Notices. Notice of application period

16,738 words·~76 min read·/register/2008/01/24/08-263

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 4401-11-C DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Office of the Secretary Submission for OMB Review: Comment Request January 17, 2008. The Department of Labor

(DOL)hereby announces the submission of the following public information collection requests

(ICR)to the Office of Management and Budget

(OMB)for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-13, 44 U.S.C. chapter 35). A copy of each ICR, with applicable supporting documentation; including among other things a description of the likely respondents, proposed frequency of response, and estimated total burden may be obtained from the RegInfo.gov Web site at *http://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain* or by contacting Darrin King on 202-693-4129 (this is not a toll-free number)/e-mail: *king.darrin@dol.gov.* Interested parties are encouraged to send comments to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Attn: John Kraemer, OMB Desk Officer for the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Office of Management and Budget, Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503, Telephone: 202-395-7316/Fax: 202-395-6974 (these are not toll-free numbers), e-mail: *OIRA_submission@omb.eop.gov* within 30 days from the date of this publication in the **Federal Register** . In order to ensure the appropriate consideration, comments should reference the OMB Control Number (see below). The OMB is particularly interested in comments which: • Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; • Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; • Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and • Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. *Agency:* Occupational Safety and Health Administration. *Type of Review:* Extension without change of a previously approved collection. *Title of Collection:* Notice of Alleged Safety or Health Hazards. *OMB Control Number:* 1218-0064. *Agency Form Number:* OSHA-7. *Affected Public:* Individuals or households. *Estimated Number of Respondents:* 48,298. *Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours:* 12,775. *Estimated Total Annual Costs Burden:* $990. *Description:* The OSHA-7 Form is used by employees who wish to report unhealthful and/or unsafe conditions at their place of employment. This information is used by OSHA to evaluate the alleged hazards and to schedule an inspection. For additional information, see related notice published at 72 FR 61377 on October 30, 2007. *Agency:* Occupational Safety and Health Administration. *Type of Review:* Extension without change of a previously approved collection. *Title of Collection:* 29 CFR Part 1904 Recordkeeping and Reporting Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. *OMB Control Number:* 1218-0176. *Agency Form Numbers:* OSHA-300; OSHA-300A; and OSHA-301. *Affected Public:* Private Sector: Business or other for-profits. *Estimated Number of Respondents:* 1,541,900. *Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours:* 3,072,980. *Estimated Total Annual Costs Burden:* $0. *Description:* The Occupational Safety and Health Act (Pub. L. 91-596) and 29 CFR Part 1904 prescribe that certain employers maintain records of job-related injuries and illnesses. The data are needed by OSHA to carry out intervention and enforcement activities that help ensure workers are provided with safe and healthful workplaces. The data are also used by the Bureau of Labor Statistics in order to produce national statistics on occupational injuries and illnesses (See OMB Number 1220-0045, Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses). For additional information, see related notice published at 72 FR 60028 on October 23, 2007. Darrin A. King, Acting Departmental Clearance Officer. [FR Doc. E8-1194 Filed 1-23-08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510-26-P NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION Community Development Revolving Loan Fund for Credit Unions AGENCY: National Credit Union Administration. ACTION: Notice of application period. SUMMARY: The National Credit Union Administration

(NCUA)will accept applications for participation in the Community Development Revolving Loan Fund's [Fund] Loan Program in September 2008, subject to availability of funds. The Fund's total appropriation is $13.4 million. As of December 31, 2007, the Fund's loan portfolio totaled to $13.3 1 million. Application procedures for the 2008 Fund Loan Program will be posted to the NCUA Web site. 1 Total outstanding loans at year-end 2007 amounted to $13.3 million. One loan commitment, in the amount of $150,000 has been approved and will be funded as monies become available. DATES: Applications can be submitted starting on September 1, 2008, and closing on November 30, 2008. ADDRESSES: Applications for participation may be obtained from and should be submitted to: NCUA, Office of Small Credit Union Initiatives, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, VA 22314-3428. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tawana James, Director, Office of Small Credit Union Initiatives at the above address or telephone

(703)518-6610. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Part 705 of the NCUA Rules and Regulations implements the Community Development Revolving Loan Fund

(Fund)for Credit Unions. The purpose of the Fund is to assist officially designated “low-income” credit unions in providing basic financial services to residents in their communities that result in increased income, home ownership, and employment. The Fund makes available low interest loans in the aggregate amount of $300,000 to qualified participating “low-income” designated credit unions. Interest rates are currently set at one percent, subject to change depending on market interest rates. Specific details regarding availability and requirements for technical assistance grants from the Fund will be published in a Letter to Credit Unions and on NCUA's Web site at *http://www.ncua.gov/* . Fund participation is limited to existing credit unions with an official “low-income” designation. This notice is published pursuant to Section 705.9 of the NCUA Rules and Regulations that states NCUA will provide notice in the **Federal Register** when funds in the program are available. By the National Credit Union Administration Board on January 17, 2008. Mary F. Rupp, Secretary, NCUA Board. [FR Doc. E8-1147 Filed 1-23-08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7535-01-P NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS); Subcommittee Meeting on Planning and Procedures; Notice of Meeting The ACRS Subcommittee on Planning and Procedures will hold a meeting on February 6, 2008, Room T-2B1, 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland. The entire meeting will be open to public attendance, with the exception of a portion that may be closed pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(2) and

(6)to discuss organizational and personnel matters that relate solely to the internal personnel rules and practices of the ACRS, and information the release of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. The agenda for the subject meeting shall be as follows: Wednesday, February 6, 2008, 8:30 a.m. Until 10 a.m. The Subcommittee will discuss proposed ACRS activities and related matters. The Subcommittee will gather information, analyze relevant issues and facts, and formulate proposed positions and actions, as appropriate, for deliberation by the full Committee. Members of the public desiring to provide oral statements and/or written comments should notify the Designated Federal Officer, Mr. Sam Duraiswamy (telephone: 301-415-7364) between 7:30 a.m. and 4 p.m.

(ET)five days prior to the meeting, if possible, so that appropriate arrangements can be made. Electronic recordings will be permitted only during those portions of the meeting that are open to the public. Detailed procedures for the conduct of and participation in ACRS meetings were published in the **Federal Register** on September 26, 2007 (72 FR 54695). Further information regarding this meeting can be obtained by contacting the Designated Federal Officer between 7:30 a.m. and 4 p.m. (ET). Persons planning to attend this meeting are urged to contact the above named individual at least two working days prior to the meeting to be advised of any potential changes in the agenda. Dated: January 15, 2008. Charles G. Hammer, Acting Chief, Reactor Safety Branch. [FR Doc. E8-1071 Filed 1-23-08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7590-01-P NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards; Meeting Notice In accordance with the purposes of sections 29 and 182b. of the Atomic Energy Act (42 U.S.C. 2039, 2232b), the Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards

(ACRS)will hold a meeting on February 7-9, 2008, 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland. The date of this meeting was previously published in the **Federal Register** on Monday, October 22, 2007 (72 FR 59574). Thursday, February 7, 2008, Conference Room T-2B3, Two White Flint North, Rockville, Maryland *8:30 a.m.-8:35 a.m.: Opening Remarks by the ACRS Chairman* (Open)—The ACRS Chairman will make opening remarks regarding the conduct of the meeting. *8:35 a.m.-10:30 a.m.: Final Review of the License Renewal Application for the Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station* (Open)—The Committee will hear presentations by and hold discussions with representatives of the NRC staff and Entergy Nuclear Operations regarding the License Renewal Application for the Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station and the associated NRC staff's Final Safety Evaluation Report. *10:45 a.m.-12 p.m.: Draft Final Revision to Regulatory Guide 1.45 (DG-1173), “Guidance on Monitoring and Responding to Reactor Coolant System Leakage”* (Open)—The Committee will hear presentations by and hold discussions with representatives of the NRC staff regarding draft final Revision 1 to Regulatory Guide 1.45 (DG-1173) and the staff's resolution of public comments. *1 p.m.-3 p.m.: Proposed Licensing Strategy for the Next Generation Nuclear Plant (NGNP)* (Open/Closed)—The Committee will hear presentations by and hold discussions with representatives of the NRC staff and Department of Energy regarding the proposed licensing strategy for the Next Generation Nuclear Plant. [Note: A portion of this session may be closed to prevent disclosure of information the premature disclosure of which would be likely to significantly frustrate implementation of a proposed agency action pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(9)(B).] *3:15 p.m.-5 p.m.: Cable Response to Live Fire (CAROLFIRE) Testing and Fire Model Improvement Program* (Open)—The Committee will hear presentations by and hold discussions with representatives of the NRC staff and its contractors regarding the results of the CAROLFIRE Testing and Fire Model Improvement Program, including staff's resolution of public comments. *5:15 p.m.-7 p.m.: Preparation of ACRS Reports* (Open)—The Committee will discuss proposed ACRS reports on matters considered during this meeting, as well as a proposed report on State-of-the-Art Reactor Consequence Analysis (SOARCA) program. Friday, February 8, 2008, Conference Room T-2B3, Two White Flint North, Rockville, Maryland *8:30 a.m.-8:35 a.m.: Opening Remarks by the ACRS Chairman* (Open)—The ACRS Chairman will make opening remarks regarding the conduct of the meeting. *8:35 a.m.-10:30 a.m.: Proposed BWR Owners Group (BWROG) Topical Report on Methodology for Calculating Available Net Positive Suction Head

(NPSH)for ECCS Pumps* (Open/Closed)—The Committee will hear presentations by and hold discussions with representatives of the NRC staff and the BWR Owners Group regarding the proposed topical report on Methodology for Calculating the Available NPSH for ECCS Pumps, including NRC staff's position on this topical report. [Note: A portion of this session may be closed to discuss and protect information that is proprietary to BWROG and their contractors pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4).] *10:45 a.m.-11:30 a.m.: Future ACRS Activities/Report of the Planning and Procedures Subcommittee* (Open)—The Committee will discuss the recommendations of the Planning and Procedures Subcommittee regarding items proposed for consideration by the full Committee during future meetings. Also, it will hear a report of the Planning and Procedures Subcommittee on matters related to the conduct of ACRS business, including anticipated workload and member assignments. *11:30 a.m.-11:45 a.m.: Reconciliation of ACRS Comments and Recommendations* (Open)—The Committee will discuss the responses from the NRC Executive Director for Operations to comments and recommendations included in recent ACRS reports and letters. *11:45 a.m.-12 p.m.: Subcommittee Report* (Open)—The Committee will hear a report by the Chairman of the ACRS Subcommittee on Reliability and Probabilistic Risk Assessment

(PRA)regarding Draft NUREG-1855, “Guidance on the Treatment of Uncertainties Associated with PRAs in Risk-Informed Decisionmaking,” that was discussed during the meeting on December 19, 2007. *1 p.m.-3 p.m.: Draft ACRS Report on the NRC Safety Research Program* (Open)—The Committee will discuss the draft ACRS report to the Commission on the NRC Safety Research Program. *3:15 p.m.-7 p.m.: Preparation of ACRS Reports* (Open)—The Committee will discuss proposed ACRS reports. Saturday, February 9, 2008, Conference Room T-2B3, Two White Flint North, Rockville, Maryland *7:30 a.m.-9:30 a.m.: Draft ACRS Report on the NRC Safety Research Program* (Open)—The Committee will continue its discussion of the draft ACRS report on the NRC Safety Research Program. *9:45 a.m.-1 p.m.: Preparation of ACRS Reports* (Open)—The Committee will continue its discussion of proposed ACRS reports. *1 p.m.-1:30 p.m.: Miscellaneous* (Open)—The Committee will discuss matters related to the conduct of Committee activities and matters and specific issues that were not completed during previous meetings, as time and availability of information permit. Procedures for the conduct of and participation in ACRS meetings were published in the **Federal Register** on September 26, 2007 (72 FR 54695). In accordance with those procedures, oral or written views may be presented by members of the public, including representatives of the nuclear industry. Electronic recordings will be permitted only during the open portions of the meeting. Persons desiring to make oral statements should notify the Cognizant ACRS staff named below five days before the meeting, if possible, so that appropriate arrangements can be made to allow necessary time during the meeting for such statements. Use of still, motion picture, and television cameras during the meeting may be limited to selected portions of the meeting as determined by the Chairman. Information regarding the time to be set aside for this purpose may be obtained by contacting the Cognizant ACRS staff prior to the meeting. In view of the possibility that the schedule for ACRS meetings may be adjusted by the Chairman as necessary to facilitate the conduct of the meeting, persons planning to attend should check with the Cognizant ACRS staff if such rescheduling would result in major inconvenience. In accordance with Subsection 10(d) (Pub.L. 92-463), I have determined that it may be necessary to close portions of this meeting noted above to discuss and protect information classified as proprietary to BWROG, and their contractors pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4), and information the premature disclosure of which would be likely to significantly frustrate implementation of a proposed agency action pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(9)(B). Further information regarding topics to be discussed, whether the meeting has been canceled or rescheduled, as well as the Chairman's ruling on requests for the opportunity to present oral statements and the time allotted therefor can be obtained by contacting Mr. Girija S. Shukla, Cognizant ACRS staff (301-415-6855), between 7:30 a.m. and 4 p.m., (ET). ACRS meeting agenda, meeting transcripts, and letter reports are available through the NRC Public Document Room at *pdr@nrc.gov* , or by calling the PDR at 1-800-397-4209, or from the Publicly Available Records System

(PARS)component of NRC's document system (ADAMS) which is accessible from the NRC Web site at *http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html* or *http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/* (ACRS & ACNW Mtg schedules/agendas). Video teleconferencing service is available for observing open sessions of ACRS meetings. Those wishing to use this service for observing ACRS meetings should contact Mr. Theron Brown, ACRS Audio Visual Technician (301-415-8066), between 7:30 a.m. and 3:45 p.m., (ET), at least 10 days before the meeting to ensure the availability of this service. Individuals or organizations requesting this service will be responsible for telephone line charges and for providing the equipment and facilities that they use to establish the video teleconferencing link. The availability of video teleconferencing services is not guaranteed. Dated: January 17, 2008. Annette Vietti-Cook, Secretary of the Commission. [FR Doc. E8-1189 Filed 1-23-08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7590-01-P NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards; Subcommittee Meeting on Safety Research Program; Notice of Meeting The ACRS Subcommittee on Safety Research Program will hold a meeting on February 5, 2008, Room T-2B1, 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland. The entire meeting will be open to public attendance. The agenda for the subject meeting shall be as follows: Tuesday, February 5, 2008—9:30 a.m. Until the Conclusion of Business The Subcommittee will discuss the scope of long-term research the agency needs to consider. The purpose of this meeting is to gather information, analyze relevant issues and facts, and formulate proposed positions and actions, as appropriate, for deliberation by the full Committee. Members of the public desiring to provide oral statements and/or written comments should notify the Designated Federal Official, Dr. Hossein P. Nourbakhsh (Telephone: 301-415-5622) five days prior to the meeting, if possible, so that appropriate arrangements can be made. Electronic recordings will be permitted. Detailed procedures for the conduct of and participation in ACRS meetings were published in the **Federal Register** on September 26, 2007 (72 FR 54695). Further information regarding this meeting can be obtained by contacting the Designated Federal Official between 7:30 a.m. and 4:15 p.m. (ET). Persons planning to attend this meeting are urged to contact the above named individual at least two working days prior to the meeting to be advised of any potential changes to the agenda. Dated: January 15, 2008. Charles G. Hammer, Acting Chief, Reactor Safety Branch. [FR Doc. E8-1073 Filed 1-23-08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7590-01-P OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE [Docket No. WTO/DS-291] WTO Dispute Settlement Proceedings Regarding Measures of the European Communities Affecting the Approval and Marketing of Biotech Products AGENCY: Office of the United States Trade Representative. ACTION: Notice; request for comments. SUMMARY: The Office of the United States Trade Representative (“USTR”) is providing notice that on January 17, 2008, the United States submitted to the World Trade Organization (“WTO”) a request for authorization to suspend WTO concessions and other obligations with respect to the European Communities (“EC”) in an amount equal to the level of nullification and impairment resulting from EC non-compliance with the WTO recommendations and rulings. Under a sequencing agreement with the EC, that request will be referred to arbitration and the arbitration will be suspended while the United States and EC continue to try to resolve this dispute and related matters. To prepare for the possibility that the arbitration is resumed and the WTO Dispute Settlement Body (“DSB”) authorizes the United States to suspend WTO concessions with respect to the EC, USTR is inviting written comments on action that USTR should take to exercise such an authorization. In particular, USTR seeks written comments with respect to the specific products of the EC or EC member States, and/or with respect to the specific member States of the EC, that should be subject to a suspension of WTO concessions, such as through increases of rates of duty above current rates. DATES: Comments are requested to be submitted on or before March 21, 2008. ADDRESSES: Comments should be submitted either

(i)electronically, to *FR0805@ustr.eop.gov,* with “EC-Biotech Dispute” in the subject line, or

(ii)by fax, to Sandy McKinzy at 202-395-3640, with a confirmation copy sent electronically to the e-mail address above. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Melissa Clarkson, Director, Agricultural Affairs,

(202)395-6127, or William Busis, Associate General Counsel and Chair, Section 301 Committee,

(202)395-3150. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EC-Biotech Dispute USTR has previously provided notice and requested public comment regarding the establishment on August 29, 2003, of a WTO panel at the request of the United States to examine EC measures affecting the approval and marketing of biotech products. See 69 FR 11,927. The WTO Panel issued its report on September 29, 2006. The Panel agreed with the United States that the disputed measures of the EC, Austria, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, and Luxembourg are inconsistent with the obligations set out in the WTO Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (“SPS Agreement”). In particular: —The Panel found that the EC adopted a de facto, across-the-board moratorium on the final approval of biotech products, starting in 1999 up through the time the panel was established in August 2003. —The Panel found that the EC had presented no scientific or regulatory justification for the moratorium, and thus that the moratorium resulted in “undue delays” in violation of the EC's obligations under the SPS Agreement. —The Panel also identified specific, WTO-inconsistent “undue delays” with regard to 24 of the 27 pending product applications that were listed in the U.S. panel request. —The Panel found that the bans adopted by six EC member States on biotech products approved in the EC prior to the moratorium were not supported by scientific evidence and were thus inconsistent with obligations under the SPS Agreement. The DSB adopted the panel report on November 21, 2006. At the meeting of the DSB held on December 19, 2006, the EC notified the DSB that the EC intended to implement the recommendations and rulings of the DSB in the dispute, and stated that it would need a reasonable period of time for implementation. On June 21, 2007, the United States notified the DSB that it had agreed with the EC on a one-year period of time for implementation, to end on November 21, 2007. The United States subsequently notified the DSB that it had agreed with the EC to extend the implementation period to January 11, 2008. On January 17, 2008, the United States submitted to the DSB a request for authorization to suspend WTO concessions and other obligations with respect to the EC on an annual basis in an amount equal to the annual level of nullification and impairment resulting from EC non-compliance with DSB recommendations and rulings. Under a sequencing agreement with the EC, that request will be referred to arbitration and the arbitration will be suspended while the United States and EC continue to try to resolve this dispute and related matters. The United States will periodically evaluate EC progress toward normalizing biotech trade against a set of benchmarks and timelines. If the United States decides to pursue WTO proceedings on the EC's compliance, then pursuant to that agreement the United States will file a formal consultation request with the EC, followed by a request for the establishment of a WTO compliance panel. Should the compliance panel find that the EC has not complied with DSB recommendations and rulings, upon request of the United States the arbitration will proceed. Once the arbitrator has issued its award, the United States will be entitled to receive from the DSB the authorization to suspend concessions in accordance with the award. Procedures for Exercising WTO Authorization To Suspend Trade Concessions The practice of USTR, in pursuing WTO authorization to suspend trade concessions on particular products, is to publish a broad preliminary product list and ask for public comments on the products to be included on a final retaliation list. This current notice is not intended to replace a notice publishing and seeking comments on a preliminary product list. Rather, the public comments received in response to this current notice will be used as input in the development of a preliminary list of specific products and of specific EC member States. The preliminary list will not necessarily include all products or EC member States suggested in response to this notice, nor will the preliminary list be limited to such products or EC member States. Public Comment: Requirements for Submissions To prepare for the possibility that the WTO arbitration is resumed and the DSB authorizes the United States to suspend WTO concessions with respect to the EC, USTR is seeking written comments on action that USTR should take to exercise such an authorization. In particular, USTR seeks written comments with respect to the specific products of the EC or of one or more EC member States, and/or with respect to specific member States of the EC, that should be subject to a suspension of WTO concessions and related obligations, such as through increases of rates of duty above current rates. If commenters suggest suspension of WTO concessions or related obligations with respect to specific products, the comments should identify the specific headings or subheadings of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States in which such products are classified. Commenters are requested to explain why the suspension with respect to particular products or with respect to particular EC member States would be effective in terms of encouraging a favorable resolution of the EC-Biotech dispute. Persons submitting comments may either send one copy by fax to Sandy McKinzy at 202-395-3640, or transmit a copy electronically to *FR0805@ustr.eop.gov,* with “EC-Biotech Dispute” in the subject line. For documents sent by fax, USTR requests that the submitter provide a confirmation copy electronically. USTR encourages the submission of documents in Adobe PDF format, as attachments to an electronic mail. Interested persons who make submissions by electronic mail should not provide separate cover letters; information that might appear in a cover letter should be included in the submission itself. Similarly, to the extent possible, any attachments to the submission should be included in the same file as the submission itself, and not as separate files. Comments must be in English. A person requesting that information contained in a comment submitted by that person be treated as confidential business information must certify that such information is business confidential and would not customarily be released to the public by the submitter. Confidential business information must be clearly designated as such and the submission must be marked “Business Confidential” at the top and bottom of the cover page and each succeeding page. Information or advice contained in a comment submitted, other than business confidential information, may be determined by USTR to be confidential in accordance with section 135(g)(2) of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2155(g)(2)). If the submitter believes that information or advice may qualify as such, the submitter—

(1)Must clearly so designate the information or advice;

(2)Must clearly mark the material as “Submitted in Confidence” at the top and bottom of the cover page and each succeeding page; and

(3)Is encouraged to provide a non-confidential summary of the information or advice. USTR will maintain a file of non-confidential comments received in response to this notice, accessible to the public, in the USTR Reading Room, which is located at 1724 F Street, NW., Washington, DC 20508. An appointment to review the public file (Docket No. WTO/DS-291) may be made by calling the USTR Reading Room at

(202)395-6186. The USTR Reading Room is open to the public from 9:30 a.m. to 12 noon and 1 p.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday. William Busis, Chair, Section 301 Committee. [FR Doc. E8-1143 Filed 1-23-08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3190-W8-P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Proposed Collection; Comment Request Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Office of Investor Education and Advocacy, Washington, DC 20549-0213. Extension: Rule 19b-7 and Form 19b-7; OMB Control No. 3235-0553; SEC File No. 270-495. Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 *et seq.* ), the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) is soliciting comments on the collection of information summarized below. The Commission plans to submit this existing collection of information to the Office of Management and Budget for extension and approval. • (Rule 19b-7 (17 CFR 240.19b-7) and Form 19b-7 (17 CFR 249.822)—Filings with respect to proposed rule changes submitted pursuant to Section 19(b)(7) of the Act. The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a *et seq.* ) (“Exchange Act”) provides a framework for self-regulation under which various entities involved in the securities business, including national securities exchanges and national securities associations (collectively, self-regulatory organizations or “SROs”), have primary responsibility for regulating their members or participants. The role of the Commission in this framework is primarily one of oversight: the Exchange Act charges the Commission with supervising the SROs and assuring that each complies with and advances the policies of the Exchange Act. The Exchange Act was amended by the Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000 (“CFMA”). Prior to the CFMA, federal law did not allow the trading of futures on individual stocks or on narrow-based stock indexes (collectively, “security futures products”). The CFMA removed this restriction and provides that trading in security futures products would be regulated jointly by the Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. The Exchange Act requires all SROs to submit to the SEC any proposals to amend, add, or delete any of their rules. Certain entities (Security Futures Product Exchanges) would be national securities exchanges only because they trade security futures products. Similarly, certain entities (Limited Purpose National Securities Associations) would be national securities associations only because their members trade security futures products. The Exchange Act, as amended by the CFMA, established a procedure for Security Futures Product Exchanges and Limited Purpose National Securities Associations to provide notice of proposed rule changes relating to certain matters. 1 Rule 19b-7 and Form 19b-7 implemented this procedure. The collection of information is designed to provide the Commission with the information necessary to determine, as required by the Exchange Act, whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Exchange Act and the rules thereunder. The information is used to determine if the proposed rule change should remain in affect or abrogated. The respondents to the collection of information are SROs. Five respondents file an average total of 12 responses per year. Each response takes approximately 17.25 hours to complete, which corresponds to an estimated annual response burden of 207 (12 responses × 17.25 hours) hours. The average cost per response is $4,607.25 (17.25 hours multiplied by an average hourly rate of $267.09). The resultant total related cost of compliance for these respondents is approximately $55,287 per year (12 responses × $4,607.25 per response). Compliance with Rule 19b-7 is mandatory. Information received in response to Rule 19b-7 shall not be kept confidential; the information collected is public information. Written comments are invited on:

(a)Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Commission, including whether the information shall have practical utility;

(b)the accuracy of the Commission's estimates of the burden of the proposed collection of information;

(c)ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and

(a)Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Commission, including whether the information shall have practical utility;

(b)the accuracy of the Commission's estimates of the burden of the proposed collection of information;

(c)ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and

(i)Providing written, prospective disclosure regarding the conflicts arising from principal trades;

(ii)obtaining written, revocable consent from the client prospectively authorizing the adviser to enter into principal transactions;

(iii)making oral or written disclosure and obtaining the client's consent before each principal transaction;

(iv)sending to the client confirmation statements disclosing the capacity in which the adviser has acted; and

(v)delivering to the client an annual report itemizing the principal transactions. The Commission staff estimates that approximately 380 investment advisers make use of rule 206(3)-3T, and that on average an investment adviser spends approximately 1,301 hours annually in complying with the requirements of the rule. The Commission staff therefore estimates the total annual burden of the rule's paperwork requirements to be approximately 494,440 hours. Rule 206(3)-3T does not require recordkeeping or record retention. The collection of information requirements under the rule are required to obtain a benefit. The information collected pursuant to the rule is not required to be filed with the Commission, but rather takes the form of disclosures to, and responses from, clients. Accordingly, these filings are not kept confidential. To the extent advisers include any of the information required by the rule in a filing, such as Form ADV, the information will not be kept confidential. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid control number. Please direct general comments regarding the above information to the following persons:

(i)Desk Officer for the Securities and Exchange Commission, Office of Management and Budget, Room 10102, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503 or e-mail to: *Alexander_T._Hunt@omb.eop.gov* ; and

(ii)R. Corey Booth, Director/Chief Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, C/O Shirley Martinson, 6432 General Green Way, Alexandria, VA 22312; or send an e-mail to: *PRA_Mailbox@sec.gov* . Comments must be submitted to OMB within 30 days of this notice. Dated: January 14, 2008. Florence E. Harmon, Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. E8-1159 Filed 1-23-08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011-01-P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Proposed Collection; Comment Request Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Office of Investor Education and Advocacy, Washington, DC 20549-0213. Extension: Rule 101: OMB Control No. 3235-0464; SEC File No. 270-408. Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 *et seq.* ), the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) is soliciting comments on the collection of information summarized below. The Commission plans to submit this existing collection of information to the Office of Management and Budget for extension and approval. • (Rule 101 of Regulation M (17 CFR 242.101)—Activities by Distribution Participants Rule 101 prohibits distribution participants from purchasing activities at specified times during a distribution of securities. Persons otherwise covered by these rules may seek to use several applicable exceptions such as a calculation of the average daily trading volume of the securities in distribution, the maintenance of policies regarding information barriers between their affiliates, and the maintenance of a written policy regarding general compliance with Regulation M for de minimus transactions. There are approximately 1,634 respondents per year that require an aggregate total of 31,355 hours to comply with this rule. Each respondent makes an estimated 1 annual response. Each response takes approximately 19.19 hours to complete. Thus, the total compliance burden per year is 31,355 burden hours. The total compliance cost for the respondents is approximately $1,763,718.75, resulting in a cost of compliance for the respondent per response of approximately $1,079.39 ( *i.e.* , $1,763,718.75/1,634 responses). Written comments are invited on:

(a)Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Commission, including whether the information shall have practical utility;

(b)the accuracy of the Commission's estimates of the burden of the proposed collection of information;

(c)ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and

(d)ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Consideration will be given to comments and suggestions submitted in writing within 60 days of this publication. Comments should be directed to: R. Corey Booth, Director/Chief Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o Shirley Martinson, 6432 General Green Way, Alexandria, Virginia 22312 or send an e-mail to: *PRA_Mailbox@sec.gov* . Comments must be submitted within 60 days of this notice. Dated: January 17, 2008. Nancy M. Morris, Secretary. [FR Doc. E8-1179 Filed 1-23-08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011-01-P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34-57160; File No. SR-Amex-2007-20] Self-Regulatory Organizations; American Stock Exchange LLC; Order Approving Proposed Rule Change as Modified by Amendment No. 1 Related to Amending Complex Orders Procedures January 16, 2008. I. Introduction On February 15, 2007, the American Stock Exchange LLC (“Amex” or “Exchange”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Act”) 1 and Rule 19b-4 thereunder, 2 a proposed rule change to amend complex orders procedures to allow the adjustment of the options leg of the order if market conditions prevent the execution of the non-option leg at the price agreed upon. On November 28, 2007, Amex filed Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule change. The proposed rule change was published for comment in the **Federal Register** on December 12, 2007. 3 The Commission received no comment letters regarding the proposal. This order approves the proposed rule change, as modified by Amendment No. 1. 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 2 17 CFR 240.19b-4. 3 *See* Securities Exchange Act Release No. 56901 (December 5, 2007), 72 FR 70625. II. Description The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 953-ANTE (b)(ii) to provide that if the stock leg or security futures leg of the order cannot be executed at the price agreed upon due to market conditions, the price of a trade representing the execution of the options leg of the transaction may be adjusted to be consistent with the net debit or credit price of the original order, if market conditions in any of the non-Exchange markets prevent the execution of the non-option leg at the price agreed upon. In addition, the Commission notes that Amex has represented that the re-pricing of the options leg must be consistent with Amex's priority and parity rules. If the transaction does not satisfy the Exchange's priority and parity rules by the end of the trading day, then the transaction would be cancelled. III. Discussion The Commission has carefully reviewed the proposed rule change and the Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of Section 6 of the Act 4 and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to a national securities exchange. 5 In particular, the Commission finds that the proposal is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act, 6 because it is designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest. 4 15 U.S.C. 78f. 5 In approving this proposed rule change the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f). 6 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). The Commission believes that the Exchange's proposal to amend its complex order procedures as described above may facilitate the execution of such complex orders. IV. Conclusion For the foregoing reasons, the Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to a national securities exchange, and, in particular, with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act. 7 7 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). *It is therefore ordered,* pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act, 8 that the proposed rule change (SR-Amex-2007-20), as modified by Amendment No. 1, is approved. 8 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2). For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority. 9 9 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12). Nancy M. Morris, Secretary. [FR Doc. E8-1177 Filed 1-23-08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011-01-P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34-57161; File No. SR-CBOE-2006-36] Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated; Notice of Filing of a Proposed Rule Change as Modified by Amendments No. 1 and 2 Thereto Regarding FLEX Equity Option Opening Transactions January 16, 2008. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Act”), 1 and Rule 19b-4 thereunder, 2 notice is hereby given that on April 14, 2006, the Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated (“CBOE” or “Exchange”), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been substantially prepared by CBOE. On December 24, 2007, the Exchange filed Amendments No. 1 3 and 2 4 to the proposed rule change. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change, as amended, from interested persons. 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 2 17 CFR 240.19b-4. 3 Amendment No. 1 replaced the original filing in its entirety. 4 Amendment No. 2 replaced Amendment No. 1 in its entirety. The purpose of Amendment 2 was to

(i)modify the proposed formula contained in Rule 24A.4 applicable to determining the minimum value size for FLEX Equity Options in new series to change the minimum contract component from the originally proposed 100 contracts to 150 contracts, and make this change applicable on a 1 1/2 -year pilot program basis;

(ii)propose changes to the formula applicable to determining the minimum value size in currently-opened series;

(iii)include corresponding amendments to Rule 24B.4; and

(iv)provide additional information in the Purpose section of the filing. I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change CBOE proposes to amend its rules regarding the minimum value size for an opening transaction in FLEX Equity Option series on a pilot program basis. The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's Web site ( *http://www.cboe.org/Legal* ), at the Office of the Secretary, CBOE and at the Commission's Public Reference Room. II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, CBOE included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements. A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change 1. Purpose The purpose of the filing is to modify the minimum value size for an opening transaction (other than FLEX Quotes responsive to a FLEX Request for Quotes) in any FLEX Equity Option 5 series in which there is no open interest at the time the Request for Quotes is submitted. Currently, the minimum opening transaction value size in the case of a FLEX Equity Options series is the lesser of

(i)250 contracts or

(ii)the number of contracts overlying $1 million in the underlying securities. 6 The Exchange proposes to reduce the “250 contracts” component to “150 contracts;” the $1 million underlying value component will continue to apply unchanged. 7 5 FLEX Equity Options are flexible exchange-traded options contracts which overlie equity securities. FLEX Equity Options provide investors with the ability to customize basic option features including size, expiration date, exercise style, and certain exercise prices. 6 Under this formula, an opening transaction in a FLEX Equity series in a stock priced at $40 or more would reach the $1 million limit before it would reach the contract size limit, *i.e.* , 250 contracts times the multiplier

(100)times the stock price ($40) equals $1 million in underlying value. For a FLEX Equity series in a stock priced at less than $40, the 250 contract size limit applies. 7 Under this proposed formula, an opening transaction in a FLEX Equity series in a stock priced at approximately $66.67 or more would reach the $1 million limit before it would reach the contract size limit, *i.e.* , 150 contracts times the multiplier

(100)times the stock price ($66.67) equals just over $1 million in underlying value. For a FLEX Equity series in a stock priced at less than $66.67, the 150 contract size limit would apply. The proposal would become effective on a pilot program basis for a period of 1 1/2 years. If the Exchange were to propose an extension, expansion, or permanent implementation of the program, the Exchange would submit, along with a filing proposing any necessary amendments to the program, a pilot program report. The report would include, for the period during which the program was in effect:

(i)Data and analysis on the open interest and trading volume in FLEX Equity Options for which series were opened with a minimum opening size of 150 to 249 contracts and less than $1 million in underlying value; and

(ii)analysis on the types of investors that initiated opening FLEX Equity Options transactions ( *i.e.* , institutional, high net worth, or retail, if any). The report would be submitted to the Commission at least ninety days prior to the expiration date of the 1 1/2 year pilot program. The Exchange believes that the reduction of the minimum value size for opening a series in the manner proposed provides FLEX-participating members with greater flexibility in structuring the terms of FLEX Equity Options that best comports with their and their customers' particular needs. The Exchange notes that the opening size requirement for FLEX Equity Options was originally put in place to limit participation in FLEX Equity Options to sophisticated, high net worth investors rather than retail investors. 8 Based on the Exchange's experience to date with such options, it appears that the existing 250 contract component is too large to accommodate the needs of FLEX-participating members and their institutional and high net worth customers and thus has become overly restrictive. In particular, the Exchange has recently received numerous requests from broker-dealers representing institutional investors that the minimum value size for opening transactions be reduced. 8 The existing customer base for FLEX Options includes both institutional investors and high net worth individuals. In proposing the reduction of the 250 contract component to 150 contracts, CBOE is cognizant of the desire to continue to provide the requisite amount of investor protection that the minimum opening size requirement was originally designed to achieve, on the one hand, and the need for market participants to have the flexibility to serve their customers' particular investment needs, on the other hand. As discussed further below, CBOE is also aware of the over-the-counter (“OTC”) market in customized options, which can take on contract characteristics similar to FLEX Options but for which similar opening size restrictions do not apply. In light of these considerations, CBOE believes it is appropriate to modify the FLEX Equity Option minimum opening size requirement in the manner proposed. By reducing the 250 contract component to 150 contracts, the Exchange believes FLEX-participating members could better serve the needs of investors, while maintaining a requirement substantial enough to limit participation to investors who have adequate resources, thereby continuing to provide the requisite amount of investor protection that the opening size requirement was originally designed to achieve. Also, limiting the term of the program to a period of 1 1/2 years would give the Exchange time to consider whether it should request that the program should be extended, expanded, and/or made permanent. If so, CBOE would seek Commission approval. In further support of its proposal, the Exchange notes that the minimum value size for currently-opened FLEX Equity Option series is already set at 100 contracts, and the minimum size for FLEX Quotes entered in response to a FLEX Request for Quotes is set at 25 contracts (whether in a new series or in a currently-opened series). 9 If FLEX Equity Option transactions can occur in increments of 100 or more contracts in subsequent opening transactions, the Exchange believes it is reasonable to permit the initial series opening transaction size to be 150 contracts (or $1 million in underlying value, whichever is less). 9 Specifically, the minimum value size for a transaction in any currently-opened FLEX Equity Option series is 100 contracts in the case of opening transactions and 25 contracts in the case of closing transactions (or any lesser amount in a closing transaction that represents the remaining underlying size, whichever is less). Additionally, the minimum value size for a FLEX Quote entered in response to a Request for Quotes in FLEX Equity Options is the lesser of 25 contracts or the remaining underlying size in a closing transaction. *See* Exchange Rules 24A.4(a)(4)(iii)-(iv) and 24B.4(a)(5)(iii)-(iv). A “FLEX Quote” refers to

(i)FLEX bids and offers entered by Market-Makers and

(ii)orders to purchase and orders to sell FLEX Options entered by Exchange members other than Market-Makers, in each case in response to a Request for Quotes. *See* CBOE Rules 24A.1(h) and 24B.1(k). The Exchange also believes that modifying the minimum opening transaction value size in this way will further broaden the base of institutional investors that use FLEX Equity Options to manage their trading and investment risk, including investors that currently trade in the OTC market for customized options which, as indicated above, can take on contract characteristics similar to FLEX Options but for which similar opening size restrictions do not apply. By reducing the minimum opening size requirements for FLEX Equity Options, market participants will have greater flexibility in determining whether to execute their customized options in an exchange environment or in the OTC market. CBOE believes market participants benefit from being able to trade these customized options in an exchange environment in several ways, including, but not limited to, enhanced efficiency in initiating and closing out positions; increased market transparency; and heightened contra-party creditworthiness due to the role of The Options Clearing Corporation as issuer and guarantor of FLEX Options. Finally, the Exchange is also proposing to modify the minimum value size for an opening transaction in a currently-opened FLEX Equity series (other than FLEX Quotes responsive to a FLEX Request for Quotes). As discussed above, presently, the minimum transaction value size for an opening transaction in a currently-opened series is 100 contracts. The Exchange is proposing to modify the minimum size formula to the lesser of

(i)100 contracts or

(ii)the number of contracts overlying $1 million in the underlying securities. This change would only impact those FLEX Equity series in which the underlying stock is trading at $100 or more. 10 10 Under this proposed formula, a transaction in a currently-opened FLEX Equity series in a stock priced at $100 or more would reach the $1 million limit before it would reach the contract size limit, *i.e.* , 100 contracts times the multiplier

(100)times the stock price ($100) equals $1 million in underlying value. The FLEX minimum size requirements have generally provided that the minimum size for subsequent opening transactions in a currently-opened series is smaller than the minimum size needed to initially open the series. Therefore, Exchange believes that this change is necessary for there to be consistency between the minimum size requirements for new series and currently-opened series when the underlying stock is trading at $100 or more. For example, a new FLEX Equity series in a stock trading at $110 could open with an initial transaction size of 91 contracts, *i.e.* , 91 contracts times the multiplier

(100)times the stock price ($110) equals just over $1 million in underlying value. Once the series is opened, absent the proposed change, any further opening transactions would require a minimum contract size of 100 contracts. However, if the initial series opening can occur with a 91 contract transaction, the Exchange believes that it is reasonable to permit the size of subsequent opening transactions in the series to be for 91 contracts. 2. Statutory Basis By providing FLEX-participating members and their customers greater flexibility to trade FLEX Equity Options by lowering from 250 to 150 the minimum number of contracts required to open a series, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act 11 in general and furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act 12 in particular in that it should promote just and equitable principles of trade, serve to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and, in general, protect investors and the public interest. 11 15 U.S.C. 78(f)(b). 12 15 U.S.C. 78(f)(b)(5). B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition CBOE does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the proposed rule change. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action Within 35 days of the date of publication of this notice in the ** Federal Register ** or within such longer period

(i)as the Commission may designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding, or

(ii)as to which CBOE consents, the Commission will:

(A)By order approve such proposed rule change, or

(B)Institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule change should be disapproved. IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic Comments • Use the Commission's Internet comment form ( *http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml* ); or • Send an e-mail to *rule-comments@sec.gov* . Please include File Number SR-CBOE-2006-36 on the subject line. Paper Comments • Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2006-36. This file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission's Internet Web site ( *http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml* ). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the CBOE. All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2006-36 and should be submitted on or before February 14, 2008. For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority. Nancy M. Morris, Secretary. [FR Doc. E8-1178 Filed 1-23-08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011-01-P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34-57164; File No. SR-FINRA-2007-041] Self-Regulatory Organizations; Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.; Notice of Filing of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend NASD Rule 7001B To Adjust the Percentage of Market Data Revenue Shared With NASD/Nasdaq TRF Participants January 17, 2008. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Act”) 1 and Rule 19b-4 thereunder, 2 notice is hereby given that on December 21, 2007, Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (“FINRA”) (f/k/a National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. (“NASD”)), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II and III below, which Items have been prepared substantially by FINRA. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 2 17 CFR 240.19b-4. I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change FINRA is proposing to amend NASD Rule 7001B (Securities Transaction Credit) to modify the percentage of New York Stock Exchange (“Tape A”), American Stock Exchange and regional exchange (“Tape B”), and Nasdaq Exchange (“Tape C”) market data revenue shared with FINRA members reporting trades to the NASD/Nasdaq Trade Reporting Facility (the “NASD/Nasdaq TRF”). 3 The text of the proposed rule change is available at *http://www.finra.org,* the principal offices of FINRA, and the Commission's Public Reference Room. 3 Effective July 30, 2007, FINRA was formed through the consolidation of NASD and the member regulatory functions of NYSE Regulation. Accordingly, the NASD/Nasdaq TRF is now doing business as the FINRA/Nasdaq TRF. The formal name change of each Trade Reporting Facility (“TRF”) is pending and once completed, FINRA will file a separate proposed rule change to reflect those changes in the Manual. II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, FINRA included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. FINRA has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements. A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change 1. Purpose Background The NASD/Nasdaq TRF provides FINRA members a mechanism for reporting locked-in transactions in exchange-listed securities effected otherwise than on an exchange. In connection with the establishment of the NASD/Nasdaq TRF, FINRA and The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc. (“Nasdaq”) entered into the Limited Liability Company Agreement of the Trade Reporting Facility LLC (“the NASD/Nasdaq TRF LLC Agreement”), a copy of which appears in the NASD Manual. Under the NASD/Nasdaq TRF LLC Agreement, FINRA, the “SRO Member,” has sole regulatory responsibility for the NASD/Nasdaq TRF. Nasdaq, the “Business Member,” is primarily responsible for the management of the NASD/Nasdaq TRF's business affairs to the extent those activities are not inconsistent with the regulatory and oversight functions of FINRA. Additionally, the Business Member is obligated to pay the cost of regulation and is entitled to the profits and losses, if any, derived from the operation of the NASD/Nasdaq TRF. On July 21, 2006, FINRA filed a proposed rule change for immediate effectiveness to adopt a new NASD Rule 7000B Series relating to fees and credits applicable to the NASD/Nasdaq TRF. 4 Pursuant to NASD Rule 7001B, FINRA members reporting trades in Tape A, Tape B 5 and Tape C securities to the NASD/Nasdaq TRF currently receive a 50% *pro rata* credit on market data revenue earned by the NASD/Nasdaq TRF. At present, the revenue eligible for sharing is the revenue received by the NASD/Nasdaq TRF from the three tape associations after deducting the amount, if any, that the NASD/Nasdaq TRF pays to the Consolidated Tape Association or the Nasdaq Securities Information Processor for capacity usage. 6 4 *See* Securities Exchange Act Release No. 54353 (August 23, 2006), 71 FR 51255 (August 29, 2006) (SR-NASD-2006-090). 5 The proposed rule change would clarify an ambiguity in the current rule. Both Rule 7001B and the predecessor rule in effect prior to Nasdaq's separation from FINRA referred to “Amex” and “Tape B” as synonymous, but in fact the Tape B revenue sharing program has always been interpreted to include stocks listed on regional exchanges, such as NYSE Arca, because transactions in such stocks are reported to Tape B. This ambiguity also exists in the market data revenue sharing rules relating to the other TRFs, which FINRA will propose to clarify in a separate filing. 6 The proposed rule change would eliminate the deduction for capacity usage. Nasdaq, as the Business Member, believes that the amount of the deduction is small and needlessly complicates the administration of the revenue sharing program. Proposal to Adjust Securities Transaction Credit FINRA is proposing to amend Rule 7001B to base the percentage of market data revenue shared with a FINRA member reporting trades to the NASD/Nasdaq TRF on the member's “Market Share.” FINRA proposes to define “Market Share” in Rule 7001B as the percentage calculated by dividing the total number of shares represented by trades reported by a member to the NASD/Nasdaq TRF during a given calendar quarter by the total number of shares represented by all trades reported to the Consolidated Tape Association or the Nasdaq Securities Information Processor, as applicable, during that quarter. Market Share will be calculated separately for each tape. Pursuant to the proposed rule change, the percentage of Market Share required to receive particular percentages of revenue will vary among the three tapes. Thus, for example, a member whose trade reports in NYSE-listed stocks constitute 0.25% or more of the total consolidated volume in those stocks would receive 100% of the attributable market data revenue, a member with less than 0.25% but at least 0.15% would receive 80% of the attributable market data revenue, a member with less than 0.15% but at least 0.10% would receive 50%, and a member with less than 0.1% would not be eligible for the market data revenue sharing program. For Tape B stocks, a member whose trade reports constitute 0.5% or more of the total consolidated volume in those stocks would receive 100% of the attributable market data revenue, a member with less than 0.5% but at least 0.25% would receive 80% of the attributable market data revenue, a member with less than 0.25% but at least 0.10% would receive 50%, and a member with less than 0.1% would not be eligible for the program. For Tape C stocks, a member whose trade reports constitute 0.75% or more of the total consolidated volume in those stocks would receive 100% of the attributable market data revenue, a member with less than 0.75% but at least 0.25% would receive 80% of the attributable market data revenue, a member with less than 0.25% but at least 0.10% would receive 50%, and a member with less than 0.1% would not be eligible for the program. According to Nasdaq, as the Business Member under the NASD/Nasdaq TRF LLC Agreement, the different percentages required for different tapes reflect the current extent to which participants use the NASD/Nasdaq TRF to report trades in different stocks, i.e., comparatively higher volumes of trades in Tape C stocks are reported through the NASD/Nasdaq TRF than in Tape B or Tape A stocks, and thus for Tape C, the levels of revenue sharing are tied to higher market share levels. As the Business Member, Nasdaq has determined that the proposed changes in the percentage of market data revenue shared with NASD/Nasdaq TRF participants may be necessary for competitive reasons. FINRA recently filed proposed rule changes to share 100% and 75% of the revenues paid with respect to trades reported to the NASD/NYSE TRF and the NASD/NSX TRF, respectively. 7 Nasdaq believes that market data revenue associated with over-the-counter trade reporting should continue to serve its traditional function of defraying at least a portion of the regulatory costs associated with the activity and is reluctant to impose the regulatory costs of the NASD/Nasdaq TRF exclusively on customers that lack a nexus to its operations. Even with 50% revenue sharing, however, the amount of remaining market data revenue is not sufficient to defray the regulatory costs of the NASD/Nasdaq TRF. Without a significant pricing change, Nasdaq believes that the NASD/Nasdaq TRF would have greater difficulty competing. Nasdaq believes that the proposed tiered revenue sharing program, in which market participants that make the most use of the NASD/Nasdaq TRF are eligible for the highest level of revenue sharing with others receiving progressively lower percentages, will allow the NASD/Nasdaq TRF to remain competitive while still funding a portion of its regulatory costs out of market data revenue. Nevertheless, Nasdaq will be required to fund a portion of the regulatory costs associated with the NASD/Nasdaq TRF from Nasdaq's general revenues. 7 *See* Securities Exchange Act Release No. 56754 (November 6, 2007), 72 FR 64101 (November 14, 2007) (SR-NASD-2007-031); Securities Exchange Act Release No. 56752 (November 6, 2007), 72 FR 64099 (November 14, 2007) (SR-NASD-2007-043). FINRA is proposing that the implementation date of the proposed rule change shall be retroactive to January 1, 2008. 2. Statutory Basis FINRA believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with the provisions of Section 15A of the Act, 8 in general, and with Section 15A(b)(5) of the Act, 9 in particular, which requires, among other things, that FINRA rules provide for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees and other charges among members and issuers and other persons using any facility or system that FINRA operates or controls. FINRA believes that the proposed rule change is a reasonable and equitable credit structure in that it bases the percentage of revenue shared on members' respective contributions to the revenues of the NASD/Nasdaq TRF, and further Nasdaq has indicated that all regulatory costs owed by Nasdaq as the Business Member related to the NASD/Nasdaq TRF that are not funded out of market data revenue or trade reporting fees will be funded by Nasdaq general revenues. 8 15 U.S.C. 78o-3. 9 15 U.S.C. 78o-3(b)(5). B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition FINRA does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others Written comments were neither solicited nor received. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action Within 35 days of the date of publication of this notice in the ** Federal Register ** or within such longer period

(i)as the Commission may designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding, or

(ii)as to which FINRA consents, the Commission will:

(A)By order approve such proposed rule change; or

(C)below, of the most significant aspects of these statements. 2 2 The Commission has modified the text of the summaries prepared by OCC.

(A)Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change OCC is proposing to amend Rule 805, which prescribes expiration date exercise procedures including exercise by exception processing, to reduce from $.05 to $.01 the threshold amount used to determine the equity options that are deemed to be in the money for purposes of exercise by exception processing. 3 3 A conforming change is also being made to Rule 1106, which concerns the treatment of open positions following the suspension of a clearing member.

(1)Background OCC has for years maintained an “exercise by exception” procedure. Under that procedure, options that are in the money at expiration by more than a specified threshold amount are exercised automatically unless the clearing member carrying the position instructs otherwise. Equity options are determined to be in the money or not based on the difference between the exercise price and the closing price of the underlying equity interest on the last trading day before expiration. In each of the last two years, OCC has reduced the threshold amounts for equity options in order to streamline expiration processing. 4 These changes were implemented at the request of the OCC Roundtable 5 and benefited both OCC and clearing members by reducing the time required for the submission of exercise instructions on an average expiration weekend. 4 In September, 2005, the threshold was reduced from $.75 to $.25 for equity options in a clearing member's customers' account and from $.25 to $.15 for equity options in any other account ( *i.e.* , firm and market makers' accounts). Securities Exchange Act Release No. 50178 (August 10, 2004), 69 FR 51343 (August 18, 2004) [File No. SR-OCC-2004-04]. In October, 2006, the threshold became $.05 for equity options in all account types. Securities Exchange Act Release No. 54514 (September 26, 2006), 71 FR 58656 (October 4, 2006) [File No. SR-OCC-2006-05]. 5 OCC's Roundtable is an OCC sponsored advisory group comprised of representatives from OCC's participant exchanges, OCC, a cross-section of OCC clearing members, and industry service bureaus. The Roundtable considers operational improvements that may be made to increase efficiencies and lower costs in the options industry.

(2)Discussion In view of the high options volumes experienced in 2007, the OCC Roundtable once again recommended that OCC decrease the threshold applicable to equity options in an effort to continue to improve expiration processing and to reducing operational risks. The Roundtable suggested $.01 as the new threshold for all accounts. As with the other proposed threshold reductions, OCC conducted a survey of its clearing membership to assess support for the change. Survey results reflected strong support for the change across the membership. 6 Seventy-nine clearing members responded to the survey with 69 clearing members in favor of the threshold change and 10 clearing members opposed. Clearing members supporting the change confirmed the Roundtable's view that it would significantly reduce the number of instructions they are required to input on expiration and thereby shorten the timeframe for completing instructions to OCC. 6 OCC also contacted clearing members that did not respond to its survey. These clearing members expressed no opinion on the matter. OCC contacted each clearing member that opposed the threshold change, generally mid-size to small retail clearing members. Their principal concern was that the lowered threshold would require them to input more “do not exercise” instructions although some indicated concerns about the need to educate customers and the possibility that commission costs could make an exercise unprofitable. 7 For approximately half of the 10 clearing members opposed to the change, expiration exercise reports for the first eight months of 2007 reflected that there were about 20 to 70 line items of positions that were in the money but not exercised because the in the money amount was less than the current threshold level. 8 As a result, OCC believes these clearing members would most likely have to input more “do not exercise” instructions. The remaining clearing members carried positions in fewer than ten expiring series that were in the money by less than the current threshold, leading OCC to conclude that these clearing members would have a negligible increase in processing time for submitting instructions not to exercise. All clearing members, however, agreed that they could adapt to the change if supported by the majority of clearing members. 7 As noted, clearing members are able to instruct OCC not to exercise an expiring equity option even though the option is in the money by more than the exercise by exception threshold. Clearing members could, for example, choose not to exercise an expiring equity option that is in the money where the in the money amount is less than the applicable commission costs. 8 OCC continually reviews expiration exercise reports of clearing members to monitor exercise activity. The referenced information, which remained consistent across expirations during this period and thereafter was obtained in the course of performing such reviews. After carefully considering clearing member views on the threshold change, OCC has concluded that a $.01 threshold will generally benefit the majority of clearing members and will further improve expiration processing. OCC will modify its clearing system to provide increased functionality in order to lessen the operational burden that may be experienced by the clearing members needing to submit additional “do not exercise” instructions as a result of changing the threshold. The clearing member survey also asked firms to provide an estimate of the time needed to accommodate the threshold change based upon supplied time frames ( *i.e.* , 0-3 months or 4-6 months). The majority of clearing members indicated that they could complete the necessary systems development and customer notifications within six months. OCC contacted every clearing member that commented on the proposed timeframes, and all expressed the view that their efforts would be completed in the six month time period. The Roundtable has asked that this change be implemented no later than the June 2008 expiration. OCC therefore requests the Commission to approve this rule filing no later than January 31, 2008, in order for OCC to provide sufficient advance notice to clearing members that it has been approved for implementation. OCC further requests that it be authorized to implement the threshold change thereafter based upon its assessment of clearing member readiness. OCC will provide at least ten days advance notice to clearing members of the effective date of the new threshold amounts. Such notice will be provided through information memoranda and other forms of electronic notice such as email. OCC believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with Section 17A of the Act because it facilitates the prompt and accurate processing of exercise information on expiration.

(B)Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition OCC does not believe that the proposed rule change would impose any burden on competition.

(C)Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others Written comments were not and are not intended to be solicited with respect to the proposed rule change, and none have been received. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act requires, among other things, that the rules of a clearing agency be designed to promote the prompt and accurate clearance and settlement of securities transactions. 9 OCC Rule 805 is based on the assumption that when an option is in-the-money by at least a minimum fixed threshold level, most OCC members and their customers would choose to exercise the option. The rule has the effect, therefore, of reducing the number of exercise instructions that must be submitted to and processed by OCC. As OCC notes in its description of the proposed rule change, if a threshold amount is set too low, the result could be that some members would have to submit a greater number of “do not exercise” instructions than they would have to submit if the threshold amount was set at a higher amount. However, the Commission is satisfied that by consulting with an industry advisory group, by surveying its clearing members, and by its analysis, OCC has made a reasoned determination in deciding to set the threshold amount for equity options in all account types at $.01. Furthermore, we note that OCC indicated that it would modify its clearing system to provide increase functionality in order to lessen the operational burden on clearing members that experience increased “do not exercise” instructions as a result of the new threshold amount. Accordingly, because the proposed rule change is designed to reduce the amount of processing required for in-the-money equity options, we find that it is designed to promote the prompt and accurate clearance and settlement of securities transactions. 9 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F). OCC has requested that the Commission approve the proposed rule at least six months prior to the June 2008 expiration. The Commission finds good cause for approving the proposed rule change prior to the thirtieth day after publication of notice because such approval will allow OCC to give its clearing members sufficient time to complete the necessary system developments and customer notifications before OCC's scheduled implementation for the June 2008 expiration. IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic Comments • Use the Commission's Internet comment form ( *http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml* ) or • Send an e-mail to *rule-comments@sec.gov* . Please include File Number SR-OCC-2007-18 on the subject line. Paper Comments • Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-OCC-2007-18. This file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission's Internet Web site ( *http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml* ). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of OCC and on OCC's Web site at *http://www.theocc.com/publications/rules/proposed_changes/sr_occ_07_18.pdf* . All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-OCC-2007-18 and should be submitted on or before February 14, 2008. IV. Conclusion On the basis of the foregoing, the Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of the Act and in particular Section 17A of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder. 10 10 In approving the proposed rule change, the Commission considered the proposal's impact on efficiency, competition and capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f). *It is therefore ordered* , pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act, that the proposed rule change (File No. SR-OCC-2007-18) be and hereby is approved. For the Commission by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority. 11 11 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12). Florence E. Harmon, Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. E8-1155 Filed 1-23-08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011-01-P SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION [Disaster Declaration #11154 and #11155] Mississippi Disaster # MS-00014 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a disaster for the State of Mississippi dated 01/16/2008. *Incident:* Severe Storms And Tornadoes. *Incident Period:* 01/10/2008. *Effective Date:* 01/16/2008. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:* 03/17/2008. *Economic Injury

(EIDL)Loan Application Deadline Date:* 10/16/2008. ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:* Holmes and Lowndes. *Contiguous Counties:* Mississippi: Attala, Carroll, Clay, Humphreys, Leflore, Madison, Monroe, Noxubee, Oktibbeha, and Yazoo. Alabama: Lamar and Pickens. The Interest Rates are: Percent Homeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere 5.875 Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere 2.937 Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere 8.000 Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without Credit Available Elsewhere 4.000 Other (Including Non-Profit Organizations) With Credit Available Elsewhere 5.250 Businesses And Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere 4.000 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 11154 C and for economic injury is 11155 0. The States which received EIDL Declaration # are Mississippi and Alabama. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) Steven C. Preston, Administrator. [FR Doc. E8-1218 Filed 1-23-08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION [Disaster Declaration #11145] Missouri Disaster Number MO-00019 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration. ACTION: Amendment 1. SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Missouri (FEMA-1736-DR), dated 12/27/2007. *Incident:* Severe Winter Storms. *Incident Period:* 12/06/2007 through 12/15/2007. DATES: *Effective Date:* 12/15/2007. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:* 02/25/2008. ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the State of Missouri, dated 12/27/2007, is hereby amended to establish the incident period for this disaster as beginning 12/06/2007 and continuing through 12/15/2007. All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008) Herbert L. Mitchell, Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance. [FR Doc. E8-1125 Filed 1-23-08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION [Disaster Declaration #11156] Nebraska Disaster #NE-00018 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Nebraska (FEMA-1739-DR), dated 01/11/2008. *Incident:* Severe Winter Storm. *Incident Period:* 12/10/2007 through 12/12/2007. DATES: *Effective Date:* 01/11/2008. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:* 03/11/2008. ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the President's major disaster declaration on 01/11/2008, Private Non-Profit organizations that provide essential services of a governmental nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:* Gage, Jefferson, Johnson, Nemaha, Otoe, Pawnee, Richardson, Thayer. *The Interest Rates are:* Percent Other (Including Non-Profit Organizations) With Credit Available Elsewhere 5.250 Businesses and Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere 4.000 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 11156. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008) James E. Rivera, Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance. [FR Doc. E8-1127 Filed 1-23-08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION [Disaster Declaration #11148 and #11149] Nevada Disaster Number NV-00008 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration. ACTION: Amendment 1. SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the State of Nevada (FEMA-1738-DR), dated 01/08/2008. *Incident:* Severe Winter Storms and Flooding. *Incident Period:* 01/05/2008 and continuing through 01/10/2008. *Effective Date:* 01/10/2008. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:* 03/10/2008. *Economic Injury

(EIDL)Loan Application Deadline Date:* 10/08/2008. ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster declaration for the State of Nevada, dated 01/08/2008 is hereby amended to establish the incident period for this disaster as beginning 01/05/2008 and continuing through 01/10/2008. All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008). Herbert L. Mitchell, Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance. [FR Doc. E8-1216 Filed 1-23-08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION [Disaster Declaration #11124 and #11125] Washington Disaster Number WA-00015 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration. ACTION: Amendment 5. SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the State of Washington (FEMA-1734-DR ), dated 12/09/2007. *Incident:* Severe Storms, Flooding, Landslides, and Mudslides. *Incident Period:* 12/01/2007 through 12/17/2007. DATES: *Effective Date:* 01/09/2008. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:* 02/07/2008. *EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date:* 09/09/2008. ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration Processing And Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the Presidential disaster declaration for the State of Washington, dated 12/09/2007 is hereby amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:* Wahkiakum. *Contiguous Counties:* Oregon: Clatsop, Columbia. All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) Herbert L. Mitchell, Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance. [FR Doc. E8-1126 Filed 1-23-08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P DEPARTMENT OF STATE [Public Notice 6067] Notice of Receipt of Application for a Presidential Permit To Construct, Operate, and Maintain a New Border Crossing Facility on the U.S.-Mexico Border at San Diego, CA and Tijuana, Baja California, Mexico AGENCY: Department of State. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: The Department of State hereby gives notice that, on January 14, 2008, it received an application for a Presidential Permit to authorize the construction, operation, and maintenance of a new border crossing facility on the U.S.-Mexico border at San Diego, California and Tijuana, Baja California, Mexico. The new crossing would be approximately two miles east of the current Otay Mesa port of entry, and would connect to existing roads via a proposed new State highway. The California Department of Transportation (“Caltrans”), a branch of the California State government, filed this application and is acting as the project's sponsor. The Department of State's jurisdiction over this application is based upon Executive Order 11423 of August 16, 1968, as amended. As provided in E.O. 11423, the Department is circulating this application to relevant Federal and State agencies for review and comment. Under E.O. 11423, the Department has the responsibility to determine, taking into account input from these agencies and other stakeholders, whether this proposed border crossing is in the U.S. national interest. DATES: Interested members of the public are invited to submit written comments regarding this application on or before April 23, 2008 to Mr. Daniel Darrach, U.S.-Mexico Border Affairs Coordinator, via e-mail at *WHA-BorderAffairs@state.gov* or by mail at WHA/MEX—Room 4258, Department of State, 2201 C St., NW., Washington, DC 20520. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Daniel Darrach, U.S.-Mexico Border Affairs Coordinator, via e-mail at *WHA-BorderAffairs@state.gov* ; by phone at 202-647-9894; or by mail at WHA/MEX—Room 4258, Department of State, 2201 C St., NW., Washington, DC 20520. General information about Presidential Permits is available on the Internet at *http://www.state.gov/p/wha/rt/permit/.* SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This application and related environmental assessment documents are available for review in the Office of Mexican Affairs, Border Affairs Unit, Department of State, during normal business hours. Dated: January 17, 2008. John Dickson, Director, Office of Mexican Affairs, Department of State. [FR Doc. E8-1217 Filed 1-23-08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4710-29-P DEPARTMENT OF STATE [Public Notice 6069] Culturally Significant Object Imported for Exhibition Determinations: “Khatchkar of Lori” SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681, *et seq.* ; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, *et seq.* ), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236 of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that the object “Khatchkar of Lori”, imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, is of cultural significance. The object is imported pursuant to a loan agreement with the foreign owner or custodian. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit object at The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, New York, from on or about September 15, 2008, until on or about February 15, 2009, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. Public Notice of these Determinations is ordered to be published in the **Federal Register** . FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a list of the exhibit objects, Wolodymyr Sulzynsky, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202/453-8050). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th Street, SW., Room 700, Washington, DC 20547-0001. Dated: January 17, 2008. C. Miller Crouch, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State. [FR Doc. E8-1204 Filed 1-23-08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4710-05-P DEPARTMENT OF STATE [Public Notice 6068] Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition Determinations: Rococo: The Continuing Curve, 1730-2008 SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681, *et seq.* ; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, *et seq.* ), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236 of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that the objects in the exhibition “Rococo: The Continuing Curve, 1730-2008, imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owner or custodian. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the Cooper-Hewitt, National Design Museum, Smithsonian Institution, New York, NY, from on or about March 7, 2008, until on or about July 7, 2008, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. Public Notice of these Determinations is ordered to be published in the **Federal Register** . FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a list of the exhibit objects, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-453-8050). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th Street, SW., Room 700, Washington, DC 20547-0001. Dated: January 16, 2008. C. Miller Crouch, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State. [FR Doc. E8-1201 Filed 1-23-08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4710-05-P DEPARTMENT OF STATE [Public Notice 6070] Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition Determinations: “Works by Frans Hals and Philips Wouwerman” SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681, *et seq.* ; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, *et seq.* ), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236 of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that the works by Frans Hals and Philips Wouwerman, imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the J. Paul Getty Museum, Los Angeles, CA, from on or about February 4, 2008, until on or about May 25, 2010, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. Public Notice of these Determinations is ordered to be published in the **Federal Register** . FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a list of the exhibit objects, contact Richard Lahne, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202/453-8058). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th Street, SW., Room 700, Washington, DC 20547-0001. Dated: January 16, 2008. C. Miller Crouch, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State. [FR Doc. E8-1203 Filed 1-23-08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4710-05-P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION [Docket No. OST-2007-27407 National Surface Transportation Infrastructure Financing Commission AGENCY: Department of Transportation (DOT). ACTION: Notice of meeting location and time. SUMMARY: This notice lists the location and time of the eighth meeting of the National Surface Transportation Infrastructure Financing Commission. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John V. Wells, Chief Economist, U.S. Department of Transportation,

(202)366-9224, *jack.wells@dot.gov.* SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: By **Federal Register** Notice dated March 12, 2007, and in accordance with the requirements of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (“FACA”) (5 U.S.C. App. 2) and the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (“SAFETEA-LU”) (Pub. L. 109-59, 119 Stat. 1144), the U.S. Department of Transportation (the “Department”) issued a notice of intent to form the National Surface Transportation Infrastructure Financing Commission (the “Financing Commission”.) Section 11142(a) of SAFETEA-LU established the National Surface Transportation Infrastructure Financing Commission and charged it with analyzing the future highway and transit needs and the finances of the Highway Trust Fund and with making recommendations regarding alternative approaches to financing transportation infrastructure. *Notice of Meeting Location and Time:* The Commissioners have agreed to hold their eighth meeting from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m. on Tuesday, February 12, 2008. The meeting will be open to the public and is scheduled to take place at the APS Corporate Office, Two Arizona Center, 400 N. 5th Street, Phoenix, Arizona 85004, in Conference Room CHQ2 South. If you need accommodations because of a disability or require additional information to attend these meetings, please contact John V. Wells, Chief Economist, U.S. Department of Transportation,

(202)366-9224, *jack.wells@dot.gov* . Issued on this 10th day of January, 2008. John V. Wells, Chief Economist, U.S. Department of Transportation, Designated Federal Official. [FR Doc. 08-263 Filed 1-23-08; 8:45 am]

Connectionstraces to 22

Traces to 22 documents

U.S. Code