Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2003-07-31 · Office of Personnel Management · Notices

Notices. Proposed rule

452 words·~2 min read·/register/2003/07/31/03-19470

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 4910-59-P 68 147 Thursday, July 31, 2003 Proposed Rules OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT 5 CFR Part 212 RIN 3206-AJ75 Competitive Service and Competitive Status AGENCY: Office of Personnel Management. ACTION: Proposed rule. SUMMARY: The Office of Personnel Management
(OPM)is proposing a plain language rewrite of its regulations on the definitions of competitive service and competitive status as part of a broader review of OPM's regulations. The purpose of the revision is to make these definitions consistent with law and civil service rules. DATES: Comments must be received on or before September 29, 2003. ADDRESSES: Send, deliver or fax comments to Ellen Tunstall, Deputy Associate Director for Talent and Capacity Policy, U.S. Office of Personnel Management, Room 6551, 1900 E Street, NW., Washington, DC 20415-9700; e-mail *employ@opm.gov;* fax: 202-606-2329. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Karen Jacobs on
(202)606-0960, by TDD on is
(202)418-3134, by fax on
(202)606-2329, or by e-mail at *kkjacobs@opm.gov.* SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We are revising the format of Part 212 and eliminating subparts that merely restate the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 2102 and Civil Service Rules 1.2 and 1.3 of this chapter. The purpose of these revisions is not to make substantive changes but, rather, to make the definitions in this part consistent with the definitions found in statute and in the civil service rules of this chapter. Regulatory Flexibility Act I certify that these regulations will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities (including small businesses, small organizational units, and small governmental jurisdictions) because the regulations apply only to appointment procedures for certain employees in Federal agencies. E.O. 12866, Regulatory Review This rule has been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget in accordance with Executive Order 1866. List of Subjects in 5 CFR Parts 212 Government employees. Office of Personnel Management. Kay Coles James, Director. Accordingly, OPM proposes to revise 5 CFR part 212 as follows: PART 212—COMPETITIVE SERVICE AND COMPETITIVE STATUS Sec. 212.101 Definitions. 212.102 Effect of competitive status on a position. Authority: 5 U.S.C. 1302, 3301, 3302; E.O. 10577, 3 CFR, 1954-1958 Comp. p. 218. § 212.101 Definitions. In this chapter: *Competitive service* has the meaning given that term by section 2102 of title 5, United States Code, and sections 1.2 and 1.3 of this chapter. *Competitive status* has the meaning given that term by section 1.3 of this chapter. *Competitive position* has the meaning given that term by section 1.3 of this chapter. § 212.102 Effect of competitive status on a position. An employee shall be considered as being in the competitive service when the employee meets the conditions established by section 1.3 of this chapter. [FR Doc. 03-19470 Filed 7-30-03; 8:45 am]
Connections1 cite this · traces to 3
Cited by 1 section
1 reference not yet in our index
  • 5 CFR 212
Citation graph
cites case law
Notices
Proposed rule
Fed. Reg.×1
Cite5 CFR 212
Cites 4Cited by 1 across 1 source
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.