Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · BILL · 114th Congress · S. 2848 (Reported in Senate) — To provide for the conservation and development of water and related resources, to authorize the Secretary of the Arm... · Sec. 7002

Sec. 7002. Sense of the Senate on appropriations levels and findings on economic impacts

351 words·~2 min read·/bill/114/s/2848/rs/section-7002

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

It is the sense of the Senate that Congress should provide robust funding for the State drinking water treatment revolving loan funds established under section 1452 of the Safe Drinking Water Act ( 42 U.S.C. 300j–12 ) and the State water pollution control revolving funds established under title VI of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act ( 33 U.S.C. 1381 et seq. ). Congress finds, based on an analysis sponsored by the Water Environment Federation and the WateReuse Association of the nationwide impact of State revolving loan fund spending using the IMPLAN economic model developed by the Federal Government, that, in addition to the public health and environmental benefits, the Federal investment in safe drinking water and clean water provides the following benefits:
Generation of significant Federal tax revenue, as evidenced by the following: Every dollar of a Federal capitalization grant returns $0.21 to the general fund of the Treasury in the form of Federal taxes and, when additional spending from the State revolving loan funds is considered to be the result of leveraging the Federal investment, every dollar of a Federal capitalization grant returns $0.93 in Federal tax revenue. A combined $34,700,000,000 in capitalization grants for the clean water and state drinking water state revolving loan funds described in subsection
(a)over a period of 5 years would generate $7,430,000,000 in Federal tax revenue and, when additional spending from the State revolving loan funds is considered to be the result of leveraging the Federal investment, the Federal investment will result in $32,300,000,000 in Federal tax revenue during that 5-year period. An increase in employment, as evidenced by the following: Every $1,000,000 in State revolving loan fund spending generates 16 ½ jobs. $34,700,000,000 in Federal capitalization grants for State revolving loan funds over a period of 5 years would result in 506,000 jobs. An increase in economic output: Every $1,000,000 in State revolving loan fund spending results in $2,950,000 in output for the economy of the United States. $34,700,000,000 in Federal capitalization grants for State revolving loan funds over a period of 5 years will generate $102,700,000,000 in total economic output.
Connectionstraces to 1
1 reference not yet in our index
  • 42 USC 300j–12
Citation graph
cites case law
Sec. 7002
Sense of the Senate on appropriations levels and findings on economic impacts
Cite42 USC 300j–12
Cites 2Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.