Notices. 30-Day Notice of Information Collection Under Review; Extension without change, of a previously approved collection-Juvenile Residential Facility Census

10,345 words·~47 min read·/register/2007/06/08/07-2842·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Office of Justice Programs [OMB Number 1121-0219] Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention; Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comments Requested ACTION: 30-Day Notice of Information Collection Under Review; Extension without change, of a previously approved collection-Juvenile Residential Facility Census. The Department of Justice (DOJ), Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, will be submitting the following information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget

(OMB)for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The proposed information collection is published to obtain comments from the public and affected agencies. This proposed information collection was previously published in the **Federal Register** Volume 72, Number 63, pages 15906-16907, on April 3, 2007, allowing for a 60 day comment period. The purpose of this notice is to allow for an additional 30 days for public comment until July 9, 2007. This process is conducted in accordance with 5 CFR 1320.10. Written comments and/or suggestions regarding the items contained in this notice, especially the estimated public burden and associated response time, should be directed to The Office of Management and Budget, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Attention Department of Justice Desk Officer, Washington, DC 20503. Additionally, comments may be submitted to OMB via facsimile to

(202)395-7285. Request written comments and suggestions from the public and affected agencies concerning the proposed collection of information are encouraged. Your comments should address one or more of the following four points: —Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; —Evaluate the accuracy of the agencies estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; —Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and —Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, *e.g.* , permitting electronic submission of responses. Overview of This Information collection

(1)*Type of information collection:* Extension of a currently approved collection.

(2)*The title of the form/collection:* Juvenile Residential Facility Census.

(3)*The agency form number, if any, and the applicable component of the Department sponsoring the collection:* The form number is CJ-15, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, United States Department of Justice.

(4)*Affected public who will be asked or required to respond, as well as a brief abstract: Primary:* Federal Government, State, Local or Tribal. *Other:* Not-for-profit institutions; Business or other for-profit. This collection will gather information necessary to routinely monitor the types of facilities into which the juvenile justice system places young persons and the services available in these facilities.

(5)*An estimate of the total number of respondents and the amount of time estimated for an average respondent to respond/reply:* It is estimated that 3,500 respondents will complete a 2-hour questionnaire.

(6)*An estimate of the total public burden (in hours) associated with the collection:* The total hour burden to complete the nominations is 7,000 annual burden hours. If additional information is required contact: Lynn Bryant, Deputy Clearance Officer, United States Department of Justice, Information Management and Security Staff, Justice Management Division, Suite 1600, Patrick Henry Building, 601 D Street NW., Washington, DC 20530. Dated: June 5, 2007. Lynn Bryant, Department Clearance Officer, PRA United States Department of Justice. [FR Doc. E7-11114 Filed 6-7-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-18-P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Mine Safety and Health Administration Petitions for Modification AGENCY: Mine Safety and Health Administration, Labor. ACTION: Notice of petitions for modification of existing mandatory safety standards. SUMMARY: Section 101(c) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 and 30 CFR Part 44 govern the application, processing, and disposition of petitions for modification. This notice is a summary of petitions for modification filed by the parties listed below to modify the application of existing mandatory safety standards published in Title 30 of the Code of Federal Regulations. DATES: Comments on the petitions must be received by the Office of Standards, Regulations, and Variances on or before July 9, 2007. ADDRESSES: You may submit your comments, identified by “docket number” on the subject line, by any of the following methods: 1. *E-Mail:* Standards-Petitions@dol.gov. 2. *Telefax:* 1-202-693-9441. 3. *Hand-Delivery or Regular Mail:* Submit comments to the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA), Office of Standards, Regulations, and Variances, 1100 Wilson Boulevard, Room 2349, Arlington, Virginia 22209, Attention: Patricia W. Silvey, Director, Office of Standards, Regulations, and Variances. We will consider only comments postmarked by the U.S. Postal Service or proof of delivery from another delivery service such as UPS or Federal Express on or before the deadline for comments. Individuals who submit comments by hand-delivery are required to sign-in at the receptionist desk on the 21st floor. Individuals may inspect copies of the petitions and comments during normal business hours at the address listed above. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Edward Sexauer, Chief, Regulatory Development Division at 202-693-9444 (Voice), *sexauer.edward@dol.gov* (E-mail), or 202-693-9441 (Telefax), or contact Barbara Barron at 202-693-9447 (Voice), *barron.barbara@dol.gov* (E-mail), or 202-693-9441 (Telefax). [These are not toll-free numbers]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background Section 101(c) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (Mine Act) allows the mine operator or representative of miners to file a petition to modify the application of any mandatory safety standard to a coal or other mine if the Secretary determines that:

(1)An alternative method of achieving the result of such standard exists which will at all times guarantee no less than the same measure of protection afforded the miners of such mine by such standard, or

(2)the application of such standard to such mine will result in a diminution of safety to the miners in such mine. In addition, the regulations at 30 CFR 44.10 and 44.11 establish the requirements and procedures for filing petitions for modifications. II. Petitions for Modification *Docket Number:* M-2007-007-C. *Petitioner:* Mingo Logan Coal Company, P.O. Box 553, Charleston, West Virginia 25322. *Mine:* Mountaineer II Mine, (MSHA I.D No. 46-09029), located in Logan and Boone Counties, West Virginia. *Regulation Affected:* 30 CFR 75.1700 (Oil and gas wells). *Modification Request:* The petitioner proposes to plug abandoned oil and gas wells, (including injection wells) to mine them or to reduce the barrier size. The petitioner proposes to:

(1)Clean out and prepare the oil and gas wells;

(2)plug the oil and gas wells to the surface using a cement plug and a small amount of steel turnings;

(3)plug the oil or gas wells using the vent pipe method;

(4)plug the oil and gas wells for use as degasification boreholes; and

(5)follow cut-through procedures whenever the petitioner reduces the safety barrier diameter to a distance less than the District Manager would approve or proceeds with an intent to cut-through a plugged well. The petitioner has listed additional specific procedures in this petition to implement the proposed alternative method. Individuals may review a complete description of the petition at the MSHA address listed in this notice. The petitioner asserts that the proposed alternative method will at all times guarantee no less than the same measure of protection afforded the miners under 30 CFR 75.1700. *Docket Number:* M-2007-008-C. *Petitioner:* The American Coal Company, 9085 Highway 34 North, Galatia, Illinois 62935. *Mine:* Galatia Mine, (MSHA I.D. No. 11-02752), located in Saline County, Illinois. *Regulation Affected:* 30 CFR 75.1700 (Oil and gas wells). *Modification Request:* The petitioner requests modification of approved petition for modification, docket number M-88-246-C, addressing the drilling out and plugging of oil and gas wells at the Galatia Mine. This request is based on the following:

(1)On occasion the mine operations have encountered wells drilled for oil and gas production that cannot be drilled out and plugged to meet the specifications in the approved petition for modification;

(2)approved procedures are ineffective because the concrete used to plug the original wellbore is harder than the surrounding strata, making it difficult to keep the drill bit in the hole and on target for locating the original wellbore;

(3)in the near future the petitioner will encounter hundreds of wells drilled for oil and gas production that it will be unable to drill out to meet the specifications in the approved petition for modification; and

(4)a substantial number of the reserves at the mine will be rendered unmineable without the approval of this petition. The petitioner has listed specific procedures in this petition that will be used for compliance with the proposed alternative method including notification procedures; using driving sights; the availability of firefighting equipment; roof support; ventilation procedures; methane testing and other hazard prevention procedures. Individuals may review a complete description of the procedures at the MSHA address listed in this notice. The petitioner asserts that the proposed alternative method will at all times guarantee no less than the same measure of protection afforded the miners under 30 CFR 75.1700. *Docket Number:* M-2007-009-C. *Petitioner:* Postar Coal Company, Inc., 685 Cavitts Creek, North Tazewell, Virginia 24630. *Mine:* Postar No. 1 Mine, (MSHA I.D. No. 46-07983), located in McDowell County, West Virginia. *Regulation Affected:* 30 CFR 75.364(b)(4) (weekly examination). *Modification Request:* The petitioner request a modification of the existing standard to permit an alternative method of examining the seals underground because the mine seals between the petitioner's mine and the abandoned U.S. Steel No. 9 Mine are in place to separate the mines and cannot be examined. The petitioner proposes to:

(1)Drill two

(2)monitoring holes from the surface to the entries at the Postar No. 1 Mine, MSHA I.D. No. 46-07983, side of the seals and drill two

(2)monitoring holes from the entries of the Mine No. 35, MSHA I.D. No. 46-08131, side of the seals;

(2)have a certified person examine and evaluate the monitoring holes; and

(3)maintain a record of the examinations and evaluations in an approved record book. The petitioner states that the Postar No. 1 Mine is a drift operation with multiple outcrop and surface openings and has no history of methane or ventilation problems. The petitioner further states that the ventilation is setup to prevent any contaminant from the abandoned area reaching the working section. The petitioner asserts that the monitoring holes will provide the level of safety as required by 30 CFR 75.364(b)(4). *Docket Number:* M-2007-010-C. *Petitioner:* XMV, Inc., P.O. Box 1335, Bluefield, West Virginia 24701. *Mine:* Mine No. 35, (MSHA I.D. No. 46-08131), located in McDowell County, West Virginia. *Regulation Affected:* 30 CFR 75.364(b)(4) (Weekly examination). *Modification Request:* The petitioner requests a modification of the existing standard to permit the inaccessible seals underground to be examined as follows:

(1)Drilling two monitoring holes from the surface to the entries at the Mine No. 35, MSHA I.D. No. 46-08161, side of the seals and two monitoring holes from the surface to the entries at the Postar No. 1 Mine, MSHA I.D. No. 46-07983, side of the seals at locations listed on the mine map;

(2)have a certified person examine and evaluate the monitoring holes on each side of the seals weekly to insure the integrity of the seals; and

(3)record the results of the examinations and evaluations in an approved record book. *Docket Number:* M-2007-011-C. *Petitioner:* Blue Diamond Coal Company, P.O. Box 47, Slemp, Kentucky 41763. *Mine:* Mine No. 75, (MSHA I.D. No. 15-17478), located in Perry County, Kentucky. *Regulation Affected:* 30 CFR 75.364(b)(2) (Weekly examination). *Modification Request:* The petitioner requests a modification of the existing standard because water accumulations in these areas cause roof falls, which prevent foot travel through these areas. Petitioner proposes to establish examination points at certain points to evaluate airflow entering the Powerline Mains. The petitioner also proposes to establish ventilation check points in certain areas of the mine between certain breaks and the Powerline Mains. The petitioner describes additional safety precautions, such as signage and establishing and monitoring air measurement stations at locations that would allow a certified person to effectively evaluate ventilation in the affected areas of the mine and signage. The petitioner states that no lesser degree of safety is ensured by traveling to the water on both sides and verifying adequate air volume and quality at the noted Examination Points. The petitioner has listed specific additional procedures in this petition that will be used to comply with the proposed alternative method. Individuals may review a complete description of the procedures at the MSHA address listed in this notice. The petitioner asserts that this petition for modification will provide no lesser degree of safety for the personnel at this mine. *Docket Number:* M-2007-012-C. *Petitioner:* Consol Energy on behalf of Eighty Four Mining Company, 1800 Washington Road, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15241. *Mine:* Mine 84, (MSHA I.D. No. 00958), located in Washington County, Pennsylvania. *Regulation Affected:* 30 CFR 75.364(b)(2) (Weekly examination). *Modification Request:* The petitioner requests a modification of the existing standard to permit an alternative method of compliance for examining the return air course. The petitioner proposes to establish evaluation points to monitor the air in the 33P Mains return air course in its entirety because deterioration, rib conditions, and roof falls expose workers to hazardous conditions. The petitioner proposes to use the following procedures to meet the requirements of its alternative method:

(1)Establish evaluation point 33P E.P. B. on the upward side of the bad roof;

(2)establish evaluation point 33P E.P.A. on the downwind side of the bad roof area;

(3)have a certified person conduct weekly evaluations at each of the monitoring stations to determine the quantity and quality of air entering or exiting the monitoring stations using an MSHA approved hand-held methane and oxygen meter; and

(4)record the date, time, and examiner's initials on a date board at each monitoring station and in a book kept on the surface The petitioner states that all monitoring stations and the approaches to the monitoring stations will be maintained in a safe condition at all times, and the roof will be adequately supported by roof bolts or other suitable means to prevent deterioration of the roof in the vicinity of the stations. The petitioner further states that methane gas or other harmful, noxious poisonous gases will not be permitted to accumulate in excess of the legal limits for return air. Petitioner will immediately investigate the affected area if there is an increase of 0.5 per centum methane from the last previous methane readings or a 10 percent change in the quantity of air flow. The petitioner asserts that the proposed alternative method would at all times guarantee no less than the same measure of protection to all miners at the Mine 84 as would be provided by the existing standard and that use of the evaluation points to measure air and gas will provide an accurate picture of the conditions of the air course without unduly exposing persons to safety hazards. *Docket Number:* M-2007-013-C. *Petitioner:* TJS Mining Company, Inc., 2340 Smith Road, Shelocta, Pennsylvania 15774. *Mine:* Rossmoyne #1 Mine, (MSHA I.D. No. 36-09075), located in Indiana County, Pennsylvania. *Regulation Affected:* 30 CFR 75.503 (Permissible electric face equipment; maintenance) and 30 CFR 18.35 (Portable trailing cables and cords). *Modification Request:* The petitioner requests a modification of the existing standard to increase the cable length of cables supplying power to two

(2)Fletcher Roof Ranger II Roof Bolters. The petitioner states that:

(1)The utilization voltage for these machines is 480-volts, three-phase alternating current;

(2)the maximum length of the 480-volt trailing cable will be 950 feet;

(3)the trailing cables for the 480-volt Fletcher Roof Ranger will not be smaller than No. 2 American Wire Gauge

(AWG)cable;

(4)the current breakers that will be used to protect those cables in excess of 700 feet will have instantaneous trip units calibrated to trip at 500 amperes; and

(5)all miners designated to operate the Roof Ranger II and individuals who examine the cables will receive the proper training prior to implementation of the proposed alternative method. The petitioner has listed additional procedures in this petition that will be used to comply with the proposed alternative method. Individuals may review a complete description of the procedures at the MSHA address listed in this notice. The petitioner asserts that the proposed alternative method will at all times guarantee no less than the same measure of protection afforded the miners by such standard with no diminution of safety to the miners. *Docket Number:* M-2007-014-C. *Petitioner:* TJS Mining Company, Inc., 2340 Smith Road, Shelocta, Pennsylvania 15774. *Mine:* TJS #5 Mine, (MSHA I.D. No. 36-00159), located in Armstrong County, Pennsylvania. *Regulation Affected:* 30 CFR 75.503 (Permissible electric face equipment; maintenance) and 30 CFR 18.35 (Portable trailing cables and cords). *Modification Request:* The petitioner requests a modification of the existing standard to increase the cable length of cables supplying power to two

(2)Fletcher Roof Ranger II Roof Bolters. The petitioner states that:

(1)The utilization voltage for these machines is 480-volts, three-phase alternating current;

(2)the maximum length of the 480-volt trailing cable will be 950 feet;

(3)the trailing cables for the 480-volt Fletcher Roof Ranger will not be smaller than No. 2 American Wire Gauge

(AWG)cable;

(4)the current breakers that will be used to protect those cables in excess of 700 feet will have instantaneous trip units calibrated to trip at 500 amperes; and

(5)all miners designated to operate the Roof Ranger II and individuals who examine the cables will receive the proper training prior to implementation of the proposed alternative method. The petitioner has listed additional procedures in this petition that will be used to comply with the proposed alternative method. Individuals may review a complete description of the procedures at the MSHA address listed in this notice. The petitioner asserts that the proposed alternative method will at all times guarantee no less than the same measure of protection afforded the miners by such standard with no diminution of safety to the miners. *Docket Number:* M-2007-015-C. *Petitioner:* Summit Engineering, Inc., P.O. Box 130, 3016 Route 10, Chapmanville, West Virginia 25508, on behalf of Spartan Mining Company. *Mine:* No. 38 Mine, (MSHA I.D. No. 46-07874), located in Logan County, West Virginia. *Regulation Affected:* 30 CFR 77.214(a) (Refuse piles; general). *Modification Request:* The petitioner requests a modification to the current standard to backfill four

(4)mine openings associated with the Spartan Mining Company with non-acid producing soil. The petitioner proposes to:

(1)Extend the soil approximately 25 feet into the mine and at least 4 feet in all directions beyond the limits of the mine openings;

(2)cover any exposed coal seam along the mine bench with soil to at least 4 feet above the coal seam;

(3)install a rock underdrain along the mine openings that would consist of approximately 6-inch (O.D.) SDR 11 high density polyethylene pipes installed in the lowest elevation mine opening; and

(4)install riser pipes at the ends of the pipes to establish water seals. The petitioner states that the existing mine bench and highwall will then be reclaimed with breaker rock coal refuse and the slope will be soil covered and revegetated in accordance with the approved West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection reclamation permit. The petitioner asserts that since the mine is abandoned, this plan will provide the same measure of protection for the miners as given to them by the standard. *Docket Number:* M-2007-016-C. *Petitioner:* Penn View Mining Company, 2340 Smith Road, Shelocta, Pennsylvania 15774. *Mine:* Penn View Mine, (MSHA I.D. No. 36-08741), located in Indiana County, Pennsylvania. *Regulation Affected:* 30 CFR 75.503 (Permissible electric face equipment; maintenance) and 30 CFR 18.35 (Portable trailing cables and cords). *Modification Request:* The petitioner requests a modification of the existing standard to increase the cable length of cables supplying power to two

(2)Fletcher Roof Ranger II Roof Bolters. The petitioner states that:

(1)The utilization voltage for these machines is 480-volts, three-phase alternating current;

(2)the maximum length of the 480-volt trailing cable will be 950 feet;

(3)the trailing cables for the 480-volt Fletcher Roof Ranger will not be smaller than No. 2 American Wire Gauge

(AWG)cable;

(4)the current breakers that will be used to protect those cables in excess of 700 feet will have instantaneous trip units calibrated to trip at 500 amperes; and

(5)all miners designated to operate the Roof Ranger II and for individuals who examine the cables will receive the proper training prior to implementation of the proposed alternative method. The petitioner has listed additional procedures in this petition that will be used to comply with the proposed alternative method. Individuals may review a complete description of the procedures at the MSHA address listed in this notice. The petitioner asserts that the proposed alternative method will at all times guarantee no less than the same measure of protection afforded the miners by such standard with no diminution of safety to the miners. *Docket Number:* M-2007-017-C. *Petitioner:* The North American Coal Company, P.O. Box 399, Jourdanton, Texas 78026. *Mine:* San Miguel Mine, (MSHA I.D. No. 41-02840), located in Atascosa County, Texas. *Regulation Affected:* 30 CFR 77.803 (Fail safe ground check circuits on high-voltage resistance grounded systems). *Modification Request:* The petitioner requests a modification of the existing standard to permit an alternative method for raising or lowering the boom during construction and maintenance, disassembly, or major maintenance to prevent power loss and injuries to workers. The petitioner listed specific guidelines in this petition that would be used to minimize the potential for electrical power loss to the boom when raising or lowering the boom on draglines using the machines electrical onboard motor generator sets. The petitioner states that:

(1)This procedure will most likely be used for boom raising and boom lowering during disassembly or major maintenance;

(2)major maintenance requiring the raising/lowering of the boom/mast would only be performed as needed, which could be for long periods of time;

(3)training and retraining will be conducted, prior to the need, for all persons involved in the process;

(4)the affected area would be secured;

(5)a dedicated channel on a two-way radio would be used to communicate at the dragline;

(6)a qualified electrician will examine all electrical components 2 hours prior to the boom process and record the examinations;

(7)ground fault and ground check circuits will be disabled under certain conditions; and

(8)a qualified electrician will be positioned at the substation dedicated to monitor the grounding circuit. The petitioner states that the proposed alternative method is not an application that would result in a diminution of safety to the miners. *Docket Number:* M-2007-003-M. *Petitioner:* Intrepid Potash NM, LLC, P.O. Box 101, Carlsbad, New Mexico 88220. *Mine:* Intrepid Underground Potash Mine, (MSHA I.D. No. 29-00175), located in Eddy County, New Mexico. *Regulation Affected:* 30 CFR 57.18028 (Mine emergency and self-rescuer training). Modification Request: The petitioner proposes to use 10-Minute (Oeanco M-20 or equivalent) and 60-Minute Self-Contained Self-Rescuers (SCSRs) in its Underground Potash Mine outside of Carlsbad, New Mexico to comply with the New Mexico State Mining Act. The petitioner states that the miner would wear the M-20 units (MSHA rated at 10 minutes) on their person and a 60-Minute unit (the SR-100, EBA 6.5 or equivalent MSHA rated for 60 minutes) on their vehicles or equipment. The units would be located within 200 to 500 feet or 5 minutes maximum of the employee. The petitioner further states that:

(1)The alternative to the M-20 type are bulky and heavy units that would expose miners to additional risk; and

(2)all training on the Ocenco M-20 and the SR 100 will be conducted according to manufacturer's recommendations and applicable MSHA and New Mexico State standards. The petitioner asserts that the proposed alternative method would provide at least the same measure of protection as the existing standard. Dated: June 1, 2007. Jack Powasnik, Acting Deputy Director, Office of Standards, Regulations, and Variances. [FR Doc. E7-11129 Filed 6-7-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510-43-P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Mine Safety and Health Administration Petitions for Modification AGENCY: Mine Safety and Health Administration, Labor. ACTION: Notice of petitions for modification of existing mandatory safety standards. SUMMARY: Section 101(c) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 and 30 CFR part 44 govern the application, processing, and disposition of petitions for modification. This notice is a summary of petitions for modification filed by the parties listed below to modify the application of existing mandatory safety standards published in Title 30 of the Code of Federal Regulations. DATES: Comments on the petitions must be received by the Office of Standards, Regulations, and Variances on or before July 9, 2007. ADDRESSES: You may submit your comments, identified by “docket number” on the subject line, by any of the following methods: 1. *E-Mail: Standards-Petitions@dol.gov.* 2. *Telefax:* 1-202-693-9441. 3. *Hand-Delivery or Regular Mail:* Submit comments to the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA), Office of Standards, Regulations, and Variances, 1100 Wilson Boulevard, Room 2349, Arlington, Virginia 22209, Attention: Patricia W. Silvey, Director, Office of Standards, Regulations, and Variances. We will consider only comments postmarked by the U.S. Postal Service or proof of delivery from another delivery service such as UPS or Federal Express on or before the deadline for comments. Individuals who submit comments by hand-delivery are required to check in at the receptionist desk on the 21st floor. Individuals may inspect copies of the petitions and comments during normal business hours at the address listed above. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Edward Sexauer, Chief, Regulatory Development Division at 202-693-9444 (Voice), *sexauer.edward@dol.gov* (E-mail), or 202-693-9441 (Telefax), or contact Barbara Barron at 202-693-9447 (Voice), *barron.barbara@dol.gov* (E-mail), or 202-693-9441 (Telefax). [These are not toll-free numbers]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background Section 101(c) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (Mine Act) allows the mine operator or representative of miners to file a petition to modify the application of any mandatory safety standard to a coal or other mine if the Secretary determines that:

(2)that the application of such standard to such mine will result in a diminution of safety to the miners in such mine. In addition, the regulations at 30 CFR 44.10 and 44.11 establish the requirements and procedures for filing petitions for modifications. II. Petitions for Modification *Docket Number:* M-2007-022-C. *Petitioner:* Little Buck Coal Company, 57 Lincoln Road, Pine Grove, Pennsylvania 17963. *Mine:* Bottom Split Slope Mine, (MSHA I.D. No. 36-09491), located in Schuylkill County, Pennsylvania. *Regulation Affected:* 30 CFR 75.1100-2 (a)(2) (Quantity and location of firefighting equipment). *Modification Request:* The petitioner requests a modification of the existing standard 30 CFR 75.1100-2(a)(2), which requires that each working section of underground coal mines producing less than 300 tons of coal per shift be provided with specified firefighting equipment and supplies. The equipment and supplies include two portable fire extinguishers, 240 pounds of rock dust in bags or other suitable containers, and at least 500 gallons of water and at least 3 pails of 10 quart capacity. The petitioner proposes to use portable fire extinguishers only, to replace existing requirements where rock dust, water cars, and other water storage equipped with three 10 quart pails are not practical. The petitioner states that equipping its small anthracite mine with two portable fire extinguishers near the slope bottom and an additional portable fire extinguisher within 500 feet of the working face will provide equivalent fire protection. The petitioner asserts that the proposed alternative method would provide at least the same measure of protection as the existing standard. *Docket Number:* M-2007-023-C. *Petitioner:* Little Buck Coal Company, 57 Lincoln Road, Pine Grove, Pennsylvania 17963. *Mine:* Bottom Split Slope Mine, (MSHA I.D. No. 36-09491), located in Schuylkill County, Pennsylvania. *Regulation Affected:* 30 CFR 75.1200

(d)&

(i)(Mine map). *Modification Request:* The petitioner proposes to use cross-sections instead of contour lines through the intake slope at locations of rock tunnel connections between veins, and at 1,000 foot intervals of advance from the intake slope. In addition, the petitioner proposes to limit the required mapping of the mine workings above and below to those present within 100 feet of the vein being mined, except when veins are interconnected to other veins beyond the 100-foot limit through rock tunnels. The petitioner states that contours provide no useful information due to the steep pitch encountered in mining anthracite coal veins, and their presence would make portions of the map illegible. The petitioner further states that use of cross-sections in lieu of contour lines has been practiced since the late 1800's and provides critical information about the spacing between veins and the proximity to other mine workings, which fluctuate considerably. Additionally, the petitioner states that the mine workings above and below are usually inactive and abandoned, and therefore not subject to changes during the life of the mine. The petitioner states that all mapping for mines above and below are researched by its contract engineer for the presence of interconnecting rock tunnels between veins in relation to the mine and a hazard analysis is done when mapping indicates the presence of known or potentially flooded workings. The petitioner asserts that when evidence indicates that prior mining was conducted on a vein above or below and research exhausts the availability of mine mapping, the vein will be considered to be mined and flooded and appropriate precautions will be taken under 30 CFR 75.388, where possible. Where potential hazards exist and in-mine drilling capabilities limit penetration, petitioner will drill surface boreholes to intercept the mine workings and will analyze the results prior to mining in the affected area. The petitioner asserts that the proposed alternative method would provide at least the same measure of protection as the existing standard. *Docket Number:* M-2007-024-C. *Petitioner:* Little Buck Coal Company, 57 Lincoln Road, Pine Grove, Pennsylvania 17963. *Mine:* Bottom Split Slope Mine, (MSHA I.D. No. 36-09491), located in Schuylkill County, Pennsylvania. *Regulation Affected:* 30 CFR 75.1202 and 30 CFR 75.1202-1(a) (Temporary notations, revisions, and supplements. *Modification Request:* The petitioner requests a modification of the existing standard to permit the required interval of survey to be established annually in of lieu every 6 months. The petitioner proposes to update the mine map by hand notations on a daily basis, conduct subsequent surveys prior to commencing retreat mining, and when either a drilling program under 30 CFR 75.388 or plan for mining into accessible areas under 30 CFR 75.389 is required. The petitioner states that:

(1)Low production and slow rate of advance in anthracite mining make surveying on 6 month intervals impractical and, in most cases, annual development is frequently limited to less than 500 feet of gangway advance with associated up-pitch development;

(2)the majority of small anthracite mines are using non-mechanized, hand-loading mining methods;

(3)development above the active gangway is designed to mine into the level above at designated intervals thereby maintaining sufficient control between both surveyed gangways; and

(4)the available engineering/surveyor resources are very limited in anthracite coal fields which makes surveying difficult to achieve. The petitioner asserts that the proposed alternative method would provide at least the same measure of protection as the existing standard. *Docket Number:* M-2007-025-C. *Petitioner:* Little Buck Coal Company, 57 Lincoln Road, Pine Grove, Pennsylvania 17963. *Mine:* Bottom Split Slope Mine, (MSHA I.D. No. 36-09491), located in Schuylkill County, Pennsylvania. *Regulation Affected:* 30 CFR 75.1400

(c)(Hoisting equipment; general). *Modification Request:* The petitioner proposes to use the slope (gunboat) to transport persons in shafts and slopes using an increased rope strength/safety factor and secondary safety rope connection instead of using safety catches or other no less effective devices. The petitioner asserts that the proposed alternative method would provide at least the same measure of protection as the existing standard. *Docket Number:* M-2007-026-C. *Petitioner:* Blue Diamond Coal Company, P.O. Box 47, Slemp, Kentucky 41763. *Mine:* Mine # 77, (MSHA I.D. No. 15-09636), located in Perry County, Kentucky. *Regulation Affected:* 30 CFR 75.364(b)(2) (Weekly examination). *Modification Request:* The petitioner requests a modification of the existing standard to permit check points to be established in nine

(9)locations to examine certain areas of the return air course. The petitioner states that:

(1)Due to hazardous roof and rib conditions, and the distance from active workings and the age of these workings, it is impractical to expose personnel to the roof and rib hazards in the affected areas; and

(2)to ensure no lesser degree of safety for all personnel in the mine, ventilation check points will be established to measure the air in the affected areas. The petitioner proposes to:

(1)Establish air measurement stations at locations that will allow effective evaluation of ventilation in the affected areas. The measurements will be conducted by a certified person on a weekly basis, and a sign will be posted designating the location of measuring stations;

(2)all air measurement stations will be maintained in safe condition at all times;

(3)the date, time and results of these measurements will be recorded in a book kept on the surface or on a date board provided at each measuring station, and made accessible to all parties;

(4)signs will be posted in an adjacent travel entry that will indicate the safe travel route to each monitoring station;

(5)evaluations will be conducted by a certified person at each of the monitoring stations on a weekly basis that will include the quantity and quality of air entering or exiting the monitoring station. The measurements will be made using the MSHA approved and calibrated hand-held multi-gas detectors to check for methane and oxygen gas concentrations and appropriate calibrated anemometers to check air flow volume;

(6)a diagram maintained in legible condition will be posted at the monitoring stations that will show the normal direction of the air flow, and any change in the direction of the air flow will be reported to the mine foreman for immediate investigation;

(7)the date, time, and examiner's initials, and the measured quantity and quality of air will be recorded in a book or on a date board and will be provided at the monitoring stations;

(8)the monitoring station location(s) will be shown on the annually submitted mine ventilation map and the stations will not be moved to another location without prior approval by the District Manager as part of the Ventilation Plan for the Bottom Split Slope Mine; and

(9)all mine personnel will receive instructions on which areas they are not permitted to travel, and all other approaches will be fenced off or barricaded with “DO NOT ENTER” warning signs. Entry in the affected area will only be permitted to conduct investigations and to correct problems with the air flow that is detected through the monitoring process. This work will be done under the supervision of an authorized person. The petitioner has listed additional procedures in this petition that will be used to comply compliance to the proposed alternative method. Individuals may review a complete description of the procedures at the MSHA address listed in this notice. The petitioner asserts that this petition will provide no lesser degree of safety for the personnel at the Mine # 77. Dated: June 1, 2007. Jack Powasnik, Acting Deputy Director, Office of Standards, Regulations, and Variances. [FR Doc. E7-11131 Filed 6-7-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510-43-P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Occupational Safety and Health Administration [Docket No. OSHA-2007-0048] Grantee Quarterly Progress Report; Extension of the Office of Management and Budget's

(OMB)Approval of Information Collection (Paperwork) Requirements AGENCY: Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Labor. ACTION: Request for public comment. SUMMARY: OSHA solicits public comments concerning its proposal to extend OMB approval of the information collection requirements contained in the Grantee Quarterly Progress Report required by Section 21 of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (the “OSH Act”) (29 U.S.C. 670). DATES: Comments must be submitted (postmarked, sent, or received) by August 7, 2007. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any of the following methods: *Electronically:* You may submit comments and attachments electronically at *http://www.regulations.gov,* which is the Federal eRulemaking Portal. Follow the instructions online for submitting comments. *Facsimile:* If your comments, including attachments, are not longer than 10 pages, you may fax them to the OSHA Docket Office at

(202)693-1648. *Mail, hand delivery, express mail, messenger, or courier service:* When using this method, you must submit three copies of your comments and attachments to the OSHA Docket Office, Docket No. OSHA-2007-0048, U.S. Department of Labor, Room N-2625, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210. Deliveries (hand, express mail, messenger, and courier service) are accepted during the Department of Labor's and Docket Office's normal business hours, 8:15 a.m.-4:45 p.m., e.t. *Instructions:* All submissions must include the Agency name and OSHA docket number for this ICR (Docket No. OSHA-2007-0048). All comments, including any personal information you provide, are placed in the public docket without change, and may be made available online at *http://www.regulations.gov* . For further information on submitting comments see the “Public Participation” heading in the section of this notice titled SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION . Docket: To read or download comments or other material in the docket, go to *http://www.regulations.gov* or the OSHA Docket Office at the address above. All documents in the docket (including this **Federal Register** notice) are listed in the *http://www.regulations.gov* index; however, some information (e.g., copyrighted material) is not publicly available to read or download through the Web site. All submissions, including copyrighted material, are available for inspection and copying at the OSHA Docket Office. You also may contact Cynthia Bencheck at the address below to obtain a copy of the ICR. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cynthia Bencheck, Division of Training and Educational Programs, OSHA Office of Training and Education, 2020 S. Arlington Heights Road, Arlington Heights, Illinois 60005; telephone:

(847)297-4810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background The Department of Labor, as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent ( *i.e.* , employer) burden, conducts a preclearance consultation program to provide the public with an opportunity to comment on proposed and continuing information collection requirements in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)). This program ensures that information is in the desired format, reporting burden (time and costs) is minimal, collection instruments are clearly understood, and OSHA's estimate of the information collection burden is accurate. The Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (the OSH Act) authorizes information collection by employers as necessary or appropriate for enforcement of the OSH Act or for developing information regarding the causes and prevention of occupational injuries, illnesses, and accidents (29 U.S.C. 657). Section 21 of the OSH Act (29 U.S.C. 670) authorizes OSHA to conduct directly, or through grants and contracts, education and training courses. These courses must ensure an adequate number of qualified personnel to fulfill the purposes of the OSH Act, provide them with short-term training, inform them of the importance and proper use of safety and health equipment, and train employers and employees to recognize, avoid, and prevent unsafe and unhealthful working conditions. Under Section 21, OSHA awards training grants to nonprofit organizations to provide part of the required training. The Agency requires organizations that receive these grants to submit quarterly progress reports that provide information on their grant-funded training activities; these reports allow OSHA to monitor the grantee's performance and to determine if an organization is using grant funds as specified in its grant application. Accordingly, the Agency compares the information provided in the quarterly progress report to the quarterly milestones proposed by the organization in the work plan and budget that accompanied the grant application. This information includes: Identifier data (organization name and grant number); the date and location where the training occurred; the length of training (hours); the number of employees and employers attending training sessions provided by the organization during the quarter; a description of the training provided; a narrative account of grant activities conducted during the quarter; and an evaluation of progress regarding planned versus actual work accomplished. This comparison permits OSHA to determine if the organization is meeting the proposed program goals and objectives, and spending funds in the manner described in the proposed budget. Requiring these reports on a quarterly basis enables OSHA to identify work plan, training, and expenditure discrepancies in a timely fashion so that it can implement appropriate action. In addition, this information permits the Agency to assess an organization's ability to meet projected milestones and expenditures. II. Special Issues for Comment OSHA has a particular interest in comments on the following issues: • Whether the proposed information collection requirements are necessary for the proper performance of the Agency's functions, including whether the information is useful; • The accuracy of the Agency's estimate of the burden (time and costs) of the information collection requirements, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; • The quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; and • Ways to minimize the burden on employers who must comply; for example, by using automated or other technological information collection and transmission techniques. III. Proposed Actions OSHA is requesting OMB to extend its approval of the information collection requirements contained in Grantee Quarterly Progress Report. The Agency will summarize the comments submitted in response to this notice, and will include this summary in the request to OMB. *Type of Review:* Extension of a currently approved collection. *Title:* Grantee Quarterly Progress Report. *OMB Number:* 1218-0100. *Affected Public:* Not-for-profit organizations. *Number of Respondents:* 55. *Frequency:* Quarterly. *Total Responses:* 55. *Average Time per Response:* 12 hours. *Estimated Total Burden Hours:* 2,640 hours. *Estimated Cost (Operation and Maintenance):* $0. IV. Public Participation—Submission of Comments on This Notice and Internet Access to Comments and Submissions You may submit comments in response to this document as follows:

(1)Electronically at *http://www.regulations.gov,* which is the Federal eRulemaking Portal;

(2)by facsimile; or

(3)by hard copy. All comments, attachments, and other material must identify the Agency name and the OSHA docket number for this ICR (Docket No. OSHA-2007-0048). You may supplement electronic submissions by uploading document files electronically. If you wish to mail additional materials in reference to an electronic or a facsimile submission, you must submit them to the OSHA Docket Office (see the section of this notice titled ADDRESSES ). The additional materials must clearly identify your electronic comments by your name, date, and docket number so the Agency can attach them to your comments. Because of security procedures, the use of regular mail may cause a significant delay in the receipt of comments. For information about security procedures concerning the delivery of materials by hand, express delivery, messenger or courier service, please contact the OSHA Docket Office at

(202)693-2350 (TTY

(877)889-5627). Comments and submissions are posted without change at *http://www.regulations.gov* . Therefore, OSHA cautions commenters about submitting personal information such as social security numbers and date of birth. Although all submissions are listed in the *http://www.regulations.gov* index, some information (e.g., copyrighted material) is not publicly available to read or download through this Web site. All submissions, including copyrighted material, are available for inspection and copying at the OSHA Docket Office. Information on using the *http://www.regulations.gov* Web site to submit comments and access the docket is available at the Web site's “User Tips” link. Contact the OSHA Docket Office for information about materials not available through the Web site, and for assistance in using the Internet to locate docket submissions. V. Authority and Signature Edwin G. Foulke, Jr., Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health, directed the preparation of this notice. The authority for this notice is the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3506 *et seq.* ) and Secretary of Labor's Order No. 5-2002 (67 FR 65008). Signed at Washington, DC, on May 31, 2007. Edwin G. Foulke, Jr., Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health. [FR Doc. E7-11045 Filed 6-7-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510-26-P NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. 030-08203] Notice of Availability of Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact for License Amendment to Byproduct Materials License No. 46-06377-04 for Unrestricted Release of the Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's Facility in Mukilteo, WA AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Issuance of Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact for License Amendment. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: D. Blair Spitzberg, Ph.D., Chief, Fuel Cycle and Decommissioning Branch, Division of Nuclear Materials Safety, Region IV, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Arlington, Texas 76011; telephone

(817)860-8191; fax number

(817)860-8188; or by e-mail: *dbs@nrc.gov.* SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Introduction The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

(NRC)is considering the issuance of a license amendment to Byproduct Material License No. 46-06377-04. This license is held by the United States Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Northwest Fisheries Science Center (the Licensee). The license authorizes the Licensee to possess and use cadmium-109, lead-210, hydrogen-3, and carbon-14 at two locations for purposes of conducting research and development activities. At one of these locations—the Licensee's field office known as the Mukilteo Research Station (the Facility) in Mukilteo, Washington—licensed activities have ceased. By letter dated November 21, 2005, the Licensee requested the NRC to authorize release of the Facility for unrestricted use, which would result in the removal of the Facility as a location of use from the NRC license. NRC has prepared an Environmental Assessment

(EA)in support of this proposed action in accordance with the requirements of Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 51 (10 CFR Part 51). Based on this EA, the NRC has concluded that a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) is appropriate with respect to the proposed action. The amendment will be issued to the Licensee following publication of this FONSI and EA in the **Federal Register** . II. Environmental Assessment Identification of Proposed Action The proposed action would approve the Licensee's November 21, 2005, license amendment request, resulting in a license amendment which would release the Facility for unrestricted use. License No. 46-06377-04 was issued in the 1950's pursuant to 10 CFR part 30, and has been amended periodically since that time. The Facility is situated on property located adjacent to Puget Sound and consists of a main research office building and several smaller support buildings in the yard. The main facility consists of laboratories and offices and is approximately 10,000 square feet (929 square meters) in size. Within the Facility, use of licensed material was confined to three specific laboratories totaling about 380 square feet (35 square meters) as well as a 350-square foot (28 square meter) portable shed located adjacent to the main research building. The Facility is located in a commercial district in Mukilteo, Washington. The Licensee ceased licensed activities at the Facility in 1987. The licensee conducted a final status survey at the Facility in November 2004. Based on the Licensee's historical knowledge of the site and the conditions of the Facility, the Licensee determined that only routine decontamination activities, in accordance with their radiation safety procedures, were required. As allowed by Section 7.4 of NUREG-1757, “Consolidated NMSS Decommissioning Guidance,” Volume 1, the Licensee was not required to submit a decommissioning plan to the NRC. The Licensee conducted surveys of the Facility and provided information to the NRC to demonstrate that it meets the criteria in Subpart E of 10 CFR part 20 for unrestricted release. Need for the Proposed Action The Licensee has ceased licensed activities at the Facility and seeks the unrestricted use of its Facility. Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action The historical review of licensed activities conducted at the Facility shows that such activities involved use of the following radionuclides with half-lives greater than 120 days: hydrogen-3, carbon-14, cadmium-109, and lead-210. Prior to performing the final status survey, the Licensee conducted decontamination activities, as necessary, in the areas of the Facility affected by these radionuclides. In November 2004, the licensee conducted a final status survey, which covered the three laboratories, hallways outside the laboratories, and the adjacent storage shed. The final status survey report was attached to the Licensee's amendment request dated November 21, 2005. The Licensee elected to demonstrate compliance with the radiological criteria for unrestricted release as specified in 10 CFR 20.1402 by using the screening approach described in Appendix H to NUREG-1757, “Consolidated NMSS Decommissioning Guidance,” Volume 2. The Licensee used guideline levels that were comparable to the derived concentration guideline levels (DCGLs) developed by the NRC which comply with the dose criterion in 10 CFR 20.1402. These DCGLs define the maximum amount of residual radioactivity on building surfaces, equipment, and materials and in soils that will satisfy the NRC requirements in Subpart E of 10 CFR part 20 for unrestricted release. The Licensee's final status survey results were below these DCGLs, and are thus acceptable. Based on its review, the staff has determined that the affected environment and any environmental impacts associated with the proposed action are bounded by the impacts evaluated by the “Generic Environmental Impact Statement in Support of Rulemaking on Radiological Criteria for License Termination of NRC-Licensed Nuclear Facilities” (NUREG-1496) Volumes 1-3 (ML042310492, ML042320379, and ML042330385). Further, no incidents were recorded involving spills or releases of radioactive material at the Facility. Accordingly, there were no significant environmental impacts from the use of radioactive material at the Facility. The NRC staff reviewed the docket file records and the final status survey report to identify any non-radiological hazards that may have impacted the environment surrounding the Facility. No such hazards or impacts to the environment were identified. The NRC staff finds that the proposed release of the Facility described above for unrestricted use is in compliance with 10 CFR 20.1402. The NRC has found no other activities in the area that could result in cumulative environmental impacts. Based on its review, the staff considered the impact of the residual radioactivity at the Facility and concluded that the proposed action will not have a significant effect on the quality of the human environment. Environmental Impacts of the Alternatives to the Proposed Action Alternatives to the proposed action discussed below are:

(1)The no-action alternative; and

(2)require the Licensee to take some alternate action. 1. *No-action Alternative:* As an alternative to the proposed action, the staff could leave things as they are by simply denying the amendment request. This no-action alternative is not feasible because it conflicts with 10 CFR 30.36(d), requiring that decommissioning of byproduct material facilities be completed and approved by the NRC after licensed activities have ceased. Additionally, this denial of the application would result in no change in current environmental impacts. The environmental impacts of the proposed action and the no-action alternative are therefore similar, and the no-action alternative is accordingly not further considered. 2. *Environmental Impacts of Alternative 2:* A second alternative to the proposed action would be to deny the Licensee's request and instead apply the 10 CFR 20.1403 criteria for restricted release of the Facility. However, restricted releases are not favored in cases where the requirements of 10 CFR 20.1402 for unrestricted release can be met, and the NRC's analysis of the Licensee's final status survey data confirmed that the Facility meets these requirements. Accordingly, the NRC finds that choosing this second alternative to the proposed action is not warranted, and this alternative is eliminated from further consideration. Conclusion The NRC staff has concluded that the proposed action is consistent with the NRC's unrestricted release criteria specified in 10 CFR 20.1402. Because the proposed action will not significantly impact the quality of the human environment, the NRC staff concludes that the proposed action is the preferred alternative. Agencies and Persons Consulted NRC provided a draft of this Environmental Assessment to the Washington Department of Health for review on October 13, 2006. On January 29, 2007, the Department of Health, Division of Radiation Protection, responded by e-mail. The State agreed with the conclusions of the EA, and otherwise had no comments. The NRC staff has determined that the proposed action is of a procedural nature, and will not affect listed species or critical habitat. Therefore, no further consultation is required under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act. The NRC staff has also determined that the proposed action is not the type of activity that has the potential to cause effects on historic properties. Therefore, no further consultation is required under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. III. Finding of No Significant Impact The NRC staff has prepared this EA in support of the proposed action. On the basis of this EA, the NRC finds that there are no significant environmental impacts from the proposed action, and that preparation of an environmental impact statement is not warranted. Accordingly, the NRC has determined that a Finding of No Significant Impact is appropriate. IV. Further Information Documents related to this action, including the application for license amendment and supporting documentation, are available electronically at the NRC's Electronic Reading Room at *http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html* . From this site, you can access the NRC's Agencywide Document Access and Management System (ADAMS), which provides text and image files of NRC's public documents. The documents related to this action are listed below, along with their ADAMS accession numbers. 1. **Federal Register** Notice, Volume 65, No. 114, page 37186, dated Tuesday, June 13, 2000, “Use of Screening Values to Demonstrate Compliance With The Federal Rule on Radiological Criteria for License Termination”; 2. Title 10 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 20, Subpart E, “Radiological Criteria for License Termination”; 3. Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 51, “Environmental Protection Regulations for Domestic Licensing and Related Regulatory Functions”; 4. NUREG-1496, “Generic Environmental Impact Statement in Support of Rulemaking on Radiological Criteria for License Termination of NRC-Licensed Nuclear Facilities,” July 1997 (ML042310492, ML042320379, and ML042330385); 5. NUREG-1757, Volume 1, “Consolidated NMSS Decommissioning Guidance,” Revision 2, September 2006 (ML063000243); 6. NUREG-1757, Volume 2, “Consolidated NMSS Decommissioning Guidance,” Revision 1, September 2006 (ML063000252); 7. Varanasi, Usha, U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service, Northwest Fisheries Science Center, License Amendment Requests, November 21, 2005 (ML053460500); 8. Byar, Ann, U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service facsimile, Supplemental Information for NOAA's Final Status Survey Report, August 2, 2006 (ML070850184); and 9. Frazee, Terry C., State of Washington email, Response to Request for Comments, January 29, 2007 (ML070800013). If you do not have access to ADAMS, or if there are problems in accessing the documents located in ADAMS, contact the NRC Public Document Room

(PDR)Reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or by e-mail to *pdr@nrc.gov* . These documents may also be viewed electronically on the public computers located at the NRC's PDR, O 1 F21, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852. The PDR reproduction contractor will copy documents for a fee. Dated at Region IV Office this 31st day of May 2007. For The Nuclear Regulatory Commission D. Blair Spitzberg, Chief, Fuel Cycle and Decommissioning Branch,Division of Nuclear Materials Safety, Region IV. [FR Doc. E7-11107 Filed 6-7-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7590-01-P NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. 030-36974] Notice of Availability—Consideration of Terrorist Acts on the Proposed Pa'ina Hawaii, LLC Irradiator in Honolulu, HI AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Notice of availability of opportunity to provide comments. SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

(NRC)is issuing a supplement to a recently published draft Environmental Assessment

(EA)for the Pa'ina Hawaii, LLC license application, dated June 27, 2005. The draft EA was previously issued for public review and comment on December 28, 2006 (71 FR 78231) as part of the NRC's decision-making process on whether to issue a license to Pa'ina, pursuant to Title 10 of the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 36, “Licenses and Radiation Safety Requirements for Irradiators.” This supplemental appendix to the draft EA presents the staff's consideration of terrorist acts at the proposed irradiator. The staff is also providing the public an opportunity to comment as described below. The draft EA and this supplement are available on the NRC's Web site: *http://www.nrc.gov/materials.html* by selecting “Pa'ina Irradiator” in the Quick Links box. Copies are also available by contacting Matthew Blevins as noted below. DATES: The public comment period on this supplemental appendix to the draft EA begins with publication of this notice and continues until July 9, 2007. Written comments should be submitted as described in the ADDRESSES section of this notice. Comments submitted by mail should be postmarked by that date to ensure consideration. Comments received or postmarked after that date will be considered to the extent practical. ADDRESSES: Members of the public are invited and encouraged to submit comments to the Chief, Rules Review and Directives Branch, Mail Stop T6-D59, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001. Please note Docket No. 030-36974 when submitting comments. Comments will also be accepted by e-mail at *NRCREP@nrc.gov* or by facsimile to

(301)415-5397, Attention: Matthew Blevins. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matthew Blevins, Environmental Project Manager, Environmental and Performance Assessment Branch, Division of Waste Management and Environmental Protection, Mail Stop T7-J8, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001. Telephone:

(301)415-7684; e-mail: *mxb6@nrc.gov.* Dated at Rockville, Maryland this 1st day of June, 2007. For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Gregory Suber, Chief, Environmental Review Branch, Division of Waste Management and Environmental Protection, Office of Federal and State Materials and Environmental Management Programs. [FR Doc. E7-11108 Filed 6-7-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7590-01-P PEACE CORPS Proposed Agency Information Collection Activities: OMB Control #0420-0531 Career Information Consultants Waiver Form (PC-DP-969.1.2) AGENCY: Peace Corps. ACTION: Notice of Reinstatement of OMB Control Number 0420-0531, with changes, of a previously approved collection for which extension approval of 11/30/07 will expire. SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1981 (44 U.S.C., Chapter 35), the Peace Corps has submitted to the Office of Management and Budget, a request for approval of Reinstatement of OMB Control Number 0420-0531, the Career Information Consultants Waiver Form (PC-DP-969.1.2). The purpose of this information collection is to gather and update contact information for individuals who volunteer to share information about their career field, their past or current employer(s), and their career and educational paths with current and returned Peace Corps Volunteers. The purpose of this notice is to allow for public comments on whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Peace Corps, including whether the information will have practical use; the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed information collection, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; ways to enhance the quality, utility and the clarity of the information to be collected; and, ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of automated collection techniques, when appropriate, and other forms of information technology. A copy of the information collection may be obtained from Ms. Tamara Webb, Peace Corps, Office of Domestic Programs, Returned Volunteer Services, 1111 20th Street, NW., Room 2132, Washington, DC 20526. Ms. Webb can be contacted by telephone at 202-692-1435 or 800-424-8580 ext. 1435. Comments on the form should be addressed to the attention of Ms. Tamara Webb, and should be received on or before August 7, 2007. *Need for and Use of This Information:* The Career Information Consultants Waiver Form is used to gather contact information from individuals who have volunteered to serve as career resources for current Peace Corps Volunteers and Returned Peace Corps Volunteers. The form is distributed and collected by the Peace Corps Office of Domestic Programs, Returned Volunteer Services Division. The Returned Volunteer Services Division provides transition assistance to returning and recently-returned volunteers through the Career Information Consultants project and other career, educational, and readjustment activities. The purpose of this information collection is to gather and update contact information for the Career Information Consultants database and publication. There is no other means of obtaining the required data. The Career Information Consultants project supports the need to assist returned volunteers and enhance the agency's capability to serve this population as required by Congressional legislation. *Respondents:* Professionals interested in supporting current and Returned peace Corps Volunteers. Respondent's Obligation to Reply: Voluntary. *Burden on the Public:* a. Annual reporting burden: 208 hours. b. Annual recordkeeping burden: 0 hours. c. Estimated average burden per response: 5 minutes. d. Frequency of response: annually. e. Estimated number of likely respondents: 2500. f. Estimated cost to respondents: $0. At this time, responses will be returned by mail. Dated: June 31, 2007. Wilbert Bryant, Associate Director for Management. [FR Doc. 07-2842 Filed 6-7-07; 8:45 am]

Connectionstraces to 21

Traces to 21 documents

CFR

U.S. Code

5 references not yet in our index

5 CFR 1320.10
30 CFR 44
10 CFR 51
10 CFR 30
10 CFR 20

Citation graph

cites case law

Notices

30-Day Notice of Information Collection Under Review; Extension without change, of a previously approved collection-Juvenile Residential Facility Census

Cite5 CFR 1320.10

Cite30 CFR 44

Cite10 CFR 51

Cites 26 · showing 12Cited by 0 across 0 sources