Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2002-04-15 · Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce · Notices

Notices. Notice of Extension of Time Limit

470 words·~2 min read·/register/2002/04/15/02-9079

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-122-814] Pure Magnesium From Canada; Notice of Extension of Time Limit for 2000-2001 Administrative Review AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. ACTION: Notice of Extension of Time Limit. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce is extending the time limit for the preliminary results of the current review of the antidumping duty order on pure magnesium from Canada.
The period of review is August 1, 2000 through July 31, 2001. This extension is made pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Uruguay Round Agreements Act. EFFECTIVE DATE: April 15, 2002. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jarrod Goldfeder or Scott Holland, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington DC 20230; telephone
(202)482-0189 or
(202)482-1279, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Applicable Statute Unless otherwise indicated, all citations to the statute are references to the provisions effective January 1, 1995, the effective date of the amendments made to the Tariff Act of 1930 (“the Act”) by the Uruguay Round Agreements Act, and all citations to the regulations are to 19 CFR Part 351 (2001). Statutory Time Limits Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act requires the Department to issue the preliminary results of an administrative review within 245 days after the last day of the anniversary month of an order for which a review is requested and a final determination within 120 days after the date on which the preliminary results are published. If it is not practicable to complete the review within the time period, section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act allows the Department to extend these deadlines to a maximum of 365 days and 180 days, respectively. Background On September 24, 2001, the Department published a notice of initiation of administrative review of the antidumping duty order on pure magnesium from Canada, covering the period August 1, 2000, through July 31, 2001 (66 FR 49924). The preliminary results for the antidumping duty administrative review of pure magnesium from Canada are currently due no later than May 3, 2002. Extension of Time Limits for Preliminary Results Due to the complexity of the issues, it is not practicable to complete this review within the originally anticipated time limit ( *i.e.* , May 3, 2002). *See* Memorandum from Team to Richard W. Moreland, “Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary Results,” dated, February 1, 2001. Therefore, the Department of Commerce is extending the time limit for completion of the preliminary results to not later than September 3, 2002, in accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: April 9, 2002 Susan Kuhback, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for AD/CVD Enforcement. [FR Doc. 02-9079 Filed 4-12-02; 8:45 am]
Connections1 off-index
1 reference not yet in our index
  • 19 CFR 351
Citation graph
cites case law
Notices
Notice of Extension of Time Limit
Cite19 CFR 351
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.