Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · BILL · 116th Congress · H.R. 8791 (Introduced in House) — To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to make certain reforms to the Department of Homeland Security, and for ot... · Sec. 206

Sec. 206. Department of Homeland Security component insignia required

188 words·~1 min read·/bill/116/hr/8791/ih/section-206

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Subtitle A of title VII of the Homeland Security Act of 2002, as amended by this Act, is further amended by adding at the end the following new section: All uniformed law enforcement officers of the Department who are required to display or wear the official insignia or uniform (as such term is defined in section 716(c)(3) of title 18, United States Code) of the Department or component, as the case may be, to perform the duties of such officer shall display or wear such official insignia or uniform in a manner that is visible to others when carrying out such duties, including when deployed to augment State or local law enforcement capabilities. The requirement under subsection
(a)shall not apply in the case of a law enforcement officer of the Department or a component of the Department who is engaged in undercover or covert operations. . The table of contents in section 1(b) of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 721, as added by this title, the following new item: Sec. 722. Department component insignia required. .
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.