Notices. Notice

55,617 words·~253 min read·/register/2008/04/24/08-1188

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P DEPARTMENT OF STATE [Public Notice 6196] Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs

(ECA)Request for Grant Proposals: Timor Leste and South Pacific Scholarship Programs *Announcement Type:* New Cooperative Agreement(s). *Funding Opportunity Number:* ECA/A/E/EAP-08-01. *Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number:* 00.000. *Application Deadline:* May 28, 2008. *Executive Summary:* The Office of Academic Programs of the Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs announces an open competition to administer the United States-Timor Leste

(USTL)Scholarship Program and the United States-South Pacific

(USSP)Scholarship Program. Eligible applicants may submit a proposal to administer one or both of the scholarship programs. Public and private non-profit organizations meeting the provisions described in Internal Revenue Code section 26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3) may submit proposals to organize and carry out academic exchange program activities for students from Timor Leste and/or the sovereign island nations of the South Pacific (eligible nations are listed below in the Overview section). The recipient(s) will be responsible for all aspects of the programs, including publicity and recruitment of applicants; merit-based competitive selection; placement of students at an accredited U.S. academic institution; student travel to the U.S.; orientation; up to 4 years of U.S. degree study at the bachelor's or 2 years at the master's level; enrichment programming; advising, monitoring and support; pre-return activities; evaluation; and follow-up with program alumni. The duration of the award(s) will be up to 5 years, beginning in late summer 2008. The Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2008 (Div. J, P.L. 110-161) provides $496,000 to support the USTL Scholarship Program and $496,000 to support the USSP Scholarship Program, which reflects the impact of the FY-2008 rescission which has been applied to all programs. I. Funding Opportunity Description *Authority:* Overall grant making authority for this program is contained in the Mutual Educational and Cultural Exchange Act of 1961, Public Law 87-256, as amended, also known as the Fulbright-Hays Act. The purpose of the Act is “to enable the Government of the United States to increase mutual understanding between the people of the United States and the people of other countries; to strengthen the ties which unite us with other nations by demonstrating the educational and cultural interests, developments, and achievements of the people of the United States and other nations * * * and thus to assist in the development of friendly, sympathetic and peaceful relations between the United States and the other countries of the world.” The funding authority for the program above is provided through legislation. *Purpose:* In response to Public Law 103-236, which directed the Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs

(ECA)to provide scholarships to students from Timor Leste and from the sovereign island nations of the South Pacific region, ECA created the USTL Scholarship Program and the USSP Scholarship Program for academic study at accredited colleges and universities in the United States. *United States—Timor Leste Scholarship Program Overview:* The goal of the USTL Scholarship Program is to support undergraduate level study at accredited higher education institutions in the United States for a select cadre of academically talented Timorese who are expected to assume future leadership roles in Timor Leste's development. As Timor Leste makes the transition to independence and democratic government, it is essential to develop the human resource capacity of the Timorese people, especially in fields such as agriculture, business, communications, computer science, economics, education, environmental science, international relations, political science, psychology and urban planning. The eligible academic fields of study were selected to emphasize the areas of critical development need in Timor Leste. USTL scholarships are typically offered for four years total including up to one year of English language and pre-academic training followed by up to three years for the completion of the undergraduate degree in designated fields. In some cases, USTL students will have undergraduate credits for transfer from their home institutions to their U.S. institutions. *United States—South Pacific Scholarship Program Overview:* The USSP Scholarship Program was established by the United States Congress to provide opportunities for U.S. study to students from South Pacific nations in fields important for the region's future development. Public Law 103-236 authorized academic scholarships to qualified students from the sovereign island nations of the South Pacific region to pursue undergraduate and graduate study at institutions of higher education in the United States. This program supports increased mutual understanding between the people of the U.S. and those of the South Pacific Islands. Students from the following nations are eligible to apply for these scholarships: Cook Islands, Fiji, Kiribati, Nauru, Niue, Papua New Guinea, Samoa, Solomon Islands, Tonga, Tuvalu, and Vanuatu. Fields of study under the program are based on recommendations from Department of State regional bureau representatives, ECA and the Public Affairs Section

(PAS)at the U.S. embassy, and have included agriculture, business, computer science, education, environmental studies, journalism, political science, public administration, urban planning and other fields. The recipient organization should arrange for the students' enrollment at accredited U.S. institutions of higher education where a full liberal arts curriculum (including social sciences, humanities and sciences) is available. Students selected for these scholarships enroll in 4-year undergraduate degree programs, or in master's degree programs. The latter have generally involved 1 year of preparatory U.S. study followed by up to 2 years of formal master's degree study. The requirements for administration of these programs are outlined in further detail in this document and in the Program Objectives, Goals and Implementation

(POGI)document. The proposal should respond to each item in the POGI. In a cooperative agreement, the Bureau is substantially involved in program activities above and beyond routine grant monitoring. Bureau activities and responsibilities for this program include:

(1)Participation in the design and direction of program activities;

(2)Approval of key personnel;

(3)Approval and input on program timelines and agendas;

(4)Guidance in execution of all program components;

(5)Review and approval of all program publicity and recruitment materials;

(6)Participation in student interview and selection panels;

(7)Review of selection decisions prior to offer of award;

(8)Consultation on and approval of academic placement assignments;

(9)Approval of changes to students' proposed academic field or institution;

(10)Approval of decisions related to special circumstances or problems throughout duration of program;

(11)Assistance with SEVIS-related issues;

(12)Assistance with participant emergencies;

(13)Liaison with relevant U.S. Embassies and country desk officers at the State Department. II. Award Information *Type of Award:* Cooperative Agreement ECA's level of involvement in this program is listed under number I above. *Fiscal Year Funds:* 2008 *Approximate Total Funding:* $992,000 *Approximate Number of Awards:* 1-2 *Anticipated Project Start Date:* late summer 2008 *Anticipated Project Completion Date:* August 2013 *Additional Information:* Pending successful implementation of this program and the availability of funds in subsequent fiscal years, it is the Bureau's intent to renew the Cooperative Agreement(s) for two additional fiscal years, before openly competing it again. III. Eligibility Information *III.1 Eligible applicants:* Applications may be submitted by public and private non-profit organizations meeting the provisions described in Internal Revenue Code section 26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3). *III.2 Cost Sharing or Matching Funds:* There is no minimum or maximum percentage required for this competition. However, the Bureau encourages applicants to provide maximum levels of cost sharing and funding in support of its programs. When cost sharing is offered, it is understood and agreed that the applicant must provide the amount of cost sharing as stipulated in its proposal and later included in an approved grant agreement. Cost sharing may be in the form of allowable direct or indirect costs. For accountability, the recipient must maintain written records to support all costs which are claimed as your contribution, as well as costs to be paid by the Federal government. Such records are subject to audit. The basis for determining the value of cash and in-kind contributions must be in accordance with OMB Circular A-110 (Revised), Subpart C.23—Cost Sharing and Matching. In the event you do not provide the minimum amount of cost sharing as stipulated in the approved budget, ECA's contribution will be reduced in like proportion. *III.3 Other Eligibility Requirements:* Bureau grant guidelines require that organizations with less than four years experience in conducting international exchanges be limited to $60,000 in Bureau funding. ECA anticipates making one award in an amount up to $992,000, or two awards of up to $496,000 each, to support program and administrative costs required to implement the exchange program(s). Therefore, organizations with less than four years experience in conducting international exchanges are ineligible to apply under this competition. The Bureau encourages applicants to provide maximum levels of cost sharing and funding in support of its programs. IV. Application and Submission Information Note: Please read the complete **Federal Register** announcement before sending inquiries or submitting proposals. Once the RFGP deadline has passed, Bureau staff may not discuss this competition with applicants until the proposal review process has been completed. *IV.1 Contact Information to Request an Application Package:* Please contact the East Asia and Pacific Programs Branch, ECA/A/E/EAP, Room 208, U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20547, phone:

(202)453-8102, fax:

(202)453-8107, e-mail: *augustinevr@state.gov* to request a Solicitation Package. Please refer to the Funding Opportunity Number *ECA/A/E/EAP-08-01* located at the top of this announcement when making your request. The Solicitation Package contains the Proposal Submission Instruction

(PSI)document, which consists of required application forms, and standard guidelines for proposal preparation. It also contains the Project Objectives, Goals and Implementation

(POGI)document, which provides specific information, award criteria and budget instructions tailored to this competition. *IV.2 To Download a Solicitation Package Via Internet:* The entire Solicitation Package may be downloaded from the Bureau's Web site at *http://exchanges.state.gov/education/rfgps/menu.htm.* Please read all information before downloading. *IV.3 Content and Form of Submission:* Applicants must follow all instructions in the Solicitation Package. The original and *10* copies of the application should be sent per the instructions under IV.3f. “Application Deadline and Methods of Submission” section below. IV.3a You are required to have a Dun and Bradstreet Data Universal Numbering System

(DUNS)number to apply for a grant or cooperative agreement from the U.S. Government. This number is a nine-digit identification number, which uniquely identifies business entities. Obtaining a DUNS number is easy and there is no charge. To obtain a DUNS number, access *http://www.dunandbradstreet.com* or call 1-866-705-5711. Please ensure that your DUNS number is included in the appropriate box of the SF-424 which is part of the formal application package. IV.3b All proposals must contain an executive summary, proposal narrative and budget. Please refer to the Solicitation Package. It contains the mandatory Proposal Submission Instructions

(PSI)document and the Project Objectives, Goals and Implementation

(POGI)document for additional formatting and technical requirements. IV.3c You must have nonprofit status with the IRS at the time of application. Please note: Effective March 14, 2008, all applicants for ECA federal assistance awards must include with their application, a copy of page 5, Part V-A, “Current Officers, Directors, Trustees, and Key Employees” of their most recent Internal Revenue Service

(J)programs is available at *http://exchanges.state.gov* or from: United States Department of State, Office of Exchange Coordination and Designation, ECA/EC/ECD-SA-44, Room 734, 301 4th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20547, Telephone:

(202)203-5029, FAX:

(202)453-8640. Please refer to Solicitation Package for further information. IV.3d.2 Diversity, Freedom and Democracy Guidelines Pursuant to the Bureau's authorizing legislation, programs must maintain a non-political character and should be balanced and representative of the diversity of American political, social, and cultural life. “Diversity” should be interpreted in the broadest sense and encompass differences including, but not limited to ethnicity, race, gender, religion, geographic location, socio-economic status, and disabilities. Applicants are strongly encouraged to adhere to the advancement of this principle both in program administration and in program content. Please refer to the review criteria under the `Support for Diversity' section for specific suggestions on incorporating diversity into your proposal. Public Law 104-319 provides that “in carrying out programs of educational and cultural exchange in countries whose people do not fully enjoy freedom and democracy,” the Bureau “shall take appropriate steps to provide opportunities for participation in such programs to human rights and democracy leaders of such countries.” Public Law 106-113 requires that the governments of the countries described above do not have inappropriate influence in the selection process. Proposals should reflect advancement of these goals in their program contents, to the full extent deemed feasible. IV.3d.3 Program Monitoring and Evaluation Proposals must include a plan to monitor and evaluate the project's success, both as the activities unfold and at the end of the program. The Bureau recommends that your proposal include a draft survey questionnaire or other technique plus a description of a methodology to use to link outcomes to original project objectives. The Bureau expects that the recipient will track participants or partners and be able to respond to key evaluation questions, including satisfaction with the program, learning as a result of the program, changes in behavior as a result of the program, and effects of the program on institutions (institutions in which participants work or partner institutions). The evaluation plan should include indicators that measure gains in mutual understanding as well as substantive knowledge. Successful monitoring and evaluation depend heavily on setting clear goals and outcomes at the outset of a program. Your evaluation plan should include a description of your project's objectives, your anticipated project outcomes, and how and when you intend to measure these outcomes (performance indicators). The more that outcomes are “smart” (specific, measurable, attainable, results-oriented, and placed in a reasonable time frame), the easier it will be to conduct the evaluation. You should also show how your project objectives link to the goals of the program described in this RFGP. Your monitoring and evaluation plan should clearly distinguish between program *outputs* and *outcomes.* *Outputs* are products and services delivered, often stated as an amount. Output information is important to show the scope or size of project activities, but it cannot substitute for information about progress towards outcomes or the results achieved. Examples of outputs include the number of people trained or the number of seminars conducted. *Outcomes,* in contrast, represent specific results a project is intended to achieve and is usually measured as an extent of change. Findings on outputs and outcomes should both be reported, but the focus should be on outcomes. We encourage you to assess the following four levels of outcomes, as they relate to the program goals set out in the RFGP (listed here in increasing order of importance): 1. Participant satisfaction with the program and exchange experience. 2. Participant learning, such as increased knowledge, aptitude, skills, and changed understanding and attitude. Learning includes both substantive (subject-specific) learning and mutual understanding. 3. Participant behavior, concrete actions to apply knowledge in work or community; greater participation and responsibility in civic organizations; interpretation and explanation of experiences and new knowledge gained; continued contacts between participants, community members, and others. 4. *Institutional changes,* such as increased collaboration and partnerships, policy reforms, new programming, and organizational improvements. Please note: Consideration should be given to the appropriate timing of data collection for each level of outcome. For example, satisfaction is usually captured as a short-term outcome, whereas behavior and institutional changes are normally considered longer-term outcomes. Overall, the quality of your monitoring and evaluation plan will be judged on how well it:

(1)Specifies intended outcomes;

(2)gives clear descriptions of how each outcome will be measured;

(3)identifies when particular outcomes will be measured; and

(4)provides a clear description of the data collection strategies for each outcome (i.e., surveys, interviews, or focus groups). (Please note that evaluation plans that deal only with the first level of outcomes [satisfaction] will be deemed less competitive under the present evaluation criteria.) Recipients will be required to provide reports analyzing their evaluation findings to the Bureau in their regular program reports. All data collected, including survey responses and contact information, must be maintained for a minimum of 3 years and provided to the Bureau upon request. IV.3d.4. Describe your plans for: Sustainability, overall program management, staffing, coordination with ECA and PAS or any other requirements. IV.3e. Please take the following information into consideration when preparing your budget: IV.3e.1. Applicants must submit a comprehensive budget for the entire program. In addition, the proposal must include a comprehensive budget narrative demonstrating how costs were derived. The budget format should break out costs on a year-by-year basis. If applying to administer both the USTL and USSP programs, the applicant's budget proposal should include a budget summary page that breaks out program and administrative costs. The total amount of funding requested from ECA may not exceed $992,000 if applying to administer both the USTL and USSP programs; or $496,000 if applying to administer one of the two programs. At this level of funding, applicants are encouraged to budget for at least ten

(10)students for degree study, i.e., at least five

(5)each under the USTL and USSP programs. The number of participants that the organization proposes to sponsor should be clearly stated. ECA reserves the right to reduce, revise or increase the proposed budget in accordance with funding availability and the needs of the program. There must be a summary budget as well as breakdowns reflecting both administrative and program budgets. IV.3e.2. Allowable costs for the program include the following:

(1)Publicity, recruitment, selection, placement and communication with applicants and participants.

(2)Travel for student participants between home and program location.

(3)Tuition and fees, stipends for living costs, book allowances, and other necessary maintenance costs and expenses for the students.

(4)Advising and monitoring of students.

(5)Academic and cultural support and enrichment activities.

(6)Pre-return activities and evaluation.

(7)Staff and administrative expenses to carry out the program activities. Administrative and overhead costs should be as low as possible. Please refer to the Solicitation Package for complete budget guidelines and formatting instructions. IV.3f. Application Deadline and Methods of Submission: *Application Deadline Date:* May 28, 2008. *Reference Number:* ECA/A/E/EAP-08-01. *Methods of Submission:* Applications may be submitted in one of two ways:

(1)In hard-copy, via a nationally recognized overnight delivery service (i.e., DHL, Federal Express, UPS, Airborne Express, or U.S. Postal Service Express Overnight Mail, etc.), or

(2)Electronically through *http://www.grants.gov.* Along with the Project Title, all applicants must enter the above Reference Number in Box 11 on the SF-424 contained in the mandatory Proposal Submission Instructions

(PSI)of the solicitation document. IV.3f.1—Submitting Printed Applications Applications must be shipped no later than the above deadline. Delivery services used by applicants must have in-place, centralized shipping identification and tracking systems that may be accessed via the Internet and delivery people who are identifiable by commonly recognized uniforms and delivery vehicles. Proposals shipped on or before the above deadline but received at ECA more than 7 days after the deadline will be ineligible for further consideration under this competition. Proposals shipped after the established deadlines are ineligible for consideration under this competition. ECA will *not* notify you upon receipt of application. It is each applicant's responsibility to ensure that each package is marked with a legible tracking number and to monitor/confirm delivery to ECA via the Internet. Delivery of proposal packages *may not* be made via local courier service or in person for this competition. Faxed documents will not be accepted at any time. Only proposals submitted as stated above will be considered. Important note: When preparing your submission please make sure to include one extra copy of the completed SF-424 form and place it in an envelope addressed to “ECA/EX/PM”. The original and 10 copies of the application should be sent to: U.S. Department of State, SA-44, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Ref.: ECA/A/E/EAP-08-01, Program Management, ECA/EX/PM, Room 534, 301 4th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20547. IV.3f.2—Submitting Electronic Applications Applicants have the option of submitting proposals electronically through Grants.gov ( *http://www.grants.gov* ). Complete solicitation packages are available at Grants.gov in the “Find” portion of the system. Please follow the instructions available in the ‘Get Started’ portion of the site ( *http://www.grants.gov/GetStarted* ). Several of the steps in the Grants.gov registration process could take several weeks. Therefore, applicants should check with appropriate staff within their organizations immediately after reviewing this RFGP to confirm or determine their registration status with Grants.gov. Once registered, the amount of time it can take to upload an application will vary depending on a variety of factors including the size of the application and the speed of your Internet connection. Therefore, we strongly recommend that you not wait until the application deadline to begin the submission process through Grants.gov. Direct all questions regarding Grants.gov registration and submission to: Grants.gov Customer Support. Contact Center Phone: 800-518-4726. Business Hours: Monday-Friday, 7 a.m.-9 p.m. Eastern Time. E-mail: *support@grants.gov.* Applicants have until midnight (12 a.m.), Washington, DC time of the closing date to ensure that their entire application has been uploaded to the Grants.gov site. There are no exceptions to the above deadline. Applications uploaded to the site after midnight of the application deadline date will be automatically rejected by the Grants.gov system, and will be technically ineligible. Applicants will receive a confirmation e-mail from grants.gov upon the successful submission of an application. ECA will *not* notify you upon receipt of electronic applications. It is the responsibility of all applicants submitting proposals via the Grants.gov web portal to ensure that proposals have been received by Grants.gov in their entirety, and ECA bears no responsibility for data errors resulting from transmission or conversion processes. Applicants must follow all instructions in the Solicitation Package. IV.3g. Intergovernmental Review of Applications: Executive Order 12372 Does Not Apply to This Program. V. Application Review Information V.1. Review Process The Bureau will review all proposals for technical eligibility. Proposals will be deemed ineligible if they do not fully adhere to the guidelines stated herein and in the Solicitation Package. All eligible proposals will be reviewed by the program office, as well as the Public Diplomacy section overseas, where appropriate. Eligible proposals will be subject to compliance with Federal and Bureau regulations and guidelines and forwarded to Bureau grant panels for advisory review. Proposals may also be reviewed by the Office of the Legal Adviser or by other Department elements. Final funding decisions are at the discretion of the Department of State's Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs. Final technical authority for cooperative agreements resides with the Bureau's Grants Officer. Review Criteria Technically eligible applications will be competitively reviewed according to the criteria stated below. These criteria are not rank ordered and all carry equal weight in the proposal evaluation:

(1)Quality of the program idea: Proposals should exhibit originality, substance, precision, and relevance to the program goals and mission. Proposals should demonstrate understanding of the participating nations and of the needs of students from the region(s) as related to the program goals.

(2)Program planning: Detailed agenda and relevant work plan should demonstrate substantive undertakings and logistical capacity. Agenda and plan should adhere to the program overview and guidelines described above. Each component of the program should be addressed.

(3)Ability to achieve program objectives: Objectives should be reasonable, feasible, and flexible. Proposals should explain how objectives will be met through specific activities to be carried out in the U.S., and in Timor Leste and/or the South Pacific region.

(4)Multiplier effect/impact: Programs should strengthen long-term mutual understanding, including maximum sharing of information and establishment of long-term institutional and individual linkages. Anticipated results of the program in Timor Leste and/or the South Pacific region as well as in the U.S. should be addressed.

(5)Support of Diversity: Proposals should demonstrate substantive support for the Bureau's policy on diversity. To the full extent possible, scholarship recipients for this program should be representative of diversity in the following categories: Country of origin/residence within country(ies); gender; ethnic community of origin within country(ies), where relevant; urban and rural regions (with emphasis on outreach beyond capital cities); and proposed fields of study within the general parameters outlined in this solicitation. Proposals should explain what efforts will be undertaken to achieve these goals. The U.S. study and enrichment programs should also incorporate and demonstrate the diversity of the American people, regions and culture.

(6)Institutional Capacity: Proposed personnel and institutional resources should be adequate and appropriate to achieve the program goals. Proposal should explain how the recipient organization will meet the requirements of students on this specific program. Proposals should describe the applicant's knowledge of, or prior experience with, students from Timor Leste, and/or the South Pacific nations, and/or other developing countries.

(7)Institution's Record/Ability: Proposals should demonstrate an institutional record of successful exchange programs, including responsible fiscal management and full compliance with all reporting requirements for past Bureau grants as determined by Bureau Grant Staff. The Bureau will consider the past performance of prior recipients and the demonstrated potential of new applicants.

(8)Follow-on Activities: Proposals should provide a plan for continued follow-on activity (without Bureau support) ensuring that Bureau-supported programs are not isolated events.

(9)Project Evaluation: Proposals should include a plan to evaluate the program's success, both as the activities unfold and at the end of the program. A draft survey questionnaire or other technique plus a description of a methodology that will link outcomes to original project objectives is recommended. The recipient will be expected to submit quarterly program reports.

(10)Cost-effectiveness and Cost-sharing: The overhead and administrative components of the proposal, including salaries and honoraria, should be kept as low as possible. All other items should be necessary and appropriate. Proposals should maximize cost-sharing through other private sector support as well as institutional direct funding contributions. VI. Award Administration Information VI.1. Award Notices Final awards cannot be made until funds have been appropriated by Congress, allocated and committed through internal Bureau procedures. Successful applicants will receive a Federal Assistance Award

(FAA)from the Bureau's Grants Office. The FAA and the original grant proposal with subsequent modifications (if applicable) shall be the only binding authorizing document between the recipient and the U.S. Government. The FAA will be signed by an authorized Grants Officer, and mailed to the recipient's responsible officer identified in the application. Unsuccessful applicants will receive notification of the results of the application review from the ECA program office coordinating this competition. VI.2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements Terms and Conditions for the Administration of ECA agreements include the following: Office of Management and Budget Circular A-122, “Cost Principles for Nonprofit Organizations.” Office of Management and Budget Circular A-21, “Cost Principles for Educational Institutions.” OMB Circular A-87, “Cost Principles for State, Local and Indian Governments”. OMB Circular No. A-110 (Revised), Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Agreements with Institutions of Higher Education, Hospitals, and other Nonprofit Organizations. OMB Circular No. A-102, Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants-in-Aid to State and Local Governments. OMB Circular No. A-133, Audits of States, Local Government, and Non-profit Organizations. Please reference the following Web sites for additional information: *http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants. http://fa.statebuy.state.gov.* VI.3. Reporting Requirements You must provide ECA with a hard copy original plus two copies of the following reports:

(1)A final program and financial report no more than 90 days after the expiration of the award;

(2)A concise, one-page final program report summarizing program outcomes no more than 90 days after the expiration of the award. This one-page report will will be transmitted to OMB, and be made available to the public via OMB's USAspending.gov Web site—as part of ECA's Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) reporting requirements.

(3)Quarterly financial and program reports, the latter of which should include record and analysis of program activities from that period. Recipients will be required to provide reports analyzing their evaluation findings to the Bureau in their regular program reports. (Please refer to IV. Application and Submission Instructions (IV.3.d.3) above for Program Monitoring and Evaluation information. All data collected, including survey responses and contact information, must be maintained for a minimum of three years and provided to the Bureau upon request. All reports must be sent to the ECA Grants Officer and ECA Program Officer listed in the final assistance award document. VI.4. Program Data Requirements Recipients will be required to maintain specific data on program participants and activities in an electronically accessible database format that can be shared with the Bureau as required. As a minimum, the data must include the following:

(1)Name, address, contact information and biographic sketch of all persons who travel internationally on funds provided by the award or who benefit from the funding but do not travel.

(2)Itineraries of international and domestic travel, providing dates of travel and cities in which any exchange experiences take place. Final schedules for in-country and U.S. activities must be received by the ECA Program Officer at least three work days prior to the official opening of the activity. VII. Agency Contacts For questions about this announcement, contact: Victoria Augustine, Program Officer, East Asia and Pacific Programs Branch (ECA/A/E/EAP), Room 208, *ECA/A/E/EAP-08-01,* U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20547, phone:

(202)453-8102, fax:

(202)453-8107, e-mail: *augustinevr@state.gov.* Individual students interested in applying for either the USTL or USSP scholarship should not contact the Office of Academic Programs. Instead they should visit the following Web site for more information on the current programs: *http://www.eastwestcenter.org/edu-sp.asp.* All correspondence with the Bureau concerning this RFGP should reference the above title and number *ECA/A/E/EAP-08-01.* Please read the complete **Federal Register** announcement before sending inquiries or submitting proposals. Once the RFGP deadline has passed, Bureau staff may not discuss this competition with applicants until the proposal review process has been completed. VIII. Other Information Notice: The terms and conditions published in this RFGP are binding and may not be modified by any Bureau representative. Explanatory information provided by the Bureau that contradicts published language will not be binding. Issuance of the RFGP does not constitute an award commitment on the part of the Government. The Bureau reserves the right to reduce, revise, or increase proposal budgets in accordance with the needs of the program and the availability of funds. Awards made will be subject to periodic reporting and evaluation requirements per section VI.3 above. Dated: April 18, 2008. Goli Ameri, Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State. [FR Doc. E8-8943 Filed 4-23-08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4710-05-P DEPARTMENT OF STATE [Public Notice 6197] Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs

(ECA)Request for Grant Proposals: American Documentaries Showcase *Announcement Type:* New Cooperative Agreement. *Funding Opportunity Number:* ECA/PE/C-CU-08-70. *Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number:* 00.000. *Key Dates:* *Application Deadline:* May 27, 2008. Executive Summary The Cultural Programs Division in the Office of Citizen Exchanges in the Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs

(ECA)announces an open competition for a cooperative agreement to administer the American Documentaries Showcase program. Through this program, ECA seeks to showcase and promote American documentaries and their filmmakers at international venues, including U.S. Embassy-organized events and/or U.S. Embassy-supported international documentary film festivals. ECA therefore seeks an organization to identify and select a thematic collection of twenty

(20)to thirty

(30)American documentaries that offer a broad overview of the best in American documentary filmmaking. The documentaries should demonstrate high artistic quality, illustrate diverse viewpoints, address a variety of social issues, and reflect the creativity inherent in an open, democratic society. The collection should include documentaries addressing universal themes and issues such as—but not limited to—nature and the environment, human rights, HIV/AIDS, and other subjects that reflect contemporary American society and culture. The documentary collection will be available to U.S. Embassies to program in its entirety or in part. U.S. Embassies also may choose to submit appropriate documentaries from the collection to local documentary festivals. This program will also provide for travel by the documentary filmmakers in conjunction with the presentation of their documentaries overseas at U.S. Embassy programs or local festivals. Travel by film experts will include public presentations, workshops, master classes, interviews, and outreach activities designed to address underserved and younger audiences overseas. Applicants should submit proposals that show how they will identify and select the collection of American documentaries outlined here and how they will assist ECA in programming the documentaries and their filmmakers in eighteen

(18)to thirty

(30)U.S. Embassies overseas. U.S. public and non-profit organizations meeting the provisions described in Internal Revenue code section 26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3) may submit proposals that support the goals of American Documentaries Showcase: To promote mutual understanding and cross-cultural awareness. The program accomplishes this by providing an opportunity for international audiences to view American documentaries; become exposed to American viewpoints on socially relevant issues; gain an understanding of the role of filmmaking as a catalyst for dialogue and for exploring solutions to contemporary problems; and allow American documentary filmmakers to learn about life and culture in the foreign host countries. The Bureau is particularly interested in proposals that will facilitate the organization of programs in countries with significant Muslim or underserved populations, and youth. No guarantee is made or implied that programming will be made in any particular region. For this competition, all organizations must demonstrate sufficient experience successfully exhibiting, distributing, or otherwise promoting American documentaries. They also should demonstrate extensive knowledge of the documentary field in general both in the U.S. and overseas. Proposals from organizations with significant international experience will be more competitive. Organizations with less than four years experience in conducting international exchanges are ineligible to apply. I. Funding Opportunity Description Authority Overall grant making authority for this program is contained in the Mutual Educational and Cultural Exchange Act of 1961, Public Law 87-256, as amended, also known as the Fulbright-Hays Act. The purpose of the Act is “to enable the Government of the United States to increase mutual understanding between the people of the United States and the people of other countries * * *; to strengthen the ties which unite us with other nations by demonstrating the educational and cultural interests, developments, and achievements of the people of the United States and other nations * * * and thus to assist in the development of friendly, sympathetic and peaceful relations between the United States and the other countries of the world.” The funding authority for the program above is provided through legislation. Purpose The Bureau seeks proposals that will showcase and promote American documentaries and their filmmakers at international venues such as U.S. Embassy-organized events and U.S. Embassy-supported documentary film festivals. These events will help engage audiences overseas that do not normally have regular access to American documentaries. The applicant will be responsible for identifying and assembling a collection of approximately 20 to 30 American documentaries on diverse social themes and whose filmmakers will be available for overseas travel and programming by U.S. Embassies in connection with the presentation of their documentaries at Embassy events or local documentary festivals. In addition to presentations, American Documentary Showcase filmmakers will be expected to conduct or participate in master classes, lectures, workshops, radio and TV appearances, and other activities with local cultural institutions, other filmmakers, media, and students. Guidelines The successful applicant must fully demonstrate a capacity to achieve the following:

(1)Identify the film professionals, subject matter specialists, and other experts who will be members of the panel selecting the documentaries. Provide credentials to illustrate the film and international expertise of the review panelists.

(2)Identify the specific selection criteria the review panel will use to select the documentaries and participating filmmakers. The panel will include an ECA representative as an observer. As documentaries will be presented abroad as part of ECA's public diplomacy outreach, they should be balanced, represent the diversity of American political, social and cultural life, and take political and cultural sensitivities into consideration. ECA will review and approve nominated documentaries in consultation with other Department officials.

(3)Identify, select, and obtain approximately twenty

(20)to thirty

(30)American documentaries appropriate for overseas presentation. The collection should include documentaries reflecting universal themes and issues such as nature and the environment, human rights, HIV/AIDS awareness, and women's issues as well as categories such as history and social documentaries, ethnographic films, biographies, animation, and the arts. The collection should include films appropriate for entry into international documentary festivals if requested by U.S. embassies. It should also include a mix of feature length and short documentaries to allow for flexible programming at various venues.

(4)Identify the film professionals, subject matter specialists or other experts who will travel overseas to present the documentaries. Filmmakers must be U.S. citizens who are at least 21 years old; demonstrate the highest artistic ability; be conversant with broader aspects of contemporary American society and culture; be conversant with the other documentaries in the collection, as well as his/her own, and be adaptable to unescorted, rigorous touring through regions where travel and performance situations may be difficult.

(5)Ensure documentaries are available in appropriate formats for various kinds of screening venues and that sufficient copies of the entire collection are available for multiple bookings in various geographic areas.

(6)Ensure documentaries meet all festival criteria, in the event they are to be submitted for presentation at a U.S. Embassy-supported festival.

(7)Ensure rights to the documentaries are cleared to permit flexibility in programming.

(8)Work with ECA and PAS to develop program models for Embassy sponsored or Embassy organized film events. This includes identifying documentaries from the collection menu that could be used to demonstrate different approaches to the same social issue or challenge.

(9)Develop discussion guides and public relations and educational materials to support the documentaries. The educational materials should be developed to be used either with individual documentaries or to support proposed thematic groupings.

(10)Working in coordination with ECA, engage Public Affairs Officers at U.S. Embassies in the project to ensure they concur with suitability of documentaries for their programming. Proposals should reflect a practical understanding of global issues, and demonstrate sensitivity to cultural, political, economic, and social differences in regions where the documentaries will be shown and the film experts programmed. Special attention should be given to describing the applicant organization's experience with documentary film and with planning and implementing logistical scenarios overseas. Applicants should outline their project team's capacity for doing projects of this nature and provide a detailed sample program to illustrate planning capacity and ability to achieve program objectives. Applicants must identify all U.S. and foreign partner organizations and/or venues with whom they are proposing to collaborate, and describe previous cooperative projects in the section on “Institutional Capacity.” For this competition, applicants must include in their proposal supporting materials or documentation that demonstrate a minimum of four years experience in conducting international exchange programs. Proposals must include references with name and contact information for other assistance awards the applicant has received, in the event the Bureau chooses to be in touch directly. ECA intends to give one assistance award to a qualified institution or organization to administer the American Documentary Showcase program globally. Activities funded through this cooperative agreement support the organization and implementation of between 20 to 30 overseas programs. Activities must include, but are not limited to: —Selection of documentaries with associated filmmakers. —Production of documentary packages in appropriate formats for multiple exhibition overseas. —Development of promotional and corollary support material, including educational and media packets. —Shipping overseas. —Travel overseas by documentary filmmakers or other experts. —Advance program planning. —Programming educational, media, and other outreach activities in consultation with U.S. embassies. —Assisting filmmakers with passport, visa, immunizations, and other pre-travel preparations. —Arranging and providing orientation sessions and pre-travel briefings, producing press materials, and providing support for publicity while the filmmakers are overseas. —Evaluating program activities. —Reporting on program activities to ECA. —Providing suggestions for follow-on program development, including the option of bringing foreign filmmakers to the United States. Applicants must have experience in documentary filmmaking aspects and in planning and implementation of programs, with particular emphasis on overseas programs and should address these elements in the proposal. The grantee must be highly responsive and able to work in close consultation with ECA and the Public Affairs Sections of the participating U.S. embassies. Successful applicants will include with their proposal specific criteria for the selection of American documentaries and documentary filmmakers. The Cultural Programs Division's activities and responsibilities for this program are as follows: —Participation in the final selection of documentaries and filmmakers. —Determination of the countries to which the documentary collection and filmmakers will travel. Priority countries will be those in all world regions of greatest importance to the Department of State's public diplomacy mission to build mutual understanding. —Final approval of all program arrangements. II. Award Information *Type of Award:* Cooperative Agreement. ECA's level of involvement in this program is listed under number I above. *Fiscal Year Funds:* FY 2008. *Approximate Total Funding:* $400,000. *Approximate Number of Awards:* 1. *Approximate Average Award:* $400,000. *Ceiling of Award Range:* $400,000. *Anticipated Award Date:* September 1, 2008. *Anticipated Project Completion Date:* December 29, 2009. *Additional Information:* Pending successful implementation of this program and the availability of funds in subsequent fiscal years, it is ECA's intent to renew this grant for two additional fiscal years, before openly competing it again. III. Eligibility Information *III.1. Eligible applicants:* Applications may be submitted by public and private non-profit organizations meeting the provisions described in Internal Revenue Code section 26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3). *III.2. Cost Sharing or Matching Funds:* There is no minimum or maximum percentage required for this competition. However, the Bureau encourages applicants to provide maximum levels of cost sharing and funding in support of its programs. In-kind cost-sharing is acceptable for certain aspects of the budget. For example, a grantee's existing inherent professional expertise is considered in-kind cost sharing. This can be reflected as a contribution of honoraria fees that might otherwise have to be spent to hire experts. When cost sharing is offered, it is understood and agreed that the applicant must provide the amount of cost sharing as stipulated in its proposal and later included in an approved grant agreement. Cost sharing may be in the form of allowable direct or indirect costs. For accountability, you must maintain written records to support all costs which are claimed as your contribution, as well as costs to be paid by the Federal government. Such records are subject to audit. The basis for determining the value of cash and in-kind contributions must be in accordance with OMB Circular A-110, (Revised), Subpart C.23—Cost Sharing and Matching. In the event you do not provide the minimum amount of cost sharing as stipulated in the approved budget, ECA's contribution will be reduced in like proportion. III.3. Other Eligibility Requirements

(a)Bureau grant guidelines require that organizations with less than four years experience in conducting international exchanges be limited to $60,000 in Bureau funding. ECA anticipates giving one award, in an amount not to exceed $400,000 to support program and administrative costs required to implement this exchange program. Therefore, organizations with less than four years experience in conducting international exchanges are ineligible to apply under this competition. The Bureau encourages applicants to provide maximum levels of cost sharing and funding in support of its programs.

(b)Technical Eligibility: All proposals must comply with the following:

(1)Full adherence to the guidelines stated herein and in the Solicitation Package;

(2)proposal submission deadline date;

(3)non-profit organization status, and;

(4)for purposes of this competition, a demonstrated track record in documentary programming and at least four years experience in international exchanges, or your proposal will be declared technically ineligible and given no further consideration in the review process. Eligible applicants may submit only ONE proposal (TOTAL) in response to this RFGP. If multiple proposals are received, all submissions will be declared technically ineligible and will be given no further consideration in the review process. IV. Application and Submission Information Note: Please read the complete announcement before sending inquiries or submitting proposals. Once the RFGP deadline has passed, Bureau staff may not discuss this competition with applicants until the proposal review process has been completed. *IV.1. Contact Information to Request an Application Package:* Please contact the Cultural Programs Division (ECA/PE/C/CU) in the Office of Citizen Exchanges, Room 568, U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20547, 202/203-7488; fax 202/203-7525; e-mail *ProctorLM@state.gov* to request a Solicitation Package. Please refer to the Funding Opportunity Number ECA/PE/C-CU-08-70 located at the top of this announcement when making your request. Alternatively, an electronic application package may be obtained from grants.gov. Please see section IV.3f for further information. The Solicitation Package contains the Proposal Submission Instruction

(PSI)document which consists of required application forms, and standard guidelines for proposal preparation. For questions about this announcement, please contact: Susan Cohen, Cultural Programs Division, ECA/PE/C/CU, 202/203-7509; fax 202/203-7525; *CohenSL@state.gov.* Please refer to the Funding Opportunity Number ECA/PE/C-CU-08-70 located at the top of this announcement on all other inquiries and correspondence. *IV.2. To Download a Solicitation Package Via Internet:* The entire Solicitation Package may be downloaded from the Bureau's Web site at *http://exchanges.state.gov/education/rfgps/menu.htm,* or from the Grants.gov Web site at *http://www.grants.gov.* Please read all information before downloading. *IV.3. Content and Form of Submission:* Applicants must follow all instructions in the Solicitation Package. The original and 14 copies (15 proposals total) of the application should be sent per the instructions under IV.3f. “Application Deadline and Methods of Submission” section below. *IV.3a.* You are required to have a Dun and Bradstreet Data Universal Numbering System

(DUNS)number to apply for a grant or cooperative agreement from the U.S. Government. This number is a nine-digit identification number, which uniquely identifies business entities. Obtaining a DUNS number is easy and there is no charge. To obtain a DUNS number, access *http://www.dunandbradstreet.com* or call 1-866-705-5711. Please ensure that your DUNS number is included in the appropriate box of the SF-424 which is part of the formal application package. *IV.3b.* All proposals must contain an executive summary, proposal narrative and budget. Please refer to the Solicitation Package. It contains the mandatory Proposal Submission Instructions

(PSI)document for additional formatting and technical requirements. *IV.3c.* You must have nonprofit status with the IRS at the time of application. Please note: Effective March 14, 2008, all applicants for ECA federal assistance awards must include with their application, a copy of page 5, Part V-A, “Current Officers, Directors, Trustees, and Key Employees” of their most recent Internal Revenue Service

(IRS)Form 990, “Return of Organization Exempt From Income Tax.” If your organization is a private nonprofit which has not received a grant or cooperative agreement from ECA in the past three years, or if your organization received nonprofit status from the IRS within the past four years, you must submit the necessary documentation to verify nonprofit status as directed in the PSI document. Failure to do so will cause your proposal to be declared technically ineligible. *IV.3d.* Please take into consideration the following information when preparing your proposal narrative: IV.3d.1 Adherence to All Regulations Governing The J Visa The Office of Citizen Exchanges of the Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs is the official program sponsor of the exchange program covered by this RFGP, and an employee of the Bureau will be the “Responsible Officer” for the program under the terms of 22 CFR 62, which covers the administration of the Exchange Visitor Program (J visa program). Under the terms of 22 CFR 62, organizations receiving grants under this RFGP will be third parties “cooperating with or assisting the sponsor in the conduct of the sponsor's program.” The actions of grantee program organizations shall be “imputed to the sponsor in evaluating the sponsor's compliance with” 22 CFR 62. Therefore, the Bureau expects that any organization receiving a grant under this competition will render all assistance necessary to enable the Bureau to fully comply with 22 CFR part 62 *et seq.* The Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs places critically important emphases on the secure and proper administration of Exchange Visitor (J visa) Programs and adherence by grantee program organizations and program participants to all regulations governing the J visa program status. Therefore, proposals should explicitly state in writing that the applicant is prepared to assist the Bureau in meeting all requirements governing the administration of Exchange Visitor Programs as set forth in 22 CFR part 62. If your organization has experience as a designated Exchange Visitor Program Sponsor, the applicant should discuss their record of compliance with 22 CFR part 62 e *t seq.,* including the oversight of their Responsible Officers and Alternate Responsible Officers, screening and selection of program participants, provision of pre-arrival information and orientation to participants, monitoring of participants, proper maintenance and security of forms, recordkeeping, reporting and other requirements. The Office of Citizen Exchanges of ECA will be responsible for issuing DS-2019 forms to participants in this program. A copy of the complete regulations governing the administration of Exchange Visitor

(J)programs is available at *http://exchanges.state.gov* or from: United States Department of State, Office of Exchange Coordination and Designation, ECA/EC/ECD—SA-44, Room 734, 301 4th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20547. Telephone:

(202)203-5029. FAX:

(202)453-8640. IV.3d.2 Diversity, Freedom and Democracy Guidelines Pursuant to the Bureau's authorizing legislation, programs must maintain a non-political character and should be balanced and representative of the diversity of American political, social, and cultural life. “Diversity” should be interpreted in the broadest sense and encompass differences including, but not limited to ethnicity, race, gender, religion, geographic location, socio-economic status, and disabilities. Applicants are strongly encouraged to adhere to the advancement of this principle both in program administration and in program content. Please refer to the review criteria under the “Support for Diversity” section for specific suggestions on incorporating diversity into your proposal. Public Law 104-319 provides that “in carrying out programs of educational and cultural exchange in countries whose people do not fully enjoy freedom and democracy,” the Bureau “shall take appropriate steps to provide opportunities for participation in such programs to human rights and democracy leaders of such countries.” Public Law 106—113 requires that the governments of the countries described above do not have inappropriate influence in the selection process. Proposals should reflect advancement of these goals in their program contents, to the full extent deemed feasible. IV.3d.3. Program Monitoring and Evaluation Proposals must include a plan to monitor and evaluate the project's success, both as the activities unfold and at the end of the program. The Bureau recommends that your proposal include a draft survey questionnaire or other technique plus a description of a methodology to use to link outcomes to original project objectives. The Bureau expects that the grantee will track participants or partners and be able to respond to key evaluation questions, including satisfaction with the program, learning as a result of the program, changes in behavior as a result of the program, and effects of the program on institutions (institutions in which participants work or partner institutions). The evaluation plan should include indicators that measure gains in mutual understanding as well as substantive knowledge. Successful monitoring and evaluation depend heavily on setting clear goals and outcomes at the outset of a program. Your evaluation plan should include a description of your project's objectives, your anticipated project outcomes, and how and when you intend to measure these outcomes (performance indicators). The more that outcomes are “smart” (specific, measurable, attainable, results-oriented, and placed in a reasonable time frame), the easier it will be to conduct the evaluation. You should also show how your project objectives link to the goals of the program described in this RFGP. Your monitoring and evaluation plan should clearly distinguish between program *outputs* and *outcomes.* *Outputs* are products and services delivered, often stated as an amount. Output information is important to show the scope or size of project activities, but it cannot substitute for information about progress towards outcomes or the results achieved. Examples of outputs include the number of people trained or the number of seminars conducted. *Outcomes,* in contrast, represent specific results a project is intended to achieve and is usually measured as an extent of change. Findings on outputs and outcomes should both be reported, but the focus should be on outcomes. We encourage you to assess the following four levels of outcomes, as they relate to the program goals set out in the RFGP (listed here in increasing order of importance): 1. Participant satisfaction with the program and exchange experience. 2. Participant learning, such as increased knowledge, aptitude, skills, and changed understanding and attitude. Learning includes both substantive (subject-specific) learning and mutual understanding. 3. Participant behavior, concrete actions to apply knowledge in work or community; greater participation and responsibility in civic organizations; interpretation and explanation of experiences and new knowledge gained; continued contacts between participants, community members, and others. 4. Institutional changes, such as increased collaboration and partnerships, policy reforms, new programming, and organizational improvements. Please note: Consideration should be given to the appropriate timing of data collection for each level of outcome. For example, satisfaction is usually captured as a short-term outcome, whereas behavior and institutional changes are normally considered longer-term outcomes. Overall, the quality of your monitoring and evaluation plan will be judged on how well it

(1)Specifies intended outcomes;

(2)gives clear descriptions of how each outcome will be measured;

(3)identifies when particular outcomes will be measured; and

(4)provides a clear description of the data collection strategies for each outcome (i.e., surveys, interviews, or focus groups). (Please note that evaluation plans that deal only with the first level of outcomes [satisfaction] will be deemed less competitive under the present evaluation criteria.) Grantees will be required to provide reports analyzing their evaluation findings to the Bureau in their regular program reports. All data collected, including survey responses and contact information, must be maintained for a minimum of three years and provided to the Bureau upon request. *IV.3e.* Please take the following information into consideration when preparing your budget: IV.3e.1. Applicants must submit a comprehensive budget for the entire program. The award may not exceed $400,000. There must be a summary budget as well as breakdowns reflecting both administrative and program budgets. Applicants may provide separate sub-budgets for each program component, phase, location, or activity to provide clarification. IV.3e.2. For budgeting purposes, applicants should estimate costs based on selection of approximately 20 to 30 documentaries, packaging of multiple copies of the collection as well as administration of travel abroad and programming of documentary filmmakers to 18 to 30 U.S. Embassies overseas. Final determination of participating regions and countries will be made by ECA in collaboration with U.S. embassies and the successful applicant after the assistance award has been given. IV.3e.3. Allowable costs for the program include the following:

(1)Program Expenses, including but not limited to: Costs involved in the identification and selection of an American documentary collection, including organization of selection panel; costs of producing multiple copies of the documentary collection; domestic and international travel for the selected filmmakers (per The Fly America Act) to approximately 20 or more venues overseas for an average of one week of programming; visas and immunizations; airport taxes and country entrance fees; honoraria for the filmmakers; educational materials and presentation items; excess and overweight baggage fees for educational material; trip itinerary booklets; press kits and promotional materials; follow-on activities; monitoring and evaluation; and international travel for program implementation and/or evaluation purposes. The following guidelines may be helpful in developing a proposed budget: A. Travel Costs. International and domestic airfares (per The Fly America Act), transit costs, ground transportation, and visas for American Documentary Showcase Abroad participants to travel to the program destinations. B. Per Diem: For any U.S. portion of the travel, organizations should use the published Federal per diem rates. The Public Affairs Sections of the participating U.S. embassies and consulates are responsible for per diem abroad. Domestic per diem rates may be accessed at: *http://www.gsa.gov/Portal/gsa/ep/contentView.do?contentId=17943&contentType=GSA_BASIC%20.* C. Sub-grantees and Consultants. Sub-grantee organizations may be used, in which case the written agreement between the prospective grantee and sub-grantee should be included in the proposal. Sub-grants must be itemized in the budget under General Program Expenses. Consultants may be used to provide specialized expertise. Daily honoraria cannot exceed $250 per day, and applicants are strongly encouraged to use organizational resources, and to cost share heavily in this area. D. Health Insurance. Each American Documentary Showcase Abroad participant will be covered under the terms of the ECA-sponsored COINS health insurance policy. The cost for international travel insurance for staff travel may be included in the proposal budget. E. Honoraria for American Documentary Showcase Abroad filmmakers. Daily honorarium is $200 per day for each filmmaker or film expert, including rest and travel days. F. Educational and Promotional Items. ECA funds for educational and promotional items should not exceed $200 per filmmaker or film expert per program. G. Excess Baggage. For brochures, educational and other support material related to overseas programming. H. Immunizations/Visas. For purposes of a proposed budget, line items for immunizations should be estimated at $400 per filmmaker, and visas/visa photos should be estimated at $600 per filmmaker or film expert. I. Press Kits. Each relevant U.S. embassy should receive appropriate contents for press kits. Items may be sent electronically with the understanding that in some cases, embassies may not be able to access large files or attachments. This line item may include funds for shooting and duplicating publicity photos and duplicating documentary clips. J. Staff Travel. Allowable costs include domestic staff travel for one staff member to attend recruitment/selection events in approximately two U.S. cities. International staff travel will be allowable, especially if associated with monitoring and evaluation. Cost-sharing for staff travel is strongly encouraged. 2. Administrative Costs. Costs necessary for the effective administration of the program may include salaries for grantee organization employees, benefits, and other direct and indirect costs per detailed instructions in the Solicitation Package. While there is no rigid ratio of administrative to program costs, proposals in which the administrative costs do not exceed 25% of the total requested from ECA grant funds will be more competitive on cost effectiveness. Please refer to the Solicitation Package for complete budget guidelines and formatting instructions. IV.3F. Application Deadline and Methods of Submission *Application Deadline Date:* Thursday, May 27, 2008. *Reference Number:* ECA/PE/C-CU-08-70. *Methods of Submission:* Applications may be submitted in one of two ways:

(1)In hard-copy, via a nationally recognized overnight delivery service (i.e., DHL, Federal Express, UPS, Airborne Express, or U.S. Postal Service Express Overnight Mail, etc.), or

(2)electronically through *http://www.grants.gov.* Along with the Project Title, all applicants must enter the above Reference Number in Box 11 on the SF-424 contained in the mandatory Proposal Submission Instructions

(PSI)of the solicitation document. IV.3f.1 Submitting Printed Applications Applications must be shipped no later than the above deadline. Delivery services used by applicants must have in-place, centralized shipping identification and tracking systems that may be accessed via the Internet and delivery people who are identifiable by commonly recognized uniforms and delivery vehicles. Proposals shipped on or before the above deadline but received at ECA more than seven days after the deadline will be ineligible for further consideration under this competition. Proposals shipped after the established deadlines are ineligible for consideration under this competition. ECA will *not* notify you upon receipt of application. It is each applicant's responsibility to ensure that each package is marked with a legible tracking number and to monitor/confirm delivery to ECA via the Internet. Delivery of proposal packages may not be made via local courier service or in person for this competition. Faxed documents will not be accepted at any time. Only proposals submitted as stated above will be considered. Important note: When preparing your submission please make sure to include one extra copy of the completed SF-424 form and place it in an envelope addressed to “ECA/EX/PM”. The original and 14 copies of the application should be sent to: U.S. Department of State, SA-44, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Ref.: ECA/PE/C-CU-08-70, Program Management, ECA/EX/PM, Room 534, 301 4th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20547. Applicants submitting hard-copy applications must also submit the “Executive Summary” and “Proposal Narrative” sections of the proposal in text (.txt) or Microsoft Word format on a PC-formatted disk. The Bureau will provide these files electronically to the appropriate Public Affairs Section(s) at the U.S. embassy(ies) for its(their) review. IV.3f.2—Submitting Electronic Applications Applicants have the option of submitting proposals electronically through Grants.gov ( *http://www.grants.gov* ). Complete solicitation packages are available at Grants.gov in the “Find” portion of the system. Please follow the instructions available in the `Get Started' portion of the site ( *http://www.grants.gov/GetStarted* ). Several of the steps in the Grants.gov registration process could take several weeks. Therefore, applicants should check with appropriate staff within their organizations immediately after reviewing this RFGP to confirm or determine their registration status with Grants.gov. Once registered, the amount of time it can take to upload an application will vary depending on a variety of factors including the size of the application and the speed of your Internet connection. Therefore, we strongly recommend that you not wait until the application deadline to begin the submission process through Grants.gov. Direct all questions regarding Grants.gov registration and submission to: Grants.gov Customer Support, Contact Center Phone: 800-518-4726, Business Hours: Monday-Friday, 7 a.m.-9 p.m. Eastern Time, E-mail: *support@grants.gov.* Applicants have until midnight (12 a.m.), Washington, DC time of the closing date to ensure that their entire application has been uploaded to the Grants.gov site. There are no exceptions to the above deadline. Applications uploaded to the site after midnight of the application deadline date will be automatically rejected by the grants.gov system, and will be technically ineligible. Applicants will receive a confirmation e-mail from grants.gov upon the successful submission of an application. ECA will *not* notify you upon receipt of electronic applications. It is the responsibility of all applicants submitting proposals via the Grants.gov Web portal to ensure that proposals have been received by Grants.gov in their entirety, and ECA bears no responsibility for data errors resulting from transmission or conversion processes. *IV.3g. Intergovernmental Review of Applications:* Executive Order 12372 does not apply to this program. V. Application Review Information V.1. Review Process The Bureau will review all proposals for technical eligibility. Proposals will be deemed ineligible if they do not fully adhere to the guidelines stated herein and in the Solicitation Package. All eligible proposals will be reviewed by the program office, as well as the Public Diplomacy section overseas, where appropriate. Eligible proposals will be subject to compliance with Federal and Bureau regulations and guidelines and forwarded to Bureau grant panels for advisory review. Proposals may also be reviewed by the Office of the Legal Adviser or by other Department elements. Final funding decisions are at the discretion of the Department of State's Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs. Final technical authority for cooperative agreements resides with the Bureau's Grants Officer. Review Criteria Technically eligible applications will be competitively reviewed according to the criteria stated below. These criteria are not rank ordered and all carry equal weight in the proposal evaluation: 1. Program Planning and Ability To Achieve Objectives: Detailed agenda and relevant work plan should demonstrate substantive undertakings and logistical capacity. Agenda and plan should adhere to the program overview and guidelines described above. Proposals should clearly demonstrate how the institution will meet the program's objectives and plan. 2. Multiplier Effect/Impact: Proposed programs should strengthen long-term mutual understanding, including maximum sharing of information and establishment of long-term institutional and individual linkages. 3. Support of Diversity: Proposals should demonstrate substantive support of the Bureau's policy on diversity. Achievable and relevant features should be cited in both program administration (selection of participants, program venue and program evaluation) and program content (orientation and wrap-up sessions, program meetings, resource materials and follow-up activities). 4. Institutional Capacity: Proposals should include

(1)The institution's mission and date of establishment;

(2)an outline of prior awards—U.S. government and/or private support received for tours abroad;

(3)descriptions of experienced staff members who will be part of the team implementing the program, and;

(4)all other documentation requested herein. Proposed personnel and institutional resources should be adequate and appropriate to achieve the program or project's goals. The proposal should reflect the institution's expertise in documentary exhibition, promotion, and programming.

(5)Institution's Record/Ability: Proposals should demonstrate an institutional record of at least four years of international exchanges.

(6)Project Evaluation: Proposals should include a plan to evaluate the activity's success, both as the activities unfold and at the end of the program. A draft survey questionnaire or other technique plus description of a methodology to use to link outcomes to original project objectives is recommended. 5. Cost-effectiveness and Cost-sharing: The overhead and administrative components of the proposal, including salaries and honoraria, should be kept as low as possible. All other items should be necessary and appropriate. Proposals should maximize cost-sharing through other private sector support as well as institutional direct funding contributions. VI. Award Administration Information VI.1a. Award Notices Final awards cannot be made until funds have been appropriated by Congress, allocated and committed through internal Bureau procedures. Successful applicants will receive a Federal Assistance Award

(OFAC)has requested the Department of State to follow certain procedures to effectuate the goals of Sections 481(b), 531(a), 571, 582, and 635(b) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (as amended); 18 U.S.C. 2339A and 2339B; Executive Order 13224; and Homeland Security Presidential Directive 6. These licensing conditions mandate that the Department conduct a vetting of potential Iran grantees and sub-grantees for counter-terrorism purposes. To conduct this vetting the Department will collect information from grantees and sub-grantees regarding the identity and background of their key employees and Boards of Directors. Note: To assure that planning for the inclusion of Iran complies with requirements, please contact the Office's Iran Policy Coordinator, Lea Perez, at

(202)453-8156 for additional information. Or in her absence, please contact Sheila Casey at

(202)453-8150. All awards made under this competition must be executed according to all relevant U.S. laws and policies regarding assistance to the Palestinian Authority, and to the West Bank and Gaza. Organizations must consult with relevant Public Affairs Offices before entering into any formal arrangements or agreements with Palestinian organizations or institutions. Note: To assure that planning for the inclusion of the Palestinian Authority complies with requirements, please contact program officer Susan Cohen

(202)203-7509, e-mail: *cohensl@state.gov* for additional information. VI.2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements Terms and Conditions for the Administration of ECA agreements include the following: Office of Management and Budget Circular A-122, “Cost Principles for Nonprofit Organizations.” Office of Management and Budget Circular A-21, “Cost Principles for Educational Institutions.” OMB Circular A-87, “Cost Principles for State, Local and Indian Governments”. OMB Circular No. A-110 (Revised), Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Agreements with Institutions of Higher Education, Hospitals, and Other Nonprofit Organizations. OMB Circular No. A-102, Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants-in-Aid to State and Local Governments. OMB Circular No. A-133, Audits of States, Local Government, and Non-profit Organizations. Please reference the following Web sites for additional information: *http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants. http://fa.statebuy.state.gov.* *VI.3. Reporting Requirements:* You must provide ECA with a hard copy original plus two copies of the following reports:

(1)A final program and financial report no more than 90 days after the expiration of the award;

(2)A concise, one-page final program report summarizing program outcomes no more than 90 days after the expiration of the award. This one-page report will be transmitted to OMB, and be made available to the public via OMB's USAspending.gov Web site—as part of ECA's Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) reporting requirements;

(3)Quarterly program and financial reports showing activities carried out and expenses incurred in the calendar quarter. Grantees will be required to provide reports analyzing their evaluation findings to the Bureau in their regular program reports. (Please refer to IV. Application and Submission Instructions (IV.3.d.3) above for Program Monitoring and Evaluation information.) All data collected, including survey responses and contact information, must be maintained for a minimum of three years and provided to the Bureau upon request. All reports must be sent to the ECA Grants Officer and ECA Program Officer listed in the final assistance award document. VII. Agency Contacts For questions about this announcement, contact: Susan Cohen, Cultural Programs, ECA/PE/C/CU, Room 568, Ref. # ECA/PE/C-CU-08-70, U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20547, tel: 202/203-7509; fax: 202/203-7525; e-mail: *CohenSL@state.gov.* All correspondence with the Bureau concerning this RFGP should reference the above title and number ECA/PE/C-CU-08-70. Please read the complete announcement before sending inquiries or submitting proposals. Once the RFGP deadline has passed, Bureau staff may not discuss this competition with applicants until the proposal review process has been completed. VIII. Other Information Notice The terms and conditions published in this RFGP are binding and may not be modified by any Bureau representative. Explanatory information provided by the Bureau that contradicts published language will not be binding. Issuance of the RFGP does not constitute an award commitment on the part of the Government. The Bureau reserves the right to reduce, revise, or increase proposal budgets in accordance with the needs of the program and the availability of funds. Awards made will be subject to periodic reporting and evaluation requirements per section VI.3 above. Dated: April 18, 2008. Goli Ameri, Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, U.S. Department of State. [FR Doc. E8-8958 Filed 4-23-08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4710-05-P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Reports, Forms and Record Keeping Requirements; Agency Information Collection Activity Under OMB Review AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, DOT. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 *et seq.* ), this notice announces that the Information Collection Request

(ICR)abstracted below regarding motorcycle helmet labels has been forwarded to the Office of Management and Budget

(OMB)for review and comment. The ICR describes the nature of the information collections and their expected burden. The **Federal Register** Notice with a 60-day comment period was published on February 1, 2008 [73 FR 6554]. The docket number is NHTSA-2008-0023. The agency received eight comments on this collection item. Two comments questioned the effectiveness of motorcycle helmet laws. This notice is not intended to address state or local helmet laws and therefore the comments are not relevant to this notice. Three comments were related to testing specifications of FMVSS No. 218. This notice does not change FMVSS No. 218 testing specifications. Consequently these comments are outside the scope of this notice. One comment recommended doing away with motorcycle helmet labels and two other comments suggested that collection of this information by NHTSA was unnecessary. The agency does not agree that motorcycle helmet labels or the information collection should be eliminated. These labels provide consumers with the assurance that the helmet meets FMVSS No. 218 minimum performance requirements. Assurance that a helmet meets FMVSS No. 218 is important to consumers because the standard specifies minimum performance requirements that are designed to reduce deaths and injuries to motorcyclists. The agency believes that it is important for consumers to be able to distinguish between helmets that meet FMVSS No. 218 requirements and those that do not. DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before May 27, 2008. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Doyle, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Office of Crash Worthiness W43-414, 202-493-0188, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration *Title:* 49 CFR 571.1218, Motorcycle Helmets (Labeling). *OMB Number:* 2127-0518. *Type of Request:* Extension of a currently approved collection. *Abstract:* The National Traffic Vehicle Safety statute at 49 U.S.C. subchapter II standards and compliance, sections 30111 and 30117, authorizes the issuance of Federal motor vehicle safety standards, rules and regulations as he/she deems necessary. The Secretary is also authorized to require manufacturers to provide information in the form of printed matter placed in the vehicle or attached to the motor vehicle or motor vehicle equipment to first purchasers of motor vehicles or motor vehicle equipment when the vehicle equipment is purchased. Using this authority, the agency issued the initial FMVSS No. 218, Motorcycle Helmets, in 1974. Motorcycle helmets are devices used to protect motorcyclists from head injury in motor vehicle accidents. FMVSS No. 218 S5.6 requires that each helmet shall be labeled permanently and legibly in a manner such that the label(s) can be read easily without removing padding or any other permanent part. *Affected Public:* Motorcycle helmet manufacturers. *Estimated Burden Hours:* 5,000 hours. ADDRESSES: Send comments, within 30 days, to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 725-17th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20503. Attention NHTSA Desk Officer. *Comments are invited on:* Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Department, including whether the information will have practical utility; the accuracy of the Department's estimate of the burden of the proposed information collection; ways to enhance the quality, utility and clarity of the information to be collected; and ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Comments to OMB are most effective if received by OMB within 30 days of publication. Issued in Washington, DC, on April 18, 2008. Stephen R. Kratzke, Associate Administrator for Rulemaking. [FR Doc. E8-8867 Filed 4-23-08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910-59-P 73 80 Thursday, April 24, 2008 Rules and Regulations Part II Department of the Treasury Office of the Comptroller of the Currency 12 CFR Parts 1, 2, 3 et al. Regulatory Review Amendments; Final Rule DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Office of the Comptroller of the Currency 12 CFR Parts 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 16, 19, 21, 22, 23, 24, 26, 27, 28, 31, 32, 34, 37, and 40 [Docket ID OCC-2008-0004] RIN 1557-AC79 Regulatory Review Amendments AGENCY: Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, Treasury. ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency

(OCC)is revising its rules in order to reduce unnecessary regulatory burden, update certain rules, and make certain technical, clarifying, and conforming changes to its regulations. These revisions result from the OCC's most recent review of its regulations to ensure that they effectively advance our mission to promote the safety and soundness of the national banking system, ensure that national banks can compete efficiently in the financial services marketplace, and foster fairness and integrity in national banks' dealings with their customers, without imposing regulatory burden unnecessary to the achievement of those objectives. The revisions also further the purposes of the Economic Growth and Regulatory Paperwork Reduction Act of 1996, which, among other provisions, directs the OCC to identify and, if appropriate, eliminate regulations that are outdated, unnecessary, or unduly burdensome. DATES: This rule is effective on July 1, 2008. National banks, and foreign banks taking actions with respect to Federal branches and agencies, may elect to comply voluntarily with any applicable provision of the rule at any time prior to this effective date. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stuart E. Feldstein, Assistant Director, Legislative and Regulatory Activities,

(202)874-5090 or Heidi M. Thomas, Special Counsel, Legislative and Regulatory Activities,

(202)874-5090, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, 250 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20219. In addition, you may also contact the following OCC staff for further information regarding specific amendments: licensing/corporate applications-related amendments: Colleen Coughlin, Senior Licensing Analyst, Licensing Activities Division,

(202)874-4465, Jan Kalmus, NBE-Senior Licensing Analyst, Licensing Activities Division, 202-874-4608, and Yoo Jin Na, Licensing Analyst, Licensing Activities Division, 202-874-4604; electronic banking-related amendments: Aida Plaza Carter, Director, Bank Information Technology,

(202)874-4593, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, 250 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20219. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Introduction and Summary of Proposed Rule On July 3, 2007, the OCC published a notice of proposed rulemaking 1 to amend a variety of our regulations to reduce or eliminate unnecessary regulatory burden, incorporate prior OCC interpretive opinions, harmonize our rules with those issued by other Federal agencies, make technical and conforming amendments to improve clarity and consistency, and conform our rules with the statutory changes made by the Financial Services Regulatory Relief Act of 2006 (FSRRA) 2 and section 8 of the 2004 District of Columbia Omnibus Authorization Act (DC Bank Act). 3 1 72 FR 36550. 2 *Public Law* 109-351, 120 Stat. 1966 (Oct. 13, 2006). 3 *Public Law* 108-386, 118 Stat. 2228 (2004). The DC Bank Act took effect on October 30, 2004. This rulemaking results from our most recent review of our regulations to identify opportunities to streamline our rules or regulatory processes. The rulemaking also furthers the purposes of section 2222 of the Economic Growth and Regulatory Paperwork Reduction Act of 1996 (EGRPRA), 4 which directed the OCC and the other member agencies of the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council to identify regulations that are outdated, unnecessary, or unduly burdensome, and to eliminate them if appropriate. 5 4 *See* EGRPRA, *Public Law* 104-208, § 2222, 110 Stat. 3009-394, 3009-314-315 (Sept. 30, 1996), *codified at* 12 U.S.C. 3311. 5 Pursuant to EGRPRA's regulatory review requirement, the OCC, together with the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Federal Reserve Board), the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), and the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS), published six notices seeking comment on ways to reduce unnecessary regulatory burden and has conducted outreach meetings with bankers and consumer groups. On November 1, 2007, the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council, which includes these agencies and the National Credit Union Administration, published a Joint Report to Congress on this regulatory review process, as required by EGRPRA. 72 FR 62036 (Nov. 1, 2007). For additional information about the agencies' EGRPRA review, *see http://www.EGRPRA.gov.* The OCC received 8 comment letters in response to this proposal. Two of the commenters, a large bank and a bank trade association, expressed support for all, or almost all, of the proposed changes. Another commenter, also a bank trade association, commended the OCC for proposing “modest changes” and expressed its hope that the OCC would seek to make more significant regulatory improvements in the future. One commenter, an individual, opposed any lessening of regulatory supervision of national banks. Six of the 8 comment letters focused on specific provisions of the proposal—those relating to part 1, investment securities (§ 1.1), operating subsidiaries (§ 5.34(e)), financial guarantees (§ 7.1017), sales of nonconvertible debt (§ 16.6), and adjustable rate mortgages (§ 34.22). These comments, and the OCC's response to them, are discussed where relevant in the section-by-section description of the final rule. Commenters suggested changes to only a few of our proposed amendments and the OCC is adopting the remaining amendments in final form as proposed, with minor clarifying or technical changes to a few provisions, as noted in the section-by-section description. The most significant of the amendments made by this final rule include the following: • Amendments to part 1, which pertains to investment securities, to provide the OCC with additional flexibility in administering part 1 as investment products evolve, codify existing precedent, and clarify applicable standards. • Amendments to part 5, which governs national banks' corporate activities, to: ○ Codify prior OCC interpretive opinions recognizing that national bank operating subsidiaries may take the form of limited partnerships; ○ Update the standards the OCC uses to determine when an entity qualifies as an operating subsidiary; ○ Clarify when a national bank may file an after-the-fact notice to establish or acquire an operating subsidiary and when the bank must file an application; and ○ Expand the list of operating subsidiary activities eligible for after-the-fact notice. • Amendments to part 5 to eliminate multiple, repetitive applications when a national bank opens an intermittent branch to provide branch banking services for one or more limited periods of time each year at a specified site during a specified recurring event, such as during a college registration period or a State fair. • Amendments to part 7, which pertains to national banks' activities and operations, to provide national banks with greater flexibility to facilitate customers' financial transactions by issuing financial guarantees, provided the financial guarantees are reasonably ascertainable in amount and consistent with applicable law. • Amendments to part 7, to codify OCC electronic banking precedent and adapt the OCC's rules to certain current developments. • Amendments to part 16, the OCC's securities offering disclosure rules, to eliminate unnecessary filing requirements and clarify the exemptions to the OCC's registration requirements for certain transactions. • Amendments to part 34, which pertains to real estate lending and appraisals, to provide national banks with additional flexibility in selecting indices from which adjustments to interest rates in adjustable rate mortgages

(ARMs)are derived. The final rule also includes certain technical and conforming amendments to our rules, including: • Changes to part 4 (the OCC's organizational rules) and part 5 to reflect the OCC's most current organizational structure. • Changes to conform the OCC's regulations—at parts 5, 23 (leasing), 31 (extensions of credit to insiders and transactions with affiliates), and 32 (lending limits)—to Regulation W issued by the Federal Reserve Board, 6 which governs transactions between Federal Reserve member banks and their affiliates and implements sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act. 7 6 12 CFR part 223. 7 12 U.S.C. 371c and 371c-1. • Amendments to part 9 (fiduciary activities of national banks) and part 12 (Securities Exchange Act disclosure rules) to reflect changes in certain regulations adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). • Amendments to part 31 to remove an obsolete interpretation relating to loans to third parties secured by both affiliate-issued securities and nonaffiliate collateral. • Amendments to parts 1, 2, 3, 5, 10, 11, 16, 19, 21, 22, 26, 27, 28, and 40 to implement the DC Bank Act, which removed the OCC as the appropriate Federal banking agency for financial institutions established under the Code of Law for the District of Columbia (DC banks) and substituted the FDIC or the Federal Reserve Board, as appropriate to the bank's charter type. 8 8 Under the DC Bank Act, the FDIC is the appropriate Federal banking agency for an insured bank chartered under District of Columbia law that is not a member of the Federal Reserve System, and the Federal Reserve Board is the appropriate Federal banking agency for a bank chartered under District of Columbia law that is a member of the Federal Reserve System, whether or not insured. Thus, while DC banks are no longer covered by these OCC regulations, they are subject to comparable regulatory regimes administered by the FDIC or the Federal Reserve Board. • Amendments to conform our regulations to the changes made by the FSRRA, including: ○ Amendments to part 5 that simplify a national bank's authority to pay a dividend and that remove the geographic limits with respect to bank service companies. ○ Amendments to the OCC's Change in Bank Control Act

(CBCA)regulation, § 5.50, that:

(1)Require a CBCA notice to include information on the future prospects of the national bank to be acquired,

(2)permit the OCC to consider the future prospects of the bank as a basis to issue a notice of disapproval, and

(3)permit the OCC to impose conditions on its action not to disapprove a CBCA notice. ○ Amendments to part 7 that permit national banks to choose whether to provide for cumulative voting in the election of their directors. ○ Amendments to part 19 that reflect changes to the OCC's enforcement authority with respect to institution-affiliated parties. ○ Amendments to part 24 (community development investments) that implement section 305 of the FSRRA. Description of Comments Received and Final Rule Part 1—Investment Securities Part 1 of our regulations (12 CFR part 1) prescribes the standards under which a national bank may purchase, sell, deal in, underwrite, and hold securities, consistent with the National Bank Act (12 U.S.C. 24 (Seventh)) and safe and sound banking practices. This final rule clarifies the applicable standards by codifying existing precedent and provides the OCC with additional flexibility to administer part 1 as investment products evolve. Authority, Purpose, and Scope (§ 1.1) National banking law explicitly authorizes the OCC to determine the types of investment securities a national bank may purchase. 9 Part 1 currently provides a general definition of the term “investment security,” describes several categories or types of permissible investment securities, and prescribes such limitations as apply to a national bank's investment in each type. To complement these specific categories, we proposed a new provision to recognize that the OCC also may determine, on a case-by-case basis, that a national bank may acquire an investment security that is not specifically listed in the regulation, provided the OCC determines that bank's investment is consistent with the character of investment securities permitted under section 24 (Seventh) and with safe and sound banking practices. We received no substantive comments on this provision and, accordingly, it is adopted essentially as proposed, with a minor revision clarifying that investments found by the OCC to be permissible under Section 1.1(d) constitute eligible investments under 12 U.S.C. 24. 9 12 U.S.C. 24 (Seventh). In making a determination under amended § 1.1, the OCC will consider all relevant factors, including an evaluation of the risk characteristics of the particular instrument compared to those of investments that the OCC has previously authorized, as well as the bank's ability effectively to manage such risks. In approving such an investment, the OCC may impose such limits or conditions as are appropriate under the circumstances. In addition, this final rule removes the now-obsolete reference to DC banks from the scope of part 1 (§ 1.1(c)), thus eliminating the applicability of part 1 to DC banks. One commenter requested that the OCC continuously update the electronic version of our annual publication of permissible activities for national banks, “ *Significant Legal, Licensing, and Community Development Precedents,* ” 10 to add precedents issued pursuant to § 1.1, as well as other activities, more frequently than once a year. We note, however, that, in addition to this annual, cumulative summary of significant precedents, we also publish the full text of these precedents in *Interpretations and Actions* , consistent with the OCC's policy of providing public notice of significant legal opinions and other important precedents. *Interpretations and Actions* is published monthly and is available both in printed form and on the OCC's internet site at *http://www.occ.treas.gov.* We believe this method of publicizing our precedent adequately serves the purpose of providing prompt notice of our opinions and decisions to national banks and the public and, accordingly, are making no changes at this time to our schedule of updating our “ * Significant Legal, Licensing, and Community Development Precedents * ” publication. 10 Our most recent *Significant Legal, Licensing, and Community Development Precedents document,* dated June 2007, is available on our Web site at *http://www.occ.gov/sigpre.pdf.* Pooled Investments (§ 1.3(h)) Current § 1.3(h) allows a national bank to purchase and sell shares in an investment company provided that the portfolio of the investment company is limited to investment securities authorized in part 1. However, as explained in the preamble to the proposed rule, markets increasingly are offering securitized, pooled investment vehicles that hold bank-permissible assets not limited to investment securities. For example, a bank may seek to purchase investment grade shares in an investment company where the underlying assets are loans. In that case, the bank's risk exposure may be comparable to its exposure when it purchases shares of identically rated and marketable pooled vehicles composed of part 1 investment securities. The proposal amended § 1.3(h) to codify OCC precedents that permit a national bank to purchase shares in investment vehicles where the underlying assets are not limited to investment securities permissible under part 1, so long as the underlying assets otherwise are bank permissible. 11 Specifically, the proposal deleted the phrase “under this part” both times it appears in § 1.3(h) and revised the heading to read “Pooled investments” to clarify that banks have the authority to invest in entities holding pooled assets, provided that the underlying assets are those that a national bank may purchase and sell for its own account. The proposal also provided that pooled investments made pursuant to § 1.3(h) must meet certain credit quality and marketability standards generally applicable to investment securities. We received no comments on this amendment and are adopting it in final form with the addition of the following clarifying language. 11 *See, e.g.* , Interpretive Letter No. 911 (June 4, 2001) (national bank may purchase interests in loan fund either pursuant to lending authority or as securities on the basis of reliable estimates of the issuer). Specifically, the final version of § 1.3(h) includes an explicit reminder that pooled investments under this section must comply with § 1.5 and conform with applicable published OCC precedent. 12 Under, 12 CFR 1.5, when conducting investment activities described in § 1.3, a national bank must adhere to safe and sound banking practices and the specific requirements of part 1. Thus, the bank must consider, as appropriate, the interest rate, credit, liquidity, price, foreign exchange, transaction, compliance, strategic, and reputation risks presented by a proposed activity; the particular activities undertaken by the bank must be appropriate for that bank; and the bank must conclude that the obligor can satisfy its obligations. 12 See, *e.g.* OCC Interpretive Letters No. 779 (April 3, 1997) and 911 (June 4, 2001). *See also* OCC BC 181 (Rev), “Purchases of Loans In Whole or In Part—Participations” (Aug. 2, 1984), and ”Interagency Policy Statement on Investment Securities,” 63 FR 20191 (April 23, 1998). Securities Held Based on Estimates of Obligor's Performance (§ 1.3(i)) Part 1 defines an investment security in terms of both asset quality and marketability. 13 Section 1.2(f) further defines a “marketable” security as one that is:

(1)Registered under the Securities Act of 1933 (Securities Act), 14

(2)a municipal revenue bond exempt from registration under the Securities Act,

(3)offered or sold pursuant to Securities and Exchange Commission

(SEC)Rule 144A 15 and rated investment grade or the credit equivalent, or

(4)“can be sold with reasonable promptness at a price that corresponds reasonably to its fair value.” 16 13 12 CFR 1.2(e). 14 15 U.S.C. 77a, *et. seq.* 15 17 CFR 230.144A. 16 12 CFR 1.2(f). Section 1.3(i), in contrast, articulates different asset quality and marketability standards. That section permits a national bank to treat a debt security as an investment security “if the bank concludes, on the basis of estimates that the bank reasonably believes are reliable, that the obligor will be able to satisfy its obligations under that security,” and the bank believes that the security may be sold with reasonable promptness at a price that corresponds reasonably to its fair value. 17 The standard of marketability in the “reliable estimates” provision differs from, and is more limited than, the marketability definition in § 1.2(f) in that it does not contain all of the elements of the definition in § 1.2(f). We proposed to harmonize these marketability standards by amending § 1.3 to reflect the same standard as in § 1.2. We received no comments on this proposal, and therefore adopt it as proposed. 17 *See* 12 CFR 1.3(i)(1). Part 2—Sales of Credit Life Insurance Part 2 sets forth the principles and standards that apply to a national bank's provision of credit life insurance and the limitations that apply to the receipt of income from those sales by certain individuals and entities associated with the bank. This final rule removes DC banks from the definition of “bank” set forth in § 2.2(a) to conform to the DC Bank Act. Part 3—Minimum Capital Ratios; Issuance of Directives Part 3 establishes the minimum capital ratios that apply to national banks, sets out in appendices the rules governing the computation of those ratios, and provides procedures for the issuance of individual minimum capital requirements and capital directives. The current rule provides that local currency claims on, or unconditionally guaranteed by, central governments that are not members of the Organization for Economic Development

(OECD)receive a zero percent risk weight to the extent the bank has local currency liabilities in that country. To align the rule more closely with foreign exchange risk, we proposed to amend Appendix A to part 3 by removing the current restriction on the location of the offsetting liability, thus providing a zero percent risk weight to the extent the bank has liabilities in that *currency* . We received no comments on this amendment and are adopting the changes as proposed, with a conforming technical amendment. This final rule also removes DC banks from the definition of “bank” in § 3.2(b). Pursuant to the DC Bank Act, DC banks now will be subject to the regulatory capital requirements prescribed either by the FDIC or the Federal Reserve Board, depending on whether the DC bank is a member of the Federal Reserve System. Part 4—Organization and Functions, Availability and Release of Information, Contracting Outreach Program, Post-Employment Restrictions for Senior Examiners The proposed rule updated § 4.4 to reflect that the Large Bank Supervision Department supervises the largest national banks under the OCC's current organizational structure. It also amended § 4.5 by updating OCC district office addresses and the geographical coverage of those offices resulting from the OCC's district office realignments. We received no comments on these changes and are adopting the changes as proposed, with additional updates to the geographical coverage of OCC district offices. Part 5—Rules, Policies, and Procedures for Corporate Activities Part 5 establishes rules, policies, and procedures for national banks' corporate activities and corporate structure. It also contains procedural requirements for the filing of corporate applications, including the circumstances under which applications or notices are required, and the required content of the filing. A description of our amendments to part 5 is set forth below, with substantive amendments presented first, followed by technical or conforming amendments. Fiduciary Powers (§ 5.26) The OCC's current rule requires a national bank filing an application for approval to offer fiduciary services to provide an opinion of counsel that the proposed fiduciary activities do not violate applicable Federal or State law. However, an opinion of counsel is not required for expedited applications filed by “eligible banks.” 18 Because our experience has been that an opinion of counsel often is not necessary to enable the OCC to conclude that the proposed fiduciary activities are permissible, we proposed to eliminate this requirement for all applications to exercise fiduciary activities, unless the OCC specifically requests an opinion. We received no comments on this amendment and adopt it as proposed. We note that the removal of this requirement does not relieve the bank of its responsibility to ensure that its fiduciary activities comport with applicable Federal and State law. 18 An “eligible bank” is a national bank that is well capitalized, has a composite rating of 1 or 2 under the Uniform Financial Institutions Rating System, has a CRA rating of “Outstanding” or “Satisfactory,” and is not subject to a cease and desist order, consent order, formal written agreement, or prompt corrective action directive. 12 CFR 5.3(g). Establishment, Acquisition, and Relocation of a Branch—Intermittent Branches (§ 5.30) Section 5.30 describes the procedures and standards governing OCC review and approval of a national bank's application to establish a new branch or to relocate a branch. As the preamble to our proposed rule noted, it is unclear under the current regulation whether a bank must refile an application under § 5.30 each year to operate branches on a recurring basis at the *same* location or event (such as an annual State fair or at a specific college campus during registration periods) even where all of the facts relevant to the branch application remain the same as those previously approved. As a result, some banks have filed for approval of such branches each time the bank seeks to operate the branch. To reduce the regulatory burden associated with these multiple filings, we proposed to eliminate subsequent applications for recurring, temporary branches that serve the same site at regular intervals. We received no comments on this amendment, and we adopt it as proposed. Specifically, the final rule adds to § 5.30 the new term, “intermittent branch,” which is defined to mean a branch that provides branch banking services, where legally permissible under the national bank branching statute, 19 for one or more limited periods of time each year at a specified site during a specified recurring event. Under this final rule, if the OCC grants a national bank approval to operate an intermittent branch, no further application or notice to the OCC is required. This amendment does not affect the legal requirements prescribing the conditions under which a national bank may establish or retain branches pursuant to the national bank branching statute at 12 U.S.C. 36. 19 12 U.S.C. 36. Operating Subsidiaries (§ 5.34) Section 5.34 of the OCC's rules authorizes national banks to establish or acquire operating subsidiaries as a means through which to exercise their powers to conduct the business of banking. The final rule makes several changes to § 5.34 to update the standards for determining whether a subsidiary is controlled by the parent bank in light of changes in accounting standards, to clarify the type of entity that may qualify as an operating subsidiary, and to modify the standards under which transactions to establish or acquire operating subsidiaries qualify for after-the-fact notice procedures rather than the filing of an application. None of the proposed revisions alters the fundamental characteristics of an operating subsidiary, that is, that an operating subsidiary may conduct only bank-permissible activities and conducts those activities pursuant to the same “authorization, terms and conditions” as apply to the parent bank. 20 20 12 CFR 5.34(e). *Qualifying standards.* Under current § 5.34(e)(2), an entity qualifies as an operating subsidiary only if the parent bank “controls” the subsidiary. The rule provides for two alternative means of establishing control. First, a national bank controls an operating subsidiary if the bank owns more than 50 percent of the voting interest (or similar type of controlling interest) in the subsidiary. Second, control may be established if the parent bank “otherwise controls” the operating subsidiary and no other party controls more than 50 percent of the voting interest (or similar type of controlling interest) in the subsidiary. The proposal would have revised this standard to provide that a national bank may invest in an operating subsidiary if it satisfies the following requirements:

(1)The bank has the ability to control the management and operations of the subsidiary by owning more than 50 percent of the voting interest in the subsidiary, or otherwise; *and*

(2)the operating subsidiary is consolidated with the bank under Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). The OCC received two comments that addressed this issue. One commenter asserted that the proposal was too broad and that there are many structures that have legitimate business purposes where the bank controls a majority of the voting and operational rights but other passive or non-controlling investors have economic rights. Another commenter noted that the requirement to consolidate under GAAP would narrow the circumstances under which national banks may establish operating subsidiaries. The OCC continues to believe that these changes are appropriate to clarify that the requirement that a national bank control its operating subsidiary encompasses the bank's control of the business activities of the subsidiary to appropriately reflect the status of the operating subsidiary as a vehicle used by the bank to exercise its powers to engage in the business of banking, the operations of which are consolidated with those of the bank as an accounting matter. Therefore, the OCC has adopted the rule essentially as proposed, with a few revisions to resolve ambiguity in the proposed text. As noted above, the first element of the proposed rule required the bank to have the ability to control the management and operations of the subsidiary by owning more than 50 percent of the voting interest in the subsidiary, or otherwise. The proposal could have been read to mean that a 50 percent voting interest in the subsidiary, without more, would have satisfied that criterion. The final rule revises the proposal to make clear that the standard has three elements:

(i)The parent bank has the ability to control the management and operations of the subsidiary;

(ii)the bank owns and controls more than 50 percent of the voting (or similar type of controlling) interest of the operating subsidiary, or the parent bank otherwise controls the operating subsidiary and no other party controls more than 50 percent of the voting (or similar type of controlling) interest of the operating subsidiary; *and*

(iii)the operating subsidiary is consolidated with the bank under GAAP. 21 These changes help to ensure that in all circumstances a parent bank must have true operating control over an entity for it to be an operating subsidiary. 21 The OCC will address on a case-by-case basis the appropriate treatment of a national bank's investment in a subsidiary in which the bank satisfies

(i)and (ii), but not

(iii)because the subsidiary is not consolidated with the bank under GAAP. Two commenters also suggested grandfathering operating subsidiaries that were established prior to these changes. These commenters noted that to do otherwise could disrupt existing arrangements and impose administrative burdens on banks to restructure their subsidiaries to comply with the new rule. The final rule adds a grandfathering provision responsive to these concerns. The provision makes clear that, unless otherwise notified by the OCC with respect to a particular operating subsidiary, an operating subsidiary a national bank lawfully acquired or established and operated as an operating subsidiary before the publication date of this rule will not be treated as in violation of § 5.34 as revised, provided that the bank and the operating subsidiary are, and continue to be, in compliance with the standards and requirements applicable when the bank established or acquired the operating subsidiary. This grandfathering applies only to operating subsidiaries in existence and conducting authorized activities on April 24, 2008. *Form of operating subsidiary.* Current § 5.34(e)(2) permits national banks to conduct activities through operating subsidiaries organized in a variety of forms, including as a corporation or limited liability company. In recent years, national banks have sought to hold limited partnerships as operating subsidiaries as States have amended their limited liability company and limited partnership laws to provide more structural flexibility. The OCC has recognized this and previously permitted a limited partnership to qualify as an operating subsidiary where the parent bank exercised “all economic and management control over the activities” of the partnership. 22 Therefore, the proposal clarified that a bank may invest in an operating subsidiary organized as a limited partnership, provided it satisfies the other requirements of § 5.34. 22 *See* Corporate Decision No. 2004-16 (Sept. 10, 2004). We did not receive any comments on that provision and are adopting the change as proposed. *After-the-fact notice procedures.* Current § 5.34(e)(5) provides that a well capitalized and well managed national bank may establish or acquire an operating subsidiary, or conduct a new activity in an existing operating subsidiary, by providing the OCC written notice within 10 days after doing so if the activity to be conducted in the subsidiary is specified in the rule as eligible for notice processing. The proposal would have permitted a bank to use the after-the-fact notice procedures if the financial statements of the bank and subsidiary were consolidated under GAAP, and the bank had the ability to control the management and operations of the subsidiary by holding:

(i)More than 50% of the voting interests in the subsidiary; or

(ii)voting interests sufficient to select the number of directors needed to control the subsidiary's board and to select and terminate senior management. The final rule slightly revises the criteria for after-the-fact notices to permit the bank to use that procedure when the bank and proposed subsidiary meet

(1)all the requirements for a notice that do not pertain to control,

(2)the financial statements of the bank and subsidiary are consolidated under GAAP, and

(3)the bank has the ability to control the management and operations of the subsidiary by holding:

(i)More than 50% of the voting interests in the subsidiary; and

(ii)voting interests sufficient to select the number of directors needed to control the subsidiary's board and to select and terminate senior management. These control arrangements are the most suitable for the after-the-fact notice procedures because the OCC generally is familiar with these structural arrangements and they do not ordinarily present unusual control or safety and soundness concerns. Other arrangements will be reviewed under the full application process. The proposal also contained an additional standard for a national bank seeking to hold a limited partnership as an operating subsidiary through an after-the-fact notice. Under that additional standard, the proposed limited partnership operating subsidiary would qualify for the after-the-fact notice procedure only in the limited circumstance where the bank controls, directly or indirectly, all of the ownership interests in the limited partnership (and the other requirements of § 5.34 are satisfied). We explained that this approach would allow the OCC to review more complex arrangements through the application process. We received two comments that addressed the after-the-fact notice procedure for limited partnerships. These commenters expressed concern that limiting after-the-fact notice in this manner would inappropriately require an application process in situations that do not present heightened complexity or risk. We agree with the commenters that the after-the-fact notice process could be modestly expanded without presenting new operational risks or policy considerations. Accordingly, we have revised the standard for investments in limited partnership operating subsidiaries to qualify for after-the-fact notice. Under the final rule, the after-the-fact notice eligibility standards for limited partnerships are similar to those for corporate entities, except that, in the case of a limited partnership, the bank or its operating subsidiary must be the sole general partner of the limited partnership and, under the partnership agreement, the limited partners must have no authority to bind the partnership by virtue solely of their status as limited partners. This will allow banks to use the less burdensome after-the-fact notice procedures while still ensuring that transactions that raise issues of potential liability for general partners are subject to the higher scrutiny available under the application process. In addition, the final rule adds the following to the list of activities eligible for after-the-fact notice: • Providing data processing, and data transmission services, facilities (including equipment, technology, and personnel), data bases, advice and access to such services, facilities, data bases and advice, for the parent bank and for others, pursuant to 12 CFR 7.5006, to the extent permitted by published OCC precedent. Currently, only data processing activity provided to the bank itself or its affiliates qualifies for after-the-fact notice treatment under § 5.34(e)(5)(v)(H). • Providing bill presentment, billing, collection, and claims-processing services. 23 23 *See* OCC Interpretive Letter No. 712 (Feb. 29, 1996). • Providing safekeeping for personal information or valuable confidential trade or business information, such as encryption keys, to the extent permitted by published OCC precedent. 24 24 *See* 12 CFR 7.5002(a)(4). • Payroll processing. 25 25 *See* Conditional Approval No. 384 (April 25, 2000) and Corporate Decision No. 2002-2 (Jan. 9, 2002). • Branch management services. 26 26 *See* Conditional Approval No. 612 (Dec. 21, 2003). • Merchant processing except when the activity involves the use of third parties to solicit or underwrite merchants. 27 27 *See* Conditional Approvals Nos. 582 (March 12, 2003) and 583 (March 12, 2003). • Administrative tasks involved in benefits administration. 28 28 *See* Corporate Decision No. 98-13 (Feb. 9, 1998). The OCC has previously found these activities to be permissible for a national bank and generally to pose low safety and soundness risks. We did not receive any comments on these additional activities eligible for after-the-fact notice and are adopting the above changes as proposed. We have determined, however, not to add to this list those activities approved for a non-controlling investment by a national bank or its operating subsidiary pursuant to 12 CFR 5.36(e)(2) because the circumstances of such non-controlling investment activities could be such that they should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis when proposed to be conducted by an operating subsidiary controlled by a national bank. *Application procedures.* Current § 5.34(e)(5)(i) sets forth the rules for when a national bank must file an operating subsidiary application. The final rule modifies these provisions to make them consistent with the changes to the qualifying subsidiary and after-the-fact notice provisions of § 5.34 discussed previously. In particular, the final rule requires the bank to describe in full detail structural arrangements where control is based on a factor other than bank ownership of more than 50 percent of the voting interest of the subsidiary and the ability to control the management and operations of the subsidiary by holding voting interests sufficient to select the number of directors needed to control the subsidiary's board and to select and terminate senior management. The final rule also requires, in the case of an application to establish a limited partnership as an operating subsidiary, that a bank provide a statement explaining why it is not eligible for the after-the-fact notice procedures. Finally, the final rule makes conforming changes to § 5.34(e)(5)(vi), which sets forth the circumstances under which an application or notice is waived, to reflect the changes discussed above. Bank Service Companies (§ 5.35) Section 602 of the FSRRA amended the Bank Service Company Act 29 to repeal the geographic limits that prohibited a bank service company from performing services for persons other than depository institutions in any State except the State where its shareholders and members are located. Section 602 retains the requirements that the services and the location at which these services are provided must be otherwise permissible for all depository institution shareholders or members and that Federal Reserve Board approval be obtained before a bank service company engages in activities that are only authorized under the Bank Holding Company Act. Section 602 also permits savings associations to invest in bank service companies under the same rules that apply to banks. 29 12 U.S.C. 1861 *et seq.* The proposal amended 12 CFR 5.35 to reflect this change in the statutory geographic restrictions on the operations of bank service companies. It also changed “insured bank” to “insured institution” throughout the section, where relevant, to reflect the fact that savings associations now may invest in bank service companies. We received no comments on these amendments and adopt them as proposed. Other Equity Investments (§ 5.36) Section 5.36(e) provides an expedited process for OCC review of a non-controlling investment by a national bank. Under this section, a national bank may make, directly or through an operating subsidiary, certain non-controlling investments in entities by filing an after-the-fact written notice in which the bank certifies, among other things, that it is well capitalized and well managed and will account for its investment under the equity or cost method of accounting. 30 This section currently does not, however, provide a procedure for a national bank to follow when it cannot provide the certifications needed for after-the-fact notice. Our proposal revised the accounting requirements needed for after-the-fact notice, added an application procedure where a bank or the proposed non-controlling investment do not qualify for the after-the-fact procedure, and made two changes to expedite non-controlling investments involving assets acquired through foreclosure or otherwise in good faith to compromise a doubtful claim or in the ordinary course of collecting a debt previously contracted (DPC assets). We received no comments on any of these amendments to § 5.36 and adopt them as proposed, with some minor technical changes in terminology for clarification purposes and a revision to a clarifying amendment to § 5.36(b). 30 Under the equity method, the carrying value of the bank's investment is originally recorded at cost but subsequently adjusted periodically to reflect the bank's proportionate share of the entity's earnings and losses and decreased by the amount of any cash dividends or similar distributions received from the entity. *Representations concerning accounting treatment.* Current § 5.36(e)(5) requires a national bank to certify in its notice that it will account for its non-controlling investment under the equity or cost method of accounting. The OCC had adopted this requirement because an investment accounted for in this manner was not previously considered under then current GAAP standards to be controlled by the parent bank and, accordingly, the parent bank did not consolidate the investment on its books. Thus, the unconsolidated entity could be considered a non-controlling investment and not an operating subsidiary. However, as we have noted, under FIN 46R this assumption is no longer valid in all cases and an investment previously accounted for using the equity or cost method today may in some instances result in consolidation of the investment with the bank, depending on which party holds the majority of risks or rewards. As in the proposal, the final rule addresses this issue by removing the requirement that a bank certify in its notice that it will account for its non-controlling investment under the equity or cost method of accounting. The final rule also accordingly removes the requirement in current § 5.36(e)(7) that a bank certify that its loss exposure related to the non-controlling investment is limited as an *accounting* matter. The final rule retains the requirement in paragraph (e)(7) that the bank certify that as a *legal* matter its loss exposure is limited and that it does not have open-ended liability for the obligations of the enterprise. *Application procedure.* Current § 5.36(e) permits use of the after-the-fact notice procedure only when the bank can make the representations and certifications required by that section. 31 The rule provides no procedure for a national bank to follow when it cannot provide all of the required representations and certifications. The final rule revises § 5.36 to establish an application procedure that a national bank may use to seek approval for non-controlling investments that do not qualify for after-the-fact notice either because the proposed activity does not qualify under the standards set forth in the rule (as described in § 5.36(e)(2)), or because the bank is not well capitalized or well managed (as described in § 5.36(e)(3)). The final rule does not require a national bank to file either an application or notice under this section if the investment is authorized by a separate provision of OCC regulations, such as 12 CFR part 1 (investment securities) or part 24 (community development). In these cases, a national bank would follow the procedures required by these provisions. 31 Section 5.36(e) currently requires that a written after-the-fact notice contain the following eight elements, set out in numbered paragraphs, as follows:

(1)A description of the proposed investment;

(2)identification of the regulatory provision or prior precedent that has authorized an activity that is substantively the same as the proposed activity;

(3)certification that the bank is well capitalized and well managed;

(4)a statement of how the bank can control the activities of the enterprise in which it is investing or ensure its ability to withdraw its investment;

(5)the accounting certification described in the preamble text (which this final rule removes);

(6)a description of how the investment relates to the bank's business;

(7)certification that the bank's loss exposure is limited as a legal and accounting matter (the final rule removes this accounting certification); and

(8)certification that the enterprise in which the bank is investing agrees to be subject to OCC examination and supervision, subject to limits provided elsewhere in Federal law. The final rule specifically requires the application to provide the other representations and certifications required in paragraph

(e)for after-the-fact notices as well as the representation required by (e)(2) (pertaining to the OCC's prior determination that the investment is permissible) or the certification required by (e)(3) (pertaining to the bank's capital level and rating for management), as appropriate. A bank may not make a non-controlling investment in an entity if the bank cannot provide the representations or certifications that the rule requires, other than those in paragraphs (e)(2) or (e)(3). In addition, if the bank is unable to make the representation described in paragraph (e)(2), the bank's application must explain why the activity is a permissible activity for a national bank and why the bank should be permitted to hold a non-controlling investment in an enterprise engaged in that activity. This application requirement would fill the gap in the current rule for investments where a national bank cannot meet all of the after-the-fact notice requirements. The use of an application procedure provides certainty to the applicant and also permits the OCC to ensure that all non-controlling investments comport with applicable legal standards and appropriate supervisory requirements. The proposal made two conforming changes to the scope of § 5.36(b) to conform to these changes. We have revised one of these changes in the final rule. This change would have removed the last sentence of § 5.36(b), which currently provides that other investments authorized under § 5.36 may be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. After further review, we have decided to maintain this sentence with minor technical revisions, as the scope section covers all equity investments not governed by other OCC regulations, not solely non-controlling investments. *DPC assets.* As in the proposal, the final rule makes two changes to expedite non-controlling investments involving assets acquired through foreclosure or otherwise in good faith to compromise a doubtful claim or in the ordinary course of collecting a debt previously contracted (DPC assets). Under the current rule, a national bank making a non-controlling investment in an entity that holds or manages DPC assets for the bank must meet all of the requirements in § 5.36, including the required certifications. However, under § 5.34, a national bank investing in an operating subsidiary engaged in the same activity need only file a written notice within 10 days after acquiring or establishing the subsidiary or commencing the activity. These procedural differences can be disruptive in workouts involving a jointly-held entity to resolve loans with multiple lenders where each lender will hold minority interests in the joint venture. The final rule harmonizes these provisions by providing that a national bank making a non-controlling investment in an entity that holds or manages DPC assets for the bank need only file a simplified written notice with the appropriate district office 32 no later than 10 days after making the non-controlling investment. The notice must contain a complete description of the bank's investment in the enterprise and the activities conducted, a description of how the bank plans to divest the non-controlling investment or the DPC assets within the statutory time frames, and a representation and undertaking that the bank will conduct the activities in accordance with OCC policies contained in guidance issued by the OCC regarding the activities. 32 Part 5 defines “appropriate district office” as the Licensing Department for all national bank subsidiaries of those holding companies assigned to the Washington, DC, licensing unit; the appropriate OCC district office for all national bank subsidiaries of certain holding companies assigned to a district office licensing unit; the OCC's district office where the national bank's supervisory office is located for all other banks; or the licensing unit in the Northeastern District Office for Federal branches and agencies of foreign banks. 12 CFR 5.3. The final rule also amends § 5.36 to clarify that an application or notice is not required when a national bank acquires DPC assets. This change conforms this section with § 5.34, which provides that a subsidiary in which the bank has acquired, in good faith, shares through foreclosure on collateral, by way of compromise of a doubtful claim, or to avoid a loss in connection with a debt previously contracted is not an operating subsidiary for purposes of § 5.34 and, therefore, no application or notice is required. Changes in Permanent Capital (§ 5.46) The final rule streamlines the application process for a national bank seeking OCC approval of a change in its permanent capital. The OCC did not receive any comments on this change and we are adopting it as proposed. The OCC's rules at § 5.46(i)(1) and

(2)currently require a national bank to submit an application and obtain prior approval for a change in permanent capital. Under the expedited review procedures in § 5.46(i)(2), the application of an eligible bank is deemed approved within 30 days of receipt, unless the OCC notifies the applicant otherwise. The final rule amends § 5.46(i)(2) to change the expedited review period from 30 days to 15 days. The final rule also simplifies the certification process for a national bank that increases its permanent capital. Section 5.46 currently requires a national bank that increases permanent capital to submit a letter of notification to the OCC in order to receive a certification of the increase as required by 12 U.S.C. 57. 33 Under the final rule, a national bank seeking to increase permanent capital continues to be required to send a notice to the OCC, but the bank will no longer receive a paper certification from the OCC. The OCC will deem the transaction approved and certified by operation of law seven days after our receipt of the bank's notice. The OCC intends to update the notification and certification procedures for increases in permanent capital in the Capital and Dividends Booklet of the * Comptroller's Licensing Manual * and on E-Corp (the OCC's electronic filing system) to reflect this final rule. 33 Section 57 provides that increases to permanent capital are not effective until the bank provides notice to the OCC and the OCC certifies the amount of the increase and approves it. The precise terms of the bank's notification and the OCC's approval vary slightly depending on whether the increase to permanent capital occurs through the declaration of a stock dividend or otherwise. *See* 12 U.S.C. 57. Change in Bank Control (§ 5.50) Section 5.50 sets forth the OCC's procedures for change in bank control transactions. Under this rule, any person seeking to acquire control of a national bank, *i.e.* , acquire the power, directly or indirectly, to direct the management or policies or to vote 25 percent or more of any class of voting securities of a national bank, must provide 60 days prior written notice of the proposed acquisition to the OCC, with certain exceptions. Currently, the OCC has the burden of proof in establishing that a group of persons are acting in concert and will control, as a group, the bank after the acquisition of shares. When a member of a family acquires stock in a national bank in which other family members own or control substantial interests, the OCC frequently will review potential control issues by requesting additional documentation from, and making additional inquiries of, the family members. These additional steps can delay the notice process and increase the burden associated with the transaction for these individuals. We proposed to amend § 5.50(f)(2) to establish a rebuttable presumption that immediate family members are acting in concert when acquiring shares of a bank. The proposal also amended § 5.50(d) to define immediate family as a person's spouse, father, mother, stepfather, stepmother, brother, sister, stepbrother, stepsister, children, stepchildren, grandparent, grandchildren, father-in-law, mother-in-law, brother-in-law, sister-in-law, son-in-law, daughter-in-law, and the spouse of any of the foregoing. We did not receive any comments on these amendments and adopt them unchanged in the final rule. As noted in the preamble to the proposed rule, establishing a clear, but rebuttable, presumption provides notice to prospective investors of their filing obligations and reduces delays in processing the notice associated with repeat requests for information. In addition, this amendment conforms our regulations to the procedures regarding control by family members in these transactions set forth in OTS and Federal Reserve Board regulations. We intend to amend the *Comptroller's Licensing Manual* to address the process by which an applicant can rebut this presumption. 34 34 *See* 12 CFR 574.4

(OTS)and 12 CFR 225.41(b)(3) and 225.41(d) (Federal Reserve Board). The proposed rule also made two amendments to § 5.50 to implement provisions of the FSRRA. We received no comments on these amendments and adopt them as proposed. First, section 705 of the FSRRA amended the CBCA to allow the OCC and the other Federal banking agencies to extend the time period for considering a CBCA notice so that the agency may consider the acquiring party's business plans and the future prospects of the institution and use that information in determining whether to disapprove the notice. The final rule amends § 5.50(f) of our regulations to implement this amendment by providing that the CBCA notice must include information on the future prospects of the institution and that the OCC may consider the future prospects of the institution as a basis to issue a notice of disapproval. Second, sections 702 and 716 of the FSRRA amended the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (FDI Act) to provide that the OCC and the other Federal banking agencies may enforce under 12 U.S.C. 1818 the terms of:

(1)Conditions imposed in writing by the agency on a depository institution, including a national bank, or an institution-affiliated party in connection with an application, notice, or other request, and

(2)written agreements between the agency and the institution or the institution-affiliated party. The amendment also clarifies that a condition imposed by a banking agency in connection with the nondisapproval of a notice, *e.g.* , a notice under the CBCA, can be enforced under the FDI Act. Accordingly, the final rule amends § 5.50(f) to provide that the OCC may impose conditions on its nondisapproval of a CBCA notice to assure satisfaction of the relevant statutory criteria for nondisapproval of the notice. Technical and Conforming Amendments to Part 5 The proposed rule made the following conforming and technical changes to part 5. None of the commenters addressed these changes and we adopt them in the final rule as proposed. *Definition of national bank (§ 5.3(j)).* This amendment removes the reference to DC banks from the definition of “national bank” found in § 5.3(j). As a result, DC banks are no longer subject to the OCC's rules, policies, and procedures for corporate activities and transactions, including the OCC's filing requirements. *Filing required (§ 5.4).* The final rule replaces the terms “Licensing Manager” with “Director for District Licensing” and replaces “Bank Organization and Structure” with the term “Licensing Department.” This reflects the OCC's current organizational structure. *Decisions (§ 5.13).* Section 5.13 sets forth the procedures for OCC decisions on corporate filings. Paragraph

(c)of § 5.13 requires a filing with the OCC to contain all required information. The OCC may require additional information if necessary to evaluate the application, and may deem a filing abandoned if the information required or requested is not furnished within the time period specified by the OCC. The OCC also may return an application that it deems materially deficient when filed. The final rule amends § 5.13(c) to define “materially deficient” to mean filings that lack sufficient information for the OCC to make a determination under the applicable statutory or regulatory criteria. Examples of material deficiencies that could cause the OCC to return a filing include failure to provide answers to all questions or failure to provide required financial information. Paragraph

(f)of this section provides that an applicant may appeal an OCC decision to the Deputy Comptroller for Licensing or to the OCC Ombudsman. In some cases, however, the Deputy Comptroller for Licensing is the deciding official for OCC licensing decisions or has personal and substantial involvement in the decision-making process. Accordingly, we are amending this paragraph to provide that an appeal may be referred instead to the Chief Counsel when the Deputy Comptroller for Licensing was the deciding official of the matter appealed or was involved personally and substantially in the matter. In addition, the final rule replaces the title “Deputy Comptroller for Bank Organization and Structure” with the title “Deputy Comptroller for Licensing” to reflect the OCC's current organizational structure. *Organizing a bank (§ 5.20)* . Section 5.20 sets forth the procedures and requirements governing OCC review and approval of an application to establish a national bank. Paragraph (i)(5) of this section requires a proposed national bank to be established as a legal entity before the OCC grants final approval. As currently drafted, our regulations may be read to imply that organizers must receive OCC preliminary approval before they may raise capital, which is not required by OCC policy or the terms of the National Bank Act. 35 35 The Comptroller's Licensing Manual permits organizers of a national bank to raise capital prior to preliminary OCC approval. * See Comptroller's Licensing Manual,* Charters, pgs. 20-21, March 2007. Accordingly, the final rule amends § 5.20(i)(5) to make clear that OCC preliminary approval is not required prior to a securities offering by a proposed national bank, provided that the proposed national bank qualifies as a body corporate under the National Bank Act by filing articles of association and an organization certificate, has filed a completed charter application, and the bank complies with the OCC's securities offering regulations set forth in Part 16. These requirements are explained in greater detail in the *Comptroller's Licensing Manual* . The final rule also amends paragraph (i)(3) of § 5.20, which requires the organizing group to designate a spokesperson to represent the group in its contacts with the OCC, by replacing the term “spokesperson” with the term “contact person” each time that term appears. This change aligns the wording of this section with the terminology used on the Interagency Charter and Deposit Application and in the “Charters” booklet of the *Comptroller's Licensing Manual* . *Business combinations (§ 5.33)* . Section 5.33 contains the provisions governing business combinations involving national banks. Section 5.33(e)(1) sets forth factors used by the OCC in evaluating applications for “business combinations,” including factors required pursuant to the Bank Merger Act

(BMA)36 and the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 (CRA). 37 As currently worded, this section could be read incorrectly to imply that the BMA and CRA apply to all business combinations even though these laws do not apply to certain business combinations, such as the merger of two uninsured national banks. The final rule revises the wording of § 5.33(e)(1) to make clear that the OCC considers the factors under the BMA and the CRA for transactions that are subject to those laws. The factors as set out in the current rule are substantively unchanged. 36 12 U.S.C. 1828(c). 37 12 U.S.C. 2901 *et seq.* Section 5.33 also requires a national bank with one or more classes of securities subject to the registration provisions of sections 12(b) or 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) 38 to file preliminary proxy materials or information statements with both the OCC's Director of Securities and Corporate Practices Division in Washington, DC and the appropriate district office. The final rule streamlines the OCC's filing process by eliminating the requirement in § 5.33(e)(8)(ii) that a registered national bank also file proxy materials with the district office. This change is consistent with the instructions in the OCC's Business Combinations Booklet of the *Comptroller's Licensing Manual* . 38 15 U.S.C. 78l(b) or 78l(g). Section 5.33(g)(2)(ii) provides the rules for a national bank consolidation and merger with a Federal savings association when the resulting institution is a national bank. The final rule removes the reference to merger transactions in paragraph (g)(2)(ii), which provides for appraisal or reappraisal of dissenters' shares, because there are no dissenters' rights for national bank shareholders in a merger between a national bank and a Federal savings association when the resulting institution is a national bank. In addition, the final rule corrects a statutory citation in paragraph (g)(3)(i). The final rule also makes clarifying changes to § 5.33(h), which sets forth the standards, requirements, and procedures that apply to mergers between insured banks with different home States pursuant to 12 U.S.C. 1831u. Although this paragraph references the standards, requirements, and procedures applicable to transactions that result in a national bank, it currently does not do so for transactions that result in a State bank. The final rule adds a reference in this paragraph to 12 U.S.C. 214a, 214b, and 214c to cover these transactions. It also amends § 5.33(h) to include a reference to 12 U.S.C. 1831u to clarify that an interstate, single-branch acquisition is treated as the acquisition of a bank only for purposes of determining compliance with the Riegle-Neal Act. 39 This change eliminates any implication in this paragraph that the procedures of 12 U.S.C. 215 or 215a are intended to apply to branch acquisitions. 39 *Public Law* 103-328, 108 Stat. 2338 (Sept. 29, 1994). Finally, we are amending § 5.33 to specify that the definitions set forth in § 5.33(d) are only applicable to § 5.33, and are revising the headings of paragraphs (g), (g)(1) and (g)(3) to conform to the heading format used in other paragraphs in the regulation. *Financial subsidiaries (§ 5.39)* . Section 5.39 sets forth authorized activities, approval procedures, and conditions for a national bank engaging in activities though a financial subsidiary. The final rule makes a number of technical changes to § 5.39 to conform this section to the Federal Reserve Board's Regulation W, which governs transactions between Federal Reserve member banks and their affiliates and implements sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act. 40 40 12 U.S.C. 371c and 371c-1. In general, under sections 23A and 23B and Regulation W, a financial subsidiary of a national bank is treated as an affiliate of the bank. Regulation W, however, excepts from its definition of a financial subsidiary a subsidiary that would be a financial subsidiary only because it is engaged in insurance sales as agent or broker in a manner not permitted to a national bank. Such a financial subsidiary is not an affiliate for Regulation W purposes (unless it falls into another category of affiliate). The final rule adds a cross-reference to Regulation W in the definition of “affiliate” at § 5.39(d)(1) and amends § 5.39(h)(5) to reflect this exception in Regulation W's definition of financial subsidiary. In addition, the final rule updates § 5.39(h)(5), which describes how sections 23A and 23B apply to financial subsidiaries, by conforming these provisions to Regulation W. Specifically, in addition to adding a cross-reference to Regulation W in § 5.39(h)(5), we are amending § 5.39(h)(5)(iii) to state that a bank's purchase of, or investment in, a security issued by a financial subsidiary of the bank must be valued at the greater of:

(a)The total amount of consideration given (including liabilities assumed) by the bank, reduced to reflect amortization of the security to the extent consistent with GAAP, or

(b)the carrying value of the security (adjusted so as not to reflect the bank's *pro rata* portion of any earnings retained or losses incurred by the financial subsidiary after the bank's acquisition of the security). We also are adding a new reference to the requirement in Regulation W that any extension of credit to a financial subsidiary of a bank by an affiliate of the bank is treated as an extension of credit by the bank to the financial subsidiary if the extension of credit is treated as capital of the financial subsidiary under any Federal or State law, regulation, or interpretation applicable to the subsidiary. *Change in bank control (§ 5.50)* . Twelve U.S.C. 1817(j) provides the standards and procedures for a change in control of insured depository institutions. As we have discussed, § 5.50 of our rules implements section 1817(j) in the case of a change in control of a national bank. 41 Section 5.50, however, does not include one of the procedures required by section 1817(j) relating to changes in management officials following a change in control. This omission may be misleading to banks that consult our rules to ascertain what change in control procedures apply. Specifically, section 1817(j)(12) provides that whenever a change in control occurs, the bank will promptly report to the appropriate Federal banking agency any changes or replacements of its chief executive officer or of any director occurring in the next 12-month period, including in this report a statement of the past and current business and professional affiliations of the new chief executive officer or director. The final rule adds a new paragraph to § 5.50(h) to incorporate this statutory requirement in order to provide clearer notice for national banks of their reporting obligation under section 1817(j)(12). 41 Section 5.50 covers uninsured national banks as well as insured national banks. *Earnings limitations under 12 U.S.C. 60 (§ 5.64)* . Section 302 of the FSRRA amended 12 U.S.C. 60 to simplify dividend calculations and provide a national bank more flexibility to pay dividends as deemed appropriate by its board of directors. The final rule amends § 5.46 (governing changes in permanent capital) and § 5.64 (governing dividend earnings limitations) to conform to the new language of section 60. In addition, the OCC is codifying and clarifying the interpretation of 12 U.S.C. 60 contained in Interpretive Letter No. 816, issued December 22, 1997. Prior to its amendment by FSRRA, section 60 provided that a national bank could only declare a dividend if its surplus fund was at least equal to its common capital or, in accordance with a computation prescribed by the statute, it transferred 10 percent of its net income to surplus. Historically, stock was assigned a par value equivalent to its estimated market value and the purpose of the transfer requirement was to provide an additional cushion. This requirement is obsolete under modern securities issuance practices because stock is issued with a nominal par value and most of the proceeds received are credited to the issuer's surplus account. Section 302 of the FSRRA eliminated this requirement and makes other minor changes to clarify and simplify dividend calculations. The final rule makes conforming changes to § 5.64 (earnings limitation under 12 U.S.C. 60) and § 5.46 (changes in permanent capital) by eliminating references to the surplus fund requirement. The final rule also reorganizes and renumbers § 5.64 and adds new paragraphs

(a)and (c)(2). New paragraph

(a)adds several defined terms to make the description of the national bank dividend calculation clearer. New paragraph (c)(2) codifies Interpretive Letter No. 816, which discussed the treatment of dividends in excess of a single year's current net income and concluded that a national bank may offset certain excess dividends against retained net income from each of the prior two years. The final rule also clarifies how to calculate permissible dividends applying the carry-back interpretation described in Interpretive Letter No. 816. The amendment is intended to eliminate confusion by providing that excess dividends may be offset by retained net income in the two years immediately preceding the year in which the excess occurred. Specifically, paragraph (c)(2)(i) describes how to calculate permissible dividends for the current year if a bank has declared a dividend in excess of net income in the first or second years immediately preceding the current year. For example, when the excess dividend occurs in current year minus one, the excess is offset by retained net income first in current year minus three and then in current year minus two. When the excess dividend occurs in current year minus two, the excess is offset by retained net income first in current year minus four and then in current year minus three. This paragraph limits the availability of offsets to a maximum of four years prior to the current year, consistent with the carry-back concept in Interpretive Letter No. 816. The Interpretive Letter was not intended to permit a bank to restate retroactively its dividend paying capacity beyond the four-year period prior to the current year. Paragraph (c)(2)(ii) clarifies that if a bank still has excess dividends remaining even after permissible offsets have been applied in accordance with paragraph (c)(2)(i), the bank must use the remaining excess dividend amount in calculating its dividend paying capacity. Paragraph (c)(2)(iii) also clarifies that the carry-back applies only to retained net loss that results from dividends declared in excess of a single year's net income, not any other type of current earnings deficit. As part of the reorganization of § 5.64, information on how to request a waiver of the dividend limitation was moved to new paragraph (c)(3) to make it easier to locate. The final rule also makes a technical amendment to 12 CFR 5.46, governing changes in permanent capital, to reflect that section 60 as amended by the FSRRA no longer requires transfers to the surplus fund as a condition of declaring a dividend. Part 7—Bank Activities and Operations National Bank as Guarantor or Surety (§ 7.1017) Section 7.1017 of the OCC's rules currently provides that a national bank may act as guarantor or surety when it has a substantial interest in the performance of the transaction *or* when the transaction is for the benefit of a customer and the bank obtains from that customer a segregated deposit account sufficient to cover the amount of the bank's potential liability. The proposed rule added a new subsection authorizing national banks to guarantee financial obligations of a customer, subsidiary, or affiliate under additional circumstances, provided the amount of the bank's obligation is reasonably ascertainable and otherwise consistent with applicable law. As explained in the preamble to the proposed rule, a financial guaranty or suretyship is essentially a promise to pay if the primary obligor defaults on its obligation. A guarantor or surety that makes good on its promise is entitled to reimbursement by the primary obligor. National banks have authority to “promise to pay” or “guarantee” the obligations of their customers through bankers’ acceptances and letters of credit. In these transactions, the bank substitutes its credit for that of its customer and participates in exchanges of payments as a financial intermediary. These activities involve the core banking powers of both lending and acting as financial intermediary. 42 42 *See* OCC Interpretive Letter No. 937 (June 27, 2002). In approving various types of guarantees in the past, and in approving a number of arrangements that are functionally similar to guarantees, the OCC has emphasized that banks must be able to respond to the evolving needs of their customers, provided always that such guarantees be issued and managed in a safe and sound manner. 43 Permitting national banks to exercise their broad authority to act as guarantor or surety benefits customers by giving banks greater ability to facilitate customers' financial transactions and by providing banks with greater flexibility to provide financial services in evolving markets. 44 43 *See, e.g.* , OCC Interpretive Letter No. 177 (Jan. 14, 1981) (national bank guaranty/reimbursement of third-party payors in connection with direct deposit pension fund program was permissible; a contrary holding “would directly inhibit the growth and development of direct deposit programs.”) and OCC Interpretive Letter No. 1010 (Sept. 7, 2004) (national bank may issue financial warranties on the investment advice and asset allocation services provided by the bank in the creation and operation of a mutual fund). 44 *See NationsBank of North Carolina, N.A.* v. *Variable Annuity Life Insurance Co.,* 513 U.S. 251 (1995). In the preamble to the proposed rule, we described the regulatory change as authorizing a national bank to act as a guarantor or surety provided the guaranty or surety is financial in nature, reasonably ascertainable, and otherwise consistent with applicable law. One commenter asked that we define or modify the terms “financial in nature,” “reasonably ascertainable in amount,” and “complies with applicable law.” Specifically, it recommended that we define “financial in nature” to reference only those activities determined by the Federal Reserve Board and Treasury Department to be “financial in nature” as required under 12 U.S.C. 1843(k)(2)(A), require that the risk in such transactions be “ascertainable as to amount” rather than “reasonably ascertainable in amount,” and specifically list those laws that apply to financial guarantees. For the following reasons, we have not incorporated these suggestions in the regulatory text. First, the regulatory text as proposed, and in this final rule, provides that a national bank may “ *guarantee financial obligations* of a customer, subsidiary, or affiliate” provided that the other elements of the standard are satisfied (emphasis added). The text does not use the phrase “financial in nature.” That phrase appears only in the preamble and was intended merely to distinguish the types of guarantees referenced in the amendment which are of a financial character from other non-financial guarantees, which are not made permissible by the amendment. The phrase was not intended to connote the range of activities made permissible for financial holding companies or financial subsidiaries pursuant to the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, 45 and our preamble reference to the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act was intended only to demonstrate that guaranteeing a financial obligation is itself an activity that Congress has recognized as permissible and appropriate for a financial services firm. However, to eliminate any uncertainty about the scope of the guaranty authority described in subsection (b), we have added to the regulation language clarifying that only an obligation that is financial in character is permissible. 45 *Public Law* 106-102, 113 Stat. 1338 (Nov. 12, 1999). The final rule also retains the requirements, without change, that the amount of the bank's obligation is “reasonably ascertainable in amount” and “otherwise consistent with applicable law.” The requirement that the guaranty or surety be “reasonably ascertainable in amount” is intended to ensure that the issuing bank can determine the extent of its exposure and engage in the activity in a safe and sound manner. Moreover, the statement that the guaranty or surety must be “consistent with applicable law” recognizes that other provisions of law may be applicable to particular transactions. As mentioned in the preamble to the proposal, these provisions of law include, among others, limitations on the amount of loans and extensions of credit a national bank may lend to a borrower (12 CFR part 32) and limitations on transactions between a bank and its affiliates (sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act). It is not feasible to inventory all laws that could apply to the financial guaranty transactions permitted under the amendment as the commenter requested, and we believe the examples suffice to make clear that other laws may restrict this type of transaction. Finally, we reiterate the point made in the preamble to the proposal that the limitations on transactions that would constitute “insurance” as principal pursuant to section 302 of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act are unaffected by the amendment. 46 46 *Public Law* 106-102, 113 Stat. 1338, 1407 (Nov. 12, 1999), codified at 15 U.S.C. 6712. The preamble to the proposal also indicated that the OCC would consider whether to provide guidance on risks and risk management in connection with the issuance of guarantees by national banks. One commenter responded by requesting that we stipulate specific risk management standards for any financial guaranty and surety powers we approve, including, among other things, requirements that the financial guaranty is prudently priced and appropriately capitalized and reserved. Another commenter noted that guidance on risks and risk management would be helpful to the extent that regulatory expectations vary depending on the method by which a national bank acts as guarantor or surety. However, this commenter recommended that we narrowly tailor this guidance to focus on related regulatory expectations and not dictate terms of agreements entered into by private parties. We agree that adequate risk measurement and management processes tailored to manage and control the risks of financial guaranty activities are necessary to ensure that a bank is conducting its financial guaranty activity in a safe and sound manner. These include appropriate standards set by the board of directors, managerial and staff expertise, policies and operating procedures, risk identification and measurement, and ongoing evaluation of the specific guarantees issued; management information systems; and an effective risk control function that oversees and ensures the appropriateness of the risk management process. Such risk measurement and risk management processes should be of a scope and scale appropriate for the nature and complexity of the bank's financial guaranty activities. Another commenter suggested that we require national banks to conduct financial guaranty business through separately capitalized affiliates that are prohibited from accepting deposits. The OCC declines to adopt this approach. As indicated above, acting as a guarantor involves the core banking powers of both lending and acting as financial intermediary and is therefore a permissible banking activity that need not be conducted only in a separate legal entity. OCC rules prescribe the appropriate regulatory capital treatment for guarantor activities. Moreover, the circumstances under which the revised provision authorizes guarantor activities—the financial guaranty is reasonably ascertainable in amount and complies with applicable law—are safeguards promoting the conduct of these transactions in a safe and sound manner. Accordingly, it is not necessary to require national banks to conduct this activity in a separately capitalized affiliate. Two commenters specifically addressed capital requirements for guarantees permitted under this amendment. One commenter recommended that, because of the “financial equivalence” of financial guarantees and letters of credit, the capital requirements for a financial guaranty issued by a national bank should be the same as the capital requirements applicable to a letter of credit in a stated amount equal to the maximum, as opposed to the expected or “reasonably anticipated,” obligation of the bank under the financial guaranty. Another commenter asked us to clarify that current capital standards governing recourse and direct credit substitutes apply to financial guarantees. Under the current risk-based capital guidelines, the risk associated with a bank's guarantees is generally based on the face amount of the guaranty, where the face amount is usually measured as the stated maximum contractual amount of that guaranty. 47 However, there are instances where the exposure measure might be less than the face amount; for example, when the guaranty is conditional or contingent upon the fulfillment of other criteria. 47 12 CFR part 3, Appendix A. As to recourse and direct credit substitutes, the OCC notes that the capital regulation for securitization exposures applies to all direct credit substitutes, which are defined to include guarantees and financial standby letters of credit that provide credit support to securitizations. Also, with respect to certain banks that will be subject to the Internal Ratings Based and Advanced Measurement Approaches (generally known as “Basel II”), the capital treatment for all guaranty exposures is governed by the advanced Internal Ratings Based Approach. 48 48 *See,* generally 12 CFR part 3, Appendix C, part IV (Risk-Weighted Assets for General Credit Risk) and part V (Risk-Weighted Assets for Securitization Exposures), 72 FR 69288 (December 7, 2007). Accordingly, for the reasons set forth above, we adopt the proposed financial guarantor provision, with the one clarifying change described previously. Cumulative Voting in Election of Directors Prior to FSRRA, national banking law imposed mandatory cumulative voting requirements on all national banks. Section 301 of the FSRRA amended section 5144 of the Revised Statutes of the United States (12 U.S.C. 61) to provide that a national bank may state in its articles of association whether to provide for cumulative voting in the election of its directors. Section 301 is consistent with the Model Business Corporation Act and most States' corporate codes, which provide that cumulative voting is optional. Our proposal amended 12 CFR 7.2006 to incorporate this change. We received no comments on this amendment and adopt it as proposed. Electronic Banking-Related Amendments Twelve CFR part 7, Subpart E, contains OCC regulations relating to various electronic activities. In 2002, the OCC undertook revisions to part 7 to address the ways in which technological developments were affecting the business of banking. The proposal included several additions to this regulation. None of the comment letters addressed these electronic banking-related amendments and we adopt them in the final rule as proposed, with updates to the citations listed in the footnote to § 7.1016. These amendments are described below. *Incidental Electronic Activities.* Currently, 12 CFR 7.5001(d) sets forth the standards that the OCC uses to determine whether an electronic activity is incidental to, though not part of, the business of banking because the activity is convenient or useful to the conduct of the business of banking. The OCC has already codified in its regulations two incidental electronic activities: The sale of excess electronic capacity and by-products (§ 7.5004) and incidental non-financial data processing (§ 7.5006). We are amending § 7.5001(d) to add other examples of electronic incidental activities that we have since approved for national banks. These activities are: Web site development where incidental to other electronic banking services; 49 Internet access and e-mail provided on a non-profit basis as a promotional activity; 50 advisory and consulting services on electronic activities where the services are incidental to customer use of electronic banking services; 51 and the sale of equipment that is convenient or useful to customers' use of related electronic banking services, such as specialized terminals for scanning checks that will be deposited electronically by wholesale customers of banks under the Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act, Public Law 108-100 (12 U.S.C. 5001-5018). 52 This list is illustrative and not exclusive, and the OCC may determine in the future that activities not on this list are permissible pursuant to this authority. 49 *See* OCC Corporate Decision No. 2002-13, July 31, 2002. 50 *See* OCC Conditional Approval No. 612, Nov. 21, 2003. 51 *See* OCC Corporate Decision No. 2002-11, June 28, 2002. 52 *See* OCC Interpretive Letter No. 1036, Aug. 10, 2005. *Electronic Letters of Credit.* Section 7.1016 permits national banks to issue letters of credit within the scope of applicable laws or rules of practice recognized by law, and includes an illustrative footnote that cites examples of these laws and practices. Section 7.5002 permits a national bank to perform, provide or deliver through electronic means and facilities any activity, function, product, or service that a bank is otherwise authorized to perform, provide, or deliver, if the electronic activity is subject to standards or conditions designed to provide that the activity functions as intended, is conducted safely and soundly, and accords with other applicable statutes, regulations, or supervisory policies and guidance of the OCC. Section 7.5002 includes a list of permissible electronic activities that currently does not include electronic letters of credit. Because the OCC has determined that a national bank may issue an electronic letter of credit in a safe and sound manner in accordance with applicable laws and OCC guidance and policies, the OCC is amending § 7.5002 by adding the issuance of electronic letters of credit within the scope of § 7.1016 to the list of banking activities that a national bank can conduct by electronic means and facilities. The proposal also amended the footnote in § 7.1016 to include a reference to the International Chamber of Commerce

(ICC)supplement to UCP 500 for Electronic Presentation

(eUCP)(the uniform customs and practices for documentary credits for electronic presentations) as a law that supports electronic letters of credit. We have updated this citation in the final rule to reflect the new version of the ICC's Uniform Customs and Practices for Documentary Credits, Publication No. 600, which became effective in July 2007. We also have made a corresponding update to the citation to the ICC's Uniform Customs and Practices for Documentary Credits already included in the current footnote. *Software That Is Part of the Business of Banking.* Currently, OCC regulations list software acquired or developed by the bank for banking purposes or to support its banking business as an example of an electronic by-product that a national bank can sell to others as a permissible “incidental” activity. 53 This final rule expands § 7.5006 to address, as “part of the business of banking,” the sale of software that performs services or functions that a national bank can perform directly, thereby codifying previous OCC interpretations. 54 We note that software that is part of the business of banking can be sold without regard to any other banking product or service, whereas software that is incidental must be shown to be convenient or useful to another activity that is authorized for national banks. 55 53 12 CFR 7.5004. 54 *See,* *e.g.* , Corporate Decision 2003-6, March 17, 2003. 55 *See* 12 CFR 7.5001(c) and 7.5001(d). Our proposal asked commenters to identify any other areas of subpart E that should be revised to recognize the evolving role of technology. We received no comments in response to this request and have not made any additional amendments to subpart E in this final rule. Part 9—Fiduciary Activities of National Banks In response to recent amendments made by the SEC to its rules and forms under section 17A of the Exchange Act, the OCC proposed to amend its transfer agent rule at § 9.20 to clarify the procedures applicable to national bank transfer agents. None of the comment letters addressed these amendments, and the final rule includes these amendments as proposed. Specifically, under the SEC's amended rules, all transfer agents, including national bank transfer agents, are required to file annual reports electronically with the SEC through the SEC's Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval (“EDGAR”) system. In addition, nonbank transfer agents now must file registration and withdrawal forms electronically with the SEC through the EDGAR system. The SEC's amended rules do not require national bank transfer agents to file registration or withdrawal forms with the SEC electronically or otherwise. Currently, § 9.20(a) of the OCC's rules cross-references to the SEC's rules with respect to registration. This cross-reference may make it appear that national bank transfer agents also are subject to the requirement to file registration and withdrawal forms through the SEC's EDGAR system. To avoid confusion regarding electronic filing, the final rule replaces the cross-reference in § 9.20(a) to the SEC's transfer agent registration and withdrawal rules with specific procedures for filing applications for registration, amending registrations, and withdrawals from registration with the OCC. This amendment will not result in any substantive changes for national bank transfer agents. National bank transfer agents will continue to file applications for registration, amendments to registration, and withdrawals from registration with the OCC as previously required. In addition, to reflect the SEC's revision and renumbering of its transfer agent rules, the final rule removes the specific citations in § 9.20(b) to the SEC's rules in favor of a more general reference. This amendment makes no substantive changes to § 9.20(b). This change will, however, avoid the need for the OCC to revise our regulation each time the SEC makes changes to its transfer agent rules. Part 10—Municipal Securities Dealers As in our proposal, the final rule amends § 10.1(a) to eliminate the application of part 10 to DC banks, consistent with the DC Bank Act. Part 11—Securities Exchange Act Disclosure Rules Part 11 addresses the rules, regulations, and filing requirements that apply to national banks with one or more classes of securities subject to the registration provisions of sections 12(b) and

(g)of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78l(b) & (g)). As in the proposal, this final rule amends § 11.1(a) to remove DC banks from the scope of part 11, consistent with the DC Bank Act. Part 12—Recordkeeping and Confirmation Requirements for Securities Transactions Section 12.7(a)(4) requires bank officers and employees who make investment recommendations or decisions for customers to report their personal transactions in securities to the bank within *ten business days* after the end of the calendar quarter. The OCC modeled this reporting requirement on SEC Rule 17j-1 (17 CFR 270.17j-1), issued pursuant to the Investment Company Act of 1940, which, at the time of the most recent revision to this OCC requirement in 1996, required “access persons” to report their personal transactions in securities within ten days after the end of the calendar quarter. 56 However, in July 2004 the SEC amended Rule 17j-1 to expand this ten-day deadline to 30 days. 57 56 *See* 61 FR 63958 (Dec. 2, 1996). The OCC's reporting requirement under 12 CFR 12.7(a)(4) is a separate requirement from any applicable requirements under SEC Rule 17j-1. However, an ”access person” required to file a report with a national bank pursuant to SEC Rule 17j-1 need not file a separate report under the OCC's reporting requirement if the required information is the same. *See* 12 CFR 12.7(d). The SEC rule defines ”access person” as including directors, officers, and certain employees of the investment adviser. 17 CFR 270.17j-1(a)(1). 57 *See* 69 FR 41696 (July 9, 2004). To conform part 12 with the current SEC filing deadline in SEC Rule 17j-1, the proposed rule amended § 12.7(a)(4) by replacing the 10-business day filing deadline for reporting personal transactions in securities with the deadline specified in SEC rule 17j-1. We received no comments on this change and adopt it as proposed. This amendment will enable bank employees that are subject to both SEC Rule 17j-1 and the OCC's securities recordkeeping and confirmation regulation to file by the same deadline, thereby eliminating employee confusion as well as the regulatory burden associated with complying with two separate filing deadlines. Part 16—Securities Offering Disclosure Rules Part 16 governs offers and sales of bank securities by issuers, underwriters, and dealers. The proposed rule made a number of amendments to Part 16. We received only one comment on these part 16 amendments, relating to § 16.6 (sale of nonconvertible debt). As explained below, we decline to revise our proposed amendment to § 16.6, and adopt all of our amendments to part 16 as proposed. 58 58 We note that the OCC has made an additional amendment to Part 16 in a separate rulemaking. This amendment reduces unnecessary regulatory burden by amending § 16.15 to provide a general waiver of certain requirements for organizing groups seeking to establish a national bank charter. *See* 73 FR 12009 (March 6, 2008). Definitions (§ 16.2) As in the proposal, the final rule eliminates DC banks from the definition of “bank” in § 16.2(b), consistent with the DC Bank Act. Sales of Nonconvertible Debt (§ 16.6) Section 16.6(a)(3) requires bank debt issued under § 16.6 to be in a minimum denomination of $250,000 and requires each note or debenture to show on its face that it cannot be exchanged for notes or debentures in smaller denominations. However, this legend requirement cannot be satisfied—and would serve no purpose—if the bank is using a paperless book entry form, which has become the more current form of issuance used by banks and other securities issuers. Our proposal amended § 16.6(a)(3) to provide that this legend requirement only applies to debt issued in certificate form. All other requirements of § 16.6, including the requirement of minimum denominations of $250,000, would continue to apply to all bank sales of nonconvertible debt, whether issued in certificate or book entry form. We received one comment on this proposed amendment that recommended that we also remove the requirements in § 16.6 that the debt be offered and sold only to accredited investors and sold in minimum denominations of $250,000, as these requirements do not apply to State member banks and State-licensed branches of non-U.S. banks. We decline to make this change. These requirements—sales only to accredited investors and only in a minimum denomination of $250,000—serve as important investor/consumer protection tools and foster safe and sound banking practices. Therefore, the final rule makes no changes from the proposal in this regard. Nonpublic Offerings (§ 16.7) Part 16 provides that, absent an available exemption, no person may offer and sell a security issued by a national bank without meeting the registration and prospectus delivery requirements of part 16. Part 16 generally incorporates by reference the definitions, registration, and prospectus delivery requirements of the Securities Act and SEC implementing rules, including Regulation D under the Securities Act. 59 Section 16.7(a) of the OCC's nonpublic offering regulation provides that the OCC will deem offers and sales of bank-issued securities to be exempt from the registration and prospectus requirements of part 16 if they meet certain requirements, including filing with the OCC a notice on Form D that meets the requirements of Regulation D. 60 59 17 CFR 230.501 *et seq.* 60 17 CFR 230.503. Form D requires the issuer to disclose basic information concerning the identity of the issuer and the offering, including the exemption being claimed and information regarding the offering price, number of investors, expenses, and use of proceeds. However, the OCC does not use the information in the Form D for any supervisory or other particular purpose, and the OCC does not treat the requirement to file a Form D as a condition to the availability of an exemption under part 16. Furthermore, the SEC adopted Form D for reasons that do not directly apply to the OCC. 61 Accordingly, as proposed, we have eliminated the requirement to file a Form D. 61 Specifically, Form D serves a useful purpose for the SEC as a uniform State notification form for purposes of the States' Uniform Limited Offering Exemption, which is inapplicable to national banks. In addition, the SEC uses the information in the forms to conduct economic and other analyses of the private placement market in general. The OCC does not use the information in the Form D for this purpose. *See* Sec. Act. Release No. 33-6339, 46 FR 41,791 (Aug. 18, 1981). Securities Offered and Sold in Bank Holding Company Dissolution (New § 16.9) The OCC's current securities offering disclosure rules, at part 16, have resulted in some confusion as to whether offers and sales of bank-issued securities in connection with the dissolution of the bank's holding company are exempt from the § 16.3 registration statement and prospectus requirements. As in the proposal, the final rule resolves this uncertainty by codifying specific requirements that apply in order for the offer and sale of bank securities in a bank holding company dissolution to be exempt from the § 16.3 registration statement and prospectus requirements. Specifically, the final rule adds a new § 16.9 that would expressly exempt from the § 16.3 registration statement and prospectus requirements offers and sales of bank-issued securities in connection with the dissolution of the holding company of the bank if those transactions satisfy the following requirements:

(1)The offer and sale of bank-issued securities occurs solely as part of a dissolution in which the security holders exchange their shares of stock in a holding company that had no significant assets other than securities of the bank, for bank stock;

(2)the security holders receive, after the dissolution, substantially the same proportional share of interests in the bank as they held in the holding company;

(3)the rights and interests of the security holders in the bank are substantially the same as those in the holding company prior to the transaction; and

(4)the bank has substantially the same assets and liabilities as the holding company had on a consolidated basis prior to the transaction. As we noted in the preamble to the proposed rule, these requirements parallel the conditions that must be satisfied in order for securities issued in connection with an acquisition by a holding company of a bank (pursuant to section 3(a) of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956) to be eligible for exemption from the registration requirements of section 3(a)(12) of the Securities Act, and are equally appropriate in the reverse context where bank-issued securities are offered and sold in connection with the dissolution of the bank's holding company. From a shareholder protection standpoint, the rationale for not requiring a registration statement for the formation of a shell holding company—that the interests of the bank and company shareholders are essentially the same—would apply equally to dissolution of a shell holding company. The business rationale—reduction of costs of dissolution of a holding company if a bank decides it does not need the flexibility of a holding company structure—also is similar. The final rule also makes conforming amendments to part 16 by amending § 16.5(a) to clarify that the exemption under section 3(a)(12) of the Securities Act is not available and adding a reference to new § 16.9 in the listing of exempt securities under § 16.5. Removal of Current and Periodic Report Filing (§ 16.20) State banks and national banks are both subject to the Exchange Act's periodic and current reporting requirements if they have one or more classes of securities subject to the registration provisions of section 12(g) of the Exchange Act. 62 Pursuant to that statute, banks having a class of equity securities held by 500 or more owners of record are required to register that class of securities under § 12(g) of the Exchange Act. 63 Once registered, a bank becomes subject to the periodic and current reporting requirements of the Exchange Act. 62 *See* Exchange Act § 12(i), 15 U.S.C. 78l(i), 12 CFR part 335, and 12 CFR part 11. 63 Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act also requires a bank to have more than $1 million of assets. Section 16.20 of the OCC's regulations imposes periodic and current reporting requirements for national banks that file registration statements with the OCC for the public offering of their securities. Pursuant to § 16.20, a national bank must file periodic and current reports after the registration statement becomes effective, even if the bank is not otherwise required to register its securities under the Exchange Act. This periodic and current reporting requirement was based on that imposed by section 15(d) of the Exchange Act on other entities filing Securities Act registration statements with the SEC. 64 The OCC adopted this periodic and current reporting requirement in consideration of the interests of potential purchasers in a bank's public offering to have access to updated information necessary for their investment decisions, in the same manner as investors in other companies. 64 59 FR 54789 (Nov. 2, 1994). The periodic and current reporting requirements of § 16.20 apply to national banks until the securities to which the national bank's registration statement relates are held of record by fewer than 300 persons. The FDIC and the Federal Reserve Board have not imposed a comparable obligation on State banks. Instead, a State bank that conducts public offerings of their securities are subject to Exchange Act periodic and current reporting requirements only if the bank has more than 500 shareholders. As in the proposal, the final rule eliminates § 16.20 in order to reduce regulatory burden with respect to small national banks that file registration statements with the OCC for the public offering of their securities. Thus, only a national bank that has 500 or more shareholders of record will be subject to the Exchange Act periodic and current reporting requirements. 65 We also make a conforming change to § 16.6 by deleting the reference to § 16.20 in that section. 65 *See* Exchange Act § 12(i), 15 U.S.C. 78l(i) and 12 CFR part 11. As noted in the preamble to our proposal, this change will not significantly diminish financial information about a bank that will be available to investors, as updated financial information, including the bank's most recent balance sheet and statement of income filed with the OCC as part of the bank's most recent Consolidated Report of Condition (Call Report), is publicly available to investors. This change also will have no effect on the requirement under the OCC's Exchange Act disclosure rule at 12 CFR part 11 that a national bank whose securities are registered under section 12(b) or 12(g) of the Exchange Act must file current and periodic reports that conform to section 13 of the Exchange Act. Part 19—Rules of Practice and Procedure The FSRRA made several changes affecting the OCC's exercise of its enforcement authority pursuant to section 8 of the FDI Act 66 and our proposed rule amended part 19 to reflect these changes. We also proposed to update the titles of OCC officials referenced in §§ 19.111 and 19.112 and to eliminate the applicability of part 19 to DC banks by deleting a reference to DC banks in the definition of “institution” in § 19.3(g) and in the scope section of subpart P, § 19.241, which relates to the removal, suspension, and debarment of accountants from performing audit services. No commenter discussed these amendments, and we adopt them as proposed, with two technical amendments, as discussed below. 66 12 U.S.C. 1818. More specifically, section 303 of the FSRRA changed the procedures for issuing orders of suspension, removal or prohibition against institution-affiliated parties

(IAPs)of national banks. Previously, section 8(e)(4) of the FDI Act 12 U.S.C. 1818(e)(4) required that, following proceedings before an administrative law judge, the determination whether to issue such orders would be made by the Federal Reserve Board. Section 303 of the FSRRA repealed that requirement, so that the OCC now has the authority to issue such orders, as it does with respect to other types of orders resulting from an OCC-initiated enforcement action. Our final rule amends § 19.100, pertaining to OCC adjudications, to reflect this change in the law. Section 8(g) of the FDI Act pertains to the suspension, removal, or prohibition of an IAP when the IAP is the subject of an information, indictment, or complaint involving certain crimes set forth in the statute or when the IAP has been convicted of such a crime. 67 Section 708 of the FSRRA revised the statutory grounds that warrant suspension, removal or prohibition of an IAP from further participation in the conduct of the affairs of a depository institution, including a national bank, in such a case. Section 708 also clarified that, if grounds exist, an appropriate Federal banking agency, including the OCC, may suspend or prohibit the IAP from participating in the affairs of *any* depository institution, and not only the institution with which the party is, or was last, affiliated. The amendment further clarified that this authority applies even if the IAP is no longer associated with the depository institution at which the offense allegedly occurred or if the depository institution with which the IAP was affiliated no longer exists. The final rule amends §§ 19.110, and 19.111, and 19.113 to conform to these amendments. We also have made a technical correction to our amendment to § 19.111, adding back in language inadvertently removed from our current rule relating to the time period allowed for an institution-affiliated party to request a hearing. In addition, the final rule includes a technical amendment to both §§ 19.110 and 19.111 not included in the proposed rule. Specifically, we are inserting the phrase “pursuant to 12 U.S.C. 1818(g)” in these two paragraphs to clarify that these provisions provide procedures for suspensions and removals of institution-affiliated parties charged with a felony. 67 *Id.* at 1818(g). Part 21—Minimum Security Devices and Procedures, Reports of Suspicious Activities, and Bank Secrecy Act Compliance Program Part 21 consists of three subparts. Subpart A requires each bank to adopt appropriate security procedures to discourage robberies, burglaries, and larcenies and to assist in identifying and apprehending persons who commit such acts. Subpart B ensures that national banks file a Suspicious Activity Report when they detect a known or suspected violation of Federal law or a suspicious transaction related to a money laundering activity or a violation of the Bank Secrecy Act. Subpart C requires that all national banks establish and maintain procedures reasonably designed to assure and monitor their compliance with the requirements of the Bank Secrecy Act and its implementing regulations. As in the proposed rule, the final rule removes references to DC banks in the scope section of part 21 to clarify that part 21 no longer applies to DC banks, pursuant to the DC Bank Act. Part 22—Loans in Areas Having Special Flood Hazards Part 22 applies to loans secured by buildings or mobile homes located or to be located in areas subject to special flood hazards. It implements the requirements of the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 and the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973. As in the proposed rule, this final rule eliminates the applicability of part 22 to DC banks by removing DC banks from the definition of “bank” in § 22.2(b). Part 23—Leasing Part 23 contains the standards for personal property lease financing transactions authorized for national banks. Section 23.6 applies the lending limits of 12 U.S.C. 84 or, if the lessee is an affiliate of the bank, the restrictions on transactions with affiliates prescribed by 12 U.S.C. 371c and 371c-1 to these lease transactions. The proposal added to § 23.6 cross-references to the Federal Reserve Board's Regulation W, 12 CFR part 223, which implements 12 U.S.C. 371c and 371c-1. We proposed this change because Regulation W contains new provisions that do not appear in 12 U.S.C. 371c and 371c-1. In addition, Regulation W contains a definition of the term “affiliate” that is broader than the definition that appears in § 371c and § 371c-1. The proposal also added to § 23.6 a cross-reference to 12 CFR part 32, which implements 12 U.S.C. 84, for consistency in reader reference. We adopt these amendments as proposed, with minor corrections to the regulatory text. Part 24—Community Development Investments The FSRRA made a number of changes to section 24 (Eleventh), the authorizing statute for 12 CFR part 24. Prior to its amendment by the FSRRA, 12 U.S.C. 24 (Eleventh) authorized a national bank to “make investments designed primarily to promote the public welfare, including the welfare of low- and moderate-income communities or families (such as by providing housing, services, or jobs)” (the public welfare test). A national bank could “make such investments directly or by purchasing interests in an entity primarily engaged in making such investments.” The FSRRA narrowed the grant of authority in section 24 (Eleventh) by providing that a national bank may “make investments, directly or indirectly, each of which promotes the public welfare by benefiting primarily low- and moderate-income communities or families (such as by providing housing, services, or jobs).” The FSRRA also revised section 24 (Eleventh) to state explicitly that the authority to make public welfare investments applies to investments made by a national bank directly and by its subsidiaries. 68 In addition, the FSRRA raised the maximum aggregate outstanding investment limit under section 24 (Eleventh) from 10 to 15 percent of the bank's unimpaired capital and surplus. 68 FSRRA, § 305, 120 Stat. at 1970-71. The proposal revised part 24 to conform to these changes. In addition, the proposal made changes to the procedure that applies when a national bank requests OCC approval to exceed the investment limit, and made a number of conforming and technical changes to part 24. The commenters did not address these amendments to part 24. We therefore adopt them in the final rule as proposed, with the exception of § 24.2(c) in which we correct a drafting error. These amendments are described below. Definition of “Community and Economic Development Entity”

(CEDE)(§ 24.2(c)) The final rule amends the definition of a CEDE in § 24.2(c) to implement the FSRRA change to the public welfare test. Paragraph

(c)now defines a CEDE as “an entity that makes investments or conducts activities that promote the public welfare by benefiting primarily low- and moderate-income areas or individuals”. We also have made a technical correction to the **Federal Register** formatting instructions, which in the proposed rule had inadvertently removed the remaining part of this definition that contained a non-exclusive list of examples of the types of entities that may be CEDEs. The final rule replaces this text. Definition of “Benefiting Primarily Low- and Moderate-Income Areas or Individuals” (§ 24.2(g)) As indicated above, 12 U.S.C. 24 (Eleventh) now authorizes a national bank and its subsidiaries to make investments that promote the public welfare by “benefiting primarily” low- and moderate-income areas or individuals. The final rule defines “benefiting primarily low and moderate-income areas or individuals” when used to describe an investment to mean that:

(1)A majority (more than 50 percent) of the investment benefits low- and moderate-income areas or individuals; or

(2)the express, primary purpose of the investment (evidenced, for example, by government eligibility requirements) is to benefit “low- and moderate-income areas or individuals.” As we noted in the preamble to the proposed rule, this definition is consistent with the way in which the OCC and the other Federal banking agencies have construed the concept of “primary” in the phrase “primary purpose” for community development activities pursuant to the CRA rules. 69 69 *See* Interagency Questions and Answers Regarding Community Reinvestment, Q&A §§ _.12(i) and 563e.12(h)-7, 66 FR 36620, 36627 (July 12, 2001) (explaining “primary purpose” for community development activities in the context of the CRA rules). Public Welfare Investments (§§ 24.3, 24.1) The final rule revises § 24.3, which contains the authorization to make investments pursuant to section 24 (Eleventh), to conform with the changes made by the FSRRA. The final rule also adds a new § 24.1(e) to clarify that investments made, or written commitments to make investments entered into, before the enactment of the FSRRA continue to be subject to the statutes and regulations in effect prior to October 13, 2006. 70 70 *See* 152 Cong. Rec. H7586 (daily ed. Sept. 29, 2006) (colloquy between Chairman Oxley of the House Financial Services Committee and Ranking Member Frank) (explaining that the revised standard in section 24 (Eleventh) applies prospectively only and does not affect investments made, or written commitments to make investments that were entered into, prior to the enactment of the new standard). Investment Limits (§ 24.4) The final rule revises § 24.4(a) to implement the statutory change to the aggregate investment limit in section 24 (Eleventh) from 10 to 15 percent of unimpaired capital and surplus. After-the-Fact Notice and Prior Approval Procedures (§ 24.5) The final rule modifies the procedure that applies when a national bank requests OCC approval to exceed the investment limit. The current rule permits a national bank's aggregate outstanding investments to exceed 5 percent of its capital and surplus if the bank is well capitalized and the OCC determines, by written approval of a bank's proposed investment pursuant to the procedures set out at § 24.5(b), that a higher amount will pose no significant risk to the deposit insurance fund. Section 24.5(b) describes the application process that is required for the OCC's prior approval of an investment when a bank does not satisfy the requirements for using an after-the-fact notice. Thus, the investment limits provision in current § 24.4(a) requires a national bank to submit a request to exceed the 5 percent limit together with a specific investment proposal, and to use the prior approval procedures for that investment proposal. As indicated in the preamble to the proposed rule, this particular prior approval procedure is not required by the statute and the OCC has determined that the burden it imposes is not warranted in view of the low level of risk generally presented by the types of investments authorized pursuant to section 24 (Eleventh). Accordingly, the final rule removes the requirement that a national bank submit a specific investment proposal for prior approval under § 24.5(b) when it also seeks approval to exceed the 5 percent investment limit. In other words, under this new, simpler procedure, the bank is not required to tie its written request to exceed the 5 percent limit to a specific investment proposal. If the OCC provides written approval of the request, the bank may make investments above the 5 percent limit. However, as is the case for investments below the 5 percent limit, for each investment above the limit the bank would submit either an after-the-fact notice under § 24.5(a) if it satisfies the requirements for after-the-fact notice, or an application under § 25.4(b) if it does not. These revisions facilitate national banks' ability to plan their investment activity while enabling the OCC to monitor the bank's use of the part 24 authority on a case-by-case basis. Thus, revised § 24.4(a) permits a national bank's aggregate outstanding investments to exceed 5 percent of its capital and surplus, *provided that* the bank is at least adequately capitalized and the OCC determines, by written approval of a written request submitted by the bank, that a higher amount of investment will pose no significant risk to the deposit insurance fund. Examples of Qualifying Public Welfare Investments (§ 24.6) Current § 24.6 contains examples of qualifying public welfare investments. The final rule revises § 24.6 as necessary to reflect the revision of the statutory standard made by section 305 of the FSRRA. The final rule also makes conforming amendments to § 24.6 to clarify that the examples of qualifying public investments include investments that benefit primarily low- and moderate-income areas or individuals and that:

(1)Finance minority- and women-owned small businesses or small farms;

(2)provide technical assistance for minority- and women-owned small businesses; or

(3)are made in minority- and women-owned depository institutions. As stated in the preamble to the final rule, the OCC expects these qualifying investments to be made in minority- and women-owned entities that conform to the ownership and control, profit and loss taking, and senior management representation requirements of the CRA's provision governing operation of branch facilities by minorities and women. 71 In addition, the final rule revises references to investments in “targeted redevelopment areas,” which, after FSRRA, would be permissible only if they promote the public welfare by benefiting primarily low- and moderate-income areas or individuals. Finally, the final rule amends § 24.6(d)(1) to include investments that provide financial literacy as an additional example of a qualifying public welfare investment. 71 *See* 12 U.S.C. 2907(b)(1)-(3). Technical Amendments The final rule revises several sections of part 24 to eliminate language that is inconsistent or unnecessary in light of the revised statutory standard for community development investments and to make technical changes, including: • A revision to § 24.2(f) that updates a cross-reference to the definitions of “low-income” and “moderate-income” in § 25.12. • Amendments to § 24.5 that direct national banks to submit after-the-fact notices and investment proposals needing prior approval to the OCC's Community Affairs Department, instead of to the Director, Community Development Division, and that permit banks to submit these materials via e-mail, fax, or electronically through National BankNet, in addition to the mail. We also are correcting the format of a citation to 12 U.S.C. 24 (Eleventh) in paragraph (a)(1). • An amendment to § 24.6(b)(2) that replaces the phrase “low- or moderate-income” with “low- and moderate-income,” which is consistent with how that phrase appears throughout part 24. • A conforming technical amendment to § 24.6(d)(3) that would permit other public welfare investments, including investments of a type determined by the OCC to be permissible under the revisions to part 24. Grandfathered investments that are subject to statutes and regulations in effect prior to October 13, 2006 would not be affected. The proposal also revises Appendix 1 to part 24, the CD-1 National Bank Community Development (Part 24) Investments Form, to reflect the proposed changes to the regulation. Part 26—Management Officials Interlocks Part 26 implements the provisions of the Depository Institution Management Interlocks Act (Interlocks Act) 72 which generally prohibits a management official from serving two nonaffiliated depository organizations in situations where the management interlock likely would have an anticompetitive effect. 73 As in the proposal, this final rule amends part 26 by deleting the reference to DC banks in the scope section, § 26.1(c), deleting the definition of “District bank” in § 26.2(i), and deleting the reference to DC banks in the enforcement section, § 26.8. 72 12 U.S.C. 3201 *et seq.* 73 Section 610 of the FSRRA raised the asset-size amount from $20 million to $50 million for small banks that are exempt under certain provisions of the Interlocks Act. Because the OCC's current substantive rules implementing the Interlocks Act were issued together with the other Federal banking agencies, the OCC has amended part 26 to reflect this FSRRA provision through a separate rulemaking conducted jointly with those agencies. The OCC and the other Federal banking agencies issued a final rule implementing this change on July 16, 2007. *See* 72 FR 38753. Part 27—Fair Housing Home Loan Data System Part 27 applies to activities of national banks and their subsidiaries that make home loans for the purpose of purchasing, construction-permanent financing, or refinancing of residential real property. As proposed, the final rule removes DC banks from the scope of part 27 in § 27.1(a) and the definition of “bank” in § 27.2(c). Part 28—International Banking Activities The proposed rule made three changes to part 28, which sets forth the OCC's rules on international banking activities of national banks. We received no comments on these changes and adopt them as proposed. The first amendment makes a technical change to the definition of “limited Federal branch” in 12 CFR 28.11(s). Currently, this regulation defines a limited foreign branch as a Federal branch or agency that, pursuant to an agreement between the parent foreign bank and the FRB, may receive only those deposits permissible for an Edge corporation to receive. However, this agreement is not required for a foreign bank to operate a limited Federal branch in the United States. Therefore, we are removing the unnecessary reference to this agreement from this definition. We note that this change does not in any manner affect the requirement in § 28.11(s) that a limited Federal branch licensed by the OCC may accept only those deposits that are permissible for an Edge corporation. Second, we are making a technical change to part 28 with respect to the expedited time periods for processing applications by eligible foreign banks to establish or relocate an interstate Federal branch or agency. Current 12 CFR 28.12(e)(3) provides that an application by an eligible foreign bank to establish and operate a *de novo* interstate Federal branch or agency is conditionally approved as of the 30th day after the OCC receives the application unless the OCC notifies the bank otherwise. However, as noted in the preamble to the proposed rule, the OCC is finding that the expedited process in the current regulation is not allowing sufficient time for the 30-day comment period to expire and for consideration of the comments received. As a result, the OCC is routinely notifying the eligible banks that the time period is extended. The final rule amends § 28.12(e) to provide that all expedited approvals to establish or relocate a Federal branch or agency are approved as of the 15th day after the close of the applicable public comment period, or the 45th day after the filing is received by the OCC, whichever is later, unless the OCC notifies the bank otherwise. These are the same time frames that would apply under 12 CFR 5.20(f)(5) if a national bank were engaging in a similar transaction. Finally, we are eliminating the applicability to DC banks of subpart C of part 28, which implements the International Lending Supervision Act of 1988 (12 U.S.C. 3901 *et seq.* ). Specifically, the final rule eliminates the references to DC banks in the scope section, § 28.50(c), and in the definition of “banking institution”, § 28.51(a). Part 31—Extensions of Credit to Insiders and Transactions With Affiliates Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act, as implemented by the Federal Reserve Board's Regulation W, impose quantitative and qualitative limitations on a bank's transactions with its “affiliates.” Appendix A to part 31 of the OCC's rules contains two interpretations of section 23A pertaining to a national bank's transactions with an affiliate. One of these interpretations provides that a loan to an unaffiliated third party that is collateralized by securities issued by an affiliate is not a “covered transaction” (that is, a transaction to which the requirements of section 23A apply) so long as: the borrower provides additional collateral that meets or exceeds the collateral requirements of § 23A ( *i.e.* , up to 130% of the loan); and the loan proceeds are not used to purchase the affiliate-issued securities or otherwise used for the benefit of, or transferred to, any affiliate. The Federal Reserve Board's Regulation W, which was issued subsequent to the OCC's adoption of these interpretations, treats this transaction differently. Accordingly, we proposed to remove our interpretation on that issue from Appendix A to part 31. In addition, we proposed minor changes to section 2 of Appendix A to part 31 to reflect the applicability of 12 U.S.C. 371c, 371c-1, and their implementing regulation, Regulation W, to deposits between affiliated banks. Furthermore, we proposed an exception to this provision in order to clarify that a national bank may make or receive a deposit if a party other than the depositary can legally offer and does post the collateral. The proposal also removed the reference to 12 U.S.C. 1972(2)(G), which was repealed by section 601 of the FSRRA, in the authority section of part 31 as well as in § 31.1. Finally, the proposal made a technical amendment to Appendix B to part 31. This appendix compares the requirements of part 31 and part 32. However, it currently contains an inaccurate description of part 32 relating to exclusions to the definition of “loans or extensions of credit.” The proposal removed this inaccuracy. None of the commenters addressed these amendments to part 31, and we adopt them as proposed. Part 32—Lending Limits Part 32 sets forth the lending limits that are applicable to a national bank. Section 32.1(c)(1) excludes from the scope of part 32's coverage loans made by a national bank and its domestic operating subsidiaries to a bank “affiliate,” as that term is defined in section 23A(b)(1) of the Federal Reserve Act. After the OCC adopted part 32 in its current form, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act authorized a national bank (as well as an insured State member bank) to hold financial subsidiaries and provided generally that financial subsidiaries would be treated as “affiliates” for purposes of sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act. This treatment appears in the statute at section 23A(e). Accordingly, the Federal Reserve Board's Regulation W generally defines as “affiliates” financial subsidiaries established pursuant to the authorization in the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act. The proposal added to § 32.1(c)(1) cross-references to section 23A(e) and to § 223.2(a) of the Federal Reserve Board's Regulation W. This change directly cites the specific statute that defines an affiliate to include a financial subsidiary as well as the implementing provision of Regulation W. We received no comments on this amendment and adopt it as proposed. This amendment to § 32.1 makes clear that a bank's loan to its financial subsidiary is not covered by the lending limit and that, instead, Regulation W applies to such a loan. 74 The amendment also serves more generally to reflect the fact that Regulation W contains a definition of the term “affiliate” that is broader than the definition that appears in § 371c. 74 However, subsidiaries that are financial subsidiaries solely because they sell insurance as agent or broker in a manner not permitted to the parent bank are not considered “affiliates” under Regulation W ( *see* 12 CFR 223.3(p)(2)(i)) (unless the subsidiary is an affiliate for reasons other than its status as a financial subsidiary under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act). Loans to such subsidiaries are not subject to the lending limit for the same reason that the lending limit does not apply to loans to companies that meet the general definition of “affiliate” in § 371c(b)(1) but are excepted from § 371c by another provision, *e.g.* , operating subsidiaries or companies engaged solely in holding the premises of the bank ( *see* section 371c(b)(2)). The OCC does not apply the lending limit to loans to any financial subsidiary since it is not necessary given that another statutory scheme—the affiliate transaction restrictions—is generally applicable. This reason applies even where a specific exemption—such as for the entities described in 12 CFR 223.3(p)(2)(i)—causes the affiliate transaction restrictions to be inapplicable. Part 34—Real Estate Lending and Appraisals Under current § 34.22, if a national bank makes an adjustable rate mortgage

(ARM)loan, the loan documents must specify an index to which a change in the interest rate will be linked. Section 34.22 describes the requirements that generally apply to such an index. The proposal amended § 34.22 to provide national banks with additional flexibility with respect to the indices upon which ARM rates may be based. Specifically, the amendment permitted national banks to use a combination of indices to which changes in the interest rate will be linked, in addition to a single index. The amendment also permitted a national bank to use an index other than one already permissible under the rule, if the bank files a notice with the OCC and the OCC does not notify the bank within 30 days that the notice raises supervisory concerns or significant issues of law or policy. If the OCC notifies the bank about such issues or concerns, the bank may not proceed unless it has obtained the OCC's written approval. The approval could include any restrictions or conditions necessary to address the issues or concerns the OCC has identified. We received one comment on this amendment to Part 34, which requested that we clarify that national banks may purchase, as well as originate, loans that use indices other than those permissible under the current rule. The commenter stated that this would permit the OCC to exercise the same level of oversight and supervision with regard to purchases as applies to originations and to ensure that the indices on which purchased ARM loans are based are also consistent with the principles of safety and soundness and fairness and transparency to the borrower. Part 34 currently addresses a national bank's purchase of loans that do not conform with the requirements of the part. Generally, loans purchased from unrelated parties are not subject to the ARM criteria specified by part 34, but loans acquired from a subsidiary or an affiliate are subject to those standards. Section 34.21(b) currently provides that: A national bank may purchase or participate in ARM loans that were not made in accordance with this part, except that loans purchased, in whole or in part, from an affiliate or subsidiary must comply with this part. For purposes of this paragraph, the terms affiliate and subsidiary have the same meaning as in 12 U.S.C. 371c. Pursuant to § 34.21(b), the index requirements (and the no-objection procedure added by the draft final rule) apply to ARM loans originated by operating subsidiaries. This is consistent with provisions elsewhere in our rules that require operating subsidiaries to conduct activities subject to the same standards as apply to the parent bank. 75 Consequently, an operating subsidiary should not have nonconforming loans available for purchase by its parent bank unless the bank or operating subsidiary had provided notice to the OCC pursuant to our amendment to § 34.22, and not received a disapproval from the OCC to use an index other than that specified in § 34.22(a). 75 *See* 12 CFR 34.l, 5.34(e). Section § 34.21(b) also provides that loans that a national bank purchases from an affiliate also must comply with the index requirements. Alternatively, a bank contemplating the purchase of nonconforming loans from an affiliate could comply with the no-objection procedure by submitting a notice prior to the purchase of the nonconforming loans. Therefore, further amendment to part 34 is not necessary in order to apply the prior notice and no-objection process of amended § 34.22 to ARM loans purchased from subsidiaries and affiliates. Section 34.21(b) does not apply the index requirements of § 34.22 to the purchase of loans from *nonaffiliates* . The final rule retains this approach with the result that a national bank still may purchase or participate in ARM loans originated by unaffiliated lenders that do not conform with the index requirements of the rule. However, we have added language to 12 CFR 34.21 emphasizing that purchases of loans from any person or entity, whether or not the seller is a subsidiary or affiliate of the bank, must be undertaken prudently and are subject to standards contained in OCC rules and guidance regarding the purchasing of loans. For example, standards are contained in “OCC Guidelines Establishing Standards for Residential Mortgage Lending Practices” set forth in Appendix C of 12 CFR part 30; 76 OCC Banking Circular No. 181; 77 the “Interagency Guidance on Nontraditional Mortgage Product Risks”; 78 and the “Interagency Statement on Subprime Mortgage Lending”. 79 76 Specifically, these standards and practices contained in these Guidelines include:

(1)Criteria for entering into and continuing relationships with intermediaries and originators, including due diligence requirements;

(2)underwriting and appraisal requirements;

(3)standards related to total loan compensation and total compensation of intermediaries, including maximum rates, points, and other charges, and the use of overages and yield-spread premiums, structured to avoid providing an incentive to originate loans with predatory or abusive characteristics;

(4)requirements for agreements with intermediaries and originators, including with respect to risks identified in the due diligence process, compliance with appropriate bank policies, procedures and practices and with applicable law (including remedies for failure to comply), protection of the bank against risk, and termination procedures;

(5)loan documentation procedures, management information systems, quality control reviews, and other methods through which the bank will verify compliance with agreements, bank policies, and applicable laws, and otherwise retain appropriate oversight of mortgage origination functions, including loan sourcing, underwriting, and loan closings; and

(6)criteria and procedures for the bank to take appropriate corrective action, including modification of loan terms and termination of the relationship with the intermediary or originator in question. *See* 12 CFR part 34, Appendix C, § III(E). 77 Banking Circular No. 181 specifically provides that the absence of satisfactory controls over risk may constitute an unsafe or unsound banking practice and thus cause for the OCC to seek appropriate corrective action through its administrative remedies. Satisfactory controls over the purchase of loans and participations in loans ordinarily include, but are not limited to:

(1)Written lending policies and procedures governing these transactions;

(2)an independent analysis of credit quality by the purchasing bank;

(3)agreement by the obligor to make full credit information available to the selling bank;

(4)agreement by the selling bank to provide available information on the obligor to the purchaser; and

(5)written documentation of recourse arrangements outlining the rights and obligations of each party. *See* OCC BC 181 (Rev), “Purchases of Loans In Whole or In Part-Participations” (Aug. 2, 1984). 78 71 FR 58609, 58618 (Oct. 4, 2006). 79 This statement sets forth expectations for sound lending practices and clear communications with borrowers with respect to subprime mortgage products and lending practices. *See* 72 FR 37569 (July 10, 2007). Accordingly, we adopt the final rule as proposed, with the clarifying amendment to § 34.21, described above. Part 37—Debt Cancellation Contracts and Debt Suspension Agreements On September 19, 2002, the OCC published a final rule in the **Federal Register** that added a new 12 CFR part 37, which establishes standards governing DCCs and DSAs. 80 In the last sentence of § 37.7(a), the cross-reference to standards in § 37.6 is incorrect. The rule should say § 37.6(d), not § 37.6(b). The final rule corrects that error. 80 67 FR 58962. Part 40—Privacy of Consumer Financial Information Part 40 governs the treatment of nonpublic personal information about consumers by financial institutions. Pursuant to the DC Bank Act, the final rule amends the scope section, § 40.1(b), to eliminate the applicability of part 40 to DC banks. Effective Date of Final Rule As noted above, the effective date of this final rule is July 1, 2008. However, national banks, and foreign banks taking actions with respect to Federal branches and agencies, may elect to comply voluntarily with any applicable provision of the final rule at any time prior to the effective date. 81 81 See 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(1), which provides that a delayed effective date is not required for a rule that reduces burden or relieves restrictions, and 12 U.S.C. 4802(b)(2), which permits voluntary compliance prior to the effective date of certain rules. Regulatory Analysis Regulatory Flexibility Act Pursuant to § 605(b) of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 605(b) (RFA), the regulatory flexibility analysis otherwise required under § 604 of the RFA is not required if the agency certifies that the rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities and publishes its certification and a short, explanatory statement in the **Federal Register** along with its rule. We have estimated that the economic costs associated with the changes made by this final rule will not be significant and that the majority of banks affected by these costs will be those with assets greater than $250 million. Therefore, pursuant to § 605(b) of the RFA, the OCC hereby certifies that this final rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. Accordingly, a regulatory flexibility analysis is not needed. Executive Order 12866 The OCC has determined that this final rule is not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866. We have concluded that the changes made by this rule will not have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more. The OCC further concludes that this rule does not meet any of the other standards for a significant regulatory action set forth in Executive Order 12866. Paperwork Reduction Act In accordance with the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 *et seq.* , the Agencies may not conduct or sponsor, and the respondent is not required to respond to, an information collection unless it displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget

(OMB)control number. The information collection requirements contained in this final rule were submitted to and preapproved by OMB at the proposed rule stage under OMB control numbers 1557-0014 (Part 5 and Comptroller's Licensing Manual), 1557-0120 (Part 16, Securities Offering Disclosure Rules), 1557-0194 (Part 24, Community and Economic Development Entities, Community Development Projects, and Other Public Welfare Investments), and 1557-0190 (Part 34, Real Estate Lending and Appraisals). Following publication of this final rule, OMB's preapproval will become final. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995, Public Law 104-4 (2 U.S.C. 1532) (Unfunded Mandates Act), requires that an agency prepare a budgetary impact statement before promulgating any rule likely to result in a Federal mandate that may result in the expenditure by State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100 million or more in any one year. If a budgetary impact statement is required, § 205 of the Unfunded Mandates Act also requires an agency to identify and consider a reasonable number of regulatory alternatives before promulgating a rule. The OCC has determined that this final rule will not result in expenditures by State, local, and tribal governments, or by the private sector, of $100 million or more in any one year. Accordingly, final rule is not subject to § 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Act. List of Subjects 12 CFR Part 1 Banks, Banking, National banks, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Securities. 12 CFR Part 2 Credit life insurance, National banks. 12 CFR Part 3 Administrative practice and procedure, National banks, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. 12 CFR Part 4 Administrative practice and procedure, Freedom of information, Individuals with disabilities, Minority businesses, Organization and functions (Government agencies), Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Women. 12 CFR Part 5 Administrative practice and procedure, National banks, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Securities. 12 CFR Part 7 National banks. 12 CFR Part 9 Estates, Investments, National banks, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Trusts and trustees. 12 CFR Part 10 National banks, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Securities. 12 CFR Part 11 Confidential business information, National banks, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Securities. 12 CFR Part 12 National banks, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Securities. 12 CFR Part 16 National banks, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Securities. 12 CFR Part 19 Administrative practice and procedure, Crime, Equal access to justice, Investigations, National banks, Penalties, Securities. 12 CFR Part 21 Crime, Currency, National banks, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Security measures. 12 CFR Part 22 Flood insurance, Mortgages, National banks, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. 12 CFR Part 23 National banks. 12 CFR Part 24 Community development, Credit investments, Low and moderate income housing, National banks, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Rural areas, Small businesses. 12 CFR Part 26 Antitrust, Holding companies, National banks. 12 CFR Part 27 Civil rights, Credit, Fair housing, Mortgages, National banks, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. 12 CFR Part 28 Foreign banking, National banks, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. 12 CFR Part 31 Credit, National banks, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. 12 CFR Part 32 National banks, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. 12 CFR Part 34 Mortgages, National banks, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. 12 CFR Part 37 Banks, Banking, Consumer protection, National banks, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. 12 CFR Part 40 Banks, Banking, Consumer protection, National banks, Privacy, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. Authority and Issuance For the reasons set forth in the preamble, chapter I of title 12 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows: PART 1—INVESTMENT SECURITIES 1. The authority citation for part 1 continues to read as follows: Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1 *et seq.* , 24 (Seventh), and 93a. 2. Amend § 1.1 by: a. Revising the section heading; b. Revising the first sentence of paragraph (c); and c. Adding a new paragraph (d). The additions and revisions read as follows: § 1.1 Authority, purpose, scope, and reservation of authority.

(c)*Scope* . The standards set forth in this part apply to national banks and Federal branches of foreign banks. * * *

(d)*Reservation of authority* . The OCC may determine, on a case-by-case basis, that a national bank may acquire an investment security other than an investment security of a type set forth in this part, provided the OCC determines that the bank's investment is consistent with 12 U.S.C. section 24 (Seventh) and with safe and sound banking practices. The OCC will consider all relevant factors, including the risk characteristics of the particular investment in comparison with the risk characteristics of investments that the OCC has previously authorized, and the bank's ability effectively to manage such risks. The OCC may impose limits or conditions in connection with approval of an investment security under this subsection. Investment securities that the OCC determines are permissible in accordance with this paragraph constitute eligible investments for purposes of 12 U.S.C. 24. 3. Amend § 1.3 by: a. In paragraph (h), removing the heading “ *Investment company shares* ” and in its place add the heading “ *Pooled investments* ”; b. In paragraph (h)(1)(i), removing the phrase “under this part”; c. In paragraph (h)(2), removing the phrase “under this part”; d. Adding a new paragraph (h)(3); and e. In paragraph (i)(1), adding the phrase “the security is marketable and” after the word “if” and removing the phrase “, and the bank believes that the security may be sold with reasonable promptness at a price that corresponds reasonably to its fair value”. The additions read as follows: § 1.3 Limitations on dealing in, underwriting, and purchase and sale of securities.

(h)* * *

(3)Investments made under this paragraph

(h)must comply with § 1.5 of this part, conform with applicable published OCC precedent, and must be:

(i)Marketable and rated investment grade or the credit equivalent of a security rated investment grade, or

(ii)Satisfy the requirements of § 1.3(i). PART 2—SALES OF CREDIT LIFE INSURANCE 4. The authority citation for part 2 continues to read as follows: Authority: 12 U.S.C. 24 (Seventh), 93a, and 1818(n). 5. In § 2.2 revise paragraph

(a)to read as follows: § 2.2 Definitions.

(a)*Bank* means a national banking association. PART 3—MINIMUM CAPITAL RATIOS; ISSUANCE OF DIRECTIVES 6. The authority citation for part 3 continues to read as follows: Authority: 12 U.S.C. 93a, 161, 1818, 1828(n), 1828 note, 1831n note, 1835, 3907, and 3909. 7. In § 3.2, revise paragraph

(b)to read as follows: § 3.2 Definitions.

(b)*Bank* means a national banking association. 8. In Appendix A to part 3, revise section 3(a)(1)(v) to read as follows: Appendix to Part 3—Risk-Based Capital Guidelines Section 3. Risk Categories/Weights for On-Balance Sheet Assets and Off-Balance Sheet Items

(a)* * *

(1)* * *

(v)That portion of local currency claims on, or unconditionally guaranteed by, central governments of non-OECD countries, to the extent the bank has liabilities in that currency. Any amount of such claims that exceeds the amount of the bank's liabilities in that currency is assigned to the 100% risk category of section 3(a)(4) of this appendix. PART 4—ORGANIZATION AND FUNCTIONS, AVAILABILITY AND RELEASE OF INFORMATION, CONTRACTING OUTREACH PROGRAM, POST-EMPLOYMENT RESTRICTIONS FOR SENIOR EXAMINERS 9. The authority citation for part 4 is revised to read as follows: Authority: 12 U.S.C. 93a. Subpart A also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552. Subpart B also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552; E.O. 12600 (3 CFR 1987 Comp., p. 235). Subpart C also issued under 5 U.S.C. 301, 552; 12 U.S.C. 161, 481, 482, 484(a), 1442, 1817(a)(2) and (3), 1818(u) and (v), 1820(d)(6), 1920(k), 1821(c), 1821(o), 1821(t), 1831m, 1831p-1, 1831o, 1867, 1951 *et seq.* , 2601 *et seq.* , 2801 *et seq.* , 2901 *et seq.* , 3101 *et seq.* , 3401 *et seq.* ; 15 U.S.C. 77uu(b), 78q(c)(3); 18 U.S.C. 641, 1905, 1906; 29 U.S.C. 1204; 31 U.S.C. 9701; 42 U.S.C. 3601; 44 U.S.C. 3506, 3510. Subpart D also issued under 12 U.S.C. 1833e. 10. In § 4.4, revise the second sentence to read as follows: § 4.4 Washington office. * * * The Washington office directs OCC policy, oversees OCC operations, and is responsible for the direct supervision of certain national banks, including the largest national banks (through the Large Bank Supervision Department) and other national banks requiring special supervision. * * * 11. In § 4.5(a), revise the table to read as follows: § 4.5 District and field offices.

(a)* * * District Office address Geographical composition Northeastern District Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, 340 Madison Avenue, 5th Floor New York, NY 10173-0002 Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, northeast Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Puerto Rico, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Vermont, the Virgin Islands, Virginia, and West Virginia. Central District Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, One Financial Place, Suite 2700, 440 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, IL 60605 Illinois, Indiana, northeast and southeast Iowa, central Kentucky, Michigan, Minnesota, eastern Missouri, North Dakota, Ohio, and Wisconsin. Southern District Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, 500 North Akard Street, Suite 1600, Dallas, TX 75201 Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, southern Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Oklahoma, Tennessee, and Texas. Western District Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, 1225 17th Street, Suite 300, Denver, CO 80202 Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Idaho, central and western Iowa, Kansas, western Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, South Dakota, Utah, Washington, Wyoming, and Guam. PART 5—RULES, POLICIES, AND PROCEDURES FOR CORPORATE ACTIVITIES 12. The authority citation for part 5 continues to read as follows: Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1 *et seq.* ; 93a; 215a-2; 215a-3, 481, and section 5136A of the Revised Statutes (12 U.S.C. 24a). § 5.3 [Amended] 13. In § 5.3 remove paragraph

(j)and redesignate paragraphs

(k)and

(l)as paragraphs

(j)and (k), respectively. § 5.4 [Amended] 14. Amend § 5.4(d) by: a. Removing “Licensing Manager” in the first sentence and adding in its place “Director for District Licensing”; and b. Removing the phrase “Bank Organization and Structure Department” in the second sentence and adding in its place the phrase “Licensing Department”. 15. Amend § 5.13 by: a. In paragraph (c), adding two sentences at the end of the paragraph; b. In paragraph (f): i. Removing the phrase “Deputy Comptroller for Bank Organization and Structure” in the first sentence and adding in its place the phrase “Deputy Comptroller for Licensing”; and ii. Adding a sentence after the first sentence. The additions read as follows: § 5.13 Decisions.

(c)* * * The OCC may return an application without a decision if it finds the filing to be materially deficient. A filing is materially deficient if it lacks sufficient information for the OCC to make a determination under the applicable statutory or regulatory criteria.

(f)* * * In the event the Deputy Comptroller for Licensing was the deciding official of the matter appealed, or was involved personally and substantially in the matter, the appeal may be referred instead to the Chief Counsel. * * * 16. Amend § 5.20 by: a. In paragraph (i)(3), removing the term “spokesperson” wherever it appears and in its place adding the term “contact person”; and b. In paragraph (i)(5) by: i. Revising the heading; and ii. Adding a sentence after the second sentence of paragraph (i)(5)(i); and iii. Redesignating paragraphs (i)(5)(ii) and (i)(5)(iii) as paragraphs (i)(5)(iii) and (i)(5)(iv), respectively; and iv. Redesignating the last sentence of paragraph (i)(5)(i) as new paragraph (i)(5)(ii). The addition and revision read as follows: § 5.20 Organizing a bank.

(i)* * *

(5)*Activities* .

(i)* * * A proposed national bank may offer and sell securities prior to OCC preliminary approval of the proposed national bank's charter application, provided that the proposed national bank has filed articles of association, an organization certificate, and a completed charter application and the bank complies with the OCC's securities offering regulations, 12 CFR part 16. * * * 17. Amend § 5.26 as follows: a. Remove paragraph (e)(2)(i)(B); b. Redesignate paragraphs (e)(2)(i)(C), (e)(2)(i)(D), (e)(2)(i)(E), as paragraphs (e)(2)(i)(B), (e)(2)(i)(C), (e)(2)(i)(D), respectively; c. At the end of newly redesignated paragraph (e)(2)(i)(C), remove the word “and”; d. At the end of newly redesignated paragraph (e)(2)(i)(D), remove the period and add in its place the phrase “; and”; e. Add a new paragraph (e)(2)(i)(E) to read as follows; f. Redesignate paragraph (e)(3)(i) as paragraph (e)(3); and g. Removing paragraph (e)(3)(ii) in its entirety. The addition reads as follows: § 5.26 Fiduciary powers.

(e)* * *

(2)* * *

(i)* * *

(E)If requested by the OCC, an opinion of counsel that the proposed activities do not violate applicable Federal or State law, including citations to applicable law. 18. Amend § 5.30 as follows: a. In paragraph (d)(1)(i), add “intermittent facility,” after “temporary facility,”; and b. Redesignate paragraphs (d)(3) though (d)(5) as paragraphs (d)(4) through (d)(6), respectively; and add a new paragraph (d)(3); c. Redesignate paragraphs (f)(4) and (f)(5) as paragraphs (f)(5) and (f)(6), respectively, and add a new paragraph (f)(4) to read as follows. The additions read as follows: § 5.30 Establishment, acquisition, and relocation of a branch.

(d)* * *

(3)*Intermittent branch* means a branch that is operated for one or more limited periods of time to provide branch banking services at a specified recurring event, on the grounds or premises where the event is held or at a fixed site adjacent to the grounds or premises where the event is held, and exclusively during the occurrence of the event. Examples of an intermittent branch include the operation of a branch on the campus of, or at a fixed site adjacent to the campus of, a specific college during school registration periods; or the operation of a branch during a State fair on State fairgrounds or at a fixed site adjacent to the fairgrounds.

(f)* * *

(4)*Intermittent branches* . Prior to operating an intermittent branch, a national bank shall file a branch application and publish notice in accordance with § 5.8, both of which shall identify the event at which the branch will be operated; designate a location for operation of the branch which shall be on the grounds or premises at which the event is held or on a fixed site adjacent to those grounds or premises; and specify the approximate time period during which the event will be held and during which the branch will operate, including whether operation of the branch will be on an annual or otherwise recurring basis. If the branch is approved, then the bank need not obtain approval each time it seeks to operate the branch in accordance with the original application and approval. 19. Amend § 5.33 as follows: a. Add introductory text at the beginning of paragraph (d); b. Revise the introductory text in paragraph (e)(1); c. Redesignate paragraphs (e)(1)(i), (e)(1)(i)(A), (e)(1)(i)(B), (e)(1)(ii), (e)(1)(iii), (e)(1)(iv), and (e)(1)(v) as paragraphs (e)(1)(i)(A) introductory text, (e)(1)(i)(A)( *1* ), (e)(1)(i)(A)( *2* ), (e)(1)(i)(B), (e)(1)(i)(C), (e)(1)(ii) and (e)(1)(iii) respectively; d. Add a new paragraph (e)(1)(i) introductory text; e. Revise redesignated paragraph (e)(1)(ii); f. Remove the phrase “, and with the appropriate district office” from the first sentence of paragraph (e)(8)(ii); g. Revise the headings of paragraphs (g), (g)(1) and (g)(3); h. Remove the phrase “or merger” in paragraph (g)(2)(ii); i. Remove the phrase “12 U.S.C. 214c” in paragraph (g)(3)(i) and add in its place “12 U.S.C. 214b”; and j. Revise paragraph (h). The additions and revisions read as follows: § 5.33 Business combinations.

(d)*Definitions* —For purposes of this § 5.33: * * *

(e)*Policy* .

(1)*Factors* .

(i)*Bank Merger Act* . When the OCC evaluates an application for a business combination under the Bank Merger Act, the OCC considers the following factors: * * *

(ii)*Community Reinvestment Act* . When the OCC evaluates an application for a business combination under the Community Reinvestment Act, the OCC considers the performance of the applicant and the other depository institutions involved in the business combination in helping to meet the credit needs of the relevant communities, including low- and moderate-income neighborhoods, consistent with safe and sound banking practices.

(g)*Provisions governing consolidations and mergers with different types of entities* .

(1)*Consolidations and mergers under 12 U.S.C. 215 or 215a of a national bank with other national banks and State banks as defined in 12 U.S.C. 215b(1) resulting in a national bank.* * * *

(3)* Consolidation or merger of a national bank resulting in a State bank as defined in 12 U.S.C. 214(a) under 12 U.S.C. 214a or a Federal savings association under 12 U.S.C. 215c. * * * *

(h)*Interstate combinations under 12 U.S.C. 1831u* . A business combination between insured banks with different home States under the authority of 12 U.S.C. 1831u must satisfy the standards and requirements and comply with the procedures of 12 U.S.C. 1831u and either 12 U.S.C. 215, 215a, and 215a-1, as applicable, if the resulting bank is a national bank, or 12 U.S.C. 214a, 214b, and 214c if the resulting bank is a State bank. For purposes of 12 U.S.C. 1831u, the acquisition of a branch without the acquisition of all or substantially all of the assets of a bank is treated as the acquisition of a bank whose home State is the State in which the branch is located. 20. Amend § 5.34 as follows: a. Amend paragraph (e)(2) by: i. Redesignating paragraphs (e)(2)(i) and (e)(2)(ii) as paragraphs (e)(2)(ii)(A) and (e)(2)(ii)(B), respectively; ii. Redesignating the first sentence of paragraph (e)(2) introductory text as paragraph (e)(2)(i) and revising it; and iii. Redesignating the second sentence of paragraph (e)(2) introductory text as paragraph (e)(2)(ii) introductory text, republishing it for reader reference; b. Amend paragraph (e)(5) by: i. Revising paragraph (e)(5)(i); ii. Removing paragraph (e)(5)(iv); iii. Redesignating paragraphs (e)(5)(ii) and (e)(5)(iii) as paragraphs (e)(5)(iii) and (e)(5)(iv); iv. Removing the word “and” at the end of paragraph (e)(5)(v)(X), and the period at the end of paragraph (e)(5)(v)(Y) and replacing it with a semicolon; v. Revising paragraph (e)(5)(vi) introductory text; vi. Removing the word “and” at the end of paragraph (e)(5)(vi)(B); vii. Redesignating paragraph (e)(6) as paragraph (e)(7); viii. Replacing the period with a semicolon and adding the word “and” at the end of (e)(5)(vi)(C); and ix. Adding new paragraphs (e)(5)(ii), (e)(5)(v)(Z), (e)(5)(v)(AA), (e)(5)(v)(BB), (e)(5)(v)(CC), (e)(5)(v)(DD), (e)(5)(v)(EE), (e)(5)(v)(FF), (e)(5)(vi)(D), and (e)(6). The additions and revisions read as follows: § 5.34 Operating subsidiaries.

(e)* * *

(2)*Qualifying subsidiaries.*

(i)An operating subsidiary in which a national bank may invest includes a corporation, limited liability company, limited partnership, or similar entity if:

(A)The bank has the ability to control the management and operations of the subsidiary;

(B)The parent bank owns and controls more than 50 percent of the voting (or similar type of controlling) interest of the operating subsidiary, or the parent bank otherwise controls the operating subsidiary and no other party controls more than 50 percent of the voting (or similar type of controlling) interest of the operating subsidiary; and

(C)The operating subsidiary is consolidated with the bank under Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP).

(ii)However, the following subsidiaries are not operating subsidiaries subject to this section:

(5)*Procedures* —(i) *Notice required.*

(A)Except for operating subsidiaries subject to the application procedures set forth in paragraph (e)(5)(ii) of this section or exempt from notice or application procedures under paragraph (e)(5)(vi) of this section, a national bank that is “well capitalized” and “well managed” may establish or acquire an operating subsidiary, or perform a new activity in an existing operating subsidiary, by providing the appropriate district office written notice within 10 days after acquiring or establishing the subsidiary, or commencing the new activity, if: ( *1* ) The activity is listed in paragraph (e)(5)(v) of this section; ( *2* ) The entity is a corporation, limited liability company, or limited partnership; and ( *3* ) The bank: ( *i* ) Has the ability to control the management and operations of the subsidiary by holding voting interests sufficient to select the number of directors needed to control the subsidiary's board and to select and terminate senior management (or, in the case of a limited partnership, has the ability to control the management and operations of the subsidiary by controlling the selection and termination of senior management); ( *ii* ) Holds more than 50 percent of the voting, or equivalent, interests in the subsidiary, and, in the case of a limited partnership, the bank or an operating subsidiary thereof is the sole general partner of the limited partnership, provided that under the partnership agreement, limited partners have no authority to bind the partnership by virtue solely of their status as limited partners; and ( *iii* ) Is required to consolidate its financial statements with those of the subsidiary under Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.

(B)The written notice must include a complete description of the bank's investment in the subsidiary and of the activity conducted and a representation and undertaking that the activity will be conducted in accordance with OCC policies contained in guidance issued by the OCC regarding the activity. To the extent that the notice relates to the initial affiliation of the bank with a company engaged in insurance activities, the bank should describe the type of insurance activity in which the company is engaged and has present plans to conduct. The bank also must list for each State the lines of business for which the company holds, or will hold, an insurance license, indicating the State where the company holds a resident license or charter, as applicable. Any bank receiving approval under this paragraph is deemed to have agreed that the subsidiary will conduct the activity in a manner consistent with published OCC guidance.

(ii)*Application required.*

(A)Except where the operating subsidiary is exempt from notice or application requirements under paragraph (e)(5)(vi) of this section, or subject to the notice procedures in paragraph (e)(5)(i), a national bank must first submit an application to, and receive approval from, the OCC with respect to the establishment or acquisition of an operating subsidiary, or the performance of a new activity in an existing operating subsidiary.

(B)The application must explain, as appropriate, how the bank “controls” the enterprise, describing in full detail structural arrangements where control is based on factors other than bank ownership of more than 50 percent of the voting interest of the subsidiary and the ability to control the management and operations of the subsidiary by holding voting interests sufficient to select the number of directors needed to control the subsidiary's board and to select and terminate senior management. In the case of a limited partnership that does not qualify for the notice procedures set forth in paragraph (e)(5)(i), the bank should provide a statement explaining why it is not eligible. The application also must include a complete description of the bank's investment in the subsidiary, the proposed activities of the subsidiary, the organizational structure and management of the subsidiary, the relations between the bank and the subsidiary, and other information necessary to adequately describe the proposal. To the extent that the application relates to the initial affiliation of the bank with a company engaged in insurance activities, the bank should describe the type of insurance activity in which the company is engaged and has present plans to conduct. The bank must also list for each State the lines of business for which the company holds, or will hold, an insurance license, indicating the State where the company holds a resident license or charter, as applicable. The application must state whether the operating subsidiary will conduct any activity at a location other than the main office or a previously approved branch of the bank. The OCC may require an applicant to submit a legal analysis if the proposal is novel, unusually complex, or raises substantial unresolved legal issues. In these cases, the OCC encourages applicants to have a pre-filing meeting with the OCC. Any bank receiving approval under this paragraph is deemed to have agreed that the subsidiary will conduct the activity in a manner consistent with published OCC guidance.

(v)* * *

(Z)Providing data processing, and data transmission services, facilities (including equipment, technology, and personnel), databases, advice and access to such services, facilities, databases and advice, for the parent bank and for others, pursuant to 12 CFR 7.5006 to the extent permitted by published OCC precedent;

(AA)Providing bill presentment, billing, collection, and claims-processing services;

(BB)Providing safekeeping for personal information or valuable confidential trade or business information, such as encryption keys, to the extent permitted by published OCC precedent;

(CC)Providing payroll processing;

(DD)Providing branch management services;

(EE)Providing merchant processing services except when the activity involves the use of third parties to solicit or underwrite merchants; and

(FF)Performing administrative tasks involved in benefits administration.

(vi)*No application or notice required.* A national bank may acquire or establish an operating subsidiary, or engage in the performance of a new activity in an existing operating subsidiary, without filing an application or providing notice to the OCC, if the bank is well managed and adequately capitalized or well capitalized and the: * * *

(D)The standards set forth in paragraphs (e)(5)(i)(A)( *2* ) and ( *3* ) of this section are satisfied.

(6)*Grandfathered operating subsidiaries.* Notwithstanding the requirements for a qualifying operating subsidiary in § 5.34(e)(2) and unless otherwise notified by the OCC with respect to a particular operating subsidiary, an entity that a national bank lawfully acquired or established as an operating subsidiary before April 24, 2008 may continue to operate as a national bank operating subsidiary under this section, provided that the bank and the operating subsidiary were, and continue to be, conducting authorized activities in compliance with the standards and requirements applicable when the bank established or acquired the operating subsidiary. 21. Amend § 5.35 as follows: a. In paragraph (d)(1) remove “insured banks” each time it appears and add in its place “insured depository institutions”; b. In paragraph (d)(3) add “, except when such term appears in connection with the term `insured depository institution” ' after “means”; c. Redesignate paragraphs (d)(4) and (d)(5) as paragraphs (d)(5) and (d)(6), respectively; d. Add new paragraph (d)(4); e. In newly redesignated paragraph (d)(6): i. Remove “insured bank” and add in its place “insured depository institution”; ii. Remove “insured banks” and add in its place “insured depository institutions”; and iii. Remove “banks as its principal investor” and add in its place “insured depository institutions as its principal investor”; f. Add the word “and” at the end of paragraph (g)(3); g. Revise paragraph (g)(4); h. Revise the heading of paragraph (i); and i. Remove paragraphs (g)(5) and (i)(2) and the paragraph designation for paragraph (i)(1). The additions and revisions read as follows: § 5.35 Bank service companies.

(d)* * *

(4)*Insured depository institution,* for purposes of this section, has the same meaning as in section 3 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act.

(g)* * *

(4)Information demonstrating that the bank service company will perform only those services that each insured depository institution shareholder or member is authorized to perform under applicable Federal or State law and will perform such services only at locations in a State in which each such shareholder or member is authorized to perform such services unless performing services that are authorized by the Federal Reserve Board under the authority of 12 U.S.C. 1865(b).

(i)*Investment limitations.* * * * 22. Amend § 5.36 as follows: a. Add “application or” before “notice” in paragraph (b); b. Revise the last sentence of paragraph (b); c. Revise paragraph

(e)introductory text; d. Remove paragraph (e)(5); e. Redesignate paragraphs (e)(6) through (e)(8) as paragraphs (e)(5) through (e)(7), respectively, and paragraphs

(f)and

(g)as paragraphs

(h)and (i), respectively; f. Revise redesignated paragraph (e)(6); and g. Add new paragraphs

(f)and (g). The additions and revisions read as follows: § 5.36 Other equity investments.

(b)* * * Other permissible equity investments may be reviewed on a case-by-case basis by the OCC.

(e)*Non-controlling investments; notice procedure.* Unless the procedures governing a national bank's non-controlling investment are prescribed by OCC rules implementing a separate legal authorization of the investment and except as provided in paragraphs

(f)and

(g)of this section, a national bank may make a non-controlling investment, directly or through its operating subsidiary, in an enterprise that engages in the activities described in paragraph (e)(2) of this section by filing a written notice. The bank must file this written notice with the appropriate district office no later than 10 days after making the investment. The written notice must: * * *

(6)Certify that the bank's loss exposure is limited as a legal matter and that the bank does not have unlimited liability for the obligations of the enterprise; and

(f)*Non-controlling investment; application procedure.* Unless the procedures governing a national bank's non-controlling investment are prescribed by OCC rules implementing a separate legal authorization of the investment, a national bank must file an application and obtain prior approval before making or acquiring, either directly or through an operating subsidiary, a non-controlling investment in an enterprise if the non-controlling investment does not qualify for the notice procedure set forth in paragraph

(e)of this section because the bank is unable to make the representation required by paragraph (e)(2) or the certification required by paragraph (e)(3) of this section. The application must include the information required in paragraphs (e)(1) and (e)(4) through (e)(7) of this section and (e)(2) or (e)(3), as appropriate. If the bank is unable to make the representation set forth in paragraph (e)(2) of this section, the bank's application must explain why the activity in which the enterprise engages is a permissible activity for a national bank and why the applicant should be permitted to hold a non-controlling investment in an enterprise engaged in that activity. A bank may not make a non-controlling investment if it is unable to make the representations and certifications specified in paragraphs (e)(1) and (e)(4) through (e)(7) of this section.

(g)*Non-controlling investments in entities holding assets in satisfaction of debts previously contracted.* Certain non-controlling investments may be eligible for expedited treatment where the bank's investment is in an entity holding assets in satisfaction of debts previously contracted or the bank acquires shares of a company in satisfaction of debts previously contracted.

(1)*Notice required.* A national bank that is well capitalized and well managed may acquire a non-controlling investment, directly or through its operating subsidiary, in an enterprise that engages in the activities of holding and managing assets acquired by the parent bank through foreclosure or otherwise in good faith to compromise a doubtful claim, or in the ordinary course of collecting a debt previously contracted, by filing a written notice in accordance with this paragraph (g)(i). The activities of the enterprise must be conducted pursuant to the same terms and conditions as would be applicable if the activity were conducted directly by a national bank. The bank must file the written notice with the appropriate district office no later than 10 days after making the non-controlling investment. This notice must include a complete description of the bank's investment in the enterprise and the activities conducted, a description of how the bank plans to divest the non-controlling investment or the underlying assets within applicable statutory time frames, and a representation and undertaking that the bank will conduct the activities in accordance with OCC policies contained in guidance issued by the OCC regarding the activities. Any national bank receiving approval under this paragraph (g)(i) is deemed to have agreed that the enterprise will conduct the activity in a manner consistent with published OCC guidance.

(2)*No notice or application required.* A national bank is not required to file a notice or application under this § 5.36 if it acquires a non-controlling investment in shares of a company through foreclosure or otherwise in good faith to compromise a doubtful claim, or in the ordinary course of collecting a debt previously contracted. 23. Amend § 5.39 as follows: a. Amend paragraph (d)(1) by adding the phrase “as implemented by Regulation W, 12 CFR part 223,” before “as applicable”; b. Amend paragraph

(h)by: i. Removing the word “Sections” at the beginning of paragraph (h)(5) introductory text and adding in its place the phrase “Except for a subsidiary of a bank that is considered a financial subsidiary under paragraph (a)(6) of this section solely because the subsidiary engages in the sale of insurance as agent or broker in a manner that is not permitted for national banks, sections”; ii. Adding the phrase “, as implemented by Regulation W, 12 CFR part 223,” before the word “apply” in paragraph (h)(5) introductory text; iii. Revising paragraph (h)(5)(iii); iv. Removing the word “and” at the end of paragraph (h)(5)(iv); v. Redesignating paragraph (h)(5)(v) as paragraph (h)(5)(vi) and adding in redesignated paragraph (h)(5)(vi) the word “other” after the word “Any”; and vi. Adding a new paragraph (h)(5)(v). The additions and revisions read as follows: § 5.39 Financial subsidiaries.

(h)* * *

(5)* * *

(iii)A bank's purchase of or investment in a security issued by a financial subsidiary of the bank must be valued at the greater of:

(A)The total amount of consideration given (including liabilities assumed) by the bank, reduced to reflect amortization of the security to the extent consistent with GAAP, or

(B)The carrying value of the security (adjusted so as not to reflect the bank's *pro rata* portion of any earnings retained or losses incurred by the financial subsidiary after the bank's acquisition of the security).

(v)Any extension of credit to a financial subsidiary of a bank by an affiliate of the bank is treated as an extension of credit by the bank to the financial subsidiary if the extension of credit is treated as capital of the financial subsidiary under any Federal or State law, regulation, or interpretation applicable to the subsidiary; and 24. Amend § 5.46 as follows: a. Remove the phrase “letter of notification” wherever it appears and replace it with the word “notice”; b. Revise paragraph (e)(3)(iii); c. Amend the first sentence of paragraph (i)(2) by removing the number “30” and replacing it with the number “15”; and d. Remove the phrase “in order to obtain a certification from the OCC” in the first sentence in paragraph (i)(3). The revision reads as follows: § 5.46 Changes in permanent capital.

(e)* * *

(3)* * *

(iii)The amount transferred from undivided profits; and 25. Amend § 5.50 by: a. Revising paragraph (a); b. Redesignating paragraphs (d)(4) through (d)(6) as paragraphs (d)(5) through (d)(7), respectively; c. Adding a new paragraph (d)(4); d. Redesignating paragraphs (f)(2)(ii) through (f)(2)(v) as paragraphs (f)(2)(iii) through (f)(2)(vi), respectively; e. Adding a new paragraph (f)(2)(ii); f. Removing the phrase “paragraph (f)(2)(ii)” in newly redesignated paragraph (f)(2)(vi) and adding in its place “paragraphs (f)(2)(ii) and (iii)”; g. Adding the phrase “information regarding the future prospects of the institution,” after “detailed financial information,” in paragraph (f)(3)(i)(A); h. Redesignating paragraphs (f)(4) and (f)(5) as paragraphs (f)(5) and (f)(6), respectively; i. Adding a new paragraph (f)(4); j. Removing the phrase “The financial condition of any acquiring person” and adding in its place “Either the financial condition of any acquiring person or the future prospects of the institution” in newly redesignated paragraph (f)(5)(iii); k. Redesignating paragraph

(h)as paragraph (i); and l. Adding a new paragraph (h). The additions and revisions read as follows: § 5.50 Change in bank control; reporting of stock loans.

(a)*Authority.* 12 U.S.C. 93a, 1817(j), and 12 U.S.C. 1831aa.

(d)* * *

(4)*Immediate family* includes a person's spouse, father, mother, stepfather, stepmother, brother, sister, stepbrother, stepsister, children, stepchildren, grandparent, grandchildren, father-in-law, mother-in-law, brother-in-law, sister-in-law, son-in-law, daughter-in-law, and the spouse of any of the forgoing.

(f)* * *

(2)* * *

(ii)The OCC presumes, unless rebutted, that a person is acting in concert with his or her immediate family.

(4)*Conditional actions.* The OCC may impose conditions on its action not to disapprove a notice to assure satisfaction of the relevant statutory criteria for non-objection to a notice.

(h)*Reporting requirement.* After the consummation of the change in control, the national bank shall notify the OCC in writing of any changes or replacements of its chief executive officer or of any director occurring during the 12-month period beginning on the date of consummation. This notice must be filed within 10 days of such change or replacement and must include a statement of the past and current business and professional affiliations of the new chief executive officers or directors. 26. Revise § 5.64 to read as follows: § 5.64 Earnings limitation under 12 U.S.C. 60.

(a)*Definitions.* As used in this section, the term “current year” means the calendar year in which a national bank declared, or proposes to declare, a dividend. The term “current year minus one” means the year immediately preceding the current year. The term “current year minus two” means the year that is two years prior to the current year. The term “current year minus three” means the year that is three years prior to the current year. The term “current year minus four” means the year that is four years prior to the current year.

(b)*Dividends from undivided profits.* Subject to 12 U.S.C. 56 and this subpart, the directors of a national bank may declare and pay dividends of so much of the undivided profits as they judge to be expedient.

(c)*Earnings limitations under 12 U.S.C. 60* —(1) *General rule.* For purposes of 12 U.S.C. 60, unless approved by the OCC in accordance with paragraph (c)(3) of this section, a national bank may not declare a dividend if the total amount of all dividends (common and preferred), including the proposed dividend, declared by the national bank in any current year exceeds the total of the national bank's net income for the current year to date, combined with its retained net income of current year minus one and current year minus two, less the sum of any transfers required by the OCC and any transfers required to be made to a fund for the retirement of any preferred stock.

(2)*Excess dividends in prior periods.*

(i)If in current year minus one or current year minus two the bank declared dividends in excess of that year's net income, the excess shall not reduce retained net income for the three-year period specified in paragraph (c)(1) of this section, provided that the amount of excess dividends can be offset by retained net income in current year minus three or current year minus four. If the bank declared dividends in excess of net income in current year minus one, the excess is offset by retained net income in current year minus three and then by retained net income in current year minus two. If the bank declared dividends in excess of net income in current year minus two, the excess is first offset by retained net income in current year minus four and then by retained net income in current year minus three.

(ii)If the bank's retained net income in current year minus three and current year minus four was insufficient to offset the full amount of the excess dividends declared, as calculated in accordance with paragraph (c)(2)(i) of this section, then the amount that is not offset will reduce the retained net income available to pay dividends in the current year.

(iii)The calculation in paragraph (c)(2) of this section shall apply only to retained net loss that results from dividends declared in excess of a single year's net income and does not apply to other types of current earnings deficits.

(3)*Prior approval required.* A national bank may declare a dividend in excess of the amount described in paragraph

(c)of this section, provided that the dividend is approved by the OCC. A national bank shall submit a request for prior approval of a dividend under 12 U.S.C. 60 to the appropriate district office.

(d)*Surplus surplus.* Any amount in capital surplus in excess of capital stock (referred to as “surplus surplus”) may be transferred to undivided profits and available as dividends, provided:

(1)The bank can demonstrate that the amount came from earnings in prior periods, excluding the effect of any stock dividend; and

(2)The board of directors of the bank approves the transfer of the amount from capital surplus to undivided profits. PART 7—BANK ACTIVITIES AND OPERATIONS 27. The authority for part 7 continues to read as follows: Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1 *et seq.* , 71, 71a, 92, 92a, 93, 93a, 481, 484, and 1818. § 7.1016 [Amended] 28. Amend footnote 1 to part 7 by: a. Removing “Publication No. 500” and inserting in its place “Publication No. 600 or any applicable prior version”; and b. Adding “Supplements to UCP 500 & 600 for Electronic Presentation (eUCP v. 1.0 & 1.1) (Supplements to the Uniform Customs and Practices for Documentary Credits for Electronic Presentation) (available from ICC Publishing, Inc., 212/206-1150; *http://www.iccwbo.org)”* before “the International Standby Practices (ISP98) (ICC Publication No. 590)”. 29. Amend § 7.1017 by: a. Redesignating the introductory text, paragraph (a), paragraph

(b)introductory text, paragraphs (b)(1) through (b)(3), and paragraphs (b)(2)(i) through (b)(2)(iv) as paragraph

(a)introductory text, paragraph (a)(1), paragraph (a)(2) introductory text, paragraphs (a)(2)(i) through (a)(2)(iii), and paragraphs (a)(2)(ii)(A) through (a)(2)(ii)(D), respectively; and b. Adding a new paragraph

(b)to read as follows: § 7.1017 National bank as guarantor or surety on indemnity bond.

(b)In addition to paragraph

(a)of this section, a national bank may guarantee obligations of a customer, subsidiary or affiliate that are financial in character, provided the amount of the bank's financial obligation is reasonably ascertainable and otherwise consistent with applicable law. 30. In § 7.2006, revise the second sentence to read as follows: § 7.2006 Cumulative voting in election of directors. * * * If permitted by the national bank's articles of association, the shareholder may cast all these votes for one candidate or distribute the votes among as many candidates as the shareholder chooses. * * * 31. In § 7.5001, add a new paragraph (d)(3) to read as follows: § 7.5001 Electronic activities that are part of, or incidental to, the business of banking.

(d)* * *

(3)In addition to the electronic activities specifically permitted in § 7.5004 (sale of excess electronic capacity and by-products) and § 7.5006 (incidental non-financial data processing), the OCC has determined that the following electronic activities are incidental to the business of banking, pursuant to this section. This list of activities is illustrative and not exclusive; the OCC may determine that other activities are permissible pursuant to this authority.

(i)Web site development where incidental to other banking services;

(ii)Internet access and e-mail provided on a non-profit basis as a promotional activity;

(iii)Advisory and consulting services on electronic activities where the services are incidental to customer use of electronic banking services; and

(iv)Sale of equipment that is convenient or useful to customer's use of related electronic banking services, such as specialized terminals for scanning checks that will be deposited electronically by wholesale customers of banks under the Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act, Public Law 108-100 (12 U.S.C. 5001-5018) (the Check 21 Act). 32. Amend § 7.5002 by: a. Removing the word “and” at the end of paragraph (a)(3), b. Removing the period at the end of paragraph (a)(4) and adding in its place the “; and”; and c. Adding a new paragraph (a)(5) to read as follows: § 7.5002 Furnishing of products and services by electronic means and facilities.

(a)* * *

(5)Issuing electronic letters of credit within the scope of 12 CFR 7.1016. 33. In § 7.5006, add a new paragraph

(c)as follows: § 7.5006 Data processing.

(c)*Software for performance of authorized banking functions.* A national bank may produce, market, or sell software that performs services or functions that the bank could perform directly, as part of the business of banking. PART 9—FIDUCIARY ACTIVITIES OF NATIONAL BANKS 34. The authority citation for part 9 continues to read as follows: Authority: 12 U.S.C. 24 (Seventh), 92a, and 93a; 15 U.S.C. 78q, 78q-1, and 78w. 35. Revise § 9.20 to read as follows: § 9.20 Transfer agents. (a)(1) *Registration.* An application for registration under Section 17A(c) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 of a transfer agent for which the OCC is the appropriate regulatory agency, as defined in section 3(a)(34)(B) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, shall be filed with the OCC on FFIEC Form TA-1, in accordance with the instructions contained therein. Registration shall become effective 30 days after the date an application on Form TA-1 is filed unless the OCC accelerates, denies, or postpones such registration in accordance with section 17A(c) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

(2)*Amendments to registration.* Within 60 days following the date on which any information reported on Form TA-1 becomes inaccurate, misleading, or incomplete, the registrant shall file an amendment on FFIEC Form TA-1 correcting the inaccurate, misleading, or incomplete information. The filing of an amendment to an application for registration as a transfer agent under this section, which registration has not become effective, shall postpone the effective date of the registration for 30 days following the date on which the amendment is filed unless the OCC accelerates, denies, or postpones the registration in accordance with Section 17A(c) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

(3)*Withdrawal from registration.* Any registered national bank transfer agent that ceases to engage in activities that require registration under Section 17A(c) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 may file a written notice of withdrawal from registration with the OCC. Deregistration shall be effective 60 days after filing.

(4)*Reports.* Every registration or amendment filed under this section shall constitute a report or application within the meaning of Sections 17, 17A(c), and 32(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

(b)*Operational and reporting requirements.* The rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 17A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 prescribing operational and reporting requirements for transfer agents apply to the domestic activities of registered national bank transfer agents. PART 10—MUNICIPAL SECURITIES DEALERS 36. The authority citation for part 10 is revised to read as follows: Authority: 12 U.S.C. 93a, 481, and 1818; 15 U.S.C. 78o-4(c)(5) and 78q-78w. 37. In § 10.1 revise paragraph

(a)to read as follows: § 10.1 Scope.

(a)Any national bank and separately identifiable department or division of a national bank (collectively, a national bank) that acts as a municipal securities dealer, as that term is defined in section 3(a)(30) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(30)); and PART 11—SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT DISCLOSURE RULES 38. The authority citation for part 11 continues to read as follows: Authority: 12 U.S.C. 93a, 15 U.S.C. 78l, 78m, 78n, 78p, 78w, 7241, 7242, 7243, 7244, 7261, 7262, 7264, and 7265. 39. In § 11.1 revise paragraph

(a)to read as follows: § 11.1 Authority and OMB control number.

(a)*Authority.* The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency

(OCC)is vested with the powers, functions, and duties otherwise vested in the Securities and Exchange Commission (Commission) to administer and enforce the provisions of sections 12, 13, 14(a), 14(c), 14(d), 14(f), and 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (1934 Act) (15 U.S.C. 78l, 78m, 78n(a), 78n(c), 78n(d), 78n(f), and 78p), regarding national banks with one or more classes of securities subject to the registration provisions of sections 12(b) and

(g)of the 1934 Act (registered national banks). Further, the OCC has general rulemaking authority under 12 U.S.C. 93a, to promulgate rules and regulations concerning the activities of national banks. PART 12—RECORDKEEPING AND CONFIRMATION REQUIREMENTS FOR SECURITIES TRANSACTIONS 40. The authority citation for part 12 continues to read as follows: Authority: 12 U.S.C. 24, 92a, and 93a. § 12.7 [Amended] 41. Amend § 12.7(a)(4) by removing “ten business days after the end of the calendar quarter” and adding “the deadline specified in SEC rule 17j-1 (17 CFR 270.17j-1) for quarterly transaction reports” in its place. PART 16—SECURITIES OFFERING DISCLOSURE RULES 42. The authority citation for part 16 continues to read as follows: Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1 *et seq.* and 93a. 43. In § 16.2 revise paragraph

(b)to read as follows: § 16.2 Definitions.

(b)*Bank* means an existing national bank, a national bank in organization, or a Federal branch or agency of a foreign bank. 44. Amend § 16.5 as follows: a. Revise paragraph (a); b. Remove “or” from the end of paragraph (f); c. Remove the period at the end of paragraph

(g)and add “; or” in its place; and d. Add a new paragraph (h), to read as follows: § 16.5 Exemptions.

(a)If the securities are exempt from registration under section 3 of the Securities Act (15 U.S.C. 77c), but only by reason of an exemption other than section 3(a)(2) (exemption for bank securities), section 3(a)(11) (exemption for intrastate offerings), and section 3(a)(12) of the Securities Act (exemption for bank holding company formation).

(h)In a transaction that satisfies the requirements of § 16.9 of this part. § 16.6 [Amended] 45. Amend § 16.6 by: a. In paragraph

(a)introductory text, removing the phrase “§§ 16.3, 16.15(a) and (b), and 16.20” and adding in its place “§§ 16.3 and 16.15(a) and (b)”; b. In paragraph (a)(3), adding “, if issued in certificate form,” after “each note or debenture”. § 16.7 [Amended] 46. Amend § 16.7 as follows: a. Remove paragraph (a)(3); b. In paragraph (a)(1), add the word “and” after the semicolon; and c. In paragraph (a)(2), remove “; and” and replace it with a period. 47. Add a new § 16.9 to read as follows: § 16.9 Securities offered and sold in holding company dissolution. Offers and sales of bank issued securities in connection with the dissolution of the holding company of the bank are exempt from the registration and prospectus requirements of § 16.3 pursuant to § 16.5(h), provided all of the following requirements are met:

(a)The offer and sale of bank-issued securities occurs solely as part of a dissolution in which the security holders exchange their shares of stock in a holding company that had no significant assets other than securities of the bank, for bank stock;

(b)The security holders receive, after the dissolution, substantially the same proportional share interests in the bank as they held in the holding company;

(c)The rights and interests of the security holders in the bank are substantially the same as those in the holding company prior to the transaction; and

(d)The bank has substantially the same assets and liabilities as the holding company had on a consolidated basis prior to the transaction. § 16.20 [Removed] 48. Remove § 16.20. PART 19—RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE 49. The authority citation for part 19 continues to read as follows: Authority: 5 U.S.C. 504, 554-557; 12 U.S.C. 93(b), 93a, 164, 505, 1817, 1818, 1820, 1831m, 1831o, 1972, 3102, 3018(a), 3909 and 4717; 15 U.S.C. 78(h) and (i), 78o-4(c), 78o-5, 78q-1, 78s, 78u, 78u-2, 78u-3, and 78w; 28 U.S.C. 2461 note, 31 U.S.C. 330 and 5321; and 42 U.S.C. 4012a. 50. In § 19.3, revise paragraph

(g)to read as follows: § 19.3 Definitions.

(g)*Institution* includes any national bank or Federal branch or agency of a foreign bank. § 19.100 [Amended] 51. In § 19.100, second sentence, remove the phrase “(except that in removal and prohibition cases instituted pursuant to 12 U.S.C. 1818, the administrative law judge will file the record and the recommended decision with the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System)”. § 19.110 [Amended] 52. In § 19.110, remove the phrase “bank affairs” and add in its place “the affairs of any depository institution pursuant to 12 U.S.C. 1818(g)”. 53. Revise § 19.111 to read as follows: § 19.111 Suspension, removal, or prohibition. The Comptroller may serve a notice of suspension or order of removal or prohibition pursuant to 12 U.S.C. 1818(g) on an institution-affiliated party. A copy of such notice or order will be served on any depository institution that the subject of the notice or order is affiliated with at the time the notice or order is issued, whereupon the institution-affiliated party involved must immediately cease service to, or participation in the affairs of, that depository institution and, if so determined by the OCC, any other depository institution. The notice or order will indicate the basis for suspension, removal or prohibition and will inform the institution-affiliated party of the right to request in writing, to be received by the OCC within 30 days from the date that the institution-affiliated party was served with such notice or order, an opportunity to show at an informal hearing that continued service to or participation in the conduct of the affairs of any depository institution has not posed, does not pose, or is not likely to pose a threat to the interests of the depositors of, or has not threatened, does not threaten, or is not likely to threaten to impair public confidence in, any relevant depository institution. The written request must be sent by certified mail to, or served personally with a signed receipt on, the District Deputy Comptroller in the OCC district in which the bank in question is located; if the bank is supervised by Large Bank Supervision, to the Senior Deputy Comptroller for Large Bank Supervision for the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency; if the bank is supervised by Mid-Size/Community Bank Supervision, to the Senior Deputy Comptroller for Mid-Size/Community Bank Supervision for the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency; or if the institution-affiliated party is no longer affiliated with a particular national bank, to the Deputy Comptroller for Special Supervision, Washington, DC 20219. The request must state specifically the relief desired and the grounds on which that relief is based. For purposes of this section, the term *depository institution* means any depository institution of which the petitioner is or was an institution-affiliated party at the time at which the notice or order was issued by the Comptroller. § 19.112 [Amended] 54. In § 19.112, amend paragraphs (a), (b), and

(c)by removing the phrase “the District Deputy Comptroller or Administrator, the Deputy Comptroller for Multinational Banking, or the Deputy Comptroller or Director for Special Supervision,” wherever it appears and adding in its place “the District Deputy Comptroller, the Senior Deputy Comptroller for Large Bank Supervision, the Senior Deputy Comptroller for Mid-Size/Community Bank Supervision, or the Deputy Comptroller for Special Supervision,”. § 19.113 [Amended] 55. In § 19.113, amend paragraph

(c)by removing the phrase “the bank” and adding in its place “any depository institution”. 56. Revise § 19.241 to read as follows: § 19.241 Scope. This subpart, which implements section 36(g)(4) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (FDI Act) (12 U.S.C. 1831m(g)(4)), provides rules and procedures for the removal, suspension, or debarment of independent public accountants and their accounting firms from performing independent audit and attestation services required by section 36 of the FDI Act (12 U.S.C. 1831m) for insured national banks and Federal branches and agencies of foreign banks. PART 21—MINIMUM SECURITY DEVICES AND PROCEDURES, REPORTS OF SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITIES, AND BANK SECRECY ACT COMPLIANCE PROGRAM 57. The authority citation for part 21 continues to read as follows: Authority: 12 U.S.C. 93a, 1818, 1881-1884, and 3401-3422; 31 U.S.C. 5318. 58. In § 21.1, revise the first sentence of paragraph

(a)to read as follows: § 21.1 Purpose and scope of subpart A of this part.

(a)This subpart is issued by the Comptroller of the Currency pursuant to section 3 of the Bank Protection Act of 1968 (12 U.S.C. 1882) and is applicable to all national banking associations. * * * PART 22—LOANS IN AREAS HAVING SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARDS 59. The authority citation for part 22 continues to read as follows: Authority: 12 U.S.C. 93a, 42 U.S.C. 4012a, 4104a, 4104b, 4106, and 4128. 60. In § 22.2 revise paragraph

(b)to read as follows: § 22.2 Definitions.

(b)*Bank* means a national bank. PART 23—LEASING 61. The authority citation for part 23 continues to read as follows: Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1 *et. seq.* , 24 (Seventh), 24 (Tenth), and 93a. § 23.6 [Amended] 62. Amend § 23.6 by: a. Removing “A” at the beginning of the first sentence and adding “All” in its place; b. Adding the phrase “and Regulation W, 12 CFR part 223” after “12 U.S.C. 371c and 371c-1” in the first sentence; c. Adding the phrase “as implemented by Regulation W, 12 CFR part 223,” before “as applicable” in the third sentence; d. Adding “, as implemented by 12 CFR part 32,” after “12 U.S.C. 84” in the first sentence; and e. Adding “as implemented by part 32,” after “12 U.S.C. 84,” in the fourth sentence. PART 24—COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ENTITIES, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS, AND OTHER PUBLIC WELFARE INVESTMENTS 63. The authority citation for part 24 continues to read as follows: Authority: 12 U.S.C. 24 (Eleventh), 93a, 481, and 1818. 64. Amend § 24.1 by: a. Removing in paragraph

(a)the colon after the word “Authority” and adding a period in its place; b. Revising paragraphs

(b)and (d); and c. Adding paragraph (e). The revisions and addition read as follows: § 24.1 Authority, purpose, and OMB control number.

(b)*Purpose.* This part implements 12 U.S.C. 24 (Eleventh). It is the OCC's policy to encourage a national bank to make investments described in § 24.3, consistent with safety and soundness. This part provides the standards and procedures that apply to these investments.

(d)A national bank that makes loans or investments that are authorized under both 12 U.S.C. 24 (Eleventh) and other provisions of the Federal banking laws may do so under such other provisions without regard to the provisions of 12 U.S.C. 24 (Eleventh) or this part.

(e)Investments made, or written commitments to make investments made, prior to October 13, 2006, pursuant to 12 U.S.C. 24 (Eleventh) and this part, continue to be subject to the statutes and regulations in effect prior to the enactment of the Financial Services Regulatory Relief Act of 2006 (Pub. L. 109-351). 65. Amend § 24.2 by: a. Revising the first sentence of paragraph (c); b. Amending paragraph

(f)by removing “12 CFR 25.12(n)” and adding “12 CFR 25.12(m)” in its place; c. Redesignating paragraphs

(g)through

(i)as paragraphs

(h)through (j), respectively; and d. Adding new paragraph (g). The revision and addition read as follows: § 24.2 Definitions.

(c)*Community and economic development entity*

(CEDE)means an entity that makes investments or conducts activities that promote the public welfare by benefiting primarily low- and moderate-income areas or individuals. * * *

(g)*Benefiting primarily low- and moderate-income areas or individuals* , when used to describe an investment, means:

(1)A majority (more than 50 percent) of the investment benefits low- and moderate-income areas or individuals; or

(2)The express, primary purpose of the investment (evidenced, for example, by government eligibility requirements) is to benefit low- and moderate-income areas or individuals. 66. Revise § 24.3 to read as follows: § 24.3 Public welfare investments. A national bank or national bank subsidiary may make an investment directly or indirectly under this part if the investment promotes the public welfare by benefiting primarily low- and moderate-income areas or individuals. 67. Amend § 24.4 by: a. Revising the first sentence in paragraph (a); and b. Removing, in the second sentence of paragraph (a), “10” and adding “15” in its place. The revision reads as follows: § 24.4 Investment limits.

(a)* * * A national bank's aggregate outstanding investments under this part may not exceed 5 percent of its capital and surplus, unless the bank is at least adequately capitalized and the OCC determines, by written approval of a written request by the bank to exceed the 5 percent limit, that a higher amount of investments will not pose a significant risk to the deposit insurance fund. * * * 68. Amend § 24.5 by: a. Amending paragraphs (a)(2) and (b)(1) by removing “Director, Community Development Division,” and adding “Community Affairs Department,” in its place; b. Adding a second sentence at the end of paragraph (a)(2); c. In paragraph (a)(5), removing “Community Development Division” where it appears in the first and second sentences and adding “Community Affairs Department” in its place; and d. Adding a new sentence after the first sentence in paragraph (b)(1). The additions read as follows: § 24.5 Public welfare investment after-the-fact notice and prior approval procedures.

(a)* * *

(2)* * * The after-the-fact notification may also be e-mailed to *CommunityAffairs@occ.treas.gov* , faxed to

(202)874-4652, or provided electronically via National BankNet at *http://www.occ.treas.gov* .

(b)* * *

(1)* * * The investment proposal may also be e-mailed to *CommunityAffairs@occ.treas.gov* , faxed to

(202)874-4652, or submitted electronically via National BankNet at *http://www.occ.treas.gov* . * * * 69. Amend § 24.6 by: a. Revising the introductory text; b. Amending paragraph (b)(1) by removing the phrase “or other targeted redevelopment areas”; c. Revising paragraphs (b)(2) and (d)(1); d. Amending paragraph (b)(3) by removing the phrase “or targeted redevelopment area”; e. Amending paragraph (b)(4) by removing the phrase “or targeted redevelopment areas”; f. Amending paragraph (d)(2) by removing the word “and”; g. Amending paragraph (d)(3) by removing the word “previously”, and by removing the period and adding “; and” in its place; and h. Adding paragraph (d)(4). The revisions and addition read as follows: § 24.6 Examples of qualifying public welfare investments. The following are examples of qualifying public welfare investments to the extent they benefit primarily low- and moderate-income areas or individuals as set forth in § 24.3:

(b)* * *

(2)Investments that finance small businesses or small farms, including minority- and women-owned small businesses or small farms that, although not located in low- and moderate-income areas, create a significant number of permanent jobs for low- and moderate-income individuals;

(d)* * *

(1)Investments that provide credit counseling, financial literacy, job training, community development research, and similar technical assistance for non-profit community development organizations, low- and moderate-income individuals or areas, or small businesses, including minority- and women-owned small businesses, located in low- and moderate-income areas or that produce or retain permanent jobs, the majority of which are held by low- and moderate-income individuals;

(4)Investments in minority- and women-owned depository institutions that serve primarily low- and moderate-income individuals or low- and moderate-income areas. 70. Revise Appendix 1 to Part 24 to read as follows: Appendix 1 to Part 24—CD-1—National Bank Community Development (Part 24) Investments BILLING CODE 4810-33-P ER24AP08.000 ER24AP08.001 ER24AP08.002 ER24AP08.003 ER24AP08.004 BILLING CODE 4810-33-C PART 26—MANAGEMENT OFFICIAL INTERLOCKS 71. The authority citation for part 26 continues to read as follows: Authority: 12 U.S.C. 93a and 3201-3208. 72. In § 26.1 revise paragraph

(c)to read as follows: § 26.1 Authority, purpose, and scope.

(c)*Scope* . This part applies to management officials of national banks and their affiliates. § 26.2 [Amended] 73. In § 26.2 remove paragraph

(i)and redesignate paragraphs

(j)through

(q)as

(i)through (p), respectively. 74. Revise § 26.8 to read as follows: § 26.8 Enforcement. Except as provided in this section, the OCC administers and enforces the Interlocks Act with respect to national banks and their affiliates, and may refer any case of a prohibited interlocking relationship involving these entities to the Attorney General of the United States to enforce compliance with the Interlocks Act and this part. If an affiliate of a national bank is subject to the primary regulation of another Federal depository organization supervisory agency, then the OCC does not administer and enforce the Interlocks Act with respect to that affiliate. PART 27—FAIR HOUSING HOME LOAN DATA SYSTEM 75. The authority citation for part 27 continues to read as follows: Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 12 U.S.C. 1 *et. seq.,* 93a, 161, 481, and 1818; 15 U.S.C. 1691 *et seq.;* 42 U.S.C. 3601 *et seq.;* 12 CFR part 202. 76. In § 27.1 revise paragraph

(a)to read as follows: § 27.1 Scope and OMB control number.

(a)*Scope.* This part applies to the activities of national banks and their subsidiaries, which make home loans for the purpose of purchasing, construction-permanent financing, or refinancing of residential real property. 77. In § 27.2 revise paragraph

(c)to read as follows: § 27.2 Definitions.

(c)*Bank* means a national bank and any subsidiaries of a national bank. PART 28—INTERNATIONAL BANKING ACTIVITIES 78. The authority citation for part 28 continues to read as follows: Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1 *et seq.,* 24 (Seventh), 93a, 161, 602, 1818, 3101 *et seq.,* and 3901 *et seq.* § 28.11 [Amended] 79. In § 28.11, remove the phrase “, pursuant to an agreement between the parent foreign bank and the FRB,” in paragraph (s). 80. In § 28.12, remove the phrase “30th day after the OCC receives the filing,” in paragraph (e)(3) and add in its place “15th day after the close of the applicable public comment period, or the 45th day after the filing is received by the OCC, whichever is later,”. 81. In § 28.50, revise paragraph

(c)to read as follows: § 28.50 Authority, purpose, and scope.

(c)*Scope.* This subpart requires national banks to establish reserves against the risks presented in certain international assets and sets forth the accounting for various fees received by the banks when making international loans. 82. In § 28.51, revise paragraph

(a)to read as follows: § 28.51 Definitions.

(a)*Banking institution* means a national bank. PART 31—EXTENSIONS OF CREDIT TO INSIDERS AND TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES 83. The authority citation for part 31 is revised to read as follows: Authority: 12 U.S.C. 93a, 375a(4), 375b(3), and 1817(k). § 31.1 [Amended] 84. Amend § 31.1 by removing “1817(k), and 1972(2)(G),” and adding in its place “and 1817(k),”. 85. Revise Appendix A to part 31 as follows: Appendix A to Part 31—Interpretations: Deposits Between Affiliated Banks a. *General rule.* A deposit made by a bank in an affiliated bank is treated as a loan or extension of credit to the affiliate bank under 12 U.S.C. 371c, as this statute is implemented by the Federal Reserve Board's Regulation W, 12 CFR part 223. Thus, unless an exemption from Regulation W is available, these deposits must be secured in accordance with 12 CFR 223.14. However, a national bank may not pledge assets to secure private deposits unless otherwise permitted by law ( *see, e.g.* , 12 U.S.C. 90 (permitting collateralization of deposits of public funds); 12 U.S.C. 92a (trust funds); and 25 U.S.C. 156 and 162a (Native American funds)). Thus, unless one of the exceptions to 12 CFR part 223 noted in paragraph b. of this interpretation applies, unless another exception applies that enables a bank to meet the collateral requirements of § 223.14, or unless a party other than the bank in which the deposit is made can legally offer and does post the required collateral, a national bank may not: 1. Make a deposit in an affiliated national bank; 2. Make a deposit in an affiliated State-chartered bank unless the affiliated State-chartered bank can legally offer collateral for the deposit in conformance with applicable State law and 12 CFR 223.14; or 3. Receive deposits from an affiliated bank. b. *Exceptions.* The restrictions of 12 CFR part 223 (other than 12 CFR 223.13, which requires affiliate transactions to be consistent with safe and sound banking practices) do not apply to deposits: 1. Made in an affiliated depository institution or affiliated foreign bank provided that the deposit represents an ongoing, working balance maintained in the ordinary course of correspondent business. *See* 12 CFR 223.42(a); or 2. Made in an affiliated, insured depository institution that meets the requirements of the “sister bank” exemption under 12 CFR 223.41(a) or (b). Appendix B to Part 31 [Amended] 86. Amend Appendix B to part 31 by removing the third sentence under the heading “Exclusions to Definition”. PART 32—LENDING LIMITS 87. The authority citation for part 32 continues to read as follows: Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1 et seq., 84, and 93a. § 32.1 [Amended] 88. In § 32.1(c)(1), add the phrase “and (e), as implemented by section 223.2(a) of Regulation W” after “12 U.S.C. 371c(b)(1)”. PART 34—REAL ESTATE LENDING AND APPRAISALS 89. The authority citation for part 34 continues to read as follows: Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1 *et seq.,* 29, 93a, 371, 1701j-3, 1828(o), and 3331 *et seq.* 90. In § 34.21, revise paragraph

(b)and add a new paragraph

(c)as follows: § 34.21 General rule.

(b)*Purchase of loans not in compliance.* Except as provided in paragraph

(c)of this section, a national bank may purchase or participate in ARM loans that were not made in accordance with this part, provided such purchases are consistent with safe and sound banking practices as described in published OCC guidance, including appropriate diligence regarding the quality and characteristics of the loans, and other applicable regulations.

(c)*Purchase of loans from a subsidiary or affiliate.* ARM loans purchased, in whole or in part, from a subsidiary or affiliate must comply with this part and with other applicable regulations, and be consistent with safe and sound banking practices as described in published OCC guidance, including appropriate diligence regarding the quality and characteristics of the loans. For purposes of this paragraph, the terms affiliate and subsidiary have the same meaning as in 12 U.S.C. 371c. 91. Amend § 34.22 by: a. Designating the existing text as paragraph (a), and by adding the following heading; b. In newly designated paragraph (a), adding to the first sentence the words “or combination of indices” after the words “specify an index”; and c. Adding a new paragraph (b). The addition and revision read as follows: § 34.22 Index.

(a)*In general.* * * *

(b)*Exception.* Thirty days after filing a notice with the OCC, a national bank may use an index other than one described in paragraph

(a)of this section unless, within that 30-day period, the OCC has notified the bank that the notice presents supervisory concerns or raises significant issues of law or policy. If the OCC provides such notice to the bank, the bank may not use that index unless it applies for and receives the OCC's prior written approval. PART 37—DEBT CANCELLATION CONTRACTS AND DEBT SUSPENSION AGREEMENTS 92. The authority citation for part 37 continues to read as follows: Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1 *et seq.,* 24 (Seventh), 93a, 1818. § 37.7 [Amended] 93. Amend the last sentence in § 37.7(a) by removing the phrase “§ 37.6(b)” and adding the phrase “§ 37.6(d)” in its place. PART 40—PRIVACY OF CONSUMER FINANCIAL INFORMATION 94. The authority citation for part 40 continues to read as follows: Authority: 12 U.S.C. 93a; 15 U.S.C. 6801 *et seq.* 95. In § 40.1 revise the last sentence of paragraph (b)(1) to read as follows: § 40.1 Purpose and scope.

(b)*Scope.*

(1)* * * These are national banks, Federal branches and Federal agencies of foreign banks, and any subsidiaries of such entities except a broker or dealer that is registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, a registered investment adviser (with respect to the investment advisory activities of the adviser and activities incidental to those investment advisory activities), an investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, an insurance company that is subject to supervision by a State insurance regulator (with respect to insurance activities of the company and activities incidental to those insurance activities), and an entity that is subject to regulation by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. Dated: February 28, 2008. John C. Dugan, Comptroller of the Currency. [FR Doc. E8-8443 Filed 4-23-08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4810-33-P 73 80 Thursday, April 24, 2008 Rules and Regulations Part III Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 26 Public Access, Use, and Recreation Regulations for the Upper Mississippi River National Wildlife and Fish Refuge; Final Rule DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 26 RIN 1018-AV43 Public Access, Use, and Recreation Regulations for the Upper Mississippi River National Wildlife and Fish Refuge AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), are adopting new regulations for the Upper Mississippi River National Wildlife and Fish Refuge (refuge) to govern existing general public use and recreation. These changes will take effect in spring 2008 and will implement the recently completed comprehensive conservation plan

(CCP)for the refuge. This regulation codifies many existing refuge regulations currently published in and by brochures, signs, maps, and other forms of public notice. DATES: This rule is effective May 27, 2008. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Don Hultman,

(507)452-4232; Fax

(507)452-0851. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Upper Mississippi River National Wildlife and Fish Refuge (refuge) encompasses 240,000 acres in a more-or-less continuous stretch of 261 miles of Mississippi River floodplain in Minnesota, Wisconsin, Iowa, and Illinois. Congress established the refuge in 1924 to provide a “refuge and breeding place” for migratory birds, fish, other wildlife, and plants. The refuge is perhaps the most important corridor of habitat in the central United States, due to its species diversity and abundance, and it is the most visited refuge in the United States, with 3.7 million annual visitors. The development of an environmental impact statement

(EIS)and CCP for the refuge began with a notice of intent to prepare the EIS, which we published in the **Federal Register** on May 30, 2002 (67 FR 37852). We followed with a notice of availability of our Draft EIS (April 28, 2005; 70 FR 22085), and we accepted public comments on the Draft EIS for 120 days. On October 7, 2005, we published a notice of intent to prepare a Supplement to the Draft EIS (70 FR 58738). We made the Supplement to the Draft EIS available on December 5, 2005 (70 FR 72462), and accepted public comments on that document for 60 days, extended to 90 days (January 17, 2006, 71 FR 2561). We offered public involvement through 46 public meetings and workshops attended by 4,500 persons in 14 different communities in 4 States during the 4-year planning process. In addition, we held or attended 80 other meetings with the States, other agencies, interest groups, and elected officials to discuss the Draft EIS, and mailed three different planning update newsletters to up to 4,900 persons or organizations on our planning mailing list. We also issued numerous news releases at various planning milestones, and held two press conferences. On July 11, 2006, we published a notice of availability of our Final EIS (71 FR 39125), and we accepted public comments on the Final EIS for 30 days. On August 24, 2006, the Regional Director of the Midwest Region of the Fish and Wildlife Service signed the Record of Decision that documented the selection of Alternative E, the Preferred Alternative presented in the Final EIS. We published a notice of availability of that Record of Decision on November 2, 2006 (71 FR 64553). In accordance with the Record of Decision, we prepared a CCP based on Alternative E. The CCP was approved on October 24, 2006. The National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966 [16 U.S.C. 668dd-668ee (Administration Act), as amended by the National Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act of 1997 (Improvement Act)] requires the Secretary of the Interior (Secretary) to manage each refuge in a manner consistent with a completed CCP. The Final EIS and CCP are available at *http://www.fws.gov/midwest/planning/uppermiss.* In accordance with the recently completed CCP, on June 28, 2007, we published a proposed rule in the **Federal Register** (72 FR 35380) identifying amendments to the refuge-specific regulations for hunting and sport fishing on the refuge and invited 30 days of public comment. We published the final rule on September 7, 2007 (72 FR 51534). On October 17, 2007, we published a proposed rule (72 FR 58982) to amend the refuge-specific regulations governing existing general public use and recreation. We accepted public comments on the proposal for 60 days, ending December 17, 2007. This final rule adopts, with certain changes described below, the amendments we proposed on October 17, 2007. This final rule implements the goals, objectives, and strategies spelled out in the CCP pertaining to wildlife observation, photography, interpretation, environmental recreation, and other forms of recreation, access, and use such as boating and camping. This rule also codifies current refuge-specific regulations contained in brochures and signs and on maps, fine-tunes the language of same for clarity and ease of enforcement, and generally modernizes the regulations for consistency with the principles of sound fish, wildlife, and recreation management. Regulations stemming from the CCP include the establishment of 4 new electric motor-only areas totaling 1,630 acres (1 such area of 222 acres already exists) and 8 new seasonal slow, no-wake areas totaling 9,370 acres. In electric motor-only areas, watercraft may only be powered by electric motors or nonmotorized means. In slow, no-wake areas from March 16 through October 31, watercraft must travel at slow, no-wake speed, and we prohibit airboats and hovercraft. These areas remain open to all forms of recreation, including hunting and fishing, and only the means of access changes to lessen wildlife and habitat disturbance and balance the needs of the estimated 3.7 million annual visitors to the refuge. Collectively, these areas account for 8 percent of the water area of the refuge, leaving 92 percent of the water area of the refuge open to watercraft without restriction. Other regulations stemming from the CCP include a ban of glass food and beverage containers on beach areas and other lands of the refuge; clarifying the definition and requirements for camping and campsite sanitation; clarifying rules for fire and firewood use; and clarifying rules for vehicles, firearms, and domestic animals on the refuge. The Administration Act authorizes the Secretary to allow uses of refuge areas, including wildlife-dependent and other recreation, upon a determination that such uses are compatible with the purposes of the refuge and National Wildlife Refuge System (Refuge System) mission. The action also must be in accordance with provisions of all laws applicable to the areas, developed in coordination with the appropriate State fish and wildlife agency(ies), and consistent with the principles of sound fish and wildlife management and administration. These requirements ensure that we maintain the biological integrity, diversity, and environmental health of the Refuge System for the benefit of present and future generations of Americans. The Secretary is required to prepare a CCP for each refuge and shall manage each refuge consistent with the CCP. Each CCP must identify and describe the refuge purposes; fish, wildlife, and plant populations; cultural resources; areas for administrative or visitor facilities; significant problems affecting resources and actions necessary; and opportunities for compatible wildlife-dependent recreation. We must also develop each CCP through consultation with the other States, agencies, and the public, and coordinate with applicable State conservation plans. Each CCP is guided by the overarching requirement that we manage refuges to fulfill the purposes for which they were established and to carry out the mission of the Refuge System. In addition, the Improvement Act requires that we administer the Refuge System to provide for the conservation of fish, wildlife, and plants and their habitats, and to ensure their biological integrity, diversity, and environmental health. We developed the CCP for the refuge in accordance with all requirements and in accordance with the consultation and public involvement provisions of the Improvement Act. This includes new compatibility determinations for interpretation, wildlife observation and photography, environmental education, beach-related uses, boating, camping, and other allowed recreation. We reference and list these compatibility determinations in Appendix E of the Final EIS. We then developed this rule to implement portions of the CCP. Plain Language Mandate In this rule, we comply with a Presidential mandate to use plain language in regulations. As examples, we use “you” to refer to the reader and “we” to refer to the Service, the word “allow” instead of “permit” when we do not require the use of a permit for an activity, and we use active voice whenever possible (e.g., “We allow camping on all lands and waters of the refuge” rather than “Camping is allowed on all lands and waters of the refuge”). Statutory Authority The National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966 (16 U.S.C. 668dd-668ee), as amended by the National Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act of 1977, and the Refuge Recreation Act of 1962 (16 U.S.C. 460k-460k-4) (Recreation Act) govern the administration and public use of refuges. This document codifies in the Code of Federal Regulations public use and recreation regulations that are applicable to the Upper Mississippi River National Wildlife and Fish Refuge. We are doing this to implement the refuge CCP, better inform the general public of the regulations at the refuge, increase understanding and compliance with these regulations, and make enforcement of these regulations more efficient. In addition to finding these regulations in 50 CFR part 26, visitors will find them reiterated in literature distributed by the refuge and posted on signs at major access points. Visitors will also find the boundaries of closed areas or other restricted-use areas referenced in these regulations marked by specific signs. This rule includes cross-references to a number of existing regulations in 50 CFR parts 26, 27, and 32 to assist visitors with understanding safety and other legal requirements on refuges. This redundancy is deliberate, with the intention of improving safety and compliance in our general public use and recreation programs. Response to Public Comment In the October 17, 2007, **Federal Register** (72 FR 58982), we published a proposed rule for new regulations for the refuge and invited public comments. We reviewed and considered all comments received by December 17, 2007, the end of the 60-day comment period. We received 22 comments on the proposed rule. Since comments were often similar or commenters covered multiple topics, we have grouped many of the comments/responses by major issue area. *Comment 1:* A commenter was opposed to prohibiting the collection of shed deer antlers, saying that it was a wholesome outdoor pastime that posed no harm since most of the refuge was already open to walking. *Response 1:* We have changed the final rule to allow the collection of shed deer antlers based on this comment and internal discussions weighing the positives and negatives of this activity. *Comment 2:* A commenter wanted to clarify that it is not practical for a hovercraft to pass through a slow, no-wake zone at reduced speed since a wake is created with hovercraft at slower speeds. *Response 2:* We have noted this comment but did not change the rule as a result. Since hovercraft are prohibited from electric motor areas year-round and in slow, no-wake areas from March 16 through October 31, it is a moot point whether hovercraft do or do not create a wake at slow speed since their use is prohibited. In the linear, slow, no-wake zones, we apply the respective State definition for slow, no-wake operation, which in many States like Wisconsin, allows the speed necessary to maintain proper control and steerage. These definitions would also apply to hovercraft in these zones. Due to the small number of these zones and multiple river access points, we do not believe the zones will cause much inconvenience to hovercraft access and use. *Comment 3:* Several commenters expressed general opposition to the CCP for the refuge and thus opposition to the proposed rule. *Response 3:* We understand that many citizens remain opposed to changes reflected in the CCP. We made a concerted effort to keep citizens informed and to consider their comments and suggestions in crafting the CCP. We developed the CCP through extensive public involvement including 46 public meetings or workshops attended by 4,500 citizens, and offered longer than normal comment periods on the Draft EIS and subsequent Supplement. However, we have an obligation to manage the refuge in accordance with the Refuge Administration Act and policies and regulations governing the Refuge System. These mandates require that we manage refuges to accomplish their established purposes and that recreation and use opportunities afforded the public are compatible with those purposes. The CCP was approved October 24, 2006, and we are now obligated to implement the plan in accordance with the Refuge Administration Act. The new rules implement portions of the CCP dealing with public access, use, and recreation, and ensure that these activities remain a safe and compatible use on the refuge. We made no change to the rule as a result of these comments. *Comment 4:* A commenter expressed support for the proposed rule and a commenter expressed support for the refined definitions regarding dogs, camping, beaching, boat mooring, campfires, and litter. *Response 4:* We have noted these comments but did not change the rule as a result. *Comment 5:* Several commenters were against restrictions to airboat or hovercraft use through the designation of slow, no-wake areas and electric motor areas. These commenters noted that the restriction was discriminatory toward certain watercraft users, most airboaters operated below 86 decibel noise level, airboats do little environmental damage, and the restriction would limit volunteer search and rescue efforts. *Response 5:* We thoroughly analyzed the effects of airboats and hovercraft and the establishment of electric motor areas and slow, no-wake areas in this rule against physical, biological, and socio-economic parameters in the EIS prepared as part of the CCP process. Watercraft speed and noise, even below 86 decibels, have been shown to be major wildlife disturbance factors in both off-refuge and on-refuge studies. We are establishing the electric motor areas and slow, no-wake areas to reduce disturbance in the backwater areas of the refuge which provide important nurseries for many fish, amphibian, and bird species. These area-specific regulations will also limit disturbance to persons who desire a slower and quieter hunting, fishing, and wildlife observation experience. As noted in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this rule, there will remain ample area and opportunity for unrestricted airboat use. Collectively, these restricted areas account for 8 percent of the water area of the refuge, leaving 92 percent of the water area open to all watercraft without restriction. The electric motor areas and slow, no-wake areas also remain open to all forms of recreation, including hunting and fishing. During bona fide emergency situations like search and rescue, common sense dictates that we would temporarily suspend restrictions for emergency workers and volunteers. We made no change to the rule as a result of these comments. *Comment 6:* A commenter reminded us that the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources does not have the authority to enact or enforce rules on the Mississippi River that regulate the means of navigation and this authority rests with local municipalities. We were encouraged to work with local municipalities and the public in pursuing designation of the slow, no-wake areas and electric motor areas. *Response 6:* As noted in our response to Comment 5, we are establishing electric motor and slow, no-wake *areas* to protect sensitive backwater areas of the refuge and provide an alternative recreation experience. Throughout the EIS and CCP preparation process, we received comments and input from the public and local governments and responded with many changes to the electric motor and slow, no-wake area designations in the CCP. Although we continue to value input, we believe we would be abdicating our responsibility to manage the refuge in accordance with its establishing legislation, the Refuge Administration Act, and Refuge System policies and regulations if we did not carry out the actions approved in the CCP. We are, however, with respect to slow, no-wake *zones* (which are linear or corridor designations), coordinating with local units of government and seeking their concurrence before establishing them. These zones are designed to improve boating safety due to narrow channels or blind spots, or to reduce bank erosion. Our coordination with the local units of government on these zones is in keeping with the language in the CCP. We made no change to the rule based on this comment. *Comment 7:* A commenter suggested that the proposed rule be modified to include an exemption for State and federal agencies entering restricted areas for bona fide fish and wildlife management, monitoring, and enforcement activities. *Response 7:* These rules govern public access, use, and recreation and are not intended to apply to States or other agencies continuing to carry out their responsibilities for fish and wildlife management and enforcement. We do not believe that exemptions for States or other agencies are necessary or practicable from a rulemaking standpoint. However, the exemption is clearly articulated in the CCP on page 107, and says “special designation regulations are general public use regulations and not intended to apply to state, federal, and local agencies engaged in bona fide fish and wildlife management, monitoring, and enforcement.” We are obligated to manage the refuge consistent with language in the CCP. We made no change to the rule based on this comment. *Comment 8:* A commenter suggested that the prohibition of chainsaws on the refuge without a permit be clarified so it does not affect through-the-ice commercial fishing operations. It was suggested that the language be modified to prohibit chainsaws on any refuge “lands.” *Response 8:* We have changed the final rule by removing the wording prohibiting the possession of chainsaws without a permit. We believe regulations dealing with the protection of plants and the cutting of campfire wood are adequate to protect refuge habitat. *Comment 9:* Several commenters contend that the refuge does not have the authority to restrict uses on navigable waters within the refuge. They contend the CCP and these proposed rules usurp Wisconsin authority on sovereign waters, violate Wisconsin's Public Trust Doctrine, and are a breach of Wisconsin's original conditioned consent to establishment of the refuge. *Response 9:* We received similar comments during preparation of the CCP. Neither the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources' nor the Wisconsin Attorney General's comments included in the EIS said the Service has intruded or impinged on State authority. In particular, the Attorney General's comments on this issue did not say that the Service crossed a line that would constitute intrusion into State authority. As the Attorney General acknowledged in citing Wisconsin Supreme Court rulings, public rights on navigable waters are to be protected, but no public right is absolute and must be balanced with other public rights: “* * * the court stated the kinds of factors that must be considered to determine whether the balance of public rights and interests has been sufficiently struck. They include whether public bodies will control the use of the area; whether the area will be devoted to public purposes and open to the public; whether the diminution of water area available to the public will be small when compared with the whole of the water body; whether no one of the public uses of the waterway will be destroyed or greatly impaired; and whether the disappointment of those members of the public who may desire to exercise particular public rights in the area is negligible when compared with the greater convenience to be afforded those members of the public who use the area.” The Attorney General's comments indicate that Wisconsin's Public Trust Doctrine embodies exactly the type of program we have been trying to develop, namely, balancing competing uses, acknowledging that no one public right is absolute. We also believe our proposal is in keeping with the Attorney General's urging that “any such restrictions are reasonable and are not imposed to the exclusion of other key factors that affect the conservation of resources in the Refuge.” We addressed the State's 1925 consent language in the EIS and CCP and developed our plan and regulations to meet those conditions. We continue to recognize and respect the various State and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers authorities while carrying out our responsibilities to manage a national wildlife refuge in accordance with the Refuge Administration Act. We made no change to the rule based on these comments. *Comment 10:* A commenter was concerned that the proposed rule violates the sovereignty of the State of Minnesota in regard to jurisdiction of State waters and the limits placed on navigation. *Response 10:* We do not claim authority to control general navigation on the Upper Mississippi River as this is under the purview of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Coast Guard, and various State agencies, and we continue to respect State authorities and sovereignty (see related Comment 9 and our response). We believe we do have the authority to control public entry and use on the refuge under the authorities cited in the **Statutory Authority** section of this rule. In summary, the United States owns the bed of the inundated areas of the refuge where we proposed restrictions and thus the Property Clause of the Constitution and laws that established the refuge and govern the administration of the Refuge System apply. These laws grant authority to control all entry and public use. However, we believe we have been diligent in balancing the public need to enjoy the refuge while safeguarding fish and wildlife resources and habitat. The CCP and this rule continue to ensure relatively free and open access. We believe this has been accomplished through controlling the means of navigation within the refuge on specific areas when necessary rather than controlling navigation itself. We made no change to the rule based on this comment. *Comment 11:* A commenter stated that the Service cannot lawfully establish regulations limiting navigation in the refuge without formal State of Wisconsin concurrence, and such concurrence has not been given. *Response 11:* We view the provisions of Wisconsin's original law granting consent for the establishment of the refuge seriously and have worked diligently to meet its conditions (see Comment 9 and response). Although there is no requirement of formal State consent for refuge management actions, such as this rule, we have approached these issues in an open manner and included the State at every stage of development of the CCP and subsequent rules. The State has had every opportunity to raise its own issues—which it did—and we responded by modifying the CCP in a number of ways including changes to waterfowl hunting closed areas, adding voluntary compliance provisions, changes to delineation of electric motor and slow, no-wake areas, safeguarding State access in restricted areas, and modifications to the number and scope of step-down management plans. We understand that all States work with different constituent groups, legislative oversight, and rulemaking processes when compared to the refuge. Although we respect these differences, as well as the State's authority to adopt or not adopt similar State regulations, we cannot abdicate our responsibilities to manage the refuge in accordance with federal laws and Refuge System policies and regulations. We made no change to the rule based on this comment. *Comment 12:* Two commenters cited the 1928 court case *U.S.* v. *2,271.29 Acres* in regard to State and Federal authorities concerning navigation and these regulations. *Response 12:* We have reviewed this case and believe that these regulations do not conflict with any of the case's holdings. We believe our responses to Comments 9, 10, and 11 cover questions concerning jurisdiction and authority for these regulations. Modifications From the Proposed Rule We are making three changes in this final rule as a result of public comment or further internal discussion. These changes are as follows:

(1)In section (a)(5), we deleted the reference to shed deer antlers and changed the wording in section (a)(4) so that the collection of shed deer antlers for personal use is allowed;

(2)In section (a)(6), we deleted the prohibition of chainsaws on the refuge; and

(3)In section (c)(3), we changed the minimum camping distance from various recreation facilities from 100 feet (30 meters) to 200 feet (60 meters). Regulatory Planning and Review In accordance with the criteria in E.O. 12866, we assert that this rule is not a significant regulatory action. The Office of Management and Budget

(OMB)makes the final determination under E.O. 12866. a. This rule will not have an annual economic effect of $100 million or adversely affect an economic sector, productivity, jobs, the environment, or other units of the government. A cost-benefit and full economic analysis is not required. However, a brief assessment follows to clarify the costs and benefits associated with this rule. The purpose of this rule is to implement public use and recreation regulations on the Upper Mississippi River National Wildlife and Fish Refuge beginning with the spring 2008 recreation season. These regulations are derived from and are consistent with the CCP approved October 24, 2006. We documented the environmental and socioeconomic impacts of the CCP in the Final EIS (available at *http://www.fws.gov/midwest/planning/uppermiss* ). Costs Incurred Costs incurred by this regulation include sign-posting, leaflet preparation and printing to provide information to the public, law enforcement, and monitoring. However, these are regular and recurring functions on the refuge with or without these regulations, and we can handle these functions within normal budget and staffing levels. Therefore, we expect any costs to be minor in the short term and negligible in the long term. Benefits Accrued These regulations will have several effects on wildlife observation, recreational boating, camping, and other beach-related uses such as swimming, picnicking, and sunbathing. These public uses account for the most annual refuge visits (1.67 million) outside of hunting and fishing. All of these uses will continue, although in some areas the means of use will change to balance the needs of a diverse public who enjoys the refuge in various ways, to safeguard visitors, and to safeguard sensitive fish and wildlife habitat. The following projections and estimations of use levels and economic benefit for wildlife observation, boating, camping, and beach-related uses are based on projected trends over the 15-year span of the CCP. While it is not possible to quantify increases in these activities that result from this rule per se, we expect the rule to contribute to these trends by improving conditions for these activities in certain areas. We estimate that wildlife observation visits will increase 20 percent over the 15-year life of the CCP due to overall long-term trends in wildlife observation visits, habitat improvements, access improvements, and a marked increase in wildlife observation-related facilities outlined in the CCP. We predict these regulations will have no effect on the positive economic impact as reflected in Table 1 below. Table 1 shows the expected annual change by the end of the 15-year life of the CCP compared with FY 2003 for the 19-county area on and adjacent to the refuge. We expect annual wildlife observation visitation to increase by 20 percent, resulting in 61,403 more wildlife observation visits. Retail expenditures associated with this increased visitation total $812,658, with total economic output (based on an output multiplier of 1.23 for the 19-county region impacted by the refuge) of $993,723. An additional 14 jobs with associated income of $214,297 would occur, along with an additional $104,531 in Federal and State tax revenue. Table 1.—Annual Economic Impacts of CCP Implementation Compared With FY 2003 Impacts: Wildlife Observation Visitors [2003 dollars] Impacts FY 2003 Annual change (from FY 2003 for 15-year span of CCP) Wildlife Observation Visitors 307,013 +61,403 Expenditures $4,063,292 +$812,658 Economic Output $4,968,614 +$993,723 Jobs 68 +14 Job Income $1,071,484 +$214,297 Federal and State Taxes $522,657 +$104,531 These regulations will have several effects on current boating opportunities on the refuge. Approximately 140,000 acres of water will remain open to boating, but 1,852 acres of backwater areas will be designated electric motor only and another 9,370 acres will be designated seasonal (March 16 through October 31) slow, no-wake areas where boaters must travel at slow, no-wake speed, and we will prohibit airboats and hovercraft. Collectively, these areas account for 8 percent of the water area of the refuge. These areas remain open to all allowed uses. These regulations will have little effect on camping and other beach-related use levels, since the areas open will remain virtually unchanged. These regulations could, however, improve the quality of the experience by clarifying and fine-tuning existing regulations on camping, boat mooring, reserving sites, length of stay, campfires, sanitation, and other aspects of the use which can cause conflicts among visitors. Also, a regulation banning the possession of glass food and beverage containers on beaches and other lands will improve visitor safety. We expect annual visits for boating, camping, and beach-related activities to remain about the same, although we expect visits for silent watercraft recreation (canoes and kayaks) to increase an estimated 15 percent due to the electric motor areas and slow, no-wake areas. We predict a corresponding modest positive change in economic impact as reflected in Table 2. Table 2 shows the expected annual change by the end of the 15-year CCP lifespan compared with FY 2003 in the 19-county area. We expect the annual number of boating, camping, and beach-related use visitors to increase by 2,044, with associated retail expenditures of $52,010 and total economic output of $63,400. We associate these expenditures and output with 1 job and $213,567 in job-related income. Federal and State tax revenue would increase by $6,838. Table 2.—Annual Economic Impacts of CCP Implementation Compared With FY 2003 Impacts: Recreational Boating, Camping, and Other Beach-Related Use Visitors [2003 dollars] Impacts FY 2003 Annual change (from FY 2003 for 15-year span of CCP) Boating, Camping, and Other Beach Use Visitors 1,362,851 +2,044 Expenditures $34,673,216 +$52,010 Economic Output $42,266,199 +$63,400 Jobs 535 +1 Job Income $9,044,582 +$213,567 Federal and State Taxes $4,558,847 +$6,838 b. This rule will not create inconsistencies with other agencies' actions. This action pertains solely to the management of the Refuge System. The wildlife observation, boating, camping, and other general recreation activities located on the Upper Mississippi River National Wildlife and Fish Refuge account for less than 1 percent of the available supply in the United States. Any small, incremental change in the supply of recreational opportunities will not measurably impact any other agencies' existing programs. c. This rule will not materially affect entitlements, grants, user fees, loan programs, or the rights and obligations of their recipients. This rule does not affect entitlement programs. There are no grants or other Federal assistance programs associated with public use on national wildlife refuges. d. This rule will not raise novel legal or policy issues that were not addressed in the Final EIS. This rule continues the practice of allowing recreational public use of the refuge. Many refuges in the Refuge System currently have opportunities for the public to engage in interpretation, wildlife observation, and other wildlife-dependent uses, and also allow regulated boating, camping, and other general recreation. Regulatory Flexibility Act Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (as amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act [SBREFA] of 1996) (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), whenever a Federal agency is required to publish a notice of rulemaking for any proposed or final rule, it must prepare and make available for public comment a regulatory flexibility analysis that describes the effect of the rule on small entities (i.e., small businesses, small organizations, and small government jurisdictions). However, no regulatory flexibility analysis is required if the head of an agency certifies that the rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. Thus, for a regulatory flexibility analysis to be required, impacts must exceed a threshold for “significant impact” and a threshold for a “substantial number of small entities.” See 5 U.S.C. 605(b). SBREFA amended the Regulatory Flexibility Act to require Federal agencies to provide a statement of the factual basis for certifying that a rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. This rule does not decrease the number of recreation types allowed on the refuge but amends current noncodified regulations on the refuge. As a result, opportunities for wildlife observation, boating, camping, and other general recreation on the refuge will remain abundant and increase over time. Many small businesses within the retail trade industry (such as hotels, gas stations, outdoor sports shops, etc.) may benefit from some increased refuge visitation. A large percentage of these retail trade establishments in the majority of affected counties qualify as small businesses (Table 3). We expect that the incremental recreational opportunities will be scattered, and so we do not expect that the rule will have a significant economic effect (benefit) on a substantial number of small entities in any given community or county. Using the estimate derived in the *Regulatory Planning and Review* section, we expect recreationists to spend an additional $865,000 annually in total in the refuges' local economies. As shown in Table 3, this represents less than 0.001 percent of the total amount of retail expenditures in the 19-county area. For comparison purposes, we show the county with the smallest retail expenditure total, Buffalo County in Wisconsin. If the entire retail trade expenditures associated with the 2008 public use and recreation regulations occurred in Buffalo County, this would amount to a 1.48 percent increase in annual retail expenditures. Table 3.—Comparative Expenditures for Retail Trade Associated With Additional Refuge Visitation From CCP Implementation Retail trade in 2002 Change during CCP implementation (15-year span of CCP) Change as percent of total retail trade Total number of retail establishments Establishments with fewer than 10 employees 19 County Area $9.8 billion $864,668 0.0097 24,878 17,957 Buffalo County, WI 58.3 million 864,668 1.48 350 290 Therefore, we certify that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. We anticipate no significant employment or small business effects. This rule: a. Will not have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more. By the end of the 15-year CCP lifespan, the additional recreational opportunities on the refuge are expected to generate an additional $865,000 in visitor expenditures with an economic impact estimated at $1.06 million per year (2003 dollars). Consequently, the maximum benefit of this rule for businesses both small and large will not be sufficient to make this a major rule. The impact will be scattered across 19 counties and will most likely not be significant in any local area. b. Will not cause a major increase in costs or prices for consumers; individual industries; Federal, State, or local government agencies; or geographic regions. We do not expect this rule to affect the supply or demand for wildlife observation, boating, camping, and other general recreation opportunities in the United States and, therefore, it should not affect prices for related recreation equipment and supplies, or the retailers that sell equipment. Additional refuge recreation opportunities could account for a virtually undetectable percent of the available opportunities in the United States. c. Will not have significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises. This rule represents only a small proportion of recreational spending of a small number of affected wildlife observers, boaters, campers, and other recreationists, approximately a maximum of $1.06 million annually in impact (economic output). Therefore, this rule will have no measurable economic effect on the wildlife-dependent boating and camping industries, which have annual sales of equipment and travel expenditures of over $120 billion nationwide in 2006. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act Since this rule applies to public use of a federally owned and managed refuge, it will not impose an unfunded mandate on State, local, or Tribal governments or the private sector of more than $100 million per year. The rule will not have a significant or unique effect on State, local, or Tribal governments or the private sector. A statement containing the information required by the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) is not required. Takings (E.O. 12630) In accordance with E.O. 12630, this rule will not have significant takings implications. This regulation affects only visitors to the refuge and describes what they can do while they are on the refuge. Federalism (E.O. 13132) As discussed in the Regulatory Planning and Review and Unfunded Mandates Reform Act sections above, this rule will not have sufficient Federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a Federalism Assessment under E.O. 13132. In preparing the CCP for the refuge, we worked closely with the four States bordering the refuge, and this rule reflects the CCP. Civil Justice Reform (E.O. 12988) In accordance with E.O. 12988, the Office of the Solicitor has determined that this rule does not unduly burden the judicial system and that it meets the requirements of sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of the Order. This rule clarifies and codifies established regulations and results in better understanding of the regulations by refuge visitors. Energy Supply, Distribution or Use (E.O. 13211) On May 18, 2001, the President issued E.O. 13211 on regulations that significantly affect energy supply, distribution, and use. E.O. 13211 requires agencies to prepare Statements of Energy Effects when undertaking certain actions. Because this rule is a modification of existing public use and recreation programs on the refuge, it is not a significant regulatory action under E.O. 12866, and we do not expect it to significantly affect energy supplies, distribution, and use. Therefore, this action is a not a significant energy action and no Statement of Energy Effects is required. Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments (E.O. 13175) In accordance with E.O. 13175, we have evaluated possible effects on federally recognized Indian tribes and have determined that there are no effects. We coordinate recreational use on national wildlife refuges with Tribal governments having adjoining or overlapping jurisdiction before we propose changes to the regulations. During scoping and preparation of the Final EIS, we contacted 35 Indian tribes to inform them of the process and seek their comments. Paperwork Reduction Act This regulation does not contain any information collection requirements other than those already approved by the Office of Management and Budget under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) (OMB Control Number is 1018-0102). See 50 CFR 25.23 for information concerning that approval. An agency may not conduct or sponsor and a person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. Endangered Species Act Section 7 Consultation During preparation of the Final EIS, we completed a section 7 consultation and determined that the preferred alternative, which included public use and recreation changes reflected in this rule, is not likely to adversely affect individuals of listed or candidate species or designated critical habitat of such species. The Service's Ecological Services Office concurred with this determination. Listed species on the refuge are the Higgins eye pearly mussel and candidate species are the Eastern massasauga and spectaclecase and sheepnose mussels. You may obtain a copy of the section 7 evaluation and accompanying biological assessment by writing: Refuge Manager, Upper Mississippi River National Fish and Wildlife Refuge, 51 East Fourth Street, Room 101, Winona, MN 55987. National Environmental Policy Act

(NEPA)Concerning the actions that are the subject of this rulemaking, we have complied with NEPA through the preparation of a Final EIS and Record of Decision which include the major public use and recreation changes reflected in this rule. The NEPA documents are available on our Web site at *http://www.fws.gov/midwest/planning/uppermiss.* Available Information for Specific Districts of the Refuge The refuge is divided into four districts for management, administrative, and public service effectiveness and efficiency. These districts correspond to two or more Mississippi River navigation pools created by the series of locks and dams on the river. District offices are located in Winona, Minnesota (Pools 4-6); La Crosse, Wisconsin (Pools 7-8); McGregor, Iowa (Pools 9-11); and Savanna, Illinois (Pools 12-14). If you are interested in specific information pertaining to a particular electric motor area; slow, no-wake area; or other feature discussed in this rule, you may contact the appropriate district office listed below: Winona District, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 51 East Fourth Street, Room 203, Winona, MN 55987; Telephone

(507)454-7351. La Crosse District, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 555 Lester Avenue, Onalaska, WI 54650; Telephone

(608)783-8405. McGregor District, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, P.O. Box 460, McGregor, IA 52157; Telephone

(563)873-3423. Savanna District, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 7071 Riverview Road, Thomson, IL 61285; Telephone

(815)273-2732. Primary Author Don Hultman, Refuge Manager, Upper Mississippi River National Wildlife and Fish Refuge, is the primary author of this rulemaking document. List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 26 Recreation and recreation areas, Wildlife refuges. For the reasons set forth in the preamble, we amend title 50, Chapter I, subchapter C of the Code of Federal Regulations as follows: PART 26—[AMENDED] 1. Revise the authority citation for part 26 to read as follows: Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 16 U.S.C. 460k, 664, 668dd-668ee, and 715i; Pub. L. 96-315 (94 Stat. 958) and Pub. L. 98-146 (97 Stat. 955). 2. Revise the heading, add introductory text, and alphabetically add lists for the States of Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota, and Wisconsin to § 26.34 to read as follows: § 26.34 What are the special regulations concerning public access, use, and recreation for individual national wildlife refuges? The following refuge units, listed in alphabetical order by State and unit name, have refuge-specific regulations for public access, use, and recreation. Illinois Upper Mississippi River National Wildlife and Fish Refuge Refer to § 26.34 Minnesota for regulations. Iowa Upper Mississippi River National Wildlife and Fish Refuge Refer to § 26.34 Minnesota for regulations. Minnesota Upper Mississippi River National Wildlife and Fish Refuge *(a) Wildlife Observation, Photography, Interpretation, Environmental Education, and other General Recreational Uses.* We allow wildlife-dependent uses and other recreational uses such as, but not limited to, sightseeing, hiking, bicycling on roads or trails, picnicking, and swimming, on areas designated by the refuge manager and shown on maps available at refuge offices, subject to the following conditions:

(1)In areas posted and shown on maps as “No Entry—Sanctuary,” we prohibit entry as specified on signs or maps (see § 32.42 of this chapter for list of areas and locations).

(2)In areas posted and shown on maps as “Area Closed,” “Area Closed—No Motors,” and “No Hunting Zone” (Goose Island), we ask that you practice voluntary avoidance of these areas by any means or for any purpose from October 15 to the end of the respective State duck hunting season. In areas marked “no motors,” we prohibit the use of motors on watercraft from October 15 to the end of the respective State duck hunting season (see § 32.42 of this chapter for list of areas and locations).

(3)Commercial tours and filming require a permit issued by the refuge or district manager (see § 27.51 of this chapter).

(4)We allow the collecting of edible fruits, nuts, mushrooms, or other plant parts for personal use (no sale or barter allowed). We limit the amount you may collect to 2 gallons by volume per person, per day (see § 27.51 of this chapter). We also allow the collecting of shed deer antlers for personal use.

(5)We prohibit the harvest of wild rice; plant and animal specimens; and other natural objects, such as rocks, stones, or minerals. We only allow the collection of plants or their parts for ornamental use by permit issued by the refuge or district manager (see § 27.51 of this chapter).

(6)We prohibit the cutting, removal, or damage of any tree or vegetation on the refuge without a permit from the refuge or district manager. We prohibit attaching nails, screws, or other hardware to any tree (see § 27.51 and § 32.42 of this chapter).

(7)We prohibit all vehicle use on or across refuge lands at any time except on designated routes of travel or on the ice over navigable waters accessed from boat landings. We prohibit parking beyond vehicle control barriers or on grass or other vegetation. We prohibit parking or operating vehicles in a manner that obstructs or impedes any road, trail, fire lane, boat ramp, access gate, or other facility, or in a manner that creates a safety hazard or endangers any person, property, or environmental feature. We may impound any vehicle left parked in violation at the owner's expense (see § 27.31(h) of this chapter).

(8)We allow dogs and other domestic animals on the refuge subject to the following conditions:

(i)We prohibit dogs disturbing or endangering wildlife or people while on the refuge.

(ii)While on the refuge, all dogs must be under the control of their owners/handlers at all times or on a leash.

(iii)We prohibit allowing dogs to roam.

(iv)All dogs must be on a leash when on hiking trails, or other areas so posted.

(v)We allow working a dog in refuge waters by tossing a retrieval dummy or other object for out-and-back exercise.

(vi)We encourage the use of dogs for hunting (see § 32.42 of this chapter), but we prohibit field trials and commercial/professional dog training.

(vii)Owners/handlers of dogs are responsible for disposal of dog droppings in refuge public use concentration areas such as trails, sandbars, and boat landings.

(viii)We prohibit horses and all other domestic animals on the refuge unless confined in a vehicle, boat, trailer, kennel or other container (see § 26.21 of this chapter).

(9)We prohibit the carrying, possessing, or discharging of firearms (including dog training pistols and dummy launchers), air guns, or any other weapons on the refuge, unless you are a licensed hunter or trapper engaged in authorized activities during established seasons, in accordance with Federal, State, and local regulations. We prohibit target practice on the refuge (see §§ 27.42 and 27.43 of this chapter).

(10)We prohibit the use or possession of glass food and beverage containers on lands within the refuge.

(11)We require that you keep all refuge lands clean during your period of use or occupancy. At all times you must keep all refuse, trash, and litter contained in bags or other suitable containers and not left scattered on the ground or in the water. You must remove all personal property, refuse, trash, and litter immediately upon vacating a site. We require that human solid waste and associated material be either removed and properly disposed of off-refuge or be buried on site to a depth of 6-8 inches (15-20 cm) and at least 50 feet (15 m) from water's edge (see § 27.94 of this chapter). *(b) Watercraft Use.* We allow the use of watercraft of all types and means of propulsion on all navigable waters of the refuge in accordance with State regulations subject to the following conditions:

(1)In areas posted and shown on maps as “Electric Motor Area,” we prohibit motorized vehicles and watercraft year-round except watercraft powered by electric motors or nonmotorized means. We do not prohibit the possession of other watercraft motors in these areas, only their use. These areas are named and located as follows:

(i)Island 42, Pool 5, Minnesota, 459 acres.

(ii)Snyder Lake, Pool 5A, Minnesota, 182 acres.

(iii)Mertes Slough, Pool 6, Wisconsin, 222 acres.

(iv)Browns Marsh, Pool 7, Wisconsin, 827 acres.

(v)Hoosier Lake, Pool 10, Wisconsin, 162 acres.

(2)In areas posted and shown on maps as “Slow No Wake Area,” we require watercraft to travel at slow, no-wake speed from March 16 through October 31. We apply the applicable State definition of slow, no-wake operation in these areas. We also prohibit the operation of airboats or hovercraft in these areas from March 16 through October 31. These areas are named and located as follows:

(i)Nelson-Trevino, Pool 4, Wisconsin, 2,626 acres (takes effect March 16, 2009).

(ii)Denzers Slough, Pool 5A, Minnesota, 83 acres.

(iii)Black River Bottoms, Pool 7, Wisconsin, 815 acres.

(iv)Blue/Target Lake, Pool 8, Minnesota, 1,834 acres.

(v)Root River, Pool 8, Minnesota, 695 acres.

(vi)Reno Bottoms, Pool 9, Minnesota, 2,536 acres.

(vii)Nine Mile Island, Pool 12, Iowa, 454 acres.

(viii)Princeton, Pool 14, Iowa, 327 acres.

(3)In water access and travel routes posted and shown on maps as “Slow No Wake Zone,” we require watercraft to travel at slow, no-wake speed at all times unless otherwise posted. We apply the respective State definition of slow, no-wake operation in these areas.

(4)In portions of Spring Lake and Crooked Slough—Lost Mound, Pool 13, Illinois, posted as “Slow, 5 mph When Boats Present” and marked on maps as “Speed/Distance Regulation,” we require watercraft operators to reduce the speed of their watercraft to less than 5 mph (8 kph) when within 100 feet (30 m) of another watercraft that is anchored or underway at 5 mph (8 kph) or less.

(5)We prohibit the mooring, beaching, or storing of watercraft on the refuge without being used at least once every 24 hours. We define “being used” as a watercraft moved at least 100 feet (30 m) on the water with operator on board. We prohibit the mooring of watercraft within 200 feet (60 m) of refuge boat landings or ramps. We may impound any watercraft moored in violation at the owner's expense (see § 27.32 of this chapter).

(6)Conditions A1, A2, and A11 apply. *(c) Camping.* We allow camping on all lands and waters of the refuge as designated by the refuge manager and shown on maps available at refuge offices subject to the following conditions:

(1)We define camping as erecting a tent or shelter of natural or synthetic material, preparing a sleeping bag or other bedding material for use, parking of a motor vehicle or mooring or anchoring of a vessel, for the apparent purpose of overnight occupancy, or, occupying or leaving personal property, including boats or other craft, at a site anytime between the hours of 11 p.m. and 3 a.m.

(2)We prohibit camping at any one site for a period longer than 14 days during any 30-consecutive-day period. After 14 days, you must move all persons, property, equipment, and boats to a new site located at least 0.5 mile (0.8 km) from the previous site.

(3)We prohibit camping within 200 feet (60 meters) of any refuge boat landing, access area, parking lot, structure, road, trail, or other recreation or management facility.

(4)We prohibit camping during waterfowl hunting seasons within areas posted “No Entry—Sanctuary,” “Area Closed,” “Area Closed—No Motors,” and “No Hunting Zone” or on any sites not clearly visible from the main commercial navigation channel of the Mississippi River (see § 32.42 of this chapter).

(5)You must occupy campsites daily. We prohibit the leaving of tents, camping equipment, or other property unattended at any site for over 24 hours, and we may impound any equipment left in violation at the owner's expense. We define occupy and attended as being present at a site for a minimum of 2 hours daily.

(6)You must remove any tables, fireplaces, or other facilities erected upon vacating a camping or day-use site.

(7)We allow campfires in conjunction with camping and day-use activities subject to the following conditions (see § 27.95 and § 32.42 of this chapter):

(i)You may only use dead wood on the ground, or materials brought into the refuge such as charcoal or firewood. You must remove any unused firewood brought into the refuge upon departure due to the threat of invasive insects.

(ii)We prohibit building, attending, and maintaining a campfire without sufficient clearance from flammable materials so as to prevent its escape.

(iii)We prohibit building a fire at any developed facility including, but not limited to, boat landings, access areas, parking lots, roads, trails, or any other recreation or management facility or structure.

(iv)We prohibit burying live fires or hot coals when vacating a campfire site.

(v)We prohibit burning or attempting to burn any nonflammable materials or any materials that may produce toxic fumes or leave hazardous waste. These materials include, but are not limited to, metal cans, plastic containers, glass, fiberglass, treated wood products, wood containing nails or staples, wire, flotation materials, or other refuse.

(8)Conditions A4 through A11 apply. Wisconsin Upper Mississippi River National Wildlife and Fish Refuge Refer to § 26.34 Minnesota for regulations. Dated: March 25, 2008. Lyle Laverty, Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and Parks. [FR Doc. E8-8972 Filed 4-23-08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310-55-P 73 80 Thursday, April 24, 2008 Presidential Documents Part IV The President Presidential Determination No. 2008-10 of April 10, 2008—Waiver and Certification of Statutory Provisions Regarding the Palestine Liberation Organization Office Title 3— The President Presidential Determination No. 2008-18 of April 10, 2008 Waiver and Certification of Statutory Provisions Regarding the Palestine Liberation Organization Office Memorandum for the Secretary of State Pursuant to the authority and conditions contained in section 634(d) of the Department of State, Foreign Operations and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2008 (Div. J, Public Law 110-161), I hereby determine and certify that it is important to the national security interests of the United States to waive the provisions of section 1003 of the Anti-Terrorism Act of 1987, Public Law 100-204. This waiver shall be effective for a period of 6 months from the date hereof. You are hereby authorized and directed to transmit this determination to the Congress and to publish it in the **Federal Register** . GWBOLD.EPS THE WHITE HOUSE, Washington, April 10, 2008. [FR Doc. 08-1188 Filed 4-23-08; 9:20 am]

Connectionstraces to 103

Traces to 103 documents

U.S. Code