Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2012-02-28 · Surface Transportation Board · Notices

Notices. Institution of declaratory order proceeding

511 words·~2 min read·/register/2012/02/28/2012-4682

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 4915-01-P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Surface Transportation Board [Docket No. FD 35496] Denver & Rio Grande Railway Historical Foundation d/b/a Denver & Rio Grande Railroad, L.L.C.—Petition for Declaratory Order AGENCY: Surface Transportation Board. ACTION: Institution of declaratory order proceeding. SUMMARY: In response to a petition filed by the Denver & Rio Grande Railway Historical Foundation, Inc. (DRGHF) on July 12, 2011, the Board is instituting a declaratory order proceeding under 49 U.S.C. 721 and 5 U.S.C. 554(e).
DRGHF requests that the Board issue an order declaring that municipal zoning law is preempted with respect to DRGHF's activities on a parcel of land leased by DRGHF in Monte Vista, Colo. DATES: DRGHF's opening evidence is due by March 26, 2012. Replies are due by April 26, 2012. DRGHF's rebuttal is due by May 11, 2012. ADDRESSES: Any filing submitted in this proceeding must be submitted either via the Board's e-filing format or in the traditional paper format. Any person using e-filing should attach a document and otherwise comply with the instructions at the E-FILING link on the Board's Web site, at *http://www.stb.dot.gov.* Any person submitting a filing in the traditional paper format should send an original and 10 copies (and also an electronic version), referring to Docket No.
FD 35496, to: Surface Transportation Board, 395 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, 1 copy of each filing in this proceeding must be sent to each of the following:
(1)Donald H. Shank, Denver & Rio Grande Railway Historical Foundation, 20 North Broadway Street, Monte Vista, CO 81144-2401;
(2)Eugene L. Farish, City Attorney, P.O. Box 430, Monte Vista, CO 81144 (representing the City of Monte Vista); and
(3)John D. Heffner, Strasburger & Price, 1700 K Street NW., Suite 640, Washington, DC 20006 (representing the San Luis & Rio Grande Railroad). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julia Farr,
(202)245-0359. [Assistance for the hearing impaired is available through the Federal Information Relay Service
(FIRS)at: 1-800-877-8339.] Copies of written comments will be available for viewing and self-copying at the Board's Public Docket Room, Room 131, and will be posted to the Board's Web site. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: DRGHF's petition requests an order declaring that its activities on a parcel of land in Monte Vista, CO, fall under the Board's jurisdiction, preempting municipal zoning regulation of those activities. DRGHF states that it uses this parcel as a railcar rehabilitation and restoration facility. This petition raises questions regarding the Board's jurisdiction under 49 U.S.C. 10501(a) and preemption under 49 U.S.C. 10501(b). Under 5 U.S.C. 554(e), the Board has discretionary authority to issue a declaratory order to terminate a controversy or remove uncertainty. The issues raised by DRGHF merit further consideration, and a declaratory order proceeding is thus instituted here. For further information, please see the Board's decision served on February 23, 2012 in Docket No. FD 35496. Board decisions and notices are available on our Web site at *www.stb.dot.gov.* Decided: February 22, 2012. By the Board, Rachel D. Campbell, Director, Office of Proceedings. Jeffrey Herzig, Clearance Clerk. [FR Doc. 2012-4682 Filed 2-27-12; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 2
1 reference not yet in our index
  • 49 USC 721
Citation graph
cites case law
Notices
Institution of declaratory order proceeding
Cite49 USC 721
Cites 3Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.