Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · Hawaii · Chapter 501

§501-53 Dismissal; effect; withdrawal, conditions.

325 words·~1 min read·/hi/chapter-501/501-53

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

§501-53 Dismissal; effect; withdrawal, conditions. If the court finds that the applicant has not title proper for registration, a decree shall be entered dismissing the application and the decree may be ordered to be without prejudice in whole or in part; but unless it is so ordered, it shall bind the parties, their privies, and the land in respect to any issue of fact which has been tried and determined. The applicant may withdraw the applicant's application at any time before final decree, upon terms to be determined by the court.
The court may in its discretion require the applicant who moves to withdraw the applicant's application or to substitute some other person as applicant, to stipulate that the applicant shall be bound by the result of any issue of fact which has been tried and determined, and such stipulation shall bind the parties, their privies and the land itself. [L 1903, c 56, §37; am L 1921, c 214, pt of §1; RL 1925, §3227; RL 1935, §5032; RL 1945, §12632; RL 1955, §342-33; HRS §501-53; gen ch 1985]
Case Notes
Petition dismissed by circuit court after appeal taken there, when it appeared U.S. indispensable party. 34 H. 93 (1937).
Application based on adverse possession, proof required. 37 H. 49 (1945).
Applicant has burden of proof; application may be dismissed if court is unable to decide which of the conflicting testimony is trustworthy. 47 H. 472, 391 P.2d 403 (1964).
Land court decree need not contain factual issues tried and determined in a land court application. Appellate court is not limited to reviewing land court decree, but should review land court's written decision and entire record to determine binding effect on the parties in accordance with the mandate of this section. 75 H. 164, 858 P.2d 712 (1993).
State was precluded from maintaining its ejectment action with respect to parcels of real property pursuant to this section. 75 H. 164, 858 P.2d 712 (1993).
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.