Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · Hawaii · Hawaii Revised Statutes

[§651C-7] Remedies of creditors.

328 words·~1 min read·/hi/651c-7

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

[§651C-7] Remedies of creditors.
(a)In any action for relief against a transfer or obligation under this chapter, a creditor, subject to the limitations provided in section 651C-8, may obtain:
(1)Avoidance of the transfer or obligation to the extent necessary to satisfy the creditor's claim;
(2)An attachment or other provisional remedy against the asset transferred or other property of the transferee in accordance with the procedure prescribed by chapter 651;
(3)Subject to applicable principles of equity and in accordance with applicable civil rules of procedure:
(A)An injunction against further disposition by the debtor or a transferee, or both, of the asset transferred or of other property;
(B)Appointment of a receiver to take charge of the asset transferred or of other property of the transferee; or
(C)Any other relief the circumstances may require.
(b)If a creditor has obtained a judgment on a claim against the debtor, the creditor may, if the court so orders, levy execution on the asset transferred or its proceeds. [L 1985, c 216, pt of §1]
Case Notes
Action in which plaintiff made fraudulent transfer claims under the Hawaii uniform fraudulent transfer act, seeking to avoid the transfer of real property to the extent necessary to satisfy plaintiff's claims and/or to grant plaintiff other relief under subsection (a), was an appropriate subject of a lis pendens under the Hawaii doctrine of lis pendens, codified in §634-51. 457 F. Supp. 2d 1121 (2006).
Petitioners were entitled to a variety of means (§§651C-8 and 651C-10 and this section) to secure a full recovery of their losses from respondent and/or the asset fraudulently transferred to respondent, but only once, not twice; moreover, nothing in this chapter requires petitioners to elect one remedy over another. This chapter does not, however, allow petitioners recovery of both the asset transferred (regardless of its value) and, in addition, a judgment in the full amount of their damages. 130 H. 58 (App.), 305 P.3d 474 (2013).
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.