Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · Nevada · CHAPTER 657 - GENERAL PROVISIONS

NRS 657.130 Committees to review compliance: Definitions; confidentiality and privilege.

271 words·~1 min read·/nv/chapter-657-general-provisions/657-130

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

NRS 657.130 Committees to review compliance: Definitions; confidentiality and privilege.
1. As used in this section, unless the context otherwise requires:
(a)“Committee to review compliance” means one or more persons assigned or engaged by a financial institution to test, review or evaluate its conduct, transactions or potential transactions, policies or procedures for the purpose of monitoring and improving or enforcing compliance with state and federal statutes and regulations requiring safe, sound and fair lending practices, including, without limitation, acts concerning equal credit opportunity, fair housing, fair lending, flood zone protection, housing and financial discrimination, truth in lending and financial reporting to federal or state regulatory agencies.
(b)“Financial institution” means an institution licensed pursuant to the provisions of this title or chapter 645B of NRS, or a similar institution chartered or licensed pursuant to federal law. The term includes, without limitation, a holding company, affiliate or subsidiary of such an institution.
2. Except as otherwise voluntarily authorized by the financial institution:
(a)A document prepared for or created by a committee to review compliance is confidential and privileged, and is not subject to discovery or admissible in evidence in a civil action of this State, even if it has been submitted to a governmental or regulatory agency of this State, the United States or a foreign government.
(b)A member of a committee to review compliance or a person who acted under the direction of the committee cannot be required to testify in a civil action concerning the contents of a document described in paragraph
(a)or concerning the discussions or conclusions of, or the actions taken by, the committee.
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.