technique at 15.403-1(c)(1)(i) in order to establish a fair and reasonable price. However, an initial regulatory flexibility analysis (IRFA) has been prepared consistent with 5 U.S.C. 603, and is summarized as follows: This rule amends the FAR at 15.404-1(b)(2)(i) to clarify the use of the price analysis technique at 15.403-1(c)(1)(i) in order to establish a fair and reasonable price. FAR 15.404-1(b)(2) addresses various price analysis techniques and procedures the Government may use to ensure a fair and reasonable price. FAR 15.404-1(b)(2)(i) discusses the comparison of proposed prices received in response to a solicitation as an example of such techniques and procedures. In this discussion, FAR 15.404-1(b)(2)(i) references 15.403-1(c)(1), which sets forth the requirements of adequate price competition. However, only FAR 15.403-1(c)(1)(i) actually addresses the situation when two or more responsible offerors, competing independently, submit priced offers that satisfy the Government's expressed requirement. Therefore, the reference in 15.404-1(b)(2)(i) is more appropriately identified as 15.403-1(c)(1)(i). The proposed rule imposes no reporting, recordkeeping, or other information collection requirements. The rule does not duplicate, overlap, or conflict with any other Federal rules, and there are no known significant alternatives to the rule. The Regulatory Secretariat has submitted a copy of the IRFA to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration. A copy of the IRFA may be obtained from the Regulatory Secretariat. DoD, GSA, and NASA invite comments from small business concerns and other interested parties on the expected impact. DoD, GSA, and NASA will also consider comments from small entities concerning the existing regulations in subparts affected by this proposed rule in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 610. Interested parties must submit such comments separately and should cite 5 U.S.C. 610 (FAR case 2012-018), in correspondence. IV. Paperwork Reduction Act The proposed rule does not contain any information collection requirements that require the approval of the Office of Management and Budget under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35). List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 15 Government procurement. Dated: July 3, 2012. Laura Auletta, Director, Office of Governmentwide Acquisition Policy, Office of Acquisition Policy, Office of Governmentwide Policy. Therefore, DoD, GSA, and NASA propose amending 48 CFR part 15 as set forth below: PART 15—CONTRACTING BY NEGOTIATION 1. The authority citation for 48 CFR part 15 continues to read as follows: Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C. chapter 137; and 42 U.S.C. 2473(c). 15.404-1 [Amended] 2. Amend section 15.404-1 by removing from paragraph (b)(2)(i) “15.403-1(c)(1)” and adding “15.403-1(c)(1)(i)” in its place. [FR Doc. 2012-16709 Filed 7-9-12; 8:45 am]