Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · BILL · 113th Congress · H.R. 2872 (Introduced in House) — To secure the borders of the United States, and for other purposes. · Sec. 403

Sec. 403. Electronic device search and seizure standards at ports of entry

1,032 words·~5 min read·/bill/113/hr/2872/ih/section-403

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security, acting through the Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection, in coordination with the Assistant Secretary of Homeland Security for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and the senior official appointed pursuant to section 222 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 ( 6 U.S.C. 142 ), shall issue a rule with respect to the scope of and procedural and recordkeeping requirements associated with border security searches of electronic devices. The rule issued pursuant to paragraph
(1)shall include the following: A requirement that information collected during a border security search of an electronic device that is determined to be commercial information, including trade secrets, information subject to attorney-client privilege, information subject to doctor-patient privilege, or information subject to another privilege or protection shall be handled in accordance with the laws, rules, and regulations governing such information and shall not be shared with a Federal, State, local, tribal, territorial, or foreign agency unless it is determined that such agency has the mechanisms in place to comply with such laws, rules, and regulations. A requirement that authorized agents, to the greatest extent practicable, conduct all border security searches of electronic devices in the presence of a supervisor and, where appropriate, in the presence of the individuals whose electronic devices are subject to such searches. A determination of the number of days that an electronic device subjected to a border security search or the information collected from such device may be retained, unless probable cause exists, that prohibits retention exceeding the period necessary to translate, decrypt, or reasonably search such device or information and that requires such information to be destroyed if in the custody of an authorized agent after such number of days. A requirement that if information collected from an electronic device subjected to a border security search is copied, shared, retained, or entered into an electronic database, the individual from whose electronic device such information is collected shall receive written notification of such copying, sharing, retention, or entry unless such notification would hinder an investigation involving national security or would meet another criteria established by the Secretary of Homeland Security in the rule. A requirement that an individual subjected to a border security search of an electronic device shall receive a receipt for such device if such device is removed from the possession of such individual. A requirement that an individual subjected to a border security search of an electronic device shall receive notice of how to report abuses or concerns and how to seek redress from the Department of Homeland Security. A requirement that information on the rights of individuals with respect to border security searches and Department of Homeland Security redress procedures shall be posted at all ports of entry in locations that are likely to be viewed by individuals subject to border security searches. A privacy impact assessment of the rule, as prepared by the senior official appointed pursuant to section 222 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002, that includes recommendations with respect to the copying, sharing, retention, and entry into an electronic database of personally identifiable information collected from electronic devices subjected to a border security search. A civil liberties impact assessment of the rule, as prepared by the Officer for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties of the Department of Homeland Security. The Secretary of Homeland Security shall provide each authorized agent with appropriate training to conduct border security searches of electronic devices in accordance with the rule issued pursuant to subsection (a). The training shall include instruction on constitutional, privacy, civil rights, and civil liberties issues related to such searches. The Secretary of Homeland Security, acting through the Inspector General of the Department of Homeland Security, shall develop and annually administer an auditing mechanism to review whether authorized agents are conducting border security searches of electronic devices in accordance with the rule issued pursuant to subsection (a). Not later than 90 days after the effective date of the rule issued pursuant to subsection
(a)and quarterly thereafter, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report that includes the following: A description of the activities of authorized agents with respect to border security searches of electronic devices. A description of the manner in which the Department of Homeland Security has complied with the requirements of this section. The number, by port of entry, of border security searches of electronic devices conducted during the reporting period. The number, by port of entry, of instances during the reporting period that information from an electronic device subjected to a border security search was retained, copied, shared, or entered in an electronic database, including the number of electronic devices retained as the result of any such border security search. The race, ethnicity, national origin, and citizenship of each individual whose electronic device was subjected to a border security search during the reporting period, to determine the existence or absence of racial profiling. The number of instances during the reporting period that information collected from an electronic device subjected to a border security search was referred to a law enforcement or intelligence agency for further action, including whether such information resulted in a prosecution or conviction. In this section: The term authorized agent means an agent, officer, or official of United States Customs and Border Protection, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, or any other office or agency of the Department of Homeland Security who is authorized to conduct a border security search. The term border security search means a search by an authorized agent of persons, baggage, or cargo entering, departing, or passing through the United States through any port of entry. The term electronic device means an electronic, magnetic, optical, electrochemical, or other high-speed data processing device performing logical, arithmetic, or storage functions, such as a computer, a cellular telephone, or any other device used for electronic communication or for storing electronic, digital or analog data, and which includes any data storage facility or communications facility directly related to or operating in conjunction with such device. The term Secretary means the Secretary of Homeland Security.
Connectionstraces to 1
Traces to 1 document
Citation graph
cites case law
Sec. 403
Electronic device search and seizure standards at ports of entry
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.