Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · Florida · Title VII — Evidence · Chapter 90

90.5015 Journalist’s privilege.

495 words·~2 min read·/fl/title-vii/chapter-90/90-5015

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

(1)DEFINITIONS. — For purposes of this section, the term:
(a)“News” means information of public concern relating to local, statewide, national, or worldwide issues or events.
(b)“Professional journalist” means a person regularly engaged in collecting, photographing, recording, writing, editing, reporting, or publishing news, for gain or livelihood, who obtained the information sought while working as a salaried employee of, or independent contractor for, a newspaper, news journal, news agency, press association, wire service, radio or television station, network, or news magazine. Book authors and others who are not professional journalists, as defined in this paragraph, are not included in the provisions of this section.
(2)PRIVILEGE. — A professional journalist has a qualified privilege not to be a witness concerning, and not to disclose the information, including the identity of any source, that the professional journalist has obtained while actively gathering news. This privilege applies only to information or eyewitness observations obtained within the normal scope of employment and does not apply to physical evidence, eyewitness observations, or visual or audio recording of crimes. A party seeking to overcome this privilege must make a clear and specific showing that:
(a)The information is relevant and material to unresolved issues that have been raised in the proceeding for which the information is sought;
(b)The information cannot be obtained from alternative sources; and
(c)A compelling interest exists for requiring disclosure of the information.
(3)DISCLOSURE. — A court shall order disclosure pursuant to subsection
(2)only of that portion of the information for which the showing under subsection
(2)has been made and shall support such order with clear and specific findings made after a hearing.
(4)WAIVER. — A professional journalist does not waive the privilege by publishing or broadcasting information.
(5)CONSTRUCTION. — This section must not be construed to limit any privilege or right provided to a professional journalist under law.
(6)AUTHENTICATION. — Photographs, diagrams, video recordings, audio recordings, computer records, or other business records maintained, disclosed, provided, or produced by a professional journalist, or by the employer or principal of a professional journalist, may be authenticated for admission in evidence upon a showing, by affidavit of the professional journalist, or other individual with personal knowledge, that the photograph, diagram, video recording, audio recording, computer record, or other business record is a true and accurate copy of the original, and that the copy truly and accurately reflects the observations and facts contained therein.
(7)ACCURACY OF EVIDENCE. — If the affidavit of authenticity and accuracy, or other relevant factual circumstance, causes the court to have clear and convincing doubts as to the authenticity or accuracy of the proffered evidence, the court may decline to admit such evidence.
(8)SEVERABILITY. — If any provision of this section or its application to any particular person or circumstance is held invalid, that provision or its application is severable and does not affect the validity of other provisions or applications of this section.
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.