Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · Kentucky · Kentucky Revised Statutes

61.882 Jurisdiction of Circuit Court in action seeking right of inspection -- Burden

364 words·~2 min read·/ky/61-882

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

of proof -- Costs -- Attorney fees.
(1)The Circuit Court of the county where the public agency has its principal place of
business or the Circuit Court of the county where the public record is maintained
shall have jurisdiction to enforce the provisions of KRS 61.870 to 61.884, by
injunction or other appropriate order on application of any person.
(2)A person alleging a violation of the provisions of KRS 61.870 to 61.884 shall not
have to exhaust his remedies under KRS 61.880 before filing suit in a Circuit Court.
(3)In an appeal of an Attorney General's decision, where the appeal is properly filed
pursuant to KRS 61.880(5)(a), the court shall determine the matter de novo. In an
original action or an appeal of an Attorney General's decision, where the appeal is
properly filed pursuant to KRS 61.880(5)(a), the burden of proof shall be on the
public agency. The court on its own motion, or on motion of either of the parties,
may view the records in controversy in camera before reaching a decision. Any
noncompliance with the order of the court may be punished as contempt of court.
(4)Except as otherwise provided by law or rule of court, proceedings arising under this
section take precedence on the docket over all other causes and shall be assigned for
hearing and trial at the earliest practicable date.
(5)Any person who prevails against any agency in any action in the courts regarding a
violation of KRS 61.870 to 61.884 may, upon a finding that the records were
willfully withheld in violation of KRS 61.870 to 61.884, be awarded costs,
including reasonable attorney's fees, incurred in connection with the legal action. If
such person prevails in part, the court may in its discretion award him costs or an
appropriate portion thereof. In addition, it shall be within the discretion of the court
to award the person an amount not to exceed twenty-five dollars ($25) for each day
that he was denied the right to inspect or copy said public record. Attorney's fees,
costs, and awards under this subsection shall be paid by the agency that the court
determines is responsible for the violation.
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.