Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · BILL · 114th Congress · S. 2943 (Engrossed in Senate) — To authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2017 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military c... · Sec. 1043

Sec. 1043. Designation of a Department of Defense Strategic Arctic Port

451 words·~2 min read·/bill/114/s/2943/es/section-1043·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

In this section, the term Arctic has the meaning given that term in section 112 of the Arctic Research and Policy Act of 1984 ( 15 U.S.C. 4111 ). Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Commanding General of the United States Army Corps of Engineers, the Commandant of the Coast Guard, and the Administrator of the Maritime Administration, shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report assessing the future security requirements for one or more strategic ports in the Arctic.
Consistent with the Department of Defense Arctic Strategy set forth pursuant to section 1068 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 ( Public Law 114–92 ; 129 Stat. 992), the assessment in subsection
(b)shall include— the amount of sufficient and suitable space needed to create capacity for port and other necessary infrastructure for at least one of each of type of Navy or Coast Guard vessel, including an Arleigh Burke class destroyer of the Navy, or a national security cutter or a heavy polar ice breaker of the Coast Guard; the amount of sufficient and suitable space needed to create capacity for equipment and fuel storage, technological infrastructure, and civil infrastructure to support military and civilian operations, including— aerospace warning; maritime surface and subsurface warning; maritime control and defense; maritime domain awareness; homeland defense; defense support to civil authorities; humanitarian relief; search and rescue; disaster relief; oil spill response; medical stabilization and evacuation; and meteorological measurements and forecasting; an identification of proximity and road access to an airport designated as a commercial service airport by the Federal Aviation Administration that is capable of supporting military and civilian aircraft for operations designated in subsection (c)(2); and a description of the requirements, to include infrastructure and installations, communications, and logistics necessary to improve response effectiveness to support military and civilian operations designated in subsection (c)(2). Upon completion of the report in subsection (b), the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Commanding General of the United States Army Corps of Engineers, the Commandant of the Coast Guard, the Administrator of the Maritime Administration, shall establish the designation criteria for a Department of Defense Strategic Arctic Port and shall submit recommendations for the designation of one or more Strategic Arctic Ports within eighteen months. The recommendations shall include an estimated cost for sufficient construction necessary to initiate and sustain expected operations. Nothing in this section may be construed to authorize any additional Department of Defense appropriations for the establishment of a port recommended pursuant to this section.
Connectionstraces to 2
1 reference not yet in our index
  • 129 Stat. 992
Citation graph
cites case law
Sec. 1043
Designation of a Department of Defense Strategic Arctic Port
Stat.129 Stat. 992
Cites 3Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.