Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · BILL · 117th Congress · S. 3623 (Placed on Calendar Senate) — To reauthorize the Violence Against Women Act of 1994, and for other purposes. · Sec. 109

Sec. 109. Pilot program on restorative practices

1,146 words·~5 min read·/bill/117/s/3623/pcs/section-109

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

The Violence Against Women Act of 1994 (title IV of Public Law 103–322 ), as amended by section 205, is further amended by adding at the end the following: In this section: The term Director means the Director of the Office on Violence Against Women. The term eligible entity means— a State; a unit of local government; a tribal government; a tribal organization; a victim service provider; an institution of higher education (as defined in section 101(a) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 ( 20 U.S.C. 1001(a) ); and a private or public nonprofit organization, including— a tribal nonprofit organization; and a faith-based nonprofit organization.
The term restorative practice means a practice relating to a specific harm that— is community-based and unaffiliated with any civil or criminal legal process; is initiated by the victim of the harm; involves, on a voluntary basis and without any evidence of coercion or intimidation of any victim of the harm by any individual who committed the harm or anyone associated with any such individual— any individual who committed the harm; any victim of the harm; and the community affected by the harm through 1 or more representatives of the community; shall include and has the goal of— collectively seeking accountability from 1 or more individuals who committed the harm; developing a written process whereby 1 or more individuals who committed the harm will take responsibility for the actions that caused harm to each victim of the harm; and developing a written course of action plan— that is responsive to the needs of any victim of the harm; and upon which any victim, any individual who committed the harm, and the community can agree; and is conducted in a victim services framework that protects the safety and supports the autonomy of 1 or more victims of the harm and the community.
The Director shall award grants to eligible entities to develop and implement a program, or to assess best practices, for— restorative practices to prevent or address domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, or stalking; training by eligible entities, or for eligible entities, courts, or prosecutors, on restorative practices and program implementation; and evaluations of a restorative practice described in paragraph (1). In awarding grants under subsection (b), the Director shall give priority to eligible entities that submit proposals that meaningfully address the needs of culturally specific or underserved populations.
To be eligible to receive a grant under this section, an eligible entity shall demonstrate a history of comprehensive training and experience in working with victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, or stalking. An eligible entity or a subgrantee of an eligible entity that offers a restorative practices program with funds awarded under this section shall ensure that such program— includes set practices and procedures for screening the suitability of any individual who committed a harm based on— the history of civil and criminal complaints against the individual involving domestic violence, sexual assault, dating violence, or stalking; parole or probation violations of the individual or whether active parole or probation supervision of the individual is being conducted for prior offenses involving domestic violence, sexual assault, dating violence, or stalking; the risk to the safety of any victim of the harm based on an evidence-based risk assessment; the risk to public safety, including an evidence-based risk assessment of the danger to the public; and past participation of any individual who committed the harm in restorative practice programing; and denies eligibility to participate in the program for any individual who committed a harm against whom there is— a pending felony or misdemeanor prosecution for an offense against any victim of the harm or a dependent of any such victim; a restraining order or a protection order (as defined in section 2266 of title 18, United States Code) that protects any victim of the harm or a dependent of any such victim, unless there is an exception in the restraining order or protective order allowing for participation in a restorative practices program; a pending criminal charge involving or relating to sexual assault, including rape, human trafficking, or child abuse, including child sexual abuse; or a conviction for child sexual abuse against the victim or a sibling of the victim if the victim or sibling of the victim is currently a minor.
With respect to a risk assessment described in paragraph (1)(A)(iii) for which an eligible entity or a subgrantee of an eligible entity determines that a victim or a dependent of a victim are at significant risk of subsequent serious injury, sexual assault, or death, the eligible entity or subgrantee shall refer the victim or dependent to other victim services, instead of restorative practices. For the purpose of section 40002(b)(2), an individual described in subsection (a)(3)(C) shall be considered a person receiving services.
Restorative practices performed with funds awarded under this section are not intended to function as a replacement for criminal justice intervention for a specific harm. As a part of the report required to be submitted under section 40002(b)(6), an eligible entity that receives a grant under this section shall annually submit to the Director information relating to the effectiveness of the restorative practices carried out with amounts from the grant, including— the number of individuals for whom the eligible entity supported a restorative practice; if applicable, the number of individuals who— sought restorative practices from the eligible entity; and the eligible entity could not serve; if applicable, the number of individuals— who sought restorative practice training; who received restorative practice training; who provided restorative practice training; and to whom the eligible entity could not provide restorative practice training; a victim evaluation component that is documented through survey or interview, including the satisfaction of victims of a harm with the restorative practice services; if applicable, the number of individuals who committed a harm and— successfully completed and executed a written course of action plan; failed to successfully complete and execute a written course of action plan; and were involved in a criminal or civil complaint involving domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, or stalking against the victims or victims during the course of the restorative practice process; and any other qualitative or quantitative information determined by the Director.
Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of this section, and biennially thereafter, the Director shall submit to Congress a report that summarizes the reports received by the Director under paragraph (1). There are authorized to be appropriated to the Director such sums as may be necessary for each of fiscal years 2023 through 2027 to carry out this section. . The table of contents in section 2 of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 ( Public Law 103–322 ) is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 41601 the following:
Subtitle R—Restorative practices Sec. 41801. Pilot program on restorative practices. .
Connectionstraces to 1
1 reference not yet in our index
  • Pub. L. 103-322
Citation graph
cites case law
Sec. 109
Pilot program on restorative practices
Pub. L.Pub. L. 103-322
Cites 2Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.