Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2002-04-15 · Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce · Notices

Notices. Notice of rescission of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review for the Period October 1, 2000, through September 30, 2001

439 words·~2 min read·/register/2002/04/15/02-9080

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-557-805] Extruded Rubber Thread From Malaysia; Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. ACTION: Notice of rescission of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review for the Period October 1, 2000, through September 30, 2001. EFFECTIVE DATE: April 15, 2002. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Irina Itkin or Elizabeth Eastwood, Office of AD/CVD Enforcement Group I, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S.
Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202)482-0656 or
(202)482-3874, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Applicable Statute Unless otherwise indicated, all citations to the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), are references to the provisions effective January 1, 1995, the effective date of the amendments made to the Act by the Uruguay Round Agreements Act. In addition, unless otherwise indicated, all citations to the Department of Commerce's (the Department)'s regulations are to 19 CFR part 351 (2001). Background On October 1, 2001, the Department published in the **Federal Register** (66 FR 49923) a notice of opportunity to request an administrative review of the antidumping order regarding extruded rubber thread from Malaysia for the period October 1, 2000, through September 30, 2001. In accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(b)(2), on October 31, 2001, two producers/exporters of extruded rubber thread requested a review of the antidumping duty order on extruded rubber thread from Malaysia ( *i.e.,* Filati Lastex Sdn. Bhd. (Filati) and Heveafil Sdn. Bhd. (Heveafil)). In November 2001, the Department initiated an administrative review for each of these companies (66 FR 58432 (Nov. 21, 2001)) and issued questionnaires to them. On February 8, 2002, Filati withdrew its request for review. On February 15, 2002, Heveafil requested an extension of the 90-day limit to withdraw its request for a review until March 29, 2002. We granted this extension on February 19, 2002, and on March 27, 2002, Heveafil withdrew its request for review. Rescission of Review Filati and Heveafil withdrew their requests for an administrative review for the above-referenced period on February 8 and March 27, 2002, respectively. Therefore, because no other interested party requested a review of Filati or Heveafil for this POR, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1) and consistent with our practice, we are rescinding this review of the antidumping duty order on extruded rubber thread from Malaysia for the period of October 1, 2000, through September 30, 2001. This notice is published in accordance with section 751 of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4). Dated: April 9, 2002. Richard W. Moreland, Deputy Assistant Secretary, Import Administration. [FR Doc. 02-9080 Filed 4-12-02; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 1
1 reference not yet in our index
  • 19 CFR 351
Citation graph
cites case law
Notices
Notice of rescission of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review for the Period October 1, 2000, through September 30, 2001
Cite19 CFR 351
Cites 2Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.